Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-31 Thread Dave Crossland
Id voice your concern on the www-style list, since css3 web fonts isn't a
final rec yet, and I expect more font fun in css4... :)

Regards, Dave

On 30 May 2009, 1:43 AM, Karl Berry k...@freefriends.org wrote:

You could always override other people's design choices in your own browser
if needed: h...
All I want to do with font-face is disable it.  Is that possible?  I
looked at these links but did not see the answer.

I'm as cognizant of the need for good design as the next person, but I
simply have next to no bandwidth and I can't waste it on font downloads
happening when I don't ask for them.

karl


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-31 Thread gww
 All I want to do with font-face is disable it.  Is that possible?
Sure, use an old browser which doesn't support it.


[OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Behdad Esfahbod

Hi,

I hope I don't get flamed for this.  I'm not a typophile, but an i18n'er. 
I've been working all my adult life making sure GNOME is accessible to people 
in any language they wish to use it with.  I fully understand the importance 
of having good, high quality, legible, fonts.  I also appreciate an Open font 
library.  I was making a video last week and wanted a fancy script font. 
Surfed to OFLB and downloaded one in under a minute.


What I don't understand is, why is it a good idea to let website designers 
choose what font *I* read their text with?  It's a basic usability question. 
I don't have Tahoma and Verdana and Arial installed for a reason.  I like the 
text I read the way I read it the easiest.  So, please tell me, how is making 
it easier for website designers to enforce their type on me a good thing?


Thanks,
behdad


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:30 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
[...]
 What I don't understand is, why is it a good idea to let website designers 
 choose what font *I* read their text with?  It's a basic usability question.

It's a balance.  Like Flash™, on the one foot it allows people to experiment
with new user interface ideas, and lets anyone be a user interface
designer, and, on the other foot, it forces everyone to be a user interface
designer.

So yes, we'll no doubt see some 1994-style geocities Web pages with 30 fonts
on them, all blinking and in different colours, just as when Pagemaker was
released. And on the other hand, after the disturbance has died down and
there's some collective wisdom, we'll see some really good designs.

Of course, there are also i18n reasons to supply a font -- if you're
writing in a script that has poor support on major platforms, you no
longer have to decide between text-in-images or telling people to
install a font.

Now, just wait until you discover that Mozilla and Safari/Webkit have
implemented CSS transforms, so that you can stretch and distort your
text too!

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org



Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Behdad Esfahbod

On 05/29/2009 10:57 AM, Liam R E Quin wrote:


Of course, there are also i18n reasons to supply a font -- if you're
writing in a script that has poor support on major platforms, you no
longer have to decide between text-in-images or telling people to
install a font.


This made me smile.  It was just ten years ago when I was writing PHP code to 
generate images from text because Netscape didn't support Arabic / Persian. 
Then I figured that the bidi handling is more complex than I had thought. 
UAX#9, FriBidi, ... the rest is history as they say.  :)


behdad


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Schrijver

+1

And one important effect I think expected by many,
is that the web becomes more attractive for professional graphic  
designers,


Who at the moment far prefer working in print exactly because of the  
control over typography, layout, measurements etc…
And are skilled in using these elements to create readable and  
accessible text


Which is not to say they do that all the time, because tradition tends  
to bore people :-)


But the idea is with things like web-fonts you could expect more print- 
designers bringing their expertise to the web,


Though there would still be a lot to be desired, stuff as basal as the  
possibility to do lay-out beyond the specific one-column lineair lay  
out css was designed to style, for example…


Eric

Op 29 mei 2009, om 16:57 heeft Liam R E Quin het volgende geschreven:


On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:30 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
[...]
What I don't understand is, why is it a good idea to let website  
designers
choose what font *I* read their text with?  It's a basic usability  
question.


It's a balance.  Like Flash™, on the one foot it allows people to  
experiment

with new user interface ideas, and lets anyone be a user interface
designer, and, on the other foot, it forces everyone to be a user  
interface

designer.

So yes, we'll no doubt see some 1994-style geocities Web pages with  
30 fonts
on them, all blinking and in different colours, just as when  
Pagemaker was
released. And on the other hand, after the disturbance has died down  
and

there's some collective wisdom, we'll see some really good designs.

Of course, there are also i18n reasons to supply a font -- if you're
writing in a script that has poor support on major platforms, you no
longer have to decide between text-in-images or telling people to
install a font.

Now, just wait until you discover that Mozilla and Safari/Webkit have
implemented CSS transforms, so that you can stretch and distort your
text too!

Liam

--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org





Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

 What I don't understand is, why is it a good idea to let website designers
 choose what font *I* read their text with?

Think of paper books :)

Alexandre


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Behdad Esfahbod

On 05/29/2009 11:10 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:


What I don't understand is, why is it a good idea to let website designers
choose what font *I* read their text with?


Think of paper books :)


Their limitation that I can't resize the type you mean? ;)

behdad


Alexandre




Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Nicolas Spalinger
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I hope I don't get flamed for this.  I'm not a typophile, but an
 i18n'er. I've been working all my adult life making sure GNOME is
 accessible to people in any language they wish to use it with.  I fully
 understand the importance of having good, high quality, legible, fonts. 
 I also appreciate an Open font library. 

:-)

 I was making a video last week
 and wanted a fancy script font. Surfed to OFLB and downloaded one in
 under a minute.
 
 What I don't understand is, why is it a good idea to let website
 designers choose what font *I* read their text with?  It's a basic
 usability question. I don't have Tahoma and Verdana and Arial installed
 for a reason.  I like the text I read the way I read it the easiest. 

You could always override other people's design choices in your own
browser if needed:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/UserContent.css
http://uwstopia.nl/blog/2006/01/my-fonts-are-better-than-yours

 So, please tell me, how is making it easier for website designers to
 enforce their type on me a good thing?

More freedom to them :-)

IMHO there will always be good and less good designs...
Beauty in the eyes of the beholder as they say but with an open web, the
beholder can tweak things to his linking too.

But I think for many people @font-face will be a great enabler: they
will have a much nicer solution for publishing content on the web (or
platforms using web-technologies) via open standards and have to worry
about pictures and problematic encodings to represent text.


 Thanks,
 behdad


-- 
Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer
Debian/Ubuntu font teams / OpenFontLibrary
http://planet.open-fonts.org




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
 So, please tell me, how is
 making it easier for website designers to enforce their type on me a good
 thing?

Right now, people use sIFR or image replacement.  This is hard for a
viewer to change.  By moving to @font-face, the viewer can still win
because they can have an !important user stylesheet.  I'd argue that
@font-face ubiquity means the viewer haves more, not less, control.


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread ricardo lafuente

Nicolas Spalinger wrote:

So, please tell me, how is making it easier for website designers to
enforce their type on me a good thing?



More freedom to them :-)
  


and more visibility for open fonts too: as designers get the chance to 
use fonts besides the MS/Apple non-free 'core-fonts' in order to achieve 
a consistent look among platforms, the spotlight will be open for many 
other creations.




Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Christopher Fynn


Nicolas Spalinger wrote:

...


But I think for many people @font-face will be a great enabler: they
will have a much nicer solution for publishing content on the web (or
platforms using web-technologies) via open standards and have to worry
about pictures and problematic encodings to represent text.


There will still be lots of problems for quite a while  - e.g. there are 
fonts that work on the PC and Linux versions of Firefox, but not on the 
Mac version; the support for OpenType is very different on PC  Mac, 
which is a real issue for non-Latin scripts.


- Chris




Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Behdad Esfahbod

On 05/29/2009 12:16 PM, Christopher Fynn wrote:


Nicolas Spalinger wrote:

...


But I think for many people @font-face will be a great enabler: they
will have a much nicer solution for publishing content on the web (or
platforms using web-technologies) via open standards and have to worry
about pictures and problematic encodings to represent text.


There will still be lots of problems for quite a while - e.g. there are
fonts that work on the PC and Linux versions of Firefox, but not on the
Mac version; the support for OpenType is very different on PC  Mac,
which is a real issue for non-Latin scripts.


This will change hopefully by the end of the year.  Firefox plans to use 
HarfBuzz on all platforms.


behdad


- Chris


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

 This will change hopefully by the end of the year.  Firefox plans to use
 HarfBuzz on all platforms.

Speaking of which... What is the best way to track HarfBuzz progress?

Alexandre


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jeremy Dunck jdu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
 So, please tell me, how is
 making it easier for website designers to enforce their type on me a good
 thing?

 Right now, people use sIFR or image replacement.  This is hard for a
 viewer to change.  By moving to @font-face, the viewer can still win
 because they can have an !important user stylesheet.  I'd argue that
 @font-face ubiquity means the viewer haves more, not less, control.


Or cufón.

Simos


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jeremy Dunck jdu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
 So, please tell me, how is
 making it easier for website designers to enforce their type on me a good
 thing?

 Right now, people use sIFR or image replacement.  This is hard for a
 viewer to change.  By moving to @font-face, the viewer can still win
 because they can have an !important user stylesheet.  I'd argue that
 @font-face ubiquity means the viewer haves more, not less, control.


 Or cufón.

Yeah, I should have mentioned, but I think the viewer still doesn't
have control over cufón, right?


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread minombresbond
El Fri, 29 May 2009 10:30:50 -0400
Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org escribió:

 Hi,

 What I don't understand is, why is it a good idea to let website
 designers choose what font *I* read their text with?  

you always have the possibility to change to your own page style in the
browser

page layout design or typography design are not only decorative issues,
are another layer of meaning!

 how is making it easier for website designers to enforce their type
 on me a good thing?

is a good thing, as you think it is good that in the world different
languages are spoken, not a single

saludos!


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jeremy Dunck jdu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Simos Xenitellis
 simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Jeremy Dunck jdu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
 So, please tell me, how is
 making it easier for website designers to enforce their type on me a good
 thing?

 Right now, people use sIFR or image replacement.  This is hard for a
 viewer to change.  By moving to @font-face, the viewer can still win
 because they can have an !important user stylesheet.  I'd argue that
 @font-face ubiquity means the viewer haves more, not less, control.


 Or cufón.

 Yeah, I should have mentioned, but I think the viewer still doesn't
 have control over cufón, right?

It would be up to the website to offer the functionality for the
visitor to select
an alternative font as the preferred font. Would require a fast server
with many autogenerated fonts.

This would be easier if it was possible to negotiate between the browser and
website as to which fonts are desired, sort of 'Accept-Font' (similar
to Accept-Encoding and Accept-Language).
Can the browser negotiate with the web server which font it would prefer to see?

Simos


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Simos Xenitellis
simos.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
...
 This would be easier if it was possible to negotiate between the browser and
 website as to which fonts are desired, sort of 'Accept-Font' (similar
 to Accept-Encoding and Accept-Language).
 Can the browser negotiate with the web server which font it would prefer to 
 see?

Expecting web sites, in general, to have that much respect for their
audience is giving them too much credit.  Something that benefits only
the viewer must be in the hands of the viewer, IMHO.


Re: [OpenFontLibrary] What's the big deal about @font-face anyway?

2009-05-29 Thread Karl Berry
You could always override other people's design choices in your own
browser if needed:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/UserContent.css
http://uwstopia.nl/blog/2006/01/my-fonts-are-better-than-yours

All I want to do with font-face is disable it.  Is that possible?  I
looked at these links but did not see the answer.

I'm as cognizant of the need for good design as the next person, but I
simply have next to no bandwidth and I can't waste it on font downloads
happening when I don't ask for them.

karl