Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2008-07-15 Thread Nicolas Spalinger
 STIX made this change after some communication with me, because the
 previous version was clearly nonfree and Barbara Beeton(*) persevered in
 getting them to review it.
 
 We urged them to use the OFL (or any existing free license, for that
 matter), but they chose not to.  I don't know why not.

Well, it seems like they listened to recommendations from you and
Barbara (and probably other reviewers and beta testers in the community):
http://www.stixfonts.org/user_license.html
http://www.stixfonts.org/STIXfaq.html

The announcement dates back a few months now but IMHO it's great news
for this rich set of scientific and mathematical Unicode fonts to be
planned for release under the OFL :-)

 Best,
 Karl
 
 (*) For those who don't know her: Barbara is a very long-time member of
 the TeX and typographic communities, and one of the hardest workers on
 the STIX project.

-- 
Nicolas Spalinger
http://scripts.sil.org
http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/
https://launchpad.net/people/fonts




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary


Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2008-07-15 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Nicolas Spalinger wrote:

 Well, it seems like they listened to recommendations from you and
 Barbara (and probably other reviewers and beta testers in the community):
 http://www.stixfonts.org/user_license.html
 http://www.stixfonts.org/STIXfaq.html

That still doesn't make the fonts available :)

Alexandre
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary


Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2008-07-15 Thread minombresbond
El Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:52:41 +0400
Alexandre Prokoudine [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:

 On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
 
  Well, it seems like they listened to recommendations from you and
  Barbara (and probably other reviewers and beta testers in the
  community): http://www.stixfonts.org/user_license.html
  http://www.stixfonts.org/STIXfaq.html
 
 That still doesn't make the fonts available :)

here:

http://olegueret.googlepages.com/stixfonts-ttf

 Alexandre
 ___
 Openfontlibrary mailing list
 Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary


Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2008-07-15 Thread Nicolas Spalinger

 That still doesn't make the fonts available :)

Yep, but looks like it's coming.
Given the size of the project, I think the delay is still fairly reasonable.

In the meantime, if you haven't seen it, there was a nice presentation
of the Stix project at TUG 2007:
http://www.river-valley.tv/conferences/tug2007/media/Barbara_Beeton/

(Along with a bunch of other brilliants presentations, thanks for all
the TUG work, Karl et al!)

 here:
 
 http://olegueret.googlepages.com/stixfonts-ttf

This is the 0.9 beta version. And it's promising.

AFAICT they're taking into account the feedback for the planned final
version. There's also work going on with making these fonts useful in
TeX environments (pre-XeTeX/PdfTeX I assume).


-- 
Nicolas Spalinger
http://scripts.sil.org
http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/
https://launchpad.net/people/fonts




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary


Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2007-10-10 Thread Karl Berry
you ask Barbara, why not?

Barbara doesn't know either.  I asked the STIX folks too.  If I ever
hear anything useful, I'll post ...

karl
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary


Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2007-10-09 Thread Karl Berry
What are your thoughts on this? Are you hopeful to interface these with
OFLB, or you have other thoughts? I'm not sure on relicensing these
fonts under OFL license...I don't see a clause on this in the
contract...

The fonts certainly cannot be relicensed.  However, in my view the new
version is a free license (though not compatible with anything else).

STIX made this change after some communication with me, because the
previous version was clearly nonfree and Barbara Beeton(*) persevered in
getting them to review it.

We urged them to use the OFL (or any existing free license, for that
matter), but they chose not to.  I don't know why not.

Best,
Karl

(*) For those who don't know her: Barbara is a very long-time member of
the TeX and typographic communities, and one of the hardest workers on
the STIX project.
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary


Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2007-10-09 Thread Jon Phillips
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:13 -0500, Karl Berry wrote:
 What are your thoughts on this? Are you hopeful to interface these with
 OFLB, or you have other thoughts? I'm not sure on relicensing these
 fonts under OFL license...I don't see a clause on this in the
 contract...
 
 The fonts certainly cannot be relicensed.  However, in my view the new
 version is a free license (though not compatible with anything else).
 
 STIX made this change after some communication with me, because the
 previous version was clearly nonfree and Barbara Beeton(*) persevered in
 getting them to review it.
 
 We urged them to use the OFL (or any existing free license, for that
 matter), but they chose not to.  I don't know why not.
 
 Best,
 Karl
 
 (*) For those who don't know her: Barbara is a very long-time member of
 the TeX and typographic communities, and one of the hardest workers on
 the STIX project.

That's what I thought...total bummer on them not using OFL license...can
you ask Barbara, why not?

License proliferation is hell.

Jon

 __
 Openfontlibrary mailing list
 Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary
-- 
Jon Phillips

San Francisco, CA
USA PH 510.499.0894
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rejon.org

MSN, AIM, Yahoo Chat: kidproto
Jabber Chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be
legal advice nor should they be relied upon as or represented to be
legal advice. Jon Phillips does not represent any organization through
this email address.

___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary


Re: [Openfontlibrary] StixFonts license update

2007-10-08 Thread Jon Phillips
What are your thoughts on this? Are you hopeful to interface these with
OFLB, or you have other thoughts? I'm not sure on relicensing these
fonts under OFL license...I don't see a clause on this in the
contract...

Jon

On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 18:15 +0100, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
 Hi All,
 StixFonts have just updated their user license, to the following
 http://www.stixfonts.org/user_license.html
 
 The following basic changes took place.
 
 From:
 4. You may also
(a) add glyphs or characters to the Fonts, so long as the base set of
glyphs is not modified or removed and (b) delete glyphs or characters
from the Fonts, provided that the resulting font set is distributed
with the following disclaimer: This [name] font does not include all
the Unicode points covered in the STIX Fonts™ set but may include
others.� In each case, the name used to denote the resulting
font set shall not include the term STIX or any similar term, and
any distribution of the resulting font set must be free of charge.
 
 To:
 4. You may also 
(a) add glyphs or characters to the Fonts, or modify the shape of
existing glyphs, so long as the base set of glyphs is not removed and
(b) delete glyphs or characters from the Fonts, provided that the
resulting font set is distributed with the following disclaimer:
This [name] font does not include all the Unicode points covered
in the STIX Fonts™ set but may include others. In each case, the
name used to denote the resulting font set shall not include the term
STIX or any similar term.
 
 Another change was the introduction paragraph of the final license; now
 there is a reference to the OFL (L=license).
 
 Simos
 
 
 ___
 Openfontlibrary mailing list
 Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
 http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary
-- 
Jon Phillips

San Francisco, CA
USA PH 510.499.0894
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rejon.org

MSN, AIM, Yahoo Chat: kidproto
Jabber Chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be
legal advice nor should they be relied upon as or represented to be
legal advice. Jon Phillips does not represent any organization through
this email address.

___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
Openfontlibrary@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openfontlibrary