Re: [openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
> > > Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Subject: Re: QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2 > > > > > > > > > > I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. > > > > > > > Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of > > > > > > > OFED 1.2 > > > > > > > (I updated the plan on the Wiki) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reasons for this are: > > > > > > > 1. Code not ready at code freeze. > > > > > > > 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some > > > > > > >implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). > > > > > > > 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this last reason also applies to the end client QoS changes > > > > > > as > > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > Yes. But the other 2 don't. > > > > > > > > Right but I think that precludes it from being included in OFED right > > > > now. > > > > > > Since the code is already included in OFED, moving it out would violate > > > the feature > > > freeze rules, unless there's an actual bug this would fix. > > > > OTOH, you are right in that without SM support we can't claim to have this > > feature at all. So, to avoid controversy, I have just removed the QoS > > patches > > from IB core and pushed the code out. > > I think that the mthca patch to encode SL in sched_queue field to > improve hardware QoS guarantees for connected QPs is useful as this can > be exercised by IPoIB-CM. If so, should/can this be included ? OK. Note this is still untested, and off by default. -- MST ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 08:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: Re: QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2 > > > > > > > > I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. > > > > > > Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of OFED > > > > > > 1.2 > > > > > > (I updated the plan on the Wiki) > > > > > > > > > > > > The reasons for this are: > > > > > > 1. Code not ready at code freeze. > > > > > > 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some > > > > > >implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). > > > > > > 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. > > > > > > > > > > I think this last reason also applies to the end client QoS changes as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > Yes. But the other 2 don't. > > > > > > Right but I think that precludes it from being included in OFED right > > > now. > > > > Since the code is already included in OFED, moving it out would violate the > > feature > > freeze rules, unless there's an actual bug this would fix. > > OTOH, you are right in that without SM support we can't claim to have this > feature at all. So, to avoid controversy, I have just removed the QoS patches > from IB core and pushed the code out. I think that the mthca patch to encode SL in sched_queue field to improve hardware QoS guarantees for connected QPs is useful as this can be exercised by IPoIB-CM. If so, should/can this be included ? -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
> Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2 > > > > > > I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. > > > > > Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of OFED > > > > > 1.2 > > > > > (I updated the plan on the Wiki) > > > > > > > > > > The reasons for this are: > > > > > 1. Code not ready at code freeze. > > > > > 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some > > > > >implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). > > > > > 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. > > > > > > > > I think this last reason also applies to the end client QoS changes as > > > > well. > > > > > > Yes. But the other 2 don't. > > > > Right but I think that precludes it from being included in OFED right > > now. > > Since the code is already included in OFED, moving it out would violate the > feature > freeze rules, unless there's an actual bug this would fix. OTOH, you are right in that without SM support we can't claim to have this feature at all. So, to avoid controversy, I have just removed the QoS patches from IB core and pushed the code out. -- MST ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 10:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. > > > Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of OFED 1.2 > > > (I updated the plan on the Wiki) > > > > > > The reasons for this are: > > > 1. Code not ready at code freeze. > > > 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some > > > implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). > > > 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. > > > > I think this last reason also applies to the end client QoS changes as > > well. > > Yes. But the other 2 don't. Right but I think that precludes it from being included in OFED right now. -- Hal ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
> > > > I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. > > > > Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of OFED 1.2 > > > > (I updated the plan on the Wiki) > > > > > > > > The reasons for this are: > > > > 1. Code not ready at code freeze. > > > > 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some > > > >implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). > > > > 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. > > > > > > I think this last reason also applies to the end client QoS changes as > > > well. > > > > Yes. But the other 2 don't. > > Right but I think that precludes it from being included in OFED right > now. Since the code is already included in OFED, moving it out would violate the feature freeze rules, unless there's an actual bug this would fix. -- MST ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
> > I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. > > Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of OFED 1.2 > > (I updated the plan on the Wiki) > > > > The reasons for this are: > > 1. Code not ready at code freeze. > > 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some > > implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). > > 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. > > I think this last reason also applies to the end client QoS changes as > well. Yes. But the other 2 don't. -- MST ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
Re: [openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
Hi Tziporet, On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 07:04, Tziporet Koren wrote: > Hi Hal, > > I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. > Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of OFED 1.2 > (I updated the plan on the Wiki) > > The reasons for this are: > 1. Code not ready at code freeze. > 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some > implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). > 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. I think this last reason also applies to the end client QoS changes as well. -- Hal > Hal & Yevgeny - please work on a plan that will enable QoS to be merged > on the main trunk once its ready. > Tziporet > > > ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
[openib-general] QoS in opensm will not be part of OFED 1.2
Hi Hal, I had an AI to check the QoS status with OSM. Conclusions are that QoS support in OpenSM will not be part of OFED 1.2 (I updated the plan on the Wiki) The reasons for this are: 1. Code not ready at code freeze. 2. There are technical discussion in the list regarding some implementation details (e.g. XML or text syntax). 3. SPEC is not published by IBTA yet. Hal & Yevgeny - please work on a plan that will enable QoS to be merged on the main trunk once its ready. Tziporet ___ openib-general mailing list openib-general@openib.org http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
