RE: [openib-general] socket based connection model for IB proposal -round 4

2005-11-23 Thread Sean Hefty 
>Yes.
>The private data format is not RC or UC specific.
>I will add this comment that format covers both EE and C.
>
>Is this sufficient?

I was referring to UD, which is the SIDR REQ message.

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

RE: [openib-general] socket based connection model for IB proposal -round 4

2005-11-23 Thread Kanevsky, Arkady 
Yes.
The private data format is not RC or UC specific.
I will add this comment that format covers both EE and C.

Is this sufficient?
Arkady

Arkady Kanevsky   email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Appliance Inc.   phone: 781-768-5395
275 Totten Pond Rd.  Fax: 781-895-1195
Waltham, MA 02451-2010  central phone: 781-768-5300
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 12:40 PM
> To: Kanevsky, Arkady; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
> openib-general@openib.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [openib-general] socket based connection model 
> for IB proposal -round 4
> 
> 
> If the proposal will include UDP, should the definition 
> extend beyond connections to include UD QPs as well (i.e. SIDR REQ)?
> 
> - Sean
> 
___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

RE: [openib-general] socket based connection model for IB proposal -round 4

2005-11-17 Thread Sean Hefty 

If the proposal will include UDP, should the definition extend beyond
connections to include UD QPs as well (i.e. SIDR REQ)?

- Sean

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general