Re: [openib-general] [PATCH untested] IB/mthca: avoid wasting MTT enties on memfree

2007-01-08 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin

Subject: Re: [PATCH untested] IB/mthca: avoid wasting MTT enties on memfree

> Have you tested this?

No, didn't I make this clear? Sorry. I'm not in the lab at the moment,
and my laptop does not have infiniband.
That's why it says untested in the subject :).

> I think it increases the amount of memory
> needed for the buddy allocator bitmaps by a factor of 8, and right now
> those bitmaps are kmalloc()ed.  So I'd be aftraid that it would make
> it impossible to load the module.

Hmph. We'll need to make these 2-level then?

> Anyway this is definitely 2.6.21 material given that we're already at
> 2.6.20-rc4, and this change is has a decent chance of introducing regressions.

OK.

-- 
MST

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general



Re: [openib-general] [PATCH untested] IB/mthca: avoid wasting MTT enties on memfree

2007-01-08 Thread Roland Dreier
Have you tested this?  I think it increases the amount of memory
needed for the buddy allocator bitmaps by a factor of 8, and right now
those bitmaps are kmalloc()ed.  So I'd be aftraid that it would make
it impossible to load the module.

Anyway this is definitely 2.6.21 material given that we're already at
2.6.20-rc4, and this change is has a decent chance of introducing regressions.

 - R.

___
openib-general mailing list
openib-general@openib.org
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general