Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
On 01/20/11 05:27, Michelle Knight wrote: SSD and HD can not be mixed. Regards Edward Apologies, the three drives at the bottom of the list are the 2tb ones. There's no way I could afford a 2tb SSD on my local government salary!!! ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss Hi, Are the SSD and the 2tb on the same raid array, maybe, that is what is causing the problems. according to IBM SSD and regular HD cannot be together. http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/powersys/v3r1m5/index.jsp?topic=/p7hal/iphalssdconfig.htm "SSD and HDD can never be mixed in the same RAID array or mirroring group." regards Edward ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
When it comes to Marvells chips it some of them work on OSOL/OI and some of them don't. Look into the OpenSolaris HCL, if it signed/certified/native than it's fine but if it merely says "reported to work" I would be careful about it. I would not recommend anyone using JMicron controller chips as I have had tons of problems with them on several different motherboards. There are drivers for them in OSOL/OI but they are nothing but trouble. On 2011-01-20 23:09, Michelle Knight wrote: Hi Willard, Thank you for those links. I've had a look through and it is interesting that the cheaper cards are Marvell, though based on . The card I've got problems with is based on the Marvell 9128 chipset. Do you think I could run in to trouble? Michelle. On Thursday 20 January 2011 21:36:50 Willard Korfhage wrote: Here are some references to good cards: From 16 to 2 ports: Ideal SATA/SAS Controllers for ZFS& Linux MD RAID http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=10 Some discussion that followed the blog posting http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=480925 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
Unfortunately I don't know the UK market but I'm not impressed by the prices scan.co.uk have on their HBA cards after looking into their page. You could also look at the" esata-4-8-port..." section as there are a few more viable alternatives. From this list an LSI based 8-port card is cheaper than a 4-port card. If I were to buy from this seller I would go for the SASUC8I card (search it on the website). There must be some kind of a price comparison website where you live, no? Since you want to go for internal cards here's a list of them you can search for: LSI SAS 3041E-R LSI SAS 3081E-R LSI-SAS 9211-4i LSI-SAS 9211-8i LSI-SAS 9201-16i Cisco LSI SAS 30813ER SAS SATA RAID Cisco LSI 1064E SAS Dell PERC 5i/6i Intel SASUC8I Intel SASMF8I Intel SASWT4I Fujitsu-Siemens S26361-F3257-L8 Fujitsu-Siemens S26361-F3257-L4 Also keep in mind that when getting a SAS card you will need a SAS-> SATA fan out cable, (unless there are other for you relevant options for connecting SATA drives to SAS HBA which I'm not aware of). It looks like this: http://www.scan.co.uk/products/3ware-cbl-sff8087ocf-10m-sff-8087-to-discrete-forward-breakout-cable or this http://www.scan.co.uk/products/highpoint-int-ms-1m4s-internal-mini-sas-to-sata-cable On some HBAs these cables are included but not all of them, especially the cheaper ones. If you want to use a standard issue E-SATA bracket you are also likely to need a male -> female SATA adapter to connect it with the fan out cable. On 2011-01-20 22:08, Michelle Knight wrote: Thanks Greg, I had written off the previous suggestions of using e-sata interfaces, because the motherboard sata ports are already fully used. I hadn't thought of using such interfaces on a PCI-E card. That's actually a great idea. Michelle. I've managed to get a couple of these... http://www.scan.co.uk/products/akasa-esata-45-ex-internal-sata-to-external- esata-pci-backplate-adaptor Hopefully they'll do the job. All I need now is a card. The problem with many that I'm finding listed, don't actually list what chipset they are based on, so I'm fishing in the dark. Anything in this list sound familiar? http://www.scan.co.uk/Shop/Computer-Hardware/All/HDD-Controllers/SATA-SAS- eSATA-2-4-Port Michelle. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
I've dug up this one. http://www.scan.co.uk/products/highpoint-rocketraid-640-%28rr640%29-4-channel- internal-pci-e-20-x4-to-sata-6gb-s-raid-controller-card#ProductFeatures Seems to be on the same Marvell 88SE9128 chipset from what I can see. Anyone any opinions on it please? More tech info here - http://www.mwave.com.au/sku-22080405- HighPoint_Rocket_RAID_640_Controller_Marvell_88SE9128_SATA_6Gb_s_RAID_Controller ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
Hi Willard, Thank you for those links. I've had a look through and it is interesting that the cheaper cards are Marvell, though based on . The card I've got problems with is based on the Marvell 9128 chipset. Do you think I could run in to trouble? Michelle. On Thursday 20 January 2011 21:36:50 Willard Korfhage wrote: > Here are some references to good cards: > > From 16 to 2 ports: Ideal SATA/SAS Controllers for ZFS & Linux MD RAID > http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=10 > > Some discussion that followed the blog posting > http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=480925 > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
Here are some references to good cards: From 16 to 2 ports: Ideal SATA/SAS Controllers for ZFS & Linux MD RAID http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=10 Some discussion that followed the blog posting http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=480925 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
On Thursday 20 January 2011 21:14:58 Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote: > If you have a 4x PCI-Express slot available, I highly recommend the 3ware > 9650. > Ouch. That's a lot of money. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote: > If you have a 4x PCI-Express slot available, I highly recommend the 3ware > 9650. > Did support for that card get added to the OI kernel? It's a good card, but last I saw it was only supported by the proprietary 3ware driver, and OpenSolaris support with their drivers has been pretty spotty. -- David Brodbeck System Administrator, Linguistics University of Washington ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
If you have a 4x PCI-Express slot available, I highly recommend the 3ware 9650. On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:08, Michelle Knight wrote: >> Thanks Greg, >> >> I had written off the previous suggestions of using e-sata interfaces, >> because the motherboard sata ports are already fully used. >> >> I hadn't thought of using such interfaces on a PCI-E card. That's actually a >> great idea. >> >> Michelle. > > I've managed to get a couple of these... > http://www.scan.co.uk/products/akasa-esata-45-ex-internal-sata-to-external- > esata-pci-backplate-adaptor > > Hopefully they'll do the job. > > All I need now is a card. The problem with many that I'm finding listed, don't > actually list what chipset they are based on, so I'm fishing in the dark. > > Anything in this list sound familiar? > > http://www.scan.co.uk/Shop/Computer-Hardware/All/HDD-Controllers/SATA-SAS- > eSATA-2-4-Port > > Michelle. > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- " ' With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.' Those words were uttered by Judge Aaron Satie as wisdom and warning... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on we’re all damaged." - Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie, Star Trek: TNG episode "The Drumhead" - Alex Smith (K4RNT) - Falls Church, Virginia USA ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
> Thanks Greg, > > I had written off the previous suggestions of using e-sata interfaces, > because the motherboard sata ports are already fully used. > > I hadn't thought of using such interfaces on a PCI-E card. That's actually a > great idea. > > Michelle. I've managed to get a couple of these... http://www.scan.co.uk/products/akasa-esata-45-ex-internal-sata-to-external- esata-pci-backplate-adaptor Hopefully they'll do the job. All I need now is a card. The problem with many that I'm finding listed, don't actually list what chipset they are based on, so I'm fishing in the dark. Anything in this list sound familiar? http://www.scan.co.uk/Shop/Computer-Hardware/All/HDD-Controllers/SATA-SAS- eSATA-2-4-Port Michelle. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
I should have also mentioned just using an adapter to provide esata interfaces from internal sata ports. Either way you are not limited to cards that already have esata ports built in. Greg Sent from my Droid Incredible. - Reply message - From: "Gregory Youngblood" Date: Thu, Jan 20, 2011 10:44 am Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card? To: "Michelle Knight" , "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" Depending on the server you may be better to look for low priced SAS cards with sata adapters and an adapter for internal sata to e-sata. It seems to me that there are more supported pcie sas cards than sata. No data to back that up, just what I seem to notice. Sent from my Droid Incredible. - Reply message - From: "Michelle Knight" Date: Thu, Jan 20, 2011 10:28 am Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card? To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" Hi Folks, I've been driving myself crazy looking at SATA cards for the last few days. What I need is the following... 1) Compatable with OI (I'm really tripping myself up here 2) Lowest price possible 3) PCI-E 4) Ports needed - 2 E-SATA Version 3. Any recommendations please? Many thanks, Michelle. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
Depending on the server you may be better to look for low priced SAS cards with sata adapters and an adapter for internal sata to e-sata. It seems to me that there are more supported pcie sas cards than sata. No data to back that up, just what I seem to notice. Sent from my Droid Incredible. - Reply message - From: "Michelle Knight" Date: Thu, Jan 20, 2011 10:28 am Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card? To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" Hi Folks, I've been driving myself crazy looking at SATA cards for the last few days. What I need is the following... 1) Compatable with OI (I'm really tripping myself up here 2) Lowest price possible 3) PCI-E 4) Ports needed - 2 E-SATA Version 3. Any recommendations please? Many thanks, Michelle. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] Can anyone recommend an external SATA card?
Hi Folks, I've been driving myself crazy looking at SATA cards for the last few days. What I need is the following... 1) Compatable with OI (I'm really tripping myself up here 2) Lowest price possible 3) PCI-E 4) Ports needed - 2 E-SATA Version 3. Any recommendations please? Many thanks, Michelle. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Antwort: Re: Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
Got it. The variable "autoexpand" wasn't set to "on". Apparently it was the default at some point, but must have changed. Doh! ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Antwort: Re: Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
Hi Thorsten, No snapshots on the data pool ... mich@jaguar:~# zfs list -tall NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT data2.28T 393G 2.28T /mirror rpool 7.69G 28.7G45K /rpool rpool/ROOT 3.70G 28.7G31K legacy rpool/ROOT/openindiana 3.70G 28.7G 3.59G / rpool/ROOT/openindiana@install 106M - 3.38G - rpool/dump 1.93G 28.7G 1.93G - rpool/export5.22M 28.7G32K /export rpool/export/home 5.19M 28.7G32K /export/home rpool/export/home/mich 5.16M 28.7G 5.16M /export/home/mich rpool/swap 2.05G 30.7G 126M - ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] Antwort: Re: Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
Hi, > I've checked that the drives have new labels written, and all three know that > there is 2tb on them. > > The interesting thing is the allocation... > mich@jaguar:~# zpool list > NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT > data 4.06T 3.42T 655G84% 1.00x ONLINE - > > It knows the size is 4tb, but only 3.42 is "allocated", but even this... > > mich@jaguar:~# zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > data2.28T 393G 2.28T /mirror > > ...doesn't even add up to 3.42tb Do you have any snapshots on your file systems? What does "zfs list -tall" print? Regards Thorsten ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] PCIe card problem
Hi Michelle, please have a look at the bug id and the thread. Seems not to be supported. On the other hand it may be possible that there is a proprietary driver for SOL 10x86 out there. Additionally go into your the BIOS options and set the SATA controller mode to AHCI, hopefullly the device will be detected properly. But now clue if it works, regardingt the driver issue. :-( devfsadm -Cv or reconfigure reboot reboot -- -r - cfgadm -al enable them the targets and device names will be different... cfgadm -xsata_port_activate sata1/2 Activate the port: /devices/pci@0,0/pci1025,183@1f,2:2 This operation will enable activity on the SATA port Continue (yes/no)? y cfgadm -c configure sata1/2 cfgadm -al sata1/2::dsk/c9t2d0disk connectedconfigured ok Am 20.01.11 17:07, schrieb Michelle Knight: > Hi Folks, > > In my effort to save money, I bought a PCIe card that gave me two reasonably > fast e-sata ports. > > I've got a feeling that OI can't see the card and therefore won't use it. Am > I > right? Is there anything I can do about this? > > The chipset is Marvell 9128 > http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6967157 http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=491082 Good luck and fingers crossed. _.-|-/\-._ \-' '-. //\/\\/ \/ <. > ./. \/ _ / < > /___\ |. .< \ / < /\> ( #) |#) | |< /\ -. __\ \ < < V > )./_._(\ .)/\ < < .- / \_'_) )-.. \ < ./ / > > /._./ /\ < '-' >>/ '-._ < v> _.-' / '-.__.·' \ \/ *** *This message has been scanned by DrWeb AV and Spamassassin ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
I've checked that the drives have new labels written, and all three know that there is 2tb on them. The interesting thing is the allocation... mich@jaguar:~# zpool list NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT data 4.06T 3.42T 655G84% 1.00x ONLINE - It knows the size is 4tb, but only 3.42 is "allocated", but even this... mich@jaguar:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT data2.28T 393G 2.28T /mirror ...doesn't even add up to 3.42tb I'm getting confused. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs
For root pool don't specify the whole disk use the slice instead, So zpool add rpool c8t2d0s0 Note the s0 slice index, so that zpool doesn't replace the boot information that it would if you use the entire disk (and it stops you with the EFI message) HTH, Deano de...@cloudpixies.com -Original Message- From: ann kok [mailto:oiyan...@yahoo.ca] Sent: 20 January 2011 15:35 To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs Hi Bernd SMI is selected now. But "zpool add" is still in problem. The /var/adm/message is showing nothing! Any idea? Thank you root@opensolaris:~# format -e Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 1. c8t1d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 2. c8t2d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 Specify disk (enter its number): 2 selecting c8t2d0 [disk formatted] No Solaris fdisk partition found. FORMAT MENU: disk - select a disk type - select (define) a disk type partition - select (define) a partition table current- describe the current disk format - format and analyze the disk fdisk - run the fdisk program repair - repair a defective sector label - write label to the disk analyze- surface analysis defect - defect list management backup - search for backup labels verify - read and display labels save - save new disk/partition definitions inquiry- show vendor, product and revision scsi - independent SCSI mode selects cache - enable, disable or query SCSI disk cache volname- set 8-character volume name ! - execute , then return quit format> fdisk No fdisk table exists. The default partition for the disk is: a 100% "SOLARIS System" partition Type "y" to accept the default partition, otherwise type "n" to edit the partition table. y format> label [0] SMI Label [1] EFI Label Specify Label type[0]: 0 Ready to label disk, continue? Ready to label disk, continue? y format> quit root@opensolaris:~# zpool add rpool c8t2d0 cannot label 'c8t2d0': EFI labeled devices are not supported on root pools. root@opensolaris:~# tail /var/adm/messages Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: winlock0 Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] winlock0 is /pseudo/winlock@0 Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: pm0 Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pm0 is /pseudo/pm@0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: nsmb0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] nsmb0 is /pseudo/nsmb@0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: lx_systrace0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is /pseudo/lx_systrace@0 Jan 20 09:17:48 opensolaris mDNSResponder: [ID 702911 daemon.error] ERROR: getOptRdata - unknown opt 4 Jan 20 09:18:16 opensolaris last message repeated 5 times Thank you --- On Thu, 1/20/11, Bernd Helber wrote: > From: Bernd Helber > Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs > To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > Received: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 10:13 AM > Sorry i forgot, > > you're on x86 > > format>fdisk > > y > > label > select SMI Label > > thanks in advance. > > > > Am 20.01.11 15:22, schrieb ann kok: > > Hi Bernd > > > > The label won't work and I also provide > /var/adm/message > > > > Thank you > > > > root@opensolaris:~# format -e > > Searching for disks...done > > > > > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: > > 0. c8t0d0 2607 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 > > 1. c8t1d0 1303 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 > > 2. c8t2d0 1534 alt 2 hd 128 sec 32> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 > > Specify disk (enter its number): 2 > > selecting c8t2d0 > > [disk formatted] > > No Solaris fdisk partition found. > > > > > > FORMAT MENU: > > disk > - select a disk > > type > - select (define) a disk type > > partition > - select (define) a partition table > > current > - describe the current disk > > format > - format and analyze the disk > > fdisk > - run the fdisk program > > repair > - repair a defective sector > > label > - write label to the disk > > analyze > - surface analysis > > defect > - defect list management > > backup > - search for backup labels > > verify > - read and display labels > > save > - save new disk/partition > definitions > > inquiry > - show vendor, product and revision > > scsi >
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
Thanks Bernd, I know ... it isn't a backup solution. This is why I have the e-sata problems, to back up to external hard drives. - and I'm having problems with that as well :-) But the problem here is that the export and import should enable ZFS to make use of the extra space ... but for some reason it is behaving as if there are still three 1.5tb drives making up the pool. I'll follow the links you've kindly supplied and see if there is a manual way of telling ZFS that there is extra space on the pool. The extra scrubs, by the way, were while I was having problems with the USB access. I wanted to make sure the data was being copied OK ... which, of course, it wasn't!!! Michelle. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] PCIe card problem
Hi Folks, In my effort to save money, I bought a PCIe card that gave me two reasonably fast e-sata ports. I've got a feeling that OI can't see the card and therefore won't use it. Am I right? Is there anything I can do about this? The chipset is Marvell 9128 http://uk.startech.com/product/PEXESAT32-2-Port-SATA-6-Gbps-PCI-Express-eSATA- Controller-Card pci bus 0x0002 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1b4b device 0x9123 Device unknown CardVendor 0x18ab card 0x9115 (Card unknown) STATUS0x0010 COMMAND 0x0047 CLASS 0x01 0x06 0x01 REVISION 0x11 BIST 0x00 HEADER 0x00 LATENCY 0x00 CACHE 0x10 BASE0 0xef00 SIZE 8 I/O BASE1 0xee00 SIZE 4 I/O BASE2 0xed00 SIZE 8 I/O BASE3 0xec00 SIZE 4 I/O BASE4 0xeb00 SIZE 16 I/O BASE5 0xfbeff000 SIZE 2048 MEM BASEROM 0x addr 0x MAX_LAT 0x00 MIN_GNT 0x00 INT_PIN 0x01 INT_LINE 0x0b ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
Am 20.01.11 14:40, schrieb Michelle Knight: > Morning! > >> Personally i assume the peaks were triggerd by resilvering the pool. >> Its not uncommon that you have a high load, if your pool is resilvering. > > Yes, the peaks were triggered by the resiver. > > >> Best Practice in this case would have been creating a new Zpool, e.g >> raidz.. >> >> zfs send from $oldpool zfs receive $newpool... :-( > > I don't have enough connections to hook everything together at the same time. > > Also, I performed the trick with memory sticks. Here is a demo video I made... > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmtPpnSrJ6w > ... once all the 4gig sticks were replaced with 8 gig sticks, simply > exporting > and then importing the pool resulted in the extra space becoming available. > > For some reason, it didn't want to work with the 2tb drives. > > >> I have three Questions for you. >> >> First.. is this a production Box? > Ok, then its comparable to a production Box. :)) > It is my home server. The one that keeps all my data, photography RAW files, > music, programs, code, everything going back to when I started with computers > in my teens. > >> Second.. could you provide the output of zpool history? Why so many scrubs, it makes me a little bit wonder, it shouldnt be necessary. > mich@jaguar:/root# zpool history > History for 'backup': > 2011-01-20.07:27:55 zpool create backup c3d0p0 > > History for 'data': > 2010-01-14.20:50:32 zpool create data raidz c10t0d0p0 c11t0d0p0 c12t0d0p0 > 2010-01-14.20:54:22 zfs set mountpoint=/mirror data > 2010-01-14.21:08:52 zfs set sharesmb=on data > 2010-01-14.21:14:38 zfs set sharesmb=on data > 2010-01-14.21:14:43 zfs set sharesmb=on data > 2010-01-14.21:21:28 zfs set sharenfs=on data > 2010-01-14.21:25:14 zfs set sharenfs=on data > 2010-01-14.21:25:35 zfs set sharesmb=on data > 2010-01-14.21:30:16 zfs set sharesmb=on data > 2010-01-14.21:30:21 zfs set sharenfs=on data > 2010-01-14.21:34:29 zfs set sharesmb=on data > 2010-01-16.17:38:07 zpool import -f data > 2010-01-17.17:13:56 zpool import -f data > 2010-01-17.17:23:31 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.17:32:34 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.18:06:15 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.18:07:18 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.18:14:38 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.18:14:55 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.19:32:29 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.20:33:34 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.20:47:38 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.20:56:05 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.21:21:50 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.21:35:24 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.21:37:52 zfs set sharesmb=on data > 2010-01-17.21:38:00 zfs set sharenfs=on data > 2010-01-17.21:41:06 zfs set sharesmb=name=mirror data > 2010-01-17.22:00:06 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.22:02:44 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.22:08:34 zpool export data > 2010-01-17.22:31:27 zpool import data > 2010-01-17.22:31:55 zpool export data > 2010-01-18.07:39:30 zpool import data > 2010-01-18.20:04:06 zfs set sharenfs=off data > 2010-01-18.22:24:18 zpool export -f data > 2010-01-18.22:26:17 zpool import data > 2010-01-27.18:47:27 zpool export data > 2010-01-27.20:36:11 zpool import data > 2010-01-27.20:37:09 zpool export data > 2010-01-31.09:26:24 zpool import data > 2010-01-31.09:26:59 zpool export data > 2010-02-03.19:19:57 zpool import data > 2010-02-03.23:09:06 zpool export data > 2010-02-03.23:13:25 zpool import data > 2010-02-03.23:56:02 zpool export data > 2010-02-16.19:41:11 zpool import data > 2010-02-17.07:34:01 zpool upgrade data > 2010-02-21.15:51:24 zpool export data > 2010-02-21.18:35:57 zpool import data > 2010-02-27.20:03:46 zpool scrub data > 2010-03-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data > 2010-04-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data > 2010-05-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data > 2010-06-01.13:48:17 zpool clear data > 2010-06-05.04:00:03 zpool scrub data > 2010-07-05.04:00:03 zpool scrub data > 2010-08-05.04:00:05 zpool scrub data > 2010-08-05.22:26:45 zpool clear data > 2010-08-19.15:01:05 zpool scrub data > 2010-09-05.04:00:03 zpool scrub data > 2010-09-15.19:44:14 zpool clear data > 2010-09-15.22:41:29 zpool clear data > 2010-10-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data > 2010-10-06.08:22:05 zpool clear data > 2010-10-08.22:45:10 zpool clear data > 2010-11-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data > 2010-12-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data > 2010-12-22.14:46:27 zpool scrub data > 2010-12-23.08:08:27 zpool replace -f data c6t0d0p0 c6t2d0p0 > 2010-12-23.20:27:17 zpool scrub data > 2010-12-23.20:55:59 zpool replace -f data c6t2d0p0 c6t0d0p0 > 2010-12-24.01:34:37 zpool clear data > 2010-12-24.01:51:21 zpool offline data c6t0d0p0 > 2010-12-24.01:53:05 zpool online data c6t0d0p0 > 2010-12-24.01:54:59 zpool export data > 2010-12-24.01:55:57 zpool import data > 2010-12-24.07:22:34 zpool scrub -s data > 2010-12-24.07:37:08 zpool detach data c6t0d0p0 > 2010-12-24.07:38:14 zpool scrub data > 2010-12-24.07:38:43 zpool scrub -s data > 2010-12-24.07:39:15 zpool scrub data > 2010-12-24.12:08:01 zpool clear data > 2010-12-24.12:24:49 zpoo
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs
I had this problem before and it drove me crazy. For some reason switching the label to SMI in format doesn't completely get rid of the GPT labels. I'm guessing maybe it removes the primary at the start of the desk, but not the end? I ended up having to use: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/c8t2d0s2 bs=512 count=16000 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rdsk/c8t2d0s2 bs=512 oseek=<# of 512-byte blocks needed to reach last MB of so of disk> And *THEN* use format. After that it worked fine. Took forever on a whole D1000 array to do. -Dustin On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:34 AM, ann kok wrote: > Hi Bernd > > SMI is selected now. But "zpool add" is still in problem. The > /var/adm/message is showing nothing! > > Any idea? Thank you > > root@opensolaris:~# format -e > Searching for disks...done > > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: > 0. c8t0d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 > 1. c8t1d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 > 2. c8t2d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 > Specify disk (enter its number): 2 > selecting c8t2d0 > [disk formatted] > No Solaris fdisk partition found. > > > FORMAT MENU: > disk - select a disk > type - select (define) a disk type > partition - select (define) a partition table > current - describe the current disk > format - format and analyze the disk > fdisk - run the fdisk program > repair - repair a defective sector > label - write label to the disk > analyze - surface analysis > defect - defect list management > backup - search for backup labels > verify - read and display labels > save - save new disk/partition definitions > inquiry - show vendor, product and revision > scsi - independent SCSI mode selects > cache - enable, disable or query SCSI disk cache > volname - set 8-character volume name > ! - execute , then return > quit > format> fdisk > No fdisk table exists. The default partition for the disk is: > > a 100% "SOLARIS System" partition > > Type "y" to accept the default partition, otherwise type "n" to edit the > partition table. > y > format> label > [0] SMI Label > [1] EFI Label > Specify Label type[0]: 0 > Ready to label disk, continue? > Ready to label disk, continue? y > > format> quit > root@opensolaris:~# zpool add rpool c8t2d0 > cannot label 'c8t2d0': EFI labeled devices are not supported on root pools. > > root@opensolaris:~# tail /var/adm/messages > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: > winlock0 > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] winlock0 is > /pseudo/winlock@0 > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: pm0 > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pm0 is /pseudo/pm@0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: nsmb0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] nsmb0 is > /pseudo/nsmb@0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: > lx_systrace0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is > /pseudo/lx_systrace@0 > Jan 20 09:17:48 opensolaris mDNSResponder: [ID 702911 daemon.error] ERROR: > getOptRdata - unknown opt 4 > Jan 20 09:18:16 opensolaris last message repeated 5 times > > Thank you > > --- On Thu, 1/20/11, Bernd Helber wrote: > >> From: Bernd Helber >> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs >> To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org >> Received: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 10:13 AM >> Sorry i forgot, >> >> you're on x86 >> >> format>fdisk >> >> y >> >> label >> select SMI Label >> >> thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> Am 20.01.11 15:22, schrieb ann kok: >> > Hi Bernd >> > >> > The label won't work and I also provide >> /var/adm/message >> > >> > Thank you >> > >> > root@opensolaris:~# format -e >> > Searching for disks...done >> > >> > >> > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: >> > 0. c8t0d0 > 2607 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> >> > >> /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 >> > 1. c8t1d0 > 1303 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> >> > >> /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 >> > 2. c8t2d0 > 1534 alt 2 hd 128 sec 32> >> > >> /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 >> > Specify disk (enter its number): 2 >> > selecting c8t2d0 >> > [disk formatted] >> > No Solaris fdisk partition found. >> > >> > >> > FORMAT MENU: >> > disk >> - select a disk >> > type >> - select (define) a disk type >> > partition >> - select (define) a partition table >> > current >> - describe the current disk >> > format >> - format and analyze the disk >> > fdisk >> - run the fdisk program >> > repair >> - repair a defective sector >> > label >> - write label to the disk >> > analyze >> - surface analysis >> > defect >> - de
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs
Try to fix the Label again... then try zpool add -n the Box should give you a response. also have a look at the man page man zpool you could also try to force it with zpool add -f But please keep in mind not every device could be forced. ;) please have also a look at blogs.sun.com its a very useful ressource. Also the Solarisinternals Wiki. Cheers Am 20.01.11 16:34, schrieb ann kok: > Hi Bernd > > SMI is selected now. But "zpool add" is still in problem. The > /var/adm/message is showing nothing! > > Any idea? Thank you > > root@opensolaris:~# format -e > Searching for disks...done > > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: >0. c8t0d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 >1. c8t1d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 >2. c8t2d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 > Specify disk (enter its number): 2 > selecting c8t2d0 > [disk formatted] > No Solaris fdisk partition found. > > > FORMAT MENU: > disk - select a disk > type - select (define) a disk type > partition - select (define) a partition table > current- describe the current disk > format - format and analyze the disk > fdisk - run the fdisk program > repair - repair a defective sector > label - write label to the disk > analyze- surface analysis > defect - defect list management > backup - search for backup labels > verify - read and display labels > save - save new disk/partition definitions > inquiry- show vendor, product and revision > scsi - independent SCSI mode selects > cache - enable, disable or query SCSI disk cache > volname- set 8-character volume name > ! - execute , then return > quit > format> fdisk > No fdisk table exists. The default partition for the disk is: > > a 100% "SOLARIS System" partition > > Type "y" to accept the default partition, otherwise type "n" to edit the > partition table. > y > format> label > [0] SMI Label > [1] EFI Label > Specify Label type[0]: 0 > Ready to label disk, continue? > Ready to label disk, continue? y > > format> quit > root@opensolaris:~# zpool add rpool c8t2d0 > cannot label 'c8t2d0': EFI labeled devices are not supported on root pools. > > root@opensolaris:~# tail /var/adm/messages > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: > winlock0 > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] winlock0 is > /pseudo/winlock@0 > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: pm0 > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pm0 is /pseudo/pm@0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: nsmb0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] nsmb0 is > /pseudo/nsmb@0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: > lx_systrace0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is > /pseudo/lx_systrace@0 > Jan 20 09:17:48 opensolaris mDNSResponder: [ID 702911 daemon.error] ERROR: > getOptRdata - unknown opt 4 > Jan 20 09:18:16 opensolaris last message repeated 5 times > > Thank you > > --- On Thu, 1/20/11, Bernd Helber wrote: > >> From: Bernd Helber >> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs >> To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org >> Received: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 10:13 AM >> Sorry i forgot, >> >> you're on x86 >> >> format>fdisk >> >> y >> >> label >> select SMI Label >> >> thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> Am 20.01.11 15:22, schrieb ann kok: >>> Hi Bernd >>> >>> The label won't work and I also provide >> /var/adm/message >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> root@opensolaris:~# format -e >>> Searching for disks...done >>> >>> >>> AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: >>> 0. c8t0d0 > 2607 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> >>> >>/pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 >>> 1. c8t1d0 > 1303 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> >>> >>/pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 >>> 2. c8t2d0 > 1534 alt 2 hd 128 sec 32> >>> >>/pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 >>> Specify disk (enter its number): 2 >>> selecting c8t2d0 >>> [disk formatted] >>> No Solaris fdisk partition found. >>> >>> >>> FORMAT MENU: >>> disk >> - select a disk >>> type >> - select (define) a disk type >>> partition >> - select (define) a partition table >>> current >> - describe the current disk >>> format >>- format and analyze the disk >>> fdisk >> - run the fdisk program >>> repair >>- repair a defective sector >>> label >> - write label to the disk >>> analyze >> - surface analysis >>> defect >>- defect list management >>> backup >>- search for backup labels >>> verify >>- read and display labels >>>
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Proposal: OpenIndiana Stable Branch
On 01/18/11 05:01 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote: On 18 Jan 2011, at 18:31, Gordon Ross wrote: Dave Miner writes: [...] Perhaps refactoring of Caiman is needed, where the Live CD ships with a pkg repo, starts a pkg server, and does an install from that. Not sure how feasible this would be. Given how complete pkg is, probably not all that hard. We looked into this a little quite some time ago. The problem with doing IPS-based installation from CD's or DVD's is that IPS's data access patterns during package installation are relatively random, not streaming, and so you will get utterly abysmal installation performance (orders of magnitude worse than anything you've ever used) when using physical CD or DVD media. That storage technology just isn't designed for random access. This doesn't apply much if you're using an ISO image as a virtual CD or using USB flash memory media. Dave Interesting. Thanks, Dave. Yes - thank you for this info, very helpful! One way around that is to do sort of a "two stage" install, where the first stage, running from the CD installs a "bare minimum" system (from a cpio image or whatever, to avoid the problems with poor random-access to the CD). Then for the second stage, boot into the new bare-minimum system and finish the install from IPS, perhaps allowing use of the CD as your repo, or a local copy, or get it off the net... This sounds like something worth exploring. There are a few options here.. just thinking out loud, a possibility would be: 1. Install the minimal base via CPIO 2. If more packages are requested than base, then extract the pkg repo to ram (tmpfs) or local disk 3. Install the additional software requested via pkg This may bump the RAM or Disk space requirements to do an install, but the OS needs a lot of that to run anyway. It will greatly increase both, in my experience, as any interesting package repo would seem to be quite large (multiple GB) and pkg has pretty substantial overhead in generating and executing a plan. Really, you'd probably be better off booting into the installed system before adding more software. Dave ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs
ann, read the error message zpool prints - it still says "EFI label", so something must have gone wrong with your labelling Michael On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:34, ann kok wrote: > Hi Bernd > > SMI is selected now. But "zpool add" is still in problem. The > /var/adm/message is showing nothing! -- regards/mit freundlichen Grüssen Michael Schuster ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs
Hi Bernd SMI is selected now. But "zpool add" is still in problem. The /var/adm/message is showing nothing! Any idea? Thank you root@opensolaris:~# format -e Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 1. c8t1d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 2. c8t2d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 Specify disk (enter its number): 2 selecting c8t2d0 [disk formatted] No Solaris fdisk partition found. FORMAT MENU: disk - select a disk type - select (define) a disk type partition - select (define) a partition table current- describe the current disk format - format and analyze the disk fdisk - run the fdisk program repair - repair a defective sector label - write label to the disk analyze- surface analysis defect - defect list management backup - search for backup labels verify - read and display labels save - save new disk/partition definitions inquiry- show vendor, product and revision scsi - independent SCSI mode selects cache - enable, disable or query SCSI disk cache volname- set 8-character volume name ! - execute , then return quit format> fdisk No fdisk table exists. The default partition for the disk is: a 100% "SOLARIS System" partition Type "y" to accept the default partition, otherwise type "n" to edit the partition table. y format> label [0] SMI Label [1] EFI Label Specify Label type[0]: 0 Ready to label disk, continue? Ready to label disk, continue? y format> quit root@opensolaris:~# zpool add rpool c8t2d0 cannot label 'c8t2d0': EFI labeled devices are not supported on root pools. root@opensolaris:~# tail /var/adm/messages Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: winlock0 Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] winlock0 is /pseudo/winlock@0 Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: pm0 Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pm0 is /pseudo/pm@0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: nsmb0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] nsmb0 is /pseudo/nsmb@0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: lx_systrace0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is /pseudo/lx_systrace@0 Jan 20 09:17:48 opensolaris mDNSResponder: [ID 702911 daemon.error] ERROR: getOptRdata - unknown opt 4 Jan 20 09:18:16 opensolaris last message repeated 5 times Thank you --- On Thu, 1/20/11, Bernd Helber wrote: > From: Bernd Helber > Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs > To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > Received: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 10:13 AM > Sorry i forgot, > > you're on x86 > > format>fdisk > > y > > label > select SMI Label > > thanks in advance. > > > > Am 20.01.11 15:22, schrieb ann kok: > > Hi Bernd > > > > The label won't work and I also provide > /var/adm/message > > > > Thank you > > > > root@opensolaris:~# format -e > > Searching for disks...done > > > > > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: > > 0. c8t0d0 2607 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 > > 1. c8t1d0 1303 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 > > 2. c8t2d0 1534 alt 2 hd 128 sec 32> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 > > Specify disk (enter its number): 2 > > selecting c8t2d0 > > [disk formatted] > > No Solaris fdisk partition found. > > > > > > FORMAT MENU: > > disk > - select a disk > > type > - select (define) a disk type > > partition > - select (define) a partition table > > current > - describe the current disk > > format > - format and analyze the disk > > fdisk > - run the fdisk program > > repair > - repair a defective sector > > label > - write label to the disk > > analyze > - surface analysis > > defect > - defect list management > > backup > - search for backup labels > > verify > - read and display labels > > save > - save new disk/partition > definitions > > inquiry > - show vendor, product and revision > > scsi > - independent SCSI mode selects > > cache > - enable, disable or query SCSI disk cache > > volname > - set 8-character volume name > > > ! - > execute , then return > > quit > > format> label > > WARNING - This disk may be in use by an application > that has > > modified > the fdisk table. Ensure that this disk is > > not > currently in use before proceeding to use fdisk. > > > > /var/adm/message
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs
Sorry i forgot, you're on x86 format>fdisk y label select SMI Label thanks in advance. Am 20.01.11 15:22, schrieb ann kok: > Hi Bernd > > The label won't work and I also provide /var/adm/message > > Thank you > > root@opensolaris:~# format -e > Searching for disks...done > > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: >0. c8t0d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 >1. c8t1d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 >2. c8t2d0 > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 > Specify disk (enter its number): 2 > selecting c8t2d0 > [disk formatted] > No Solaris fdisk partition found. > > > FORMAT MENU: > disk - select a disk > type - select (define) a disk type > partition - select (define) a partition table > current- describe the current disk > format - format and analyze the disk > fdisk - run the fdisk program > repair - repair a defective sector > label - write label to the disk > analyze- surface analysis > defect - defect list management > backup - search for backup labels > verify - read and display labels > save - save new disk/partition definitions > inquiry- show vendor, product and revision > scsi - independent SCSI mode selects > cache - enable, disable or query SCSI disk cache > volname- set 8-character volume name > ! - execute , then return > quit > format> label > WARNING - This disk may be in use by an application that has > modified the fdisk table. Ensure that this disk is > not currently in use before proceeding to use fdisk. > > /var/adm/message > > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: pm0 > Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pm0 is /pseudo/pm@0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: nsmb0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] nsmb0 is > /pseudo/nsmb@0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: > lx_systrace0 > Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is > /pseudo/lx_systrace@0 > Jan 20 09:17:48 opensolaris mDNSResponder: [ID 702911 daemon.error] ERROR: > getOptRdata - unknown opt 4 > Jan 20 09:18:16 opensolaris last message repeated 5 times > > > > > --- On Wed, 1/19/11, Bernd Helber wrote: > >> From: Bernd Helber >> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs >> To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" >> Received: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 5:37 PM >> format >> label --> select SMI Label. >> >> that should solve the issue, >> >> if there are more issues, please provide >> >> /var/adm/messages* >> >> thanks in advance. >> >> >> Am 19.01.11 22:53, schrieb ann kok: >>> Hi Edward >>> >>> Thank you for your mail >>> >>> I follow your advice to reboot my computer. It is >> fine >>> >>> Now. I have problem to attach it. What can I do this? >>> >>> root@opensolaris:~# format -e >>> Searching for disks...done >>> >>> >>> AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: >>> 0. c8t0d0 > 2607 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> >>> >>/pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 >>> 1. c8t1d0 > 1303 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> >>> >>/pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 >>> Specify disk (enter its number): ^C >>> root@opensolaris:~# zpool add rpool c8t1d0 >>> cannot label 'c8t1d0': EFI labeled devices are not >> supported on root pools. >>> >>> 2/ For the command devfsadm -Cv, I run it the first >> time. It showed many message but I can't catch it. >>> I try to run again, but show nothing >>> How can I catch those message? >>> >>> Thank you so much >>> >>> >>> --- On Wed, 1/19/11, Edward Ned Harvey >> wrote: >>> From: Edward Ned Harvey Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" Received: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 4:23 PM > From: ann kok [mailto:oiyan...@yahoo.ca] > > As I haven't received the response, I run the >> formart -e > It said it needs around 3 hours > > format> format > Ready to format. Formatting cannot be interrupted > and takes 232 minutes (estimated). Continue? > Continue? y Oh my goodness. No. When you run format -e, it should just display a >> list of all the disks in the system (instantly), and ask you which one you >> want to work on, and then you quit. I'm sure I said that. Quit >> without changing anything. (And be careful not to break anything.) I am >> extremely certain I never told you to type "format" after you got into the format >> prompt. And when it prompted you "Continue?" You should definitely have >> said "n" instead of "y" You have entered the format prompt, and then >> entered the format command on
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] netstat
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:52 PM, adrian kok wrote: Hello I am new in open solaris. I run the command netstat -r and don't know meaning of Ref and USE columns 25, 32381, 38 Why the interface is solaris2? Because it resolved the ip address to a hostname. netstat -rn will display ip addresses only. Routing Table: IPv4 Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface - - -- - default 192.168.0.5 UG1 25 192.168.0.0 solaris U 1 32381 solaris2 localhostlocalhostUH11 38 lo0 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] netstat
Hello I am new in open solaris. I run the command netstat -r and don't know meaning of Ref and USE columns 25, 32381, 38 Why the interface is solaris2? Routing Table: IPv4 Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface - - -- - default 192.168.0.5 UG1 25 192.168.0.0 solaris U 1 32381 solaris2 localhostlocalhostUH11 38 lo0 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs
Hi Bernd The label won't work and I also provide /var/adm/message Thank you root@opensolaris:~# format -e Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 1. c8t1d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 2. c8t2d0 /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@2,0 Specify disk (enter its number): 2 selecting c8t2d0 [disk formatted] No Solaris fdisk partition found. FORMAT MENU: disk - select a disk type - select (define) a disk type partition - select (define) a partition table current- describe the current disk format - format and analyze the disk fdisk - run the fdisk program repair - repair a defective sector label - write label to the disk analyze- surface analysis defect - defect list management backup - search for backup labels verify - read and display labels save - save new disk/partition definitions inquiry- show vendor, product and revision scsi - independent SCSI mode selects cache - enable, disable or query SCSI disk cache volname- set 8-character volume name ! - execute , then return quit format> label WARNING - This disk may be in use by an application that has modified the fdisk table. Ensure that this disk is not currently in use before proceeding to use fdisk. /var/adm/message Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: pm0 Jan 20 09:07:58 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] pm0 is /pseudo/pm@0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: nsmb0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] nsmb0 is /pseudo/nsmb@0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: lx_systrace0 Jan 20 09:07:59 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is /pseudo/lx_systrace@0 Jan 20 09:17:48 opensolaris mDNSResponder: [ID 702911 daemon.error] ERROR: getOptRdata - unknown opt 4 Jan 20 09:18:16 opensolaris last message repeated 5 times --- On Wed, 1/19/11, Bernd Helber wrote: > From: Bernd Helber > Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs > To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" > Received: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 5:37 PM > format > label --> select SMI Label. > > that should solve the issue, > > if there are more issues, please provide > > /var/adm/messages* > > thanks in advance. > > > Am 19.01.11 22:53, schrieb ann kok: > > Hi Edward > > > > Thank you for your mail > > > > I follow your advice to reboot my computer. It is > fine > > > > Now. I have problem to attach it. What can I do this? > > > > root@opensolaris:~# format -e > > Searching for disks...done > > > > > > AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: > > 0. c8t0d0 2607 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@0,0 > > 1. c8t1d0 1303 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> > > > /pci@0,0/pci15ad,1976@10/sd@1,0 > > Specify disk (enter its number): ^C > > root@opensolaris:~# zpool add rpool c8t1d0 > > cannot label 'c8t1d0': EFI labeled devices are not > supported on root pools. > > > > 2/ For the command devfsadm -Cv, I run it the first > time. It showed many message but I can't catch it. > > I try to run again, but show nothing > > How can I catch those message? > > > > Thank you so much > > > > > > --- On Wed, 1/19/11, Edward Ned Harvey > wrote: > > > >> From: Edward Ned Harvey > >> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool and nfs > >> To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana" > >> Received: Wednesday, January 19, 2011, 4:23 PM > >>> From: ann kok [mailto:oiyan...@yahoo.ca] > >>> > >>> As I haven't received the response, I run the > formart > >> -e > >>> It said it needs around 3 hours > >>> > >>> format> format > >>> Ready to format. Formatting cannot be > >> interrupted > >>> and takes 232 minutes (estimated). Continue? > >>> Continue? y > >> > >> Oh my goodness. No. > >> When you run format -e, it should just display a > list of > >> all the disks in > >> the system (instantly), and ask you which one you > want to > >> work on, and then > >> you quit. I'm sure I said that. Quit > without > >> changing anything. (And be > >> careful not to break anything.) I am > extremely > >> certain I never told you to > >> type "format" after you got into the format > prompt. > >> And when it prompted > >> you "Continue?" You should definitely have > said "n" > >> instead of "y" > >> > >> You have entered the format prompt, and then > entered the > >> format command on > >> the format prompt, which apparently does > something > >> horrific. Hopefully > >> you're doing it to a disk you don't care about. > >> > >> I suggest rebooting first, just to ensure you > haven't > >> destroyed your system. > >> You may have destroyed it. > >> > >> Here is an example
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
Morning! > Personally i assume the peaks were triggerd by resilvering the pool. > Its not uncommon that you have a high load, if your pool is resilvering. Yes, the peaks were triggered by the resiver. > Best Practice in this case would have been creating a new Zpool, e.g > raidz.. > > zfs send from $oldpool zfs receive $newpool... :-( I don't have enough connections to hook everything together at the same time. Also, I performed the trick with memory sticks. Here is a demo video I made... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmtPpnSrJ6w ... once all the 4gig sticks were replaced with 8 gig sticks, simply exporting and then importing the pool resulted in the extra space becoming available. For some reason, it didn't want to work with the 2tb drives. > I have three Questions for you. > > First.. is this a production Box? It is my home server. The one that keeps all my data, photography RAW files, music, programs, code, everything going back to when I started with computers in my teens. > Second.. could you provide the output of zpool history? mich@jaguar:/root# zpool history History for 'backup': 2011-01-20.07:27:55 zpool create backup c3d0p0 History for 'data': 2010-01-14.20:50:32 zpool create data raidz c10t0d0p0 c11t0d0p0 c12t0d0p0 2010-01-14.20:54:22 zfs set mountpoint=/mirror data 2010-01-14.21:08:52 zfs set sharesmb=on data 2010-01-14.21:14:38 zfs set sharesmb=on data 2010-01-14.21:14:43 zfs set sharesmb=on data 2010-01-14.21:21:28 zfs set sharenfs=on data 2010-01-14.21:25:14 zfs set sharenfs=on data 2010-01-14.21:25:35 zfs set sharesmb=on data 2010-01-14.21:30:16 zfs set sharesmb=on data 2010-01-14.21:30:21 zfs set sharenfs=on data 2010-01-14.21:34:29 zfs set sharesmb=on data 2010-01-16.17:38:07 zpool import -f data 2010-01-17.17:13:56 zpool import -f data 2010-01-17.17:23:31 zpool export data 2010-01-17.17:32:34 zpool import data 2010-01-17.18:06:15 zpool export data 2010-01-17.18:07:18 zpool import data 2010-01-17.18:14:38 zpool export data 2010-01-17.18:14:55 zpool import data 2010-01-17.19:32:29 zpool export data 2010-01-17.20:33:34 zpool import data 2010-01-17.20:47:38 zpool export data 2010-01-17.20:56:05 zpool import data 2010-01-17.21:21:50 zpool export data 2010-01-17.21:35:24 zpool import data 2010-01-17.21:37:52 zfs set sharesmb=on data 2010-01-17.21:38:00 zfs set sharenfs=on data 2010-01-17.21:41:06 zfs set sharesmb=name=mirror data 2010-01-17.22:00:06 zpool export data 2010-01-17.22:02:44 zpool import data 2010-01-17.22:08:34 zpool export data 2010-01-17.22:31:27 zpool import data 2010-01-17.22:31:55 zpool export data 2010-01-18.07:39:30 zpool import data 2010-01-18.20:04:06 zfs set sharenfs=off data 2010-01-18.22:24:18 zpool export -f data 2010-01-18.22:26:17 zpool import data 2010-01-27.18:47:27 zpool export data 2010-01-27.20:36:11 zpool import data 2010-01-27.20:37:09 zpool export data 2010-01-31.09:26:24 zpool import data 2010-01-31.09:26:59 zpool export data 2010-02-03.19:19:57 zpool import data 2010-02-03.23:09:06 zpool export data 2010-02-03.23:13:25 zpool import data 2010-02-03.23:56:02 zpool export data 2010-02-16.19:41:11 zpool import data 2010-02-17.07:34:01 zpool upgrade data 2010-02-21.15:51:24 zpool export data 2010-02-21.18:35:57 zpool import data 2010-02-27.20:03:46 zpool scrub data 2010-03-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data 2010-04-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data 2010-05-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data 2010-06-01.13:48:17 zpool clear data 2010-06-05.04:00:03 zpool scrub data 2010-07-05.04:00:03 zpool scrub data 2010-08-05.04:00:05 zpool scrub data 2010-08-05.22:26:45 zpool clear data 2010-08-19.15:01:05 zpool scrub data 2010-09-05.04:00:03 zpool scrub data 2010-09-15.19:44:14 zpool clear data 2010-09-15.22:41:29 zpool clear data 2010-10-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data 2010-10-06.08:22:05 zpool clear data 2010-10-08.22:45:10 zpool clear data 2010-11-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data 2010-12-05.04:00:04 zpool scrub data 2010-12-22.14:46:27 zpool scrub data 2010-12-23.08:08:27 zpool replace -f data c6t0d0p0 c6t2d0p0 2010-12-23.20:27:17 zpool scrub data 2010-12-23.20:55:59 zpool replace -f data c6t2d0p0 c6t0d0p0 2010-12-24.01:34:37 zpool clear data 2010-12-24.01:51:21 zpool offline data c6t0d0p0 2010-12-24.01:53:05 zpool online data c6t0d0p0 2010-12-24.01:54:59 zpool export data 2010-12-24.01:55:57 zpool import data 2010-12-24.07:22:34 zpool scrub -s data 2010-12-24.07:37:08 zpool detach data c6t0d0p0 2010-12-24.07:38:14 zpool scrub data 2010-12-24.07:38:43 zpool scrub -s data 2010-12-24.07:39:15 zpool scrub data 2010-12-24.12:08:01 zpool clear data 2010-12-24.12:24:49 zpool clear data 2010-12-24.12:27:10 zpool clear data 2010-12-24.12:30:33 zpool scrub -s data 2010-12-24.12:31:05 zpool clear data 2010-12-24.12:37:56 zpool replace data c6t0d0p0 c6t2d0p0 2010-12-25.07:02:28 zpool scrub data 2010-12-25.07:34:09 zpool scrub -s data 2010-12-25.07:34:18 zpool clear data 2010-12-25.10:55:36 zpool replace data c6t2d0p0 c4t1d0 2010-12-25.20:01:19 zpool clear data 2010-12-25.20:01:52 zp
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
> SSD and HD can not be mixed. > > Regards > Edward Apologies, the three drives at the bottom of the list are the 2tb ones. There's no way I could afford a 2tb SSD on my local government salary!!! ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Enable samba
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:07 PM, Paul Johnston wrote: On 01/19/11 10:09 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: On Thursday, January 20, 2011 01:40 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote: And I'm assuming that you've created an smb.conf file in /etc/sfw ... Did that change again? I thought it was in /etc/samba? Any idea where the smb.conf file should be? With OpenIndiana, it appears that it will live in /etc/samba just like it does elsewhere besides Solaris. There is a directory /etc/samba which has a file called smb.conf-example which I have made a copy of called smb.conf just to see it the lack of that file is causing the problem. Most likely. I have a smb.conf file paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ ls -l total 22 dr-x-- 2 root bin 2 2011-01-19 16:06 private -r--r--r-- 1 root root 9662 2011-01-20 09:33 smb.conf -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 9662 2011-01-19 16:06 smb.conf-example Now paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ pfexec svcadm clear samba paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ pfexec svcs samba STATE STIME FMRI online 9:48:29 svc:/network/samba:default paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ pfexec svcs -xv samba svc:/network/samba:default (SMB file server) State: online since January 20, 2011 09:48:29 AM GMT See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 1m smbsmbd See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 4 smb.conf See: /var/svc/log/network-samba:default.log Impact: None. paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ WORKING!!! At this point I am getting confused :-) Wonder what exactly was causing it not to start and which thing caused it to be able to start. No smb.conf I would believe... I am guessing it was the lack of a config file but cannot be sure. No config, no startup. I suspect the logs would have pretty much said the same...in /var/samba/log/log.smbd ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Enable samba
On 01/19/11 10:09 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, January 20, 2011 01:40 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
And I'm assuming that you've created an smb.conf file in /etc/sfw ...
Did that change again? I thought it was in /etc/samba?
Any idea where the smb.conf file should be?
There is a directory /etc/samba which has a file called smb.conf-example
which I have made a copy of called smb.conf just to see it the lack of
that file is causing the problem.
I have a smb.conf file
paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ ls -l
total 22
dr-x-- 2 root bin 2 2011-01-19 16:06 private
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 9662 2011-01-20 09:33 smb.conf
-r--r--r-- 1 root bin 9662 2011-01-19 16:06 smb.conf-example
Now
paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ pfexec svcadm clear samba
paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ pfexec svcs samba
STATE STIMEFMRI
online 9:48:29 svc:/network/samba:default
paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$ pfexec svcs -xv samba
svc:/network/samba:default (SMB file server)
State: online since January 20, 2011 09:48:29 AM GMT
See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 1m smbsmbd
See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 4 smb.conf
See: /var/svc/log/network-samba:default.log
Impact: None.
paulj@openindiana:/etc/samba$
WORKING!!!
At this point I am getting confused :-)
Wonder what exactly was causing it not to start and which thing caused
it to be able to start.
I am guessing it was the lack of a config file but cannot be sure.
How am I able to find which config file samba was looking at?
I've looked in /lib/svc/manifest/network/samba.xml but am no the wiser.
swat.xml says
paulj@openindiana:/lib/svc/manifest/network$ find . -name "swat.xml"
-exec grep "/smb.conf" {} \;
Swat support a browser interface to configure samba generating the
/etc/samba/smb.conf .
But that is the only reference to the location of a config file I can find.
Regards Paul
Paul
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
Good Morning Michelle. Am 20.01.11 08:05, schrieb Michelle Knight: > hi Folks, > > OI 148. > > Three 1.5tb drives were replaced with three 2tb drives. They are here on > internal SATA channels c2t2d0, c2t3d0 and c2t4d0. One is a Seagate Barracuda > and the other two are Western Digital Greens. > > mich@jaguar:~# cfgadm -lv > Ap_Id Receptacle Occupant Condition > Information > When Type Busy Phys_Id > Slot8 connectedconfigured ok Location: > Slot8 > Jan 1 1970 unknown n/devices/pci@0,0/pci8086,3b4a@1c,4:Slot8 > sata0/0::dsk/c2t0d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: > INTEL > SSDSA2M040G2GC FRev: 2CV102HB SN: CVGB949301PH040GGN > unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:0 > sata0/1::dsk/c2t1d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: > INTEL > SSDSA2M040G2GC FRev: 2CV102HB SN: CVGB949301PC040GGN > unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:1 > sata0/2::dsk/c2t2d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: > ST32000542AS FRev: CC34 SN: 5XW17ARW > unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:2 > sata0/3::dsk/c2t3d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: WDC > WD20EARS-00MVWB0 FRev: 51.0AB51 SN: WD-WMAZA075 > unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:3 > sata0/4::dsk/c2t4d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: WDC > WD20EARS-00MVWB0 FRev: 51.0AB51 SN: WD-WMAZA0484508 > > A zpool export and subsequent import, which should have taken the set to 4tb > overall storage in the raidz, appears to have not worked despite the import > taking what must have been about ten to fifteen minutes to do the import. > (during which time the drives were silent and the zpool process was mostly 0% > very occasionally peaking to 25%, and the system being very slow to respond > during that period) > Personally i assume the peaks were triggerd by resilvering the pool. Its not uncommon that you have a high load, if your pool is resilvering. Best Practice in this case would have been creating a new Zpool, e.g raidz.. zfs send from $oldpool zfs receive $newpool... :-( I have three Questions for you. First.. is this a production Box? Second.. could you provide the output of zpool history? Third, no offence, but do you have proper Literature for ZFS? If not please have a look at Solarisinternals http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/Solaris_Internals_and_Performance_FAQ http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide Or have a look at the Open Solaris Bible. Fourth... what would you like to achieve with OI ? Sorry now i made four Questions out of it. ;) Cheers :-) > Any ideas please? Or is there still some process running in the background > that I can't see? > > mich@jaguar:~# zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > data2.27T 401G 2.27T /mirror > rpool 7.69G 28.7G45K /rpool > rpool/ROOT 3.70G 28.7G31K legacy > rpool/ROOT/openindiana 3.70G 28.7G 3.59G / > rpool/dump 1.93G 28.7G 1.93G - > rpool/export5.22M 28.7G32K /export > rpool/export/home 5.19M 28.7G32K /export/home > rpool/export/home/mich 5.16M 28.7G 5.16M /export/home/mich > rpool/swap 2.05G 30.7G 126M - > > > mich@jaguar:~# zpool status > pool: data > state: ONLINE > scan: resilvered 1.13T in 12h26m with 0 errors on Wed Jan 19 23:42:23 2011 > config: > > NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM > dataONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > That took a very long time, for only 1 TB > > last pid: 1802; load avg: 0.61, 0.56, 0.61; up 0+19:55:20 > 07:06:01 > 74 processes: 73 sleeping, 1 on cpu > CPU states: 99.8% idle, 0.0% user, 0.3% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap > Kernel: 375 ctxsw, 653 intr, 120 syscall > Memory: 3959M phys mem, 401M free mem, 1979M total swap, 1979M free swap > >PID USERNAME NLWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIMECPU COMMAND > 1197 gdm 1 590 95M 28M sleep1:23 0.04% gdm-simple-gree >922 root3 590 102M 51M sleep0:37 0.02% Xorg > 1801 root1 590 4036K 2460K cpu/30:00 0.01% top > 1196 gdm 1 590 80M 13M sleep0:00 0.00% metacity > 1190 gdm 1 590 7892K 6028K sleep0:00 0.00% at-spi-registry >640 root 16 590 14M 9072K sleep0:09 0.00% smbd > 1737 mich1 590 13M 5392K sleep0:00 0.00% sshd >148 root1 590
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zpool upgrade didn't seem to upgrade
On 01/19/11 23:05, Michelle Knight wrote: hi Folks, OI 148. Three 1.5tb drives were replaced with three 2tb drives. They are here on internal SATA channels c2t2d0, c2t3d0 and c2t4d0. One is a Seagate Barracuda and the other two are Western Digital Greens. mich@jaguar:~# cfgadm -lv Ap_Id Receptacle Occupant Condition Information When Type Busy Phys_Id Slot8 connectedconfigured ok Location: Slot8 Jan 1 1970 unknown n/devices/pci@0,0/pci8086,3b4a@1c,4:Slot8 sata0/0::dsk/c2t0d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: INTEL SSDSA2M040G2GC FRev: 2CV102HB SN: CVGB949301PH040GGN unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:0 sata0/1::dsk/c2t1d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: INTEL SSDSA2M040G2GC FRev: 2CV102HB SN: CVGB949301PC040GGN unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:1 sata0/2::dsk/c2t2d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: ST32000542AS FRev: CC34 SN: 5XW17ARW unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:2 sata0/3::dsk/c2t3d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: WDC WD20EARS-00MVWB0 FRev: 51.0AB51 SN: WD-WMAZA075 unavailable disk n/devices/pci@0,0/pci1458,b005@1f,2:3 sata0/4::dsk/c2t4d0connectedconfigured ok Mod: WDC WD20EARS-00MVWB0 FRev: 51.0AB51 SN: WD-WMAZA0484508 A zpool export and subsequent import, which should have taken the set to 4tb overall storage in the raidz, appears to have not worked despite the import taking what must have been about ten to fifteen minutes to do the import. (during which time the drives were silent and the zpool process was mostly 0% very occasionally peaking to 25%, and the system being very slow to respond during that period) Any ideas please? Or is there still some process running in the background that I can't see? mich@jaguar:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT data2.27T 401G 2.27T /mirror rpool 7.69G 28.7G45K /rpool rpool/ROOT 3.70G 28.7G31K legacy rpool/ROOT/openindiana 3.70G 28.7G 3.59G / rpool/dump 1.93G 28.7G 1.93G - rpool/export5.22M 28.7G32K /export rpool/export/home 5.19M 28.7G32K /export/home rpool/export/home/mich 5.16M 28.7G 5.16M /export/home/mich rpool/swap 2.05G 30.7G 126M - mich@jaguar:~# zpool status pool: data state: ONLINE scan: resilvered 1.13T in 12h26m with 0 errors on Wed Jan 19 23:42:23 2011 config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM dataONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors last pid: 1802; load avg: 0.61, 0.56, 0.61; up 0+19:55:20 07:06:01 74 processes: 73 sleeping, 1 on cpu CPU states: 99.8% idle, 0.0% user, 0.3% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap Kernel: 375 ctxsw, 653 intr, 120 syscall Memory: 3959M phys mem, 401M free mem, 1979M total swap, 1979M free swap PID USERNAME NLWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIMECPU COMMAND 1197 gdm 1 590 95M 28M sleep1:23 0.04% gdm-simple-gree 922 root3 590 102M 51M sleep0:37 0.02% Xorg 1801 root1 590 4036K 2460K cpu/30:00 0.01% top 1196 gdm 1 590 80M 13M sleep0:00 0.00% metacity 1190 gdm 1 590 7892K 6028K sleep0:00 0.00% at-spi-registry 640 root 16 590 14M 9072K sleep0:09 0.00% smbd 1737 mich1 590 13M 5392K sleep0:00 0.00% sshd 148 root1 590 8312K 1608K sleep0:00 0.00% dhcpagent 672 root 26 590 27M 15M sleep0:01 0.00% fmd 1198 gdm 1 590 87M 18M sleep0:02 0.00% gnome-power-man 1247 root1 590 6080K 2500K sleep0:00 0.00% sendmail 11 root 21 590 15M 13M sleep0:06 0.00% svc.configd 272 root6 590 11M 4784K sleep0:01 0.00% devfsadm 1220 root 24 590 13M 4404K sleep0:01 0.00% nscd 45 netcfg 5 590 4716K 3268K sleep0:00 0.00% netcfgd 1309 admin 1 590 16M 8404K sleep 14:30 0.00% sshd 1312 admin 1 590 16M 5468K sleep3:47 0.00% sshd 787 root1 590 12M 5928K sleep0:05 0.00% intrd 1237 root4 590 8400K 1936K sleep0:03 0.00% automountd 9 root 15 590 20M 12M sleep0:02 0.00% svc.startd 387 root5 590 7500K 6024K sleep0:01 0.00% hald 1308 root1 590 13M 4788K sleep0:01 0.00% sshd 252 root5 60 -20 2544
