Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Apache error on reboot

2011-10-11 Thread Mark Humphreys
When deploying Webstack 1.6 on Solaris 10, I found a similar issue with
making directories in the /var/run file system, after reboot.  To secure the
application, I had changed apache2 to run as the webservd user/role (the
main process was previously kicked-off as root), and consequently it could
no longer create the temporary items under /var/run.

My workaround was to add webservd to the sys group, and write a startup
script to issue a "chmod g+w" on /var/run.  To do this, I:

1) Created a startup script in /etc/init.d (ie. /etc/init.d/chmod_varrun)
2) Created a symbolic link in /etc/rc2.d (ie.
/etc/init.d/rc2.d/S99chmod_varrun) back-to the the script in /etc/init.d.

Granted, the solution was for Solaris 10.  I'm not sure the legacy script
will work on an OpenSolaris derivative.

Of course, if someone else knows a best practice, or a better place to put
this kind-of script which would be relevant to recent builds, I'm all ears
(well eyes), as well!

-- 
.\\ark
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Huawei E1550 usb 3g modem

2011-10-11 Thread Andrey N. Oktyabrski

Good day.

How can I switch it to the modem mode from mass storage mode? Something 
same as usb_modeswitch from Linux wanted. Or I must write anything in 
the /etc/driver_aliases?


dmesg fragment:
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 2.0 device 
(usb12d1,1446) operating at full speed (USB 1.x) on USB 1.10 root hub: 
device@1, usb_mid9 at bus address 2
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot usba: [ID 349649 kern.info]HUAWEI 
Technology Mobile
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] usb_mid9 is 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1 (usb_mid9) online
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 2.0 interface 
(usbif12d1,1446.config1.0) operating at full speed (USB 1.x) on USB 1.10 
root hub: storage@0, scsa2usb13 at bus address 2
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot usba: [ID 349649 kern.info]HUAWEI 
Technology Mobile
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] scsa2usb13 is 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@0
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@0 (scsa2usb13) online
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 2.0 interface 
(usbif12d1,1446.config1.1) operating at full speed (USB 1.x) on USB 1.10 
root hub: storage@1, scsa2usb14 at bus address 2
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot usba: [ID 349649 kern.info]HUAWEI 
Technology Mobile
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] scsa2usb14 is 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@1
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@1 (scsa2usb14) online
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot scsi: [ID 583861 kern.info] sd22 at scsa2usb14: 
target 0 lun 0
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] sd22 is 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@1/disk@0,0
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot scsi: [ID 583861 kern.info] sd21 at scsa2usb13: 
target 0 lun 0
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] sd21 is 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@0/disk@0,0
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@1/disk@0,0 (sd22) online
Oct 12 09:22:34 thinkpot genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] 
/pci@0,0/pci17aa,20aa@1a,1/device@1/storage@0/disk@0,0 (sd21) online


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Howto proceed, when new to (openindiana) development

2011-10-11 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:04:51AM +0200, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> Currently I'm running a centos 5 server.
> 
> I have a spare machine that I have centos6(C6) and OpenIndiana 151a(oi).
> This machine is replacing the current server and will have x TB of disk.
> Thinking of 4-5 x WD RE4 2Tb/1TB to start with
> 
> It's a mbr boot, NOT a EFI boot.
> I'm also testing out GPT label disks.
> 2 disks c2 80gb ata(mbr) and on c3 a 320GB sata(GPT).
> oi on a c2 p2
> Created a zpool tank with one partition from c2 and c3.
> tank kan be seen from C6 and from oi.
> 
> Planning on changing to openindiana, primarily to get ZFS and zones.
> 
> I run web,dns,dhcp, tftp, sendmail, torrents, fax(connected to sendmail), 
> backup  and use a UPS
> The new server is also handling backup and storage for clients.
> 
> Does packages exist for
> hylafax faxhttp://hylafax.sourceforge.net/ (not same as hylafax.org)
> bacula  backup http://www.bacula.org/
> nut upshttp://www.networkupstools.org/
> 
> 
> This means that I have to build a number of packages.
> An idea was to build them as a package's to contribute.
> 
> I'm new to solaris and experienced in computers and systems.
> I have been running a development/system verification test lab with redundent 
> sunos blades.
> 
> I have a lot to learn :)
> I believe in just jumping in.
> 
> Suggestion on howto proceed

Hello!

We have a mailing list for development (oi-dev@...) and an IRC channel
(#oi-dev on FreeNode).  I strongly suggest that you go into the IRC channel
since you'll get help there much more quickly.

Regardless, OI is switching to a unified build system, called oi-build -
yes, not very creative.  There is a wiki page that describes how to get
started with it: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Building+with+oi-build

Once you get the hang of the system, it's pretty easy to add new packages.

Welcome aboard!

Jeff.

-- 
UNIX is user-friendly ... it's just selective about who its friends are

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread David Brodbeck
2011/10/10 Любомир Григоров 

> >I'll take a couple of people with a clue over a hundred _looking_ for a
> clue any day.
>
> It will be just as I said earlier - the userland will consist of the devs
> and a bunch of fanboys, no one will know the OS and will just view it as
> "another one". This whole conversation and all the emails in it just proves
> OI is not ready to be a real OS. Maybe in 10 years after it matures I will
> give it another go. Like things stand, it's headed in the OpenBSD path.
>

I don't have a dog in this hunt, but this remark struck me as odd.  I've
never considered popularity a sign of the merit of an OS.  If I did I'd run
everything on Windows. ;)

-- 
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, Linguistics
University of Washington
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Familiarity, was Re: Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread David Brodbeck
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Gabriel de la Cruz <
gabriel.delac...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It takes 2 comands to learn smf, swaping from ubuntu to gentoo is damn
> harder than reading the Solaris howtos.
>

I think the biggest problem I had adapting to SMF is it's very opaque
compared to what I was used to.  It's somewhat reminiscent of the Windows
registry that way; you're manipulating a black box database with commands,
instead of editing flat files.

The second biggest problem I had is I find XML confusing.  It's only sort of
human-readable. ;)

Like anything it gets easier with experience, and there are decided
advantages to it; it's just a bit of a jolt for people who are used to nice
UNIX-y text scripts that you can just go and look at.  It seems more aimed
at the convenience of packaging scripts than at being manipulated by actual
humans. ;)

-- 
David Brodbeck
System Administrator, Linguistics
University of Washington
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Question regarding OI148, SI3124 and port multiplier Sil3726

2011-10-11 Thread Attila Fülöp
On 10/ 8/11 12:29 AM, Albert Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Stefano Del Corno
>  wrote:
>> Hi, I'm sorry if the question have been already discussed in the past:
>> I'm having an issue with a PCI-e 3132 SATA card and a 3726 port
>> multiplier. Digging both the internet and OI discussions, I had the
>> feeling that this specific combination is working fine in a few
>> different environments.
>>
>> http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2011-January/002209.html
>> http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2011-May/003998.html
>>
>> I've loaded latest "ide" firmware (B7703) on my 3132 card. I tested
>> the pci-e card, the port multiplier and 4 attached sata drives under
>> linux: everything was working fine. I did also a couple of "raw"
>> performance tests with good results. Given the good experience under
>> "another OS" and given that I saw positive reports of SIL port
>> multipliers with SIL based SATA boards, I dropped both the card and
>> the port multiplier in my OpenIndiana box.
>>
>> I'm running OI 148 on a SuperMicro X7SPA-H board. It's booting from a
>> couple of USB drives (forming a mirrored rpool). Right now I'm using 4
>> out of 6 internal sata connectors to drive a small SSD and 3 1.5tb
>> drives. My plan is to add the above mentioned 3124 + 3726 + 4drives to
>> my OpenIndiana box to test different protection schemes and run some
>> "zpool send" tests.
>>
>> The issue I'm experiencing is that I can only see the first drive
>> (port 0) I've attached to the port multiplier.
>>
> 
> I'm not sure where you heard otherwise, but only the ahci driver
> supports SATA port multipliers.

Maybe from me, at least the links above refer to messages I sent.

IIRC PM support was added to si3124.c in snv_111 and it definitely worked
for me. I could access three disks connected to a PM.

Wondering why everybody said PMs are not supported by si3124 I googled
a bit and found this thread:

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.solaris.opensolaris.storage.general/8073

To summarize: PM support worked from snv_111 up to snv_124. Some change
in snv_125 seems to have borken it.

Looking at
http://src.illumos.org/source/xref/illumos-gate/usr/src/uts/common/io/sata/adapters/si3124/si3124.c
it seems a lot (if not all) of PM stuff is already there, see eg.

  175  * Port Multiplier: Enumeration of port multiplier is handled during the
  176  *controller initialization and also during the a hotplug 
operation.
  177  *Current logic takes care of situation where a port multiplier
  178  *is hotplugged into a port which had a cdisk connected previously
  179  *and vice versa.

 3182 static int
 3183 si_enumerate_port_multiplier(

  static int
 3334 si_read_portmult_reg(

 3454 static int
 3455 si_write_portmult_reg(

 4009 static void
 4010 si_recover_portmult_errors(

Without any deeper knowledge I would guess that bringing back PM support should
only involve some (minor?) tweaking of the existing code.

My sincere apologies to everybody I misled by my postings. I should've
done some research before posting. Sorry for that.

Attila


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Linda Kateley
I will personally apologize for the spam on the nexenta forums.. The 
other guy quit months ago and it took me awhile to catch on... If you 
see anymore spam please let me know, right now i feel like i have it 
under control...Our company is growing at 400% and the forums got 
overlooked...


lk

On 10/11/11 2:12 PM, qutic development wrote:

On 11.10.2011, at 21:05, Linda Kateley wrote:


We have redmine running already and forums are available.

The problem with these forums from nexenta is, that there are a lot (!) of spam 
posts and nobody from nexenta cares about it...

Ps.: This rant is not about radiant at all - we are using it too for our 
projects...
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



--
Linda Kateley
Global Evangelist and Community Manager
(mobile) 612-807-6349
(email) linda.kate...@nexenta.com
(skype) lkateley



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread qutic development
On 11.10.2011, at 21:05, Linda Kateley wrote:

> We have redmine running already and forums are available.

The problem with these forums from nexenta is, that there are a lot (!) of spam 
posts and nobody from nexenta cares about it...

Ps.: This rant is not about radiant at all - we are using it too for our 
projects...
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Linda Kateley

Sorry i so late to this party..

So i was hired by nexenta as community manager. i have illumos as one of 
my communities. We have redmine running already and forums are 
available. I have only been at this for a short time, but it appears 
that most of the distro's come from illumos, and that might be the right 
location for general solaris admin info. I actually have that on my list 
of things to do... My first project was going to be around smf.


Anyone who would like to help.. I am all for that. Please contact me 
directly


lk

On 10/8/11 6:20 PM, LinuxBSDos.com wrote:

So if you are still open to helping, that makes two persons who are ready
to help with a forum-type setting.


--
Fini D.
http://LinuxBSDos.com



Keep in mind that the current wiki is outdated and disorganized. I offered
to help with it, but got no reply and still have no wiki account.

--
Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam)
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss




___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



--
Linda Kateley
Global Evangelist and Community Manager
(mobile) 612-807-6349
(email) linda.kate...@nexenta.com
(skype) lkateley



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI and GNU grep

2011-10-11 Thread Guido Berhoerster
* Richard Jones  [2011-10-11 18:42]:
> I'm probably being really thick, but what's going on here?
> 
>set | grep -i grep
>$ which grep
>/usr/gnu/bin/grep
>$ echo foo | grep '[A-Z]'
>foo
> 
> I get the expected behaviour on linux boxes with GNU grep.

That this works in any locale in Linux a GNUism, you cannot rely
on the portability of such a contruct in anything but the POSIX
locale (see also
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap09.html#tag_09_03_05)
because ranges inside bracket expressions depend on the order of
characters in a locale.  If you want it to work the way you
expected it to work set LC_ALL=C or LC_COLLATE=C.

-- 
Guido Berhoerster

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI and GNU grep

2011-10-11 Thread Alan Coopersmith

On 10/11/11 09:42 AM, Richard Jones wrote:

I'm probably being really thick, but what's going on here?

set | grep -i grep
$ which grep
/usr/gnu/bin/grep
$ echo foo | grep '[A-Z]'
foo

I get the expected behaviour on linux boxes with GNU grep.


Run "locale" to see what locale you are running in:

$ echo foo | env LANG='C' /usr/gnu/bin/grep '[A-Z]'
$ echo foo | env LANG='en_US.UTF-8' /usr/gnu/bin/grep '[A-Z]'
foo

The Solaris UTF-8 locales use case insensitive ordering, so [A-Z]
expands to A, a, B, b, C, c, ... Y, y, Z.

The C locale uses ASCII value ordering, so [A-Z] expands to
A, B, C, ... Y, Z.

--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OI and GNU grep

2011-10-11 Thread Jonathan Adams
jadams@jadlaptop:~$ set | grep -i grep
jadams@jadlaptop:~$ which grep
/usr/bin/grep
jadams@jadlaptop:~$ echo foo | grep '[A-Z]'
jadams@jadlaptop:~$ echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/ccs/bin:/opt/tools/bin:/usr/gnu/bin
jadams@jadlaptop:~$

On 11 October 2011 17:42, Richard Jones  wrote:
> I'm probably being really thick, but what's going on here?
>
>   set | grep -i grep
>   $ which grep
>   /usr/gnu/bin/grep
>   $ echo foo | grep '[A-Z]'
>   foo
>
> I get the expected behaviour on linux boxes with GNU grep.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
> --
> Richard Jones                 +44 7843 588 599
>   "Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur"
> Privacy notice:         jonze.com/privacy.html
>
> ___
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] OI and GNU grep

2011-10-11 Thread Richard Jones
I'm probably being really thick, but what's going on here?

   set | grep -i grep
   $ which grep
   /usr/gnu/bin/grep
   $ echo foo | grep '[A-Z]'
   foo

I get the expected behaviour on linux boxes with GNU grep.

Thanks,

Richard

-- 
Richard Jones +44 7843 588 599
   "Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur"
Privacy notice: jonze.com/privacy.html

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Apache error on reboot

2011-10-11 Thread Gary Gendel
I've got a machine that I've been upgrading since about snv_64ish.  
Since upgrading to OpenIndiana (and possibly slightly before) apache 
doesn't come up after a reboot.  Since I don't reboot this very much I 
keep forgetting about this problem.  I've having frequent power failures 
lately which have caused me to shut down my servers and bring them up 
later so I've been reminded again.


For some reason I end up with a permission error when it's trying to 
create the /var/run/apache2/2.2 directory.  The offending line is in the 
apachectl script:


mkdir -p /var/run/apache2/2.2

Which makes sense if this script is not being as root since "ls -l 
/var/run" is:


drwxr-xr-x 18 root sys 3503 2011-10-10 18:29 /var/run

What needs to be fixed on my apache installation so I don't need to fix 
it every boot?


Regards,
Gary


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zones advice

2011-10-11 Thread Lleo
 Thanks for the advice.  The zones directory was located on a mirrored 
pool in scsi extension cabinet on channel B.  Moved the zones to drives 
on channel A and the problem seems to have disappeared.  Must be a 
problem with the extension cable - I guess.  But I do appreciate the 
write back.


On 10/11/11 10:18 AM, Linda Kateley wrote:
I have seen that error when /etc/zones was on shared storage... had a 
customer try to run it on qfs.


where is your /etc/zones directory?

lk

On 10/10/11 8:53 PM, l...@lwordshop.com wrote:

Trying to found out the cause for this error when I start  the zonecfg
command.

zonecfg: Could not access zone configuration store: Miscellaneous file
system error

I know it is a bit vague - but I was wondering if anyone has any 
advice on

which direction to research.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss






___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana-discuss Digest: gibberish post

2011-10-11 Thread Gregory Youngblood
I can relate - my daughter has been playing with phones since she was a few 
months old - she's 4 now. :) I can't speak for the others, but I found your 
message a nice distraction to the long-running forum v list thread that's been 
going on. 

On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Butch Whitby wrote:

> Sorry about the gibberish message. Apparently my two year old had my 
> blackberry at some point.
> Sent from my BlackBerry


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Zones advice

2011-10-11 Thread Linda Kateley
I have seen that error when /etc/zones was on shared storage... had a 
customer try to run it on qfs.


where is your /etc/zones directory?

lk

On 10/10/11 8:53 PM, l...@lwordshop.com wrote:

Trying to found out the cause for this error when I start  the zonecfg
command.

zonecfg: Could not access zone configuration store: Miscellaneous file
system error

I know it is a bit vague - but I was wondering if anyone has any advice on
which direction to research.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



--
Linda Kateley
Global Evangelist and Community Manager
(mobile) 612-807-6349
(email) linda.kate...@nexenta.com
(skype) lkateley



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Jonathan Adams
+1

On 11 October 2011 15:32, Ken Gunderson  wrote:
> Hello Peter:
>
> I think your accusations of bikeshedding are unfounded and unkind. Many
> stayed out of this discussion until noting that a few oi-dev regulars
> like Alasdair, jeffpc, drlou, herzen, etc. expressed some interest in
> exploring possibility of forums.  Such being the case, it seems more
> than appropriate for further discussion to occur on oi-discuss - note
> the word following the hyphen there - where a broader cross section of
> oi users might have the opportunity to weigh in.
>
> I have been involved in various projects over the years that that
> utilized mlm long before forums were an option.  Yet when some, e.g.
> FreeBSD, finally acknowledged the changing times the issue was discussed
> before anyone ran out and launched forums.freebsd.org.  To the best of
> my knowledge I have _never_ used these forums, but I don't bitch about
> them being available for others. Or that others talked about it at some
> length before moving forward with rolling them out.
>
> Yes, the forum issue has come up before in oi, but to my awareness, not
> for a little while now, and not ever discussed in any depth.  Yeah, us
> old dogs have seen these arguments before and may have  a tendency to
> sigh and shake our heads.  But that doesn't make them irrelevant to the
> discussion at hand.
>
> People disagreeing, discussing, etc. on oi-discuss is not a bad thing.
> Yes, a couple people got a bit heated and sunk to some mild name
> calling, but this was nothing even close to what happens from time to
> time on even high profile projects. Those so easily offended need to
> grow thicker skin. Maybe never move out from Mommy's house. Or
> whatever.
>
> My $0.02
>
> Peace--
>
> --
> Regards-- Ken Gunderson
>
>
> ___
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 09:16 +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Dan Swartzendruber  
> wrote:
> >
> > And this continues to miss the point.
> ...
> >but honestly, it's beyond frustrating to find out that
> > there is no obvious way to do the /etc/rc.local thing I kvetched about
> > earlier
> 
> Which point are you missing? You rc.local thing is trivially easy
> to address, there are well known and obvious ways to do it, and
> several people pointed out how you could do so in a few seconds.
> 
> There are lots of things in OI that need fixing, seeing people making
> up non-existent problems and bikeshedding about forums vs smtp
> and users vs developers and OS choices is so frustrating.

Hello Peter:

I think your accusations of bikeshedding are unfounded and unkind. Many
stayed out of this discussion until noting that a few oi-dev regulars
like Alasdair, jeffpc, drlou, herzen, etc. expressed some interest in
exploring possibility of forums.  Such being the case, it seems more
than appropriate for further discussion to occur on oi-discuss - note
the word following the hyphen there - where a broader cross section of
oi users might have the opportunity to weigh in.

I have been involved in various projects over the years that that
utilized mlm long before forums were an option.  Yet when some, e.g.
FreeBSD, finally acknowledged the changing times the issue was discussed
before anyone ran out and launched forums.freebsd.org.  To the best of
my knowledge I have _never_ used these forums, but I don't bitch about
them being available for others. Or that others talked about it at some
length before moving forward with rolling them out.

Yes, the forum issue has come up before in oi, but to my awareness, not
for a little while now, and not ever discussed in any depth.  Yeah, us
old dogs have seen these arguments before and may have  a tendency to
sigh and shake our heads.  But that doesn't make them irrelevant to the
discussion at hand. 

People disagreeing, discussing, etc. on oi-discuss is not a bad thing.
Yes, a couple people got a bit heated and sunk to some mild name
calling, but this was nothing even close to what happens from time to
time on even high profile projects. Those so easily offended need to
grow thicker skin. Maybe never move out from Mommy's house. Or
whatever. 

My $0.02

Peace--

-- 
Regards-- Ken Gunderson


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Customized startup commands?

2011-10-11 Thread Dan Swartzendruber

I think I've converged on a solution.  Rather than some start-up hack, I'm
going to put the cleanup command at the beginning of each script.  Reason:
apparently even just hot-plugging a sata drive in and unplugging it caused
some turds to be left in the device space.  Does anyone know why this
happens?


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Dan Swartzendruber

I'm really trying to avoid getting back into a flamefest, but I detest it
when people are intellectually dishonst (which are you being by quoting part
of my message out of context.)  Sad...

-Original Message-
From: Peter Tribble [mailto:peter.trib...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:16 AM
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Dan Swartzendruber 
wrote:
>
> And this continues to miss the point.
...
>but honestly, it's beyond frustrating to find out that
> there is no obvious way to do the /etc/rc.local thing I kvetched about
> earlier

Which point are you missing? You rc.local thing is trivially easy
to address, there are well known and obvious ways to do it, and
several people pointed out how you could do so in a few seconds.

There are lots of things in OI that need fixing, seeing people making
up non-existent problems and bikeshedding about forums vs smtp
and users vs developers and OS choices is so frustrating.

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana-discuss Digest: gibberish post

2011-10-11 Thread Butch Whitby
Sorry about the gibberish message. Apparently my two year old had my blackberry 
at some point.
Sent from my BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:15:34 
To: 
Reply-To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: OpenIndiana-discuss Digest, Vol 15, Issue 25

Send OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list submissions to
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
openindiana-discuss-ow...@openindiana.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OpenIndiana-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Help with website (Alasdair Lumsden)
   2. Re: Help with website (Richard L. Hamilton)
   3. Re: Help with website (Dan Swartzendruber)
   4. A (Butch Whitby)
   5. Re: A (Dan Swartzendruber)
   6. Re: Help with website (Alasdair Lumsden)
   7. Re: Help with website (Gregory Youngblood)
   8. Re: A (Gregory Youngblood)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:56:04 +0100
From: Alasdair Lumsden 
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website
Message-ID: <4e939424.3080...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi All,

Please, for the sake of everybody's sanity, can people chill out and 
stop arguing.

This thread started as someone wanting to volunteer to help the project, 
and it has descended into a flame fest. I'd kindly ask that people 
respect the rules of the mailing list and stop flaming each other.

Remember this is a public forum, and when people google your name, they 
will find these posts; they are preserved forever.

Think before hitting the send button.

Regards,

Alasdair



--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:56:16 -0400
From: "Richard L. Hamilton" 
To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana

Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website
Message-ID: <3e68a0c9-3487-4ee0-be23-8e751b0a7...@smart.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252


On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:

> 
> Richard, you continue to miss the point.  This isn't about you (OS) vs me
> (linux).  I would wager that for every opensolaris user there are at least
> 10 linux users.  Getting them to use OS (which is better in many ways,
> granted), making the environment more familiar is essential, IMO.  You are
> of course, free to disagree.  Just saying, I've been through this before?

That assumes that there's a benefit of converting people from Linux to OS/OI.

I see no benefit for OS/OI users (numbers of users rather than clue-bringers 
don't build a community) nor for that matter, for the Linux users, in promoting 
that conversion on terms that displace those already there to make room for 
those coming over.

Unless of course you really think that OS/OI is well short of the minimum 
viable number.  I don't happen to think that's the case, but I'll admit I'm 
biased towards smaller numbers anyway, since the majority is nothing to brag 
about (look at a bell curve sometime).

I'd go so far as to say why not take some existing migration guide and flesh it 
out.  Or improve coexistence, if a migration guide would impose too much of a 
burden on the newcomers.  Or whatever.  But don't expect those already here to 
take in the shorts for the sake of attracting newcomers.  It's exactly like the 
border debate.  My view is that those here should not have to accommodate 
themselves to new arrivals.  Let them assimilate or go back.  We may need some 
immigrants?on _our_ terms, but if we need them on _their_ terms, we're already 
dead as a distinct community.




--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:59:51 -0400
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" 
To: "'Discussion list for OpenIndiana'"

Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="us-ascii"


Alasdair, thank you.  I apologize for my intemperate language.  The
frustration at people's apparent inability to get the point I was trying to
make doesn't justify it.




--

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:03:12 +
From: "Butch Whitby" 
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] A
Message-ID:

<420246489-1318294993-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-675200187-@b14.c31.bise6.blackberry>

Content-Type: text/plain

Jjjk


KkKkik

De

Sent from my BlackBerry



--

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:04:14 -0400
From: "Dan Swartzendruber" 
To: "'Discussion list for OpenIndia

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Doug Hughes

On 10/11/2011 6:10 AM, Dmitry Kozhinov wrote:

 > doesn't "pull" let them manage their own time better?

Yes. This is why my vote is for forum, not mailing list.

Dmitry.



I've stayed out of this thread thus far, and probably will going 
forward, but I vastly prefer mail lists and I think the above is a 
non-argument. Forums do not allow better time management by any 
objective means. In a mail list, I am equally capable of sending all of 
the mail list to a folder, or not, threaded in my mail reader, or not, 
as I choose, and I can read them whenever I want. If I see a topic pop 
up that interests me, I can read it then, or not. I can make agile 
changes in my interests easily.


Forums have one major failing for me: Out of sight is out of mind.

If I have to go to a website, login (maybe it has cookies, maybe it 
doesn't; maybe it does and I don't want the website to remember my 
password!) then find the thread or topic where I left off, which will 
take a few clicks or more depending upon how long it has been. Mail 
messages are all right there, and I only need to go to the most recent 
undeleted or unread one with less effort.


But, there is also a tradeoff in volume. If a mail list starts receiving 
100s of messages a day it becomes less useful and it might as well be a 
forum. Linux kernel development lists come to mind. Those would be more 
useful as a forum. There are very few topics in there that actually 
might interest me and the flood of mail makes it a chore. OI is a 
smallish mail list (aside from this thread!) so managing the (normally) 
20 messages that come in in a day is easier in my inbox.


thresholds matter.

$.02


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Question regarding OI148, SI3124 and port multiplier Sil3726

2011-10-11 Thread Matt Connolly

On 08/10/2011, at 8:29 AM, Albert Lee  wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Stefano Del Corno
>  wrote:
>> Hi, I'm sorry if the question have been already discussed in the past:
>> I'm having an issue with a PCI-e 3132 SATA card and a 3726 port
>> multiplier. Digging both the internet and OI discussions, I had the
>> feeling that this specific combination is working fine in a few
>> different environments.
>> 
>> http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2011-January/002209.html
>> http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2011-May/003998.html
>> 
>> I've loaded latest "ide" firmware (B7703) on my 3132 card. I tested
>> the pci-e card, the port multiplier and 4 attached sata drives under
>> linux: everything was working fine. I did also a couple of "raw"
>> performance tests with good results. Given the good experience under
>> "another OS" and given that I saw positive reports of SIL port
>> multipliers with SIL based SATA boards, I dropped both the card and
>> the port multiplier in my OpenIndiana box.
>> 
>> I'm running OI 148 on a SuperMicro X7SPA-H board. It's booting from a
>> couple of USB drives (forming a mirrored rpool). Right now I'm using 4
>> out of 6 internal sata connectors to drive a small SSD and 3 1.5tb
>> drives. My plan is to add the above mentioned 3124 + 3726 + 4drives to
>> my OpenIndiana box to test different protection schemes and run some
>> "zpool send" tests.
>> 
>> The issue I'm experiencing is that I can only see the first drive
>> (port 0) I've attached to the port multiplier.
>> 
> 
> I'm not sure where you heard otherwise, but only the ahci driver
> supports SATA port multipliers.
> 
> -Albert

I have a Si3124 4 port SATA card, and could only get it to work with the 
pic-ide drivers. It also doesn't support hot plugging / reconfiguration via 
cfgadm. 


Matt. 


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Dmitry Kozhinov

> doesn't "pull" let them manage their own time better?

Yes. This is why my vote is for forum, not mailing list.

Dmitry.

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] A

2011-10-11 Thread Colin Ellis
The only email to be successfully delivered by blackberry and it was an
unfortunate trouser accident.

Why oh why doesn't blackberry have auto key lock?
On Oct 11, 2011 2:26 AM, "Dan Swartzendruber"  wrote:

> LOL
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Youngblood [mailto:greg...@youngblood.me]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:16 PM
> To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] A
>
> Pocket-emailing?
>
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
>
> > Tourette's?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Butch Whitby [mailto:jwhit...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:03 PM
> > To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> > Subject: [OpenIndiana-discuss] A
> >
> > Jjjk
> >
> >
> > KkKkik
> >
> > De
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry
> >
> > ___
> > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
>
> ___
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Peter Tribble
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Dan Swartzendruber  wrote:
>
> And this continues to miss the point.
...
>but honestly, it's beyond frustrating to find out that
> there is no obvious way to do the /etc/rc.local thing I kvetched about
> earlier

Which point are you missing? You rc.local thing is trivially easy
to address, there are well known and obvious ways to do it, and
several people pointed out how you could do so in a few seconds.

There are lots of things in OI that need fixing, seeing people making
up non-existent problems and bikeshedding about forums vs smtp
and users vs developers and OS choices is so frustrating.

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Howto proceed, when new to (openindiana) development

2011-10-11 Thread Per Sjoholm

Currently I'm running a centos 5 server.

I have a spare machine that I have centos6(C6) and OpenIndiana 151a(oi).
This machine is replacing the current server and will have x TB of disk.
Thinking of 4-5 x WD RE4 2Tb/1TB to start with

It's a mbr boot, NOT a EFI boot.
I'm also testing out GPT label disks.
2 disks c2 80gb ata(mbr) and on c3 a 320GB sata(GPT).
oi on a c2 p2
Created a zpool tank with one partition from c2 and c3.
tank kan be seen from C6 and from oi.

Planning on changing to openindiana, primarily to get ZFS and zones.

I run web,dns,dhcp, tftp, sendmail, torrents, fax(connected to sendmail), 
backup  and use a UPS
The new server is also handling backup and storage for clients.

Does packages exist for
hylafax faxhttp://hylafax.sourceforge.net/ (not same as hylafax.org)
bacula  backup http://www.bacula.org/
nut upshttp://www.networkupstools.org/


This means that I have to build a number of packages.
An idea was to build them as a package's to contribute.

I'm new to solaris and experienced in computers and systems.
I have been running a development/system verification test lab with redundent 
sunos blades.

I have a lot to learn :)
I believe in just jumping in.

Suggestion on howto proceed



--
Per Sjöholm
Spanga, Stockholm, Sweden

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Familiarity, was Re: Help with website

2011-10-11 Thread Gabriel de la Cruz
It takes 2 comands to learn smf, swaping from ubuntu to gentoo is damn
harder than reading the Solaris howtos.

I think adoption wont be such a problem in terms of usability
differences with linux, first of all we should start by letting people
notice that we are not dead as they think we are.

Solaris is very well designed in terms of usability, I would rather
make a very fast to read manual.

Br

Gab

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Richard L. Hamilton  wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:25 PM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
>
>>
>> Gregory, I can second that.  I have a friend who is very experienced in
>> Linux and BSD and I was mentioning at dinner how I was using a SAN appliance
>> that was based on ZFS, and started extolling its virtues.  He asked me
>> (totally seriously) "ZFS is still around?  I thought all that stuff died
>> when Oracle bought Sun?"  This is the barrier we have to deal with.  Somehow
>> because I grumbled about commands being somewhat different, I got branded as
>> "one of them", when my original point was that we need to get people using
>> OI (or any other flavor for that matter), or it will end up a fringe system,
>> and ultimately die.  The technical merits don't matter in a lot of ways,
>> when perception comes into it (for you old fogies, think Betamax vs VHS -
>> think which was the better implementation, and which one ended up winning
>> the marketing battle...)  I've had this same fight some years back before
>> linux had plug and play desktop support - I tried to use some random distro
>> and was having incredible hassles getting X to work right.  I was on some
>> forum or other, and people were telling me what juju I had to perform on
>> various config files, and when I made the innocent remark that "with
>> windows, all I have to do is boot it, and it comes up with a usable
>> desktop!", and was flamed into the next county by the residents of that
>> forum.  I really like ZFS, and like I said, that was my only motivation in
>> getting involved in OI (I have enough stuff on my plate without learning yet
>> another flavor of Unix, but one even farther away than Linux variations or
>> even *BSD).  That said, I've had no real choice if I want ZFS, so I'm
>> learning the ropes.  I will say that the previous exchange I had here about
>> the absense of /etc/rc.local was a perfect example (albeit a minor one) of
>> the point I was thinking of.  Yes, in pretty much any of the flavors of Unix
>> using the /etc/init.d script system, you can get this to work.  Every Linux
>> distro I've used in the last N years provides the /etc/rc.local method for
>> those corner cases that don't go anywhere else, yet not one person here said
>> "yeah, you know, that IS a useful thing to have, maybe we should consider
>> it".
>
> While it may be useful, it was eliminated (SunOS 4.x used to have it) for 
> what seemed good reasons at the time.  Separate rc files 
> (/etc/rc[S0123].d/[SK]*, with links to /etc/init.d) can be replaced rather 
> than edited, which is more maintainable (think patches, etc).  SMF largely 
> replaced rc files because SMF can track stuff and restart it if it dies.  
> etc.  The differences aren't arbitrary, they're there for a _reason_.
>
> Now, someone could always add an /etc/rc3.d/S999rc_local, which simply runs 
> /etc/rc.local if it exists.  I could do that, so could you.  Looks just like
>
> #! /bin/sh
>
> if [ start = "$1" -a -f /etc/rc.local ]
> then
>        sh /etc/rc.local
> fi
>
> Easy, right?  I don't mind that…much…except it does encourage throwing all 
> the "corner cases that don't go anywhere else" into one big sloppy file, the 
> whole reason it was gotten rid of (along with /usr/local) in the first place.
>
> You would perhaps view familiarity as more important.  Having seen people 
> come and go, and continuity of experience lost, I'd prefer maintainability, 
> and something that could be put under configuration control (think CFengine 
> (open source) or Opsware (commercial), or similar).  Separate rc files, or 
> for that matter SMF methods and manifests, lend themselves to that better 
> than does a single optional rc.local file; or at least, that's AFAIK among 
> the reasons rc.local was done away with.
>
> Again, one could do both; include the hook for rc.local but publicize that it 
> was deprecated and that there were drawbacks to using it in certain 
> circumstances.
>
> Similar considerations may apply to a number (by no means all) of other 
> differences.
>
> You may find the least resistance to something that's a clean superset of 
> traditional Solaris - won't break anything those already used to it are 
> depending on, and the most to that which is incompatible (can only do it one 
> way or the other, but neither tool will handle both ways).
>
>
> ___
> OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
> OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>

___