Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installation on HD = 2TB

2013-02-02 Thread Udo Grabowski (IMK)

On 02/ 2/13 04:47 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:

Well, I'm still puzzled why OI installer and/or gparted won't show you
any info about the drive 


This message is what he sent me a while ago:
Jan 29 05:07:08 openindianadisk has 3907029168 blocks,
which is too large for a 32-bit kernel


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Auto snapshots

2013-02-02 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
 From: Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
 [mailto:openindi...@nedharvey.com]
 
 In 151a5, I had to fiddle with password before time-slider GUI config worked.
 But the present release is 151a7, so maybe that's a resolved issue now.
 Either way, the workaround was trivial, so I would say you can safely call the
 issue resolved.

Yesterday, I built a 151a5 server and upgraded to 151a7.  The bug is still 
present.  A few months ago, I did file a bug report, so eventually I'm sure 
it'll be resolved.  But like I said, the workaround is trivial, so, ...  
whatever.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installation on HD = 2TB

2013-02-02 Thread Jim Klimov

On 2013-02-02 10:59, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote:

On 02/ 2/13 04:47 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:

Well, I'm still puzzled why OI installer and/or gparted won't show you
any info about the drive 


This message is what he sent me a while ago:
Jan 29 05:07:08 openindianadisk has 3907029168 blocks,
which is too large for a 32-bit kernel



Hm... makes sense... and there were discussions in the past on how
to try and enforce a 64-bit kernel/userspace for the installer.
Should in fact happen automatically (with $ISADIR in GRUB menu)
but may fail due to misdetection on some hardware and other
circumstances. Namely - did not fail for me when I was using an
OI livecd to add a 3Tb HDD to a pool of an older (SXCE) server
which did not fully see the disk natively - but agreed to use
the GPT partitioning which I imposed with OI.

I believe, the trick is to edit the GRUB menu during boot (press
e) and modify the kernel and module lines to replace $ISADIR
with explicit amd64, then press b to load this configuration.

If this workaround is needed after installation, it may IMHO be
regarded as a bug, but easily mended by editing the GRUB menu file
in /rpool/boot/grub/menu.lst in a similar fashion (probably best
is to clone the existing entries, to leave ones with autodetection
for reference and to use ones with explicit 64-bitness).

HTH,
///Jim Klimov


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
I am having a really hard time coming up with a plausible explanation for this, 
other than some kind of kernel bug with openindiana...

I have two systems in the office, Dell PowerEdge SC 1435 (Embedded Broadcom 
5721 NIC) and Dell PowerEdge 2950 (Embedded Broadcom 5708 NIC), both running OI 
151a5 or newer.

Inside the office, everything works fine.  But when I go home and VPN into the 
office, I ssh or vnc to these two boxes, and I get packet garbling and 
retransmissions and dropped connections, but *only* on these two machines, and 
*only* from the vpn connection, and *only* for certain specific types of 
traffic.  Here's an example:

I'm on an ssh prompt.  I can type in commands all day and night, it always 
works fine when I'm typing.  (One character at a time, typing via keyboard, I 
can hold down a key and completely fill the screen, 4320 keystrokes no 
problem.)  But I'm following a procedure, so I'm also pasting commands.  
Sometimes when I paste commands, I get PuTTY Fatal Error:  Incoming packet was 
garbled on decryption.  (Disconnected.)

It's not a MTU thing.  (First of all, I checked all the MTU's looking for any 
problems) but a better clue is that I can paste the same command over and over 
and over (obviously the same packet size each time) and it only fails after the 
Nth repititon.  For testing purposes, I ssh into box, and I paste this command:
echo hello there buddy, whatcha doing  /dev/null
Obviously nowhere near the MTU size.  I keep pasting it over and over, until 
connection fails.  Count how many times I can successfully paste it before 
failure.  Repeat.  My results were:  5, 0, 12, 0, 9, 0.  Deterministic inputs, 
nondeterministic outputs.  (Well, probably deterministic, but not determined by 
the inputs that I'm controlling).

I have a workaround.  I ssh into some other machine in the network, and then 
ssh to the machine in question.  Infinite success.  Paste the above command 
until my fingers are tired and I'm satisfied that there's no problem.  The 
problem *only* happens when I ssh (or vnc or whatever) directly to the machine 
from the vpn client.  And obviously, it doesn't happen when I ssh to some other 
machine from the vpn client (and then ssh to the machine in question).

The only difference between the LAN traffic which works perfectly, and the VPN 
traffic that's having a problem, is the fact that the VPN traffic needs to go 
through a router.  It's not the router that's messing up the traffic, or else I 
would expect to see the same problem on a different machine.

It's hard for me to imagine a driver problem that will only affect traffic that 
requires a router.  But maybe.  Maybe there's a broadcom driver problem, that 
doesn't affect LAN traffic but does affect traffic going through a router.

Anyway, I'm at a loss for how to debug further.  I suppose I could create a 
dummy network with a really simple router in between, and see if the problem 
persists, using a different router and no VPN.  Also, if I do that, I'll be 
able to wireshark both sides, to see what happens.  For now, on my VPN, I can 
only wireshark the OI side of the equation; can't wireshark the traffic at my 
VPN endpoint.

I also have one Intel NIC I can stick into one of the machines.
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Jim Klimov

On 2013-02-02 16:32, Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana) wrote:

I am having a really hard time coming up with a plausible explanation for this, 
other than some kind of kernel bug with openindiana...


This may be a (well-known) problem between hardware TCP offload and
IPFilter. Basically, the hardware inserts such changes into packets
that the filter either drops them or processes and some CRCs become
invalid. This happens on various OSes. My memory may be garbled now
(maybe this only pertains to NAT, maybe to any firewalling?), but I
think Darren Reed on this list might fix my description or add more
insight if needed ;)

See this thread for example (and links):
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.ipfilter/8541

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.firewalls.ipfilter/6026

Basically, the workaround for us was to enable this line in /etc/system:

set ip:dohwcksum = 0

to disable hardware offload - so that IPFilter works on original
packets, and reboot. And yes, we (and others with the problem) had
the bge interfaces which are too smart for our own good.

HTH,
//Jim



I have two systems in the office, Dell PowerEdge SC 1435 (Embedded Broadcom 
5721 NIC) and Dell PowerEdge 2950 (Embedded Broadcom 5708 NIC), both running OI 
151a5 or newer.

Inside the office, everything works fine.  But when I go home and VPN into the 
office, I ssh or vnc to these two boxes, and I get packet garbling and 
retransmissions and dropped connections, but *only* on these two machines, and 
*only* from the vpn connection, and *only* for certain specific types of 
traffic.  Here's an example:

I'm on an ssh prompt.  I can type in commands all day and night, it always 
works fine when I'm typing.  (One character at a time, typing via keyboard, I 
can hold down a key and completely fill the screen, 4320 keystrokes no 
problem.)  But I'm following a procedure, so I'm also pasting commands.  
Sometimes when I paste commands, I get PuTTY Fatal Error:  Incoming packet was 
garbled on decryption.  (Disconnected.)

It's not a MTU thing.  (First of all, I checked all the MTU's looking for any 
problems) but a better clue is that I can paste the same command over and over 
and over (obviously the same packet size each time) and it only fails after the 
Nth repititon.  For testing purposes, I ssh into box, and I paste this command:
 echo hello there buddy, whatcha doing  /dev/null
Obviously nowhere near the MTU size.  I keep pasting it over and over, until 
connection fails.  Count how many times I can successfully paste it before 
failure.  Repeat.  My results were:  5, 0, 12, 0, 9, 0.  Deterministic inputs, 
nondeterministic outputs.  (Well, probably deterministic, but not determined by 
the inputs that I'm controlling).

I have a workaround.  I ssh into some other machine in the network, and then 
ssh to the machine in question.  Infinite success.  Paste the above command 
until my fingers are tired and I'm satisfied that there's no problem.  The 
problem *only* happens when I ssh (or vnc or whatever) directly to the machine 
from the vpn client.  And obviously, it doesn't happen when I ssh to some other 
machine from the vpn client (and then ssh to the machine in question).

The only difference between the LAN traffic which works perfectly, and the VPN 
traffic that's having a problem, is the fact that the VPN traffic needs to go 
through a router.  It's not the router that's messing up the traffic, or else I 
would expect to see the same problem on a different machine.

It's hard for me to imagine a driver problem that will only affect traffic that 
requires a router.  But maybe.  Maybe there's a broadcom driver problem, that 
doesn't affect LAN traffic but does affect traffic going through a router.

Anyway, I'm at a loss for how to debug further.  I suppose I could create a 
dummy network with a really simple router in between, and see if the problem 
persists, using a different router and no VPN.  Also, if I do that, I'll be 
able to wireshark both sides, to see what happens.  For now, on my VPN, I can 
only wireshark the OI side of the equation; can't wireshark the traffic at my 
VPN endpoint.

I also have one Intel NIC I can stick into one of the machines.






___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Jim Klimov

As an alternate thought, what OSes and NICs are running on your router,
VPN box (and what sort of VPN is that?), and on those boxes where you
don't have the problem?

I might guess that if the problem happens with Solaris/OI boxes and
does not, for example, happen to Linux and Windows, this might mean
that your network gear mangles packets in some way (why not - VPN and
NAT and even software VLAN might do strange wonders), and while other
OSes might be less picky about packet consistency mismatches, the IP
engine in Solaris (or IPFilter) might be more picky and thus fail...

Or maybe all of the above and the hardware offload (which of course is
not a feature of only bge). From those threads I linked, I incurred
that Solaris 10+ should be (have been?) able to detect and disable
or collaborate with hardware features, at least on some NICs. It may
be that for example e1000g won't show this behavior (being detected
by the engine and either degraded to no offload, or worked-around
otherwise), and bge's - not so for some reason... Again, here I can
only speculate, and there are more knowledgeable experts on the list.

Good luck,
//Jim Klimov

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Jake Young
Thanks Jim!

I've seen similar behavior to what Ed described on a Solaris 10 Sparc box
(V445) that is in a remote office.

I'll try that setting and see if it resolves my issue.

I was VNCing in to an OI box in my office from my laptop via VPN and sshing
in to the V445 box to kick off some backup scripts (which take a long time
to run, due to the slow link to this office).

Oddly enough I never had any issues with the automounter or nfs share I was
backing up the V445 to.  One issue was with the ssh connection between my
OI desktop and the V445 dropping out (note there is very little text output
in my backup script) after an hour or two. My other issue was having the
VNC drop out between my laptop and desktop.  It was setup as a persistent
session, so no big deal, just annoying.

I think the V445 interfaces are bge and the OI desktop is e1000g.

Jake
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Jim Klimov

On 2013-02-02 18:26, Jake Young wrote:

Thanks Jim!

I've seen similar behavior to what Ed described on a Solaris 10 Sparc box
(V445) that is in a remote office.


I think we had something similar too on another setup, but the failure
involved larger packets, i.e. in SCP sessions timing out at 192KB or so.
Note the multiple of power of two in the problem ;)

I recall that the solution had to do with either MTU or the TCP window,
something was mismatched with the deployment's provider. I think it was
a smaller MTU on an intermediate link, and the overflow errors added up.
Maybe the firewall refused fragmented packets or some of the service
packets needed to dynamically reduce MTU, also...

IIRC, they ultimately forced a smallish MTU on the internet-facing
ethernet NIC (further connected to a DSL-Ethernet modem), and this
solved the problem for them...

Today I'd look at SSH-HPC extensions which may improve buffering and
windowing and such for the bulky SSH sessions. Maybe it can help the
running job adapt to changing networking conditions.

HTH,
//Jim


I'll try that setting and see if it resolves my issue.

I was VNCing in to an OI box in my office from my laptop via VPN and sshing
in to the V445 box to kick off some backup scripts (which take a long time
to run, due to the slow link to this office).

Oddly enough I never had any issues with the automounter or nfs share I was
backing up the V445 to.  One issue was with the ssh connection between my
OI desktop and the V445 dropping out (note there is very little text output
in my backup script) after an hour or two. My other issue was having the
VNC drop out between my laptop and desktop.  It was setup as a persistent
session, so no big deal, just annoying.

I think the V445 interfaces are bge and the OI desktop is e1000g.

Jake


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Jim Klimov

On 2013-02-02 18:26, Jake Young wrote:

Oddly enough I never had any issues with the automounter or nfs share I was
backing up the V445 to.  One issue was with the ssh connection between my
OI desktop and the V445 dropping out (note there is very little text output
in my backup script) after an hour or two. My other issue was having the


Speculating on these points, I'd suggest that:
1) NFS is by default over UDP, which may be more resilient to dropped
   packets and adaptation to smaller sizes can be natively bundled.
   The higher-layer programs above UDP (i.e. NFS) have to detect and
   retry the transmissions, however - unlike TCP which should handle
   this sort of problems but may lag until it delivers its payload of
   bytes (the sliding window, usually several typical packets in
   size).

2) SSH drop-out may be timeout-related... See if your server and/or
   client can use (TCP)KeepAlive, or if the script could output more
   data to keep the connection active. Timeouts might be related
   to the IPFilter (NAT entry age, size of session bucket, etc).

3) Speaking of the latter, we had a problem on our firewall with the
   default IPFilter session bucket being very small. I am not sure
   if this was solved in later releases, we applied a fix like this
   at the time (and it's still running):

[root@newgw /lib/svc/method]# gdiff -bu ipfilter.snv_129-orig ipfilter
--- ipfilter.snv_129-orig   2009-11-27 01:07:18.0 +0300
+++ ipfilter2010-06-29 14:07:36.034883267 +0400
@@ -153,7 +153,12 @@
create_services_rules || exit $SMF_EXIT_ERR_CONFIG

[ ! -f ${IPFILCONF} -a ! -f ${IPNATCONF} ]  exit 0
-   ipf -E
+
+   ### Enforce and display state-table sizing
+   ### Jim Klimov, 2009-2010
+ipf -D -T 
fr_statemax=72901,fr_statesize=104147,fr_statemax,fr_statesize -E -T 
fr_statemax,fr_statesize

+   # ipf -E
+
load_ippool || exit $SMF_EXIT_ERR_CONFIG
load_ipf || exit $SMF_EXIT_ERR_CONFIG
load_ipnat || exit $SMF_EXIT_ERR_CONFIG

  In fact, in OI 151a7 I see that the values are set to 5, so
  it seems, while on older Sol10u8 and SXCE it is around 4000.

  Our values were from trial-and-error somewhat; and I think there
  was some math to them as well (google or ask Darren) ;)

HTH,
//Jim



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] new SXCE distribution now available

2013-02-02 Thread Andrej Javoršek
Hello!
OpenSXCE repo seems to have wrong address (or at least it is not in sync
with pkgutil's expectations):
eg.

andrejj@opensxce:~# pkgutil -i SUNWwget
= Fetching new catalog and descriptions (
http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11) if available ...
--2013-02-02 19:35:11--  http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/catalog
Resolving svr4.opensxce.org (svr4.opensxce.org)... failed: node name or
service name not known.
wget: unable to resolve host address `svr4.opensxce.org'

Fetching of catalog failed.

I can not find any workaround to get it (pkgutil withOpenSXCE repo.)
working. After changing pkgutil.conf I'm able to get files from CSW repo.

Best Regards
Andrej




On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Al Hopper a...@logical-approach.com wrote:

 Done!

 The md5sum is  330a82654405c77c8cea903ed18117f2

 And yes - it's logical dash approach dot com   (sorry about that)



 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi Al,
 
  On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Al Hopper a...@logical-approach.com
  wrote:
  
   Martin Bochnig has developed a new Solaris distribution called SXCE.
   It's available at http://www.opensxce.org
  
   My involvement in this project is simply to provide a distribution
  mechanism
   for Martins work.  So, all the credit for this work belongs to Martin
 and
   all the
   complaints related to the quick and dirty opensxce.org website
 should
  be
   sent to me at al at logical dot approach dot com.
 
  I think this was mentioned in another thread, but could you post the
  md5sums (and/or another checksum) on the site? With such a large
  download, many people may wish to verify it.
 
  Cheers,
  Jan
 
  P.S. Your e-mail is ... at logical *dash* approach, right? I got a
  failure otherwise.
 



 --
 Al Hopper
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn

On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, Jim Klimov wrote:


On 2013-02-02 18:26, Jake Young wrote:

Oddly enough I never had any issues with the automounter or nfs share I was
backing up the V445 to.  One issue was with the ssh connection between my
OI desktop and the V445 dropping out (note there is very little text output
in my backup script) after an hour or two. My other issue was having the


Speculating on these points, I'd suggest that:
1) NFS is by default over UDP, which may be more resilient to dropped
  packets and adaptation to smaller sizes can be natively bundled.



From mount_nfs manual page:


 By default, the  transport  protocol  that  the  NFS
 mount  uses  is  the  first available RDMA transport
 supported both by the client and the server.  If  no
 RDMA  transport  is found, then it attempts to use a
 TCP transport or, failing that, a UDP transport,  as
 ordered  in  the /etc/netconfig file. If it does not
 find a connection oriented transport,  it  uses  the
 first available connectionless transport.

So Solaris NFS mounts use TCP by default.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
 From: Jim Klimov [mailto:jimkli...@cos.ru]
 
 Basically, the workaround for us was to enable this line in /etc/system:
 
 set ip:dohwcksum = 0

Oh well, thanks for the suggestion...  Unfortunately, didn't make any 
difference...


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] new SXCE distribution now available

2013-02-02 Thread ken mays


Use the repo link as posted on the opensxce website for now.


--
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 1:39 PM EST Andrej Javoršek wrote:

Hello!
OpenSXCE repo seems to have wrong address (or at least it is not in sync
with pkgutil's expectations):
eg.

andrejj@opensxce:~# pkgutil -i SUNWwget
= Fetching new catalog and descriptions (
http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11) if available ...
--2013-02-02 19:35:11--  http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/catalog
Resolving svr4.opensxce.org (svr4.opensxce.org)... failed: node name or
service name not known.
wget: unable to resolve host address `svr4.opensxce.org'

Fetching of catalog failed.

I can not find any workaround to get it (pkgutil withOpenSXCE repo.)
working. After changing pkgutil.conf I'm able to get files from CSW repo.

Best Regards
Andrej




On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Al Hopper a...@logical-approach.com wrote:

 Done!

 The md5sum is  330a82654405c77c8cea903ed18117f2

 And yes - it's logical dash approach dot com   (sorry about that)



 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi Al,
 
  On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Al Hopper a...@logical-approach.com
  wrote:
  
   Martin Bochnig has developed a new Solaris distribution called SXCE.
   It's available at http://www.opensxce.org
  
   My involvement in this project is simply to provide a distribution
  mechanism
   for Martins work.  So, all the credit for this work belongs to Martin
 and
   all the
   complaints related to the quick and dirty opensxce.org website
 should
  be
   sent to me at al at logical dot approach dot com.
 
  I think this was mentioned in another thread, but could you post the
  md5sums (and/or another checksum) on the site? With such a large
  download, many people may wish to verify it.
 
  Cheers,
  Jan
 
  P.S. Your e-mail is ... at logical *dash* approach, right? I got a
  failure otherwise.
 



 --
 Al Hopper
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Bob Friesenhahn

On Sat, 2 Feb 2013, Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana) wrote:


From: Jim Klimov [mailto:jimkli...@cos.ru]

Basically, the workaround for us was to enable this line in /etc/system:

set ip:dohwcksum = 0


Oh well, thanks for the suggestion...  Unfortunately, didn't make any 
difference...


Unless TCP is offloaded from the kernel (so that checksums are in an 
adaptor card), it is exceedingly difficult for wrong data to pass 
TCP's checksumming and get passed up to the socket that SSH uses. 
However the other end, or an intermediary (e.g. router), can send 
certain TCP packets (and/or ICMP packets) which cause the connection 
to be aborted.  The using software may not be properly prepared to 
deal with TCP connections going away at some random time and may 
mis-diagnose the problem.  This is particularly an issue with software 
using the poll() system call, from which state changes need to be 
evaluated in a particular order or else the wrong diagnosis will be 
made.


Regardless, PUtty is Windows sofware so it is subject to Windows 
TCP/IP stack behavior.


Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Success at last!

2013-02-02 Thread Reginald Beardsley
I got the N40L built w/ OI_151a7 using the LiveCD.  Jim's suggestion of a small 
MBR partition was the key.  

It's a messy process though.  I've got a page on the wiki under storage that 
sort of describes the process.  I'll fill in more detail later. I'm a bit 
nervous that I've missed a detail.  I got beat up pretty badly by issues 
introduced by the 4k sectors and various rabbit holes making all the number 
match.  The cylinders on the ST2000DM001 are not multiples of 4k.  That doesn't 
seem to matter, but it wasted a lot of time.

There's a real need for something simpler for installing a NAS w/ a regular GUI 
console.  I like my text windows.

I created a 3x30 GB mirrored rpool and a 3 disk RAIDZ dpool.  I've got 3.5 TB 
available in the RAIDZ pool and a 64 GB write of /dev/zero reported 199 MB/s.  
It even boots if I remove a disk w/o having to hit F10, so the N40L BIOS is not 
completely hopeless.

Thanks a lot for all the help and guidance.  Now to get my head around writing 
bug reports on format(1m) and fmthard(1m) and possibly some other things.

Have Fun!
Reg

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] weird packet garbling problem

2013-02-02 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (openindiana)
 From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
 
 Unless TCP is offloaded from the kernel (so that checksums are in an
 adaptor card), it is exceedingly difficult for wrong data to pass
 TCP's checksumming and get passed up to the socket that SSH uses.

In the one packet capture that I was able to do so far, running wireshark on 
the OI side of the connection, I saw all the checksums were 0's and triggering 
the bad checksum flag in wireshark.  When I googled around, some wireshark FAQ 
said if all your bad checksums are 0's and only on sent packets (not received 
packets) then it means the checksumming is happening at a layer lower than 
wireshark, and you can ignore the errors, by toggling a checkbox.  This fit the 
description, so I did it.  A lower layer might be either kernel or hardware; 
I don't know.

The second thing I saw was ... For every time I sent/received a single 
character (typing on my keyboard) the OI system received an ssh packet, sent an 
ssh packet (terminal echo), and sent an ssh ACK for the first packet.  But then 
when I pasted some command that caused the failure ... the OI machine saw the 
packet come in, and get repeated like 100 times all within 1ms of each other.  
Then it spewed out like 100 responses, all with about 1ms, and wireshark 
flagged as error, like 100 duplicate ACKs, that were again, all within like 
1ms.  And the TCP FIN.  ...  I know my laptop didn't send like 100 times.  
(First of all, it happened too quickly for that to be possible, second, it only 
happens when connected to an OI server, third, it happens for both ssh and vnc 
traffic.)  It's the sort of thing that makes me suspect some sort of faulty 
interrupt or interrupt handler.  The more I think about it, the more I am 
suspicious of the broadcom NIC driver.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] new SXCE distribution now available

2013-02-02 Thread Al Hopper
That issue has been resolved.

Please contact me directly if you encounter any other issues with
opensxce.org

Thanks,

Al Hopper



On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Andrej Javoršek dr...@ntf.uni-lj.siwrote:

 Hello!
 OpenSXCE repo seems to have wrong address (or at least it is not in sync
 with pkgutil's expectations):
 eg.

 andrejj@opensxce:~# pkgutil -i SUNWwget
 = Fetching new catalog and descriptions (
 http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11) if available ...
 --2013-02-02 19:35:11--  http://svr4.opensxce.org/sparc/5.11/catalog
 Resolving svr4.opensxce.org (svr4.opensxce.org)... failed: node name or
 service name not known.
 wget: unable to resolve host address `svr4.opensxce.org'

 Fetching of catalog failed.

 I can not find any workaround to get it (pkgutil withOpenSXCE repo.)
 working. After changing pkgutil.conf I'm able to get files from CSW repo.

 Best Regards
 Andrej




 On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Al Hopper a...@logical-approach.com
 wrote:

  Done!
 
  The md5sum is  330a82654405c77c8cea903ed18117f2
 
  And yes - it's logical dash approach dot com   (sorry about that)
 
 
 
  On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   Hi Al,
  
   On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Al Hopper a...@logical-approach.com
   wrote:
   
Martin Bochnig has developed a new Solaris distribution called SXCE.
It's available at http://www.opensxce.org
   
My involvement in this project is simply to provide a distribution
   mechanism
for Martins work.  So, all the credit for this work belongs to Martin
  and
all the
complaints related to the quick and dirty opensxce.org website
  should
   be
sent to me at al at logical dot approach dot com.
  
   I think this was mentioned in another thread, but could you post the
   md5sums (and/or another checksum) on the site? With such a large
   download, many people may wish to verify it.
  
   Cheers,
   Jan
  
   P.S. Your e-mail is ... at logical *dash* approach, right? I got a
   failure otherwise.
  
 
 
 
  --
  Al Hopper
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss




-- 
Al Hopper
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss