[OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
I've been trying to find what powerloss protected SSDs are available in sweden. The only ones I can find that are generally available are Samsung 843 and Intel S3500. The Intel S3500 costs about 1300 SEK (145 €??) each at 120GB. The Seagates are NOT available anywhere that I can see. Samsung 843 are available from two resellers only, and are only very slightly more expensive than the S3500 at 120GB. The Intel S3700 is also available but is twice the price, at least. What say you, crowd, to these possibilities? Samsung or Intel? They are both so expensive that I hesitate to mirror them. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Compiling OpenOffice4
Has this moved forward yet? On 2014-02-06 18:51, carl brunning wrote: If no one else will hosts it then yes I will put it on my website and give a link to it for other till a better place for it happens Thank Carl -Original Message- From: Apostolos Syropoulos [mailto:asyropou...@yahoo.com] Sent: 06 February 2014 16:32 To: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Compiling OpenOffice4 On Thursday, February 6, 2014 5:14 PM, carl brunning ca...@flamewarestudios.com wrote: Hay that great One question were I find and download GCC 4.8.2 Provided one can host it, I can contribute a package. A.S. -- Apostolos Syropoulos Xanthi, Greece ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] Smart Array driver
Looking at https://www.illumos.org/issues/3881 and http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182190/2013/09/sort/time_rev/page/1/entry/3:14/ I get the impression, the cpqary3 driver should be already available. Could anyone help getting hold of the binaries? Cheers Stefan Acando GmbH, Millerntorplatz 1, 20359 Hamburg, Germany | Geschäftsführer: Guido Ahle | Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 76048 | Ust.Ident-Nr.:DE208833022 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: Samsung 843 The 843 while called and enterprise SSD, does not have capacitors for power loss protection. http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-843/2/ ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Schweiss, Chip c...@innovates.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: Samsung 843 The 843 while called and enterprise SSD, does not have capacitors for power loss protection. http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-843/2/ ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
On 2014-02-10 22:50, Doug Hughes wrote: Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. Also, read at least the official specs - the S3500 seems a lot less reliable than S3700 (which is positioned to be very sturdy at least for an SSD, and would likely be out of fashion long before it breaks). As for the disks I have - trust the later letter which is the shopping spec we used ;) I guess I mixed up the two S-vendors somehow :) //Jim ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-) Regards -- Volker -- Volker A. Brandt Consulting and Support for Oracle Solaris Brandt Brandt Computer GmbH WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/ Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim, GERMANYEmail: v...@bb-c.de Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513 Schuhgröße: 46 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J.H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Low low end server
2014.02.09. 22:19 keltezéssel, Jim Klimov írta: 2*120Gb Samsung Pro SSDs (with powerloss protection, formatted to use 100Gb for mirrored rpool/mirrored zil/striped l2arc since their 100Gb sub-model has much higher reliability and speed - but is not on sale here). Jim Only one question about the SSD usage. How do I know the SSD status? You know the SSD capacity is decreasing. When have to replace it? Regards Brogyi ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote: This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-) I tend to agree with this. My approach is to slice a Samsung 840 Pro, which holds up performance really well and do an aggressive backup cycle to my disk pool. Turn off sync, and forget about a ZIL unless your running a database. Even still just do a snapshot policy so you have an acceptable fallback point if power loss does bite you. ZFS is consistent even with sync off. -Chip ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
true, Volker.. Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough capacitor to flush anything from the small ram into flash on power outage. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote: Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-) Regards -- Volker -- Volker A. Brandt Consulting and Support for Oracle Solaris Brandt Brandt Computer GmbH WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/ Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim, GERMANYEmail: v...@bb-c.de Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513 Schuhgröße: 46 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J.H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Low low end server
smartctl -x reports the wear on decent ones (read: you shouldn't consider any that doesn't have this feature). When it gets close to 0, or you see a lot of errors, it's time to replace it. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Brogyányi József bro...@gmail.com wrote: 2014.02.09. 22:19 keltezéssel, Jim Klimov írta: 2*120Gb Samsung Pro SSDs (with powerloss protection, formatted to use 100Gb for mirrored rpool/mirrored zil/striped l2arc since their 100Gb sub-model has much higher reliability and speed - but is not on sale here). Jim Only one question about the SSD usage. How do I know the SSD status? You know the SSD capacity is decreasing. When have to replace it? Regards Brogyi ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery Passthrough for this exact application. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Doug Hughes d...@will.to wrote: true, Volker.. Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough capacitor to flush anything from the small ram into flash on power outage. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote: Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-) Regards -- Volker -- Volker A. Brandt Consulting and Support for Oracle Solaris Brandt Brandt Computer GmbH WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/ Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim, GERMANYEmail: v...@bb-c.de Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513 Schuhgröße: 46 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J.H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
capacitors are better. Batteries wear out and are difficult to have the correct monitoring for replacement. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ben Taylor bentaylor.sol...@gmail.comwrote: Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery Passthrough for this exact application. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Doug Hughes d...@will.to wrote: true, Volker.. Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough capacitor to flush anything from the small ram into flash on power outage. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote: Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-) Regards -- Volker -- Volker A. Brandt Consulting and Support for Oracle Solaris Brandt Brandt Computer GmbH WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/ Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim, GERMANYEmail: v...@bb-c.de Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513 Schuhgröße: 46 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J.H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
While I agree that monitoring is good, and batteries wear out, and this is a problem in production environments. For a hobbyist, where I can take down my system without permission from my boss or business unit, it is really that bad of an idea? On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Doug Hughes d...@will.to wrote: capacitors are better. Batteries wear out and are difficult to have the correct monitoring for replacement. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ben Taylor bentaylor.sol...@gmail.com wrote: Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery Passthrough for this exact application. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Doug Hughes d...@will.to wrote: true, Volker.. Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough capacitor to flush anything from the small ram into flash on power outage. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote: Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-) Regards -- Volker -- Volker A. Brandt Consulting and Support for Oracle Solaris Brandt Brandt Computer GmbH WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/ Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim, GERMANYEmail: v...@bb-c.de Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513 Schuhgröße: 46 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J.H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
Wouldn't a UPS with monitoring be a better alternative? Allow the server to power down safely on UPS when it detects a power lost state. Most UPSes I know have either serial or USB monitoring, sometimes even Ethernet on higher-end models (although I've never looked at the monitoring systems in depth, YMMV). ' With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.' Those words were uttered by Judge Aaron Satie as wisdom and warning... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on we’re all damaged. - Jean-Luc Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie, Star Trek: TNG episode The Drumhead - Alex Smith - Dulles Technology Corridor (Chantilly/Ashburn/Dulles), Virginia USA On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Ben Taylor bentaylor.sol...@gmail.comwrote: While I agree that monitoring is good, and batteries wear out, and this is a problem in production environments. For a hobbyist, where I can take down my system without permission from my boss or business unit, it is really that bad of an idea? On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Doug Hughes d...@will.to wrote: capacitors are better. Batteries wear out and are difficult to have the correct monitoring for replacement. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Ben Taylor bentaylor.sol...@gmail.com wrote: Surprised someone hasn't developed a SATA power cable with small battery Passthrough for this exact application. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Doug Hughes d...@will.to wrote: true, Volker.. Just to note though, the 320s have no battery, but they do have enough capacitor to flush anything from the small ram into flash on power outage. On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote: Why not Intel 320 series? Also 710 series work fine for this, for a bit more $$ and a bit more speed. The 320 are not as fast as the S3700 or S3500 but they are a LOT less expensive. This thread started out as a discussion of the merits of the HP N54L microserver for home use. I am not really sure if a home server needs mirrored battery-protected SSDs. :-) Regards -- Volker -- Volker A. Brandt Consulting and Support for Oracle Solaris Brandt Brandt Computer GmbH WWW: http://www.bb-c.de/ Am Wiesenpfad 6, 53340 Meckenheim, GERMANYEmail: v...@bb-c.de Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 10513 Schuhgröße: 46 Geschäftsführer: Rainer J.H. Brandt und Volker A. Brandt When logic and proportion have fallen sloppy dead ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] iostat - sum of the parts
I have asked this question before but I am going to try to rephrase it. when i look at the output from iostat -nMxCz 1 i see something that looks like following on my shinny new servers running 151a9. I was previously rev-locked on 151a1. my question is why do the numbers for the zpool not resemble the sum of the parts? for example busy reports 56% for the pool but no device in the pool is more than 40% busy, in this example. Or why does wait report 5171ms when the devices are report 0. Does wait reflect the flush timer that is 5 seconds by default? extended device statistics r/s w/s Mr/s Mw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 3676.030115.6 9.5 140.70.1 4.30.00.1 0 339 c3 422.04002.91.3 13.9 0.0 0.50.00.1 2 40 c3t55CD2E404B41906Cd0 455.03991.01.3 14.0 0.0 0.50.00.1 2 39 c3t55CD2E404B417F40d0 442.04028.91.4 14.0 0.0 0.50.00.1 2 37 c3t55CD2E404B417E7Bd0 509.04008.91.2 14.0 0.0 0.50.00.1 2 36 c3t55CD2E404B417F07d0 390.04001.91.2 14.0 0.0 0.50.00.1 1 38 c3t55CD2E404B417F34d0 285.02033.00.7 14.2 0.0 0.30.00.1 1 27 c3t55CD2E404B41903Dd0 280.02062.00.7 14.2 0.0 0.30.00.1 1 29 c3t55CD2E404B417EDFd0 301.01999.00.6 14.2 0.0 0.40.00.2 1 31 c3t55CD2E404B417F8Ad0 304.02011.00.6 14.2 0.0 0.40.00.2 1 33 c3t55CD2E404B417B32d0 288.01977.00.6 14.2 0.0 0.40.00.2 1 29 c3t55CD2E404B4063DDd0 3676.0 29045.69.5 140.7 5171.0 4.8 158.00.1 51 56 data ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] iostat - sum of the parts
On 10 February 2014 18:02, jason matthews ja...@broken.net wrote: my question is why do the numbers for the zpool not resemble the sum of the parts? for example busy reports 56% for the pool but no device in the pool is more than 40% busy, in this example. In both cases, the % busy column can be somewhat misleading. Essentially, this column represents the amount of time that we were waiting on the device to complete some number of I/O operations. That is: for that percentage of the last refresh interval, we were waiting on _at least one_ I/O operation. For the remainder of the interval the device was idle. This applies to the data pool, as well: some amount of the time it is servicing I/O requests (the %b figure), and some amount of the time it is idle. Critically, for data to be busy only _one_ of its underlying disks must be busy; busyness for data is the percentage of the last interval where _at least one disk_ had _at least one inflight I/O operation_. -- Joshua M. Clulow UNIX Admin/Developer http://blog.sysmgr.org ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
Is that really true: The press reslease from Samsung in the US said explicitly: The integrated Power loss function includes tantalum capacitors, thus ensuring the data is written while power failure. On 2014-02-10 22:32, Schweiss, Chip wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: Samsung 843 The 843 while called and enterprise SSD, does not have capacitors for power loss protection. http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-843/2/ ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
The SSD I'm looking at is a Samsung 843T, note the T. Maybe there's a non - T variety w/o the powerloss protection?? On 2014-02-11 08:28, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: Is that really true: The press reslease from Samsung in the US said explicitly: The integrated Power loss function includes tantalum capacitors, thus ensuring the data is written while power failure. On 2014-02-10 22:32, Schweiss, Chip wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: Samsung 843 The 843 while called and enterprise SSD, does not have capacitors for power loss protection. http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-843/2/ ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Powerloss protected SSDs for ...Re: Low low end server
That was it. The 843 has no powerloss protection short-term backup power supply, the 843T does have tantalum powerloss backup caps. On 2014-02-11 08:42, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: The SSD I'm looking at is a Samsung 843T, note the T. Maybe there's a non - T variety w/o the powerloss protection?? On 2014-02-11 08:28, Hans J. Albertsson wrote: Is that really true: The press reslease from Samsung in the US said explicitly: The integrated Power loss function includes tantalum capacitors, thus ensuring the data is written while power failure. On 2014-02-10 22:32, Schweiss, Chip wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote: Samsung 843 The 843 while called and enterprise SSD, does not have capacitors for power loss protection. http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/samsung-843/2/ ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
