[OpenIndiana-discuss] /hipster-2015: library/lzo package problem

[Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator]

Hi all,

I am running system which was upgraded from 151a7 -> 151a9 -> /hipster 
-> /hipster-2014 -> /hipster-2015 and now I am faced with being unable 
to get rid of library/lzo package from old sfe repository 
(http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe publisher):


$  pkg info library/lzo
   Name: library/lzo
Summary: Lossless data compression library
   Category: System/Libraries
  State: Installed
  Publisher: sfe
Version: 2.6
 Branch: 0.151.1.5
 Packaging Date: August  7, 2012 06:15:21 PM
   Size: 361.69 kB
   FMRI: pkg://sfe/library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5:20120807T181521Z
Project Contact: Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer 
Project URL: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
 Source URL: 
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/download/lzo-2.06.tar.gz


Package has wrong Version number, and:

$ pfexec pkg uninstall -vn library/lzo
Creating Plan (Solver setup): -
pkg uninstall: Unable to remove 'library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5' due to the 
following packages that depend on it:

  compress/lzop@1.0.3-2014.0.1.0
  library/desktop/cairo@1.14.2-2015.0.1.0

E.G:
$ pkg contents -m library/desktop/cairo | grep lzo
depend fmri=pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 type=require

$ pfexec pkg install -v pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
Creating Plan (Solver setup): \
pkg install: No matching version of library/lzo can be installed:

$ pkg search -r pkg:/library/lzo
INDEX  ACTION VALUE PACKAGE
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 
pkg:/backup/bacula/bacula-sd@5.2.13-2015.0.1.1
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.0.1.0 
pkg:/compress/lzop@1.0.3-2014.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 
pkg:/library/desktop/cairo@1.14.2-2015.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 
pkg:/backup/bacula/bacula-fd@5.2.13-2015.0.1.1
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 
pkg:/network/openvpn@2.3.8-2015.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 
pkg:/games/openttd@1.5.1-2015.0.1.0


No library/lzo@2.0.6-* package listed? So, my question is:

How to replace library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5 with 
library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 package?


Best regards.
--
Predrag Zečević
Technical Support Analyst
2e Systems GmbH

Telephone: +49 6196 9505 815, Facsimile: +49 6196 9505 894
Mobile:+49  174 3109 288, Skype: predrag.zecevic
E-mail:predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com

Headquarter:  2e Systems GmbH, Königsteiner Str. 87,
  65812 Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany
Company registration: Amtsgericht Königstein (Germany), HRB 7303
Managing director:Phil Douglas

http://www.2e-systems.com/ - Making your business fly!

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New packaged LibreOffice4

[Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator]

On 10/27/15 10:05 AM, Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator wrote:

On 10/26/15 09:13 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:

On 10/26/2015 11:01, Nikola M wrote:


Thanks alp, just to check if I understood it right:
OI hipster now removed g++ from oi-userland consolidation so that SFE
g++ and SFE packages will be working without collisions and g++ is now
installed from SFE with it's packages.

Instalaltions of SFE g++ happens in place of previously OI
hipster-compiled g++ and that is not the issue for OI hipster itself
because it does not depend on them?


It's not an issue as we don't provide any content in */g++/* packages
(besides rename metadata).



Question is what happens with current installations and are OI
hipster-installed g++ packages replaced by adding SFE repository or some
of them get replaced and some don't.
Are g++ packages from OI hipster removed from oi-userland of they are
still there, but not installed by default, so one installing them can
still see collisions if SFE is added to instal external packages?



We keep A/g++/B packages in /hipster-2015 repository which are marked
renamed and depend on corresponding A/B packages. As libraries are under
/usr/lib now, they are picked by applications.
But if SFE application depends on later library version, it should use
SFE-provided package. I don't know if IPS will fetch it automatically or
user will have to add corresponding package to the list of packages to
install.



Just FYI:

change in /hipster-2015 (
https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/commit/bd7a4342eab3cb61abee46dc9a9a642a4ea2b1f4
) is not eanough to install libreoffice4 package... After some
strugling, I have anded with this "solution":
http://sfe.opencsw.org/newsflash/libreoffice-20151018#comment-41

Best regards.
Sorry for terrible mistakes, my thunderbird 31.8.0 doesn't support spell 
checking.

--
Predrag Zečević
Technical Support Analyst
2e Systems GmbH

Telephone: +49 6196 9505 815, Facsimile: +49 6196 9505 894
Mobile:+49  174 3109 288, Skype: predrag.zecevic
E-mail:predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com

Headquarter:  2e Systems GmbH, Königsteiner Str. 87,
  65812 Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany
Company registration: Amtsgericht Königstein (Germany), HRB 7303
Managing director:Phil Douglas

http://www.2e-systems.com/ - Making your business fly!

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] /hipster-2015: library/lzo package problem

[Alexander Pyhalov]

On 10/27/2015 11:57, Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator wrote:

Hi all,

I am running system which was upgraded from 151a7 -> 151a9 -> /hipster
-> /hipster-2014 -> /hipster-2015 and now I am faced with being unable
to get rid of library/lzo package from old sfe repository
(http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe publisher):

$  pkg info library/lzo
Name: library/lzo
 Summary: Lossless data compression library
Category: System/Libraries
   State: Installed
   Publisher: sfe
 Version: 2.6
  Branch: 0.151.1.5
  Packaging Date: August  7, 2012 06:15:21 PM
Size: 361.69 kB
FMRI: pkg://sfe/library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5:20120807T181521Z
Project Contact: Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer 
 Project URL: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
  Source URL:
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/download/lzo-2.06.tar.gz

Package has wrong Version number, and:

$ pfexec pkg uninstall -vn library/lzo
Creating Plan (Solver setup): -
pkg uninstall: Unable to remove 'library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5' due to the
following packages that depend on it:
   compress/lzop@1.0.3-2014.0.1.0
   library/desktop/cairo@1.14.2-2015.0.1.0

E.G:
$ pkg contents -m library/desktop/cairo | grep lzo
depend fmri=pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 type=require

$ pfexec pkg install -v pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
Creating Plan (Solver setup): \
pkg install: No matching version of library/lzo can be installed:

$ pkg search -r pkg:/library/lzo
INDEX  ACTION VALUE PACKAGE
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/backup/bacula/bacula-sd@5.2.13-2015.0.1.1
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.0.1.0
pkg:/compress/lzop@1.0.3-2014.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/library/desktop/cairo@1.14.2-2015.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/backup/bacula/bacula-fd@5.2.13-2015.0.1.1
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/network/openvpn@2.3.8-2015.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/games/openttd@1.5.1-2015.0.1.0

No library/lzo@2.0.6-* package listed? So, my question is:

How to replace library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5 with
library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 package?

Best regards.


Try pkg update "library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1"

--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Southern Federal University IT department

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] /hipster-2015: library/lzo package problem

[Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator]

On 10/27/15 10:10 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:

On 10/27/2015 11:57, Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator wrote:

Hi all,

I am running system which was upgraded from 151a7 -> 151a9 -> /hipster
-> /hipster-2014 -> /hipster-2015 and now I am faced with being unable
to get rid of library/lzo package from old sfe repository
(http://pkg.openindiana.org/sfe publisher):

$  pkg info library/lzo
Name: library/lzo
 Summary: Lossless data compression library
Category: System/Libraries
   State: Installed
   Publisher: sfe
 Version: 2.6
  Branch: 0.151.1.5
  Packaging Date: August  7, 2012 06:15:21 PM
Size: 361.69 kB
FMRI: pkg://sfe/library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5:20120807T181521Z
Project Contact: Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer 
 Project URL: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/
  Source URL:
http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/download/lzo-2.06.tar.gz

Package has wrong Version number, and:

$ pfexec pkg uninstall -vn library/lzo
Creating Plan (Solver setup): -
pkg uninstall: Unable to remove 'library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5' due to the
following packages that depend on it:
   compress/lzop@1.0.3-2014.0.1.0
   library/desktop/cairo@1.14.2-2015.0.1.0

E.G:
$ pkg contents -m library/desktop/cairo | grep lzo
depend fmri=pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 type=require

$ pfexec pkg install -v pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
Creating Plan (Solver setup): \
pkg install: No matching version of library/lzo can be installed:

$ pkg search -r pkg:/library/lzo
INDEX  ACTION VALUE PACKAGE
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/backup/bacula/bacula-sd@5.2.13-2015.0.1.1
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.0.1.0
pkg:/compress/lzop@1.0.3-2014.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/library/desktop/cairo@1.14.2-2015.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/backup/bacula/bacula-fd@5.2.13-2015.0.1.1
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/network/openvpn@2.3.8-2015.0.1.0
requiredepend pkg:/library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1
pkg:/games/openttd@1.5.1-2015.0.1.0

No library/lzo@2.0.6-* package listed? So, my question is:

How to replace library/lzo@2.6-0.151.1.5 with
library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1 package?

Best regards.


Try pkg update "library/lzo@2.0.6-2014.1.1.1"


Hi Alexander,

yes that has worked... Thanks! I should get to this solution myself...
Best regards.
--
Predrag Zečević
Technical Support Analyst
2e Systems GmbH

Telephone: +49 6196 9505 815, Facsimile: +49 6196 9505 894
Mobile:+49  174 3109 288, Skype: predrag.zecevic
E-mail:predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com

Headquarter:  2e Systems GmbH, Königsteiner Str. 87,
  65812 Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany
Company registration: Amtsgericht Königstein (Germany), HRB 7303
Managing director:Phil Douglas

http://www.2e-systems.com/ - Making your business fly!

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New packaged LibreOffice4

[Predrag Zečević - Unix Systems Administrator]

On 10/26/15 09:13 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:

On 10/26/2015 11:01, Nikola M wrote:


Thanks alp, just to check if I understood it right:
OI hipster now removed g++ from oi-userland consolidation so that SFE
g++ and SFE packages will be working without collisions and g++ is now
installed from SFE with it's packages.

Instalaltions of SFE g++ happens in place of previously OI
hipster-compiled g++ and that is not the issue for OI hipster itself
because it does not depend on them?


It's not an issue as we don't provide any content in */g++/* packages
(besides rename metadata).



Question is what happens with current installations and are OI
hipster-installed g++ packages replaced by adding SFE repository or some
of them get replaced and some don't.
Are g++ packages from OI hipster removed from oi-userland of they are
still there, but not installed by default, so one installing them can
still see collisions if SFE is added to instal external packages?



We keep A/g++/B packages in /hipster-2015 repository which are marked
renamed and depend on corresponding A/B packages. As libraries are under
/usr/lib now, they are picked by applications.
But if SFE application depends on later library version, it should use
SFE-provided package. I don't know if IPS will fetch it automatically or
user will have to add corresponding package to the list of packages to
install.



Just FYI:

change in /hipster-2015 ( 
https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/commit/bd7a4342eab3cb61abee46dc9a9a642a4ea2b1f4 
) is not eanough to install libreoffice4 package... After some 
strugling, I have anded with this "solution": 
http://sfe.opencsw.org/newsflash/libreoffice-20151018#comment-41


Best regards.
--
Predrag Zečević
Technical Support Analyst
2e Systems GmbH

Telephone: +49 6196 9505 815, Facsimile: +49 6196 9505 894
Mobile:+49  174 3109 288, Skype: predrag.zecevic
E-mail:predrag.zece...@2e-systems.com

Headquarter:  2e Systems GmbH, Königsteiner Str. 87,
  65812 Bad Soden am Taunus, Germany
Company registration: Amtsgericht Königstein (Germany), HRB 7303
Managing director:Phil Douglas

http://www.2e-systems.com/ - Making your business fly!

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Network Monitor 2.28.2 and IPv6

[russell]

Hi,

I had Network Monitor enabled so that it would report on network traffic 
on my e1000g1 interface but it only reports the IPv4 network details 
only. Given that e1000g1 is dual stack, is there a version of Network 
Monitor which supports IPv6 addresses?


Regards

Russell

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [HEADS UP] Updating from /dev to /hipster-2015 is now can be possible

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:


I've checked that at least I can update default OI /dev text installation


For those who normally log into a graphical desktop, can this 
procedure be followed from the graphical desktop or is it necessary to 
reduce the init level (e.g. to 2) so there is a minimum of stuff 
running?


Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Does the latest OI version allow ashift=12 for zpool creation?

[andy thomas]

I admit I haven't been on this forum for years, such is the reliability of 
my OI 148 server built in 2011. I'm using 3 x 2 TB WD2002FAEX 512-byte 
sector disks for a ZFS RAIDz1 pool in this and about a year ago, one of 
these disks failed - I tried fitting a more recent WD2002 disk with 4k 
sectors but zpool replace complained about the sector mismatch and in the 
end I had to find another WD2002FAEX (and it was quite expensive too).


This server is now free to be rebuilt so I upgraded it today to OI 151a9 
but the latest zpool doesn't seem to offer the option to set the ashift 
value. I wondered if I installed the latest OI from DVD, destroying the 
original pool, would zpool default to using ashift=12? This would allow me 
to use both 512 and 4096 byte sectors in vdevs.


Andy

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Does the latest OI version allow ashift=12 for zpool creation?

[jason matthews]

If your new drives are misrepresenting their sector size you can 
override the sector size, thanks to george wilson, in sd.conf. this is 
common for SSDs.


http://wiki.illumos.org/display/illumos/List+of+sd-config-list+entries+for+Advanced-Format+drives

You can gather the data for the identifying text from iostat -En or 
format -> select disk -> inquiry


once the zpool created you can verify with zdb -vv  |grep ashfit


j.

On 10/27/15 11:17 AM, andy thomas wrote:
I admit I haven't been on this forum for years, such is the 
reliability of my OI 148 server built in 2011. I'm using 3 x 2 TB 
WD2002FAEX 512-byte sector disks for a ZFS RAIDz1 pool in this and 
about a year ago, one of these disks failed - I tried fitting a more 
recent WD2002 disk with 4k sectors but zpool replace complained about 
the sector mismatch and in the end I had to find another WD2002FAEX 
(and it was quite expensive too).


This server is now free to be rebuilt so I upgraded it today to OI 
151a9 but the latest zpool doesn't seem to offer the option to set the 
ashift value. I wondered if I installed the latest OI from DVD, 
destroying the original pool, would zpool default to using ashift=12? 
This would allow me to use both 512 and 4096 byte sectors in vdevs.


Andy

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [HEADS UP] Updating from /dev to /hipster-2015 is now can be possible

[Alexander Pyhalov]

Bob Friesenhahn писал 27.10.2015 21:19:

On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:


I've checked that at least I can update default OI /dev text 
installation


For those who normally log into a graphical desktop, can this
procedure be followed from the graphical desktop or is it necessary to
reduce the init level (e.g. to 2) so there is a minimum of stuff
running?


I think this can be done into graphical desktop - in any case you should 
operate on alternative BE.

---
System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Broken zpool

[Rainer Heilke]

I don't have a backup. I can't afford the gear to back up terabytes of 
data, which is why I had the zpool on mirrored disks to begin with.


Rainer

On 27/10/2015 12:30 PM, jason matthews wrote:




You may want to consider restoring from backup.

j.

On 10/27/15 7:00 AM, Rainer Heilke wrote:

Greetings.

Some of you may remember that I had a couple disk failures recently.
One of those disk was the mirror for all of my critical data. The
problem is that, no matter what I do, I cannot get the data zpool
functioning:

OpenIndiana (powered by illumos)SunOS 5.11oi_151a9May 2015
rheilke@eris:~$ zpool status -v data
  pool: data
 state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered.  The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
  scan: resilver in progress since Sun Oct 25 02:03:37 2015
602G scanned out of 1.66T at 601K/s, 530h45m to go
601G resilvered, 35.47% done
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
data DEGRADED 1 0 0
  mirror-0   DEGRADED 4 0 0
7152018192933189428  UNAVAIL  0 0 0  was
/dev/dsk/c11t8d1s0
c6d0 ONLINE   0 0 4 (resilvering)
c7d1 ONLINE   0 0 4 (resilvering)

errors: List of errors unavailable (insufficient privileges)

If I sudo the command with -v, it shows 3 or 4 erroros, and freezes.

rheilke@eris:~$ sudo zpool detach data c11t8d1
cannot detach c11t8d1: pool I/O is currently suspended

rheilke@eris:~$ zpool offline data c11t8d1
cannot offline c11t8d1: pool I/O is currently suspended

Note that the resilver is going nowhere.

I even attached c7d0, so that I could dettatch c11t8d1 without getting
the "Not enough mirrors" message, and now I can't detach either of
them, getting the same I/O suspended error. This was after I tried to
run the replace subcommand, getting the same error and nothing happening.

No matter what I do, I get this I/O suspended. I _really_ need to get
at my data. I deliberately used a ZFS mirror so that I could still get
at my data, even if a HHD failed. But I can't. I can't even see my
data when only c6d0 and /rpool are connected, and all other drives
disconnected from the system.

Does anyone have any ideas?

Rainer




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



--
Put your makeup on and fix your hair up pretty,
And meet me tonight in Atlantic  City
Bruce Springsteen


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Broken zpool

[jason matthews]

You may want to consider restoring from backup.

j.

On 10/27/15 7:00 AM, Rainer Heilke wrote:

Greetings.

Some of you may remember that I had a couple disk failures recently. 
One of those disk was the mirror for all of my critical data. The 
problem is that, no matter what I do, I cannot get the data zpool 
functioning:


OpenIndiana (powered by illumos)SunOS 5.11oi_151a9May 2015
rheilke@eris:~$ zpool status -v data
  pool: data
 state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered.  The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
  scan: resilver in progress since Sun Oct 25 02:03:37 2015
602G scanned out of 1.66T at 601K/s, 530h45m to go
601G resilvered, 35.47% done
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
data DEGRADED 1 0 0
  mirror-0   DEGRADED 4 0 0
7152018192933189428  UNAVAIL  0 0 0  was 
/dev/dsk/c11t8d1s0

c6d0 ONLINE   0 0 4 (resilvering)
c7d1 ONLINE   0 0 4 (resilvering)

errors: List of errors unavailable (insufficient privileges)

If I sudo the command with -v, it shows 3 or 4 erroros, and freezes.

rheilke@eris:~$ sudo zpool detach data c11t8d1
cannot detach c11t8d1: pool I/O is currently suspended

rheilke@eris:~$ zpool offline data c11t8d1
cannot offline c11t8d1: pool I/O is currently suspended

Note that the resilver is going nowhere.

I even attached c7d0, so that I could dettatch c11t8d1 without getting 
the "Not enough mirrors" message, and now I can't detach either of 
them, getting the same I/O suspended error. This was after I tried to 
run the replace subcommand, getting the same error and nothing happening.


No matter what I do, I get this I/O suspended. I _really_ need to get 
at my data. I deliberately used a ZFS mirror so that I could still get 
at my data, even if a HHD failed. But I can't. I can't even see my 
data when only c6d0 and /rpool are connected, and all other drives 
disconnected from the system.


Does anyone have any ideas?

Rainer




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Broken zpool

[jason matthews]

If I had a nickel for every time someone told me, "I don't have a backup."

I am just going to go on a generalized rant... and then return to next 
steps.


This is probably not the appropriate time, given your state of mind is 
not likely accepting this sort of advice at this point in time, to 
remind you that mirrors and backups serve two different purposes and are 
not equivalent things. This is a difficult lesson for some to learn. You 
are one of the some.


I am not trying to be a dick (it happens naturally), but if you cant 
afford to backup terabytes of data, then you cant afford to have 
terabytes of data. Consider a strategy where you backup things important 
to you and gamble on the rest. I use cheap SATA disks at home too. I use 
big ass 6TB WD drives that I dont trust. Because I dont trust them they 
are in 3-way mirrors. I also have a backup pool that I back them up too. 
This is just good stewardship of data you want to keep.


People who buy giant ass disks and then complain about how long it takes 
to resilver a giant ass disk are out of their minds. They remind me of 
morons that buy houses next airports and then complain about the noise 
of airplanes.


I have no idea what happened to your system for you to loose three disks 
simultaneously. There is about a one in a ten billion chance of that 
happening on the same day unless your controller card or cables are bad, 
you lost your cmos settings and then compounded it by doing something 
stupid. I just dont see you recovering from this scenario where you have 
two bad drives trying to resilver from each other.



WWJD - what would Jason do?

Here is what I would do, if this were my system. You should see if 
anyone else has a better idea.


If you are at all concerned about losing data first use dd to backup 
your messed up zfs disks to new drives. use the new drives in the system 
and perform the following operations. If you are willing to wing it like 
me you can skip the backup. Be advised, the system is in this mess 
because you skipped the back up :-) Ironic, right?


One likely has access to some of the files as the pool is marked 
DEGRADED and not FAILED for reasons I dont understand.

- zpool status -v data
-- the files listed from the output of this command are toast. they are 
bogging the system down. if it were my data, i would delete them. say 
what? yes delete them. The system cant recover them, they cant be 
snapshot'd,  they are just in your way. For purposes of recovering files 
on the live filesystem you dont need to delete existing corrupted 
snapshots. If you dont want to delete these corrupted files, then you 
need to find a way to exclude them from your backup  process (rsync 
--exclude=)


-- the surviving files are going to have to be copied  to new target 
media. once the corrupted files are deleted standard file tools like tar 
and cpio can be used to copy to the new target smoothly. It might be 
possible to get snapshot/send/recv working again by deleting all the 
snapshots with corrupted blocks so that the zpool is clean of 
corruption. Be advised, there maybe something on one of those snapshots 
you may want to keep.


- i was going to stay stop the resilver, but that might detach the 
mirrors and that could be a bad thing(tm). Instead, you might want to 
consider tuning the resilver so it goes really slow (in terms of I/O per 
second), obviously it is going slowly in Mb/s :-)


that's what I would do. Your level of comfort and skill level should 
should be governing factors. You may wish to seek professional help.


That's what I would do. Your mileage may vary.

j.


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Broken zpool

[Rainer Heilke]

On 27/10/2015 4:48 PM, jason matthews wrote:


This is probably not the appropriate time, given your state of mind is
not likely accepting this sort of advice at this point in time, to
remind you that mirrors and backups serve two different purposes and are
not equivalent things.


I know this, thank you. Not being able to afford a proper backup 
solution, I went the mirroring route to at least give me some security.



I am not trying to be a dick (it happens naturally), but if you cant
afford to backup terabytes of data, then you cant afford to have
terabytes of data.


That is a meaningless statement, that reflects nothing in real-world terms.


Because I dont trust them they
are in 3-way mirrors. I also have a backup pool that I back them up too.


It must be nice to have the money for this. Ever hear of a fixed income?


This is just good stewardship of data you want to keep.


That's an arrogant statement, presuming that if a person doesn't have 
gobs of money, they shouldn't bother with computers at all.



People who buy giant ass disks and then complain about how long it takes
to resilver a giant ass disk are out of their minds.


I am not complaining about the time it takes; I know full well how long 
it can take. I am complaining that the "resilvering" stops dead. (More 
on this below.)



I have no idea what happened to your system for you to loose three disks
simultaneously.


This was covered in a thread ages ago; the tech took days to find the 
problem, which was a CMOS battery that was on Death's door.



you lost your cmos settings and then compounded it by doing something
stupid.


So, rebooting a system is now considered "stupid?"


I just dont see you recovering from this scenario where you have
two bad drives trying to resilver from each other.


They aren't trying to resilver from each other. The dead disk is gone. 
The good disk is trying to resilver from the ether. Or some such. 
(Itself?) I added a third drive to the mirror in a vain attempt to get 
past the error saying there weren't enough remaining mirrors when I 
tried to zpool detach the now non-existent drive. Again, what is IT 
trying to resilver from? The same Twilight Zone the first disk is trying 
to resilver from?



If you are at all concerned about losing data first use dd to backup
your messed up zfs disks to new drives. use the new drives in the system
and perform the following operations. If you are willing to wing it like
me you can skip the backup. Be advised, the system is in this mess
because you skipped the back up :-) Ironic, right?


Actually, no. The system is in this state because ZFS keeps freezing the 
I/O of the pool, not letting me clear up the issues. The DATA is 
inaccessible due to the lack of backups. If we are being pedantic, we 
must be consistently so. :-)



One likely has access to some of the files as the pool is marked
DEGRADED and not FAILED for reasons I dont understand.


It seems to think that the one disk is fine, but the data isn't. ZFS is 
then locking the pool's I/O, not letting me clear up the damaged files 
(nor the pool). It's like there's a trapped loop between two parts of 
the ZFS code, but I refuse to believe Cantrill (and the many programmers 
since) didn't see this kind of problem.



- zpool status -v data
-- the files listed from the output of this command are toast. they are
bogging the system down. if it were my data, i would delete them. say
what? yes delete them.


I'm more than willing to sacrifice some files, if that lets me get at 
the rest. But when I try to delete a file, the terminal freezes up again 
(though, like some other actions tried earlier, it doesn't give me the 
"I/O suspended" message).



- i was going to stay stop the resilver, but that might detach the
mirrors and that could be a bad thing(tm). Instead, you might want to
consider tuning the resilver so it goes really slow (in terms of I/O per
second), obviously it is going slowly in Mb/s :-)


The system isn't letting me do _anything_ with this pool's data, 
silvering, tuning, scrubbing,... Nothing. I think I'll try the dd route. 
That should operate below the ZFS (file system) level, and maybe give me 
a chance. One thing I can't figure out is why the one disk is being 
listed as: 7152018192933189428
Isn't that the WNN (if I remember correctly; it's been a while)? Or is 
this just the "unique identifier" mentioned in the zpool man page?


Rainer

--
Put your makeup on and fix your hair up pretty,
And meet me tonight in Atlantic  City
Bruce Springsteen


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] [HEADS UP] Updating from /dev to /hipster-2015 is now can be possible

[Alexander Pyhalov]

Hello.

Note to all OpenIndiana Hipster users:
0.151.1.8* package versions were replaced by 2013.0.0.0 versions, so 
ensure that pkg list |grep '0\.151\.1\.'
output is empty after update (if you use only /hipster-2015 and 
/hipster-encumbered repositories). All *-2013.0.0.0 packages were not 
recompiled, only version numbers were changed.


Yes, thanks to the work of Hans Rosenfeld (Woodstock), now you can try 
updating OpenIndiana /dev installations to /hipster-2015. I specially 
say 'can try' as we have removed principal obstacles, but there can be 
rough edges.


First of all, note, that we have replaced most of the Studio-compiled 
C++ libraries with GCC-compiled (if some are still here, it's not a 
feature, but a bug). So, if your C++ applications used something besides 
system/library/c++/sunpro, it will not work without recompilation.


Second, some packages can be present in /dev, but not in /hipster. Such 
packages should be uninstalled (or added to oi-userland, if you need them).


Now, if you are brave enough, you can try to update your system.

0) Create backup. Really.
1) Uninstall all packages from opensolaris.org publisher
2) pkg set-publisher -g http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster-2015 -G 
http://pkg.openindiana.org/dev openindiana.org

3) pkg unset-publisher opensolaris.org
4) pkg refresh --full
5) pkg update --be-name oi-hipster -nv 2>&1|less - look how it is going 
to work

6) pkg update --be-name oi-hipster -v
7) boot new BE and check that you don't have packages with '*0.151.1.*' 
branch versions installed

(check that
pkg list |grep '0\.151\.1\.'
output is empty)
8) ensure that you have userland incorporation and entire installed:
pkg install userland-incorporation entire@0.5.11-2015.0.2.1


I've checked that at least I can update default OI /dev text installation

--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Southern Federal University IT department

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Broken zpool

[Rainer Heilke]

Greetings.

Some of you may remember that I had a couple disk failures recently. One 
of those disk was the mirror for all of my critical data. The problem is 
that, no matter what I do, I cannot get the data zpool functioning:


OpenIndiana (powered by illumos)SunOS 5.11oi_151a9May 2015
rheilke@eris:~$ zpool status -v data
  pool: data
 state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered.  The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
  scan: resilver in progress since Sun Oct 25 02:03:37 2015
602G scanned out of 1.66T at 601K/s, 530h45m to go
601G resilvered, 35.47% done
config:

NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
data DEGRADED 1 0 0
  mirror-0   DEGRADED 4 0 0
7152018192933189428  UNAVAIL  0 0 0  was 
/dev/dsk/c11t8d1s0

c6d0 ONLINE   0 0 4  (resilvering)
c7d1 ONLINE   0 0 4  (resilvering)

errors: List of errors unavailable (insufficient privileges)

If I sudo the command with -v, it shows 3 or 4 erroros, and freezes.

rheilke@eris:~$ sudo zpool detach data c11t8d1
cannot detach c11t8d1: pool I/O is currently suspended

rheilke@eris:~$ zpool offline data c11t8d1
cannot offline c11t8d1: pool I/O is currently suspended

Note that the resilver is going nowhere.

I even attached c7d0, so that I could dettatch c11t8d1 without getting 
the "Not enough mirrors" message, and now I can't detach either of them, 
getting the same I/O suspended error. This was after I tried to run the 
replace subcommand, getting the same error and nothing happening.


No matter what I do, I get this I/O suspended. I _really_ need to get at 
my data. I deliberately used a ZFS mirror so that I could still get at 
my data, even if a HHD failed. But I can't. I can't even see my data 
when only c6d0 and /rpool are connected, and all other drives 
disconnected from the system.


Does anyone have any ideas?

Rainer

--
Put your makeup on and fix your hair up pretty,
And meet me tonight in Atlantic  City
Bruce Springsteen


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] New packaged LibreOffice4

[Thomas Wagner]

Nikola,

could you please be a bit more specific about "save problems"
with the libreoffice from SFE? 
It works for Libreoffice on other installations.

As both issued SFE package versions for libreoffice can save 
odt files on my systems, I'm wondering what is going. 
I test basic functionality like open / save / print preview
before pushing the packages to the public repo.

If you please could provide debug output from libreoffice, e.g.
if you start from a terminal, is something printed on the xterm
at the time the save fails? Or is a core dump written which
could be inspected closer.

Regards,
Thomas



On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:53:27AM +0200, Nikola M wrote:
>  That package should not be put in public repo because as zou discovered it 
>  doesn't install well regular way, but with issuing exact full package name 
>  it installs, but only for testing before release.
> 
>  Butw when installed it has same problem as OpenOffice in O:, doesn't save 
>  .odt files but LibreO dies and OpenOffice does not die.
> 
>  SFE is separate project from OI / OI hipster but somplementary SFE OI 
>  hipster repo is welcomed and I am happy to have it.
> 

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss