Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Docs - Demo 2.0

2016-06-12 Thread Michael Kruger

On 06/12/2016 03:59 PM, Nikola M wrote:


So doesn't look nice , not solving any issue and not needing any
"Organizing" into "Roles" right now, thank you.


Nikolam,

All criticisms set aside, you have to admit this new site looks simply 
fabulous on an iPhone.


Try that sometime with the OI wiki.

Michael



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Docs - Demo 2.0

2016-06-12 Thread Nikola M

On 06/12/16 06:27 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote:

Wow Michael,

That's awesome.  Thank you.


It has so many problems and is so ugly and doesn't fit to OI.org site 
and we have a Wiki for an article review before entering Site.
It is interesting maybe but not awesome by any mean and doesn't fit OI 
needs at the moment (including segregation of contributors at the moment).



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Docs - Demo 2.0

2016-06-12 Thread Nikola M

On 06/12/16 03:56 PM, Michael Kruger wrote:

Website: http://makruger.github.io/website-2.0/


Still too many empty space between lines, uncondesed and widen without need.
More info on less space.

All texts on "Notes" seems like your private writings that are good to 
be moved on some personal blog (and discussed there or as topics 
discussed on ML.


Docs are not code!
Articles are not Docs.

Separating people to "reviewers" (gods) and "the rest" is not good at 
the moment, regarding number of people.
"Code of conduct not needed (!) , and absolutely not part of any docs 
movement atm. We are base on INCLUSION of people and not Exclusive... 
Presenting hierarchy not needed because administrative moves does not 
help doing the work atm.


Wiki is there to put articles on. Some of your writings on "Notes could 
be conidered for a Wiki material (if not already on Wiki, that is very 
possible)..

Git presented is managed by single person and not form inside OI.

No space on site for such a large overwhelming web page like this. 
Jumping to separate site like this from OI.org site is confusing to people.


** Path to articles is like this:   Whatever -> Personal blogs etc - > 
Wiki -> Redaction -> Site.**


No publishing on Openindiana site from your private repo without this 
review path.


This is only known to me "docs" pages that actually does not include 
docs, but "handbook" that _we already have on Wiki_.


And at the end, it does not looks nice, if it too pompously separate to 
separated site ,
does not conform with Openindiana.org site look and feel and is 
therefore unsuitable to put on Openindian.org site, anywhere, any time 
soon.


Very little actual content (articles are not docs),
lack Opensolaris docs to PDF and Html that "Docs" should actually solve.
So it actually doesn't sovle much problems right now.

I think That your writings could be reviewed for Wiki inclusion but 
after that it is interesting what is the use case of your site an process?


So doesn't look nice , not solving any issue and not needing any 
"Organizing" into "Roles" right now, thank you.



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Docs - Demo 2.0

2016-06-12 Thread Michael Kruger

On 06/12/2016 12:27 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote:


Wow Michael,

That's awesome.  Thank you.

Jerry


Hi Jerry, it gets even better

This afternoon we automated everything with Travis-CI. Now upon commit 
the site automatically runs through a series of validation tests. If 
everything passes, the site is automatically built and deployed to 
GitHub pages.


If you or anyone else has any suggestions for improvement, we're happy 
to listen. Simply open an issue on Github:


https://github.com/makruger/website-2.0/issues

Michael

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Docs - Demo 2.0

2016-06-12 Thread Jerry Kemp

Wow Michael,

That's awesome.  Thank you.

Jerry


On 06/12/16 08:56 AM, Michael Kruger wrote:

Hello All,

I am happy to announce further development of the OpenIndiana Docs static HTML
website concept. This latest demonstration site uses the MkDocs content
authoring and static website generation framework. MkDocs uses Markdown as the
text markup used for content authoring.

The website theme remains the same (Bootswatch/Spacelab). Supported are in-line
HTML elements, as well as Font Awesome HTML elements.

Please go have a look:

Website: http://makruger.github.io/website-2.0/

GitHub repository: https://github.com/makruger/website-2.0


Michael

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Docs - Demo 2.0

2016-06-12 Thread Michael Kruger

Hello All,

I am happy to announce further development of the OpenIndiana Docs 
static HTML website concept. This latest demonstration site uses the 
MkDocs content authoring and static website generation framework. MkDocs 
uses Markdown as the text markup used for content authoring.


The website theme remains the same (Bootswatch/Spacelab). Supported are 
in-line HTML elements, as well as Font Awesome HTML elements.


Please go have a look:

Website: http://makruger.github.io/website-2.0/

GitHub repository: https://github.com/makruger/website-2.0


Michael

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss