Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Replacing Solaris 10 u8

2021-03-24 Thread Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss



> On 24. Mar 2021, at 02:50, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss 
>  wrote:
> 
> My Solaris 10 u8 instance is rather dated.  I'd like to update it, but there 
> are some absolute requirements:
> 
> Sun/Forte/Oracle Developer Studio

If that is required, then the only option are solaris 11.4, oracle linux 6 & 7, 
redhat 6 & 7.

> twm window manager on at least one screen
> ZFS filesystem
> must be stable long term

That is a tricky one.

rgds,
toomas

> 
> If needed I'll consider creating and supporting an LTS branch of Hipster.
> 
> Split screen with MATE on one screen and twm on another is acceptable.  I ran 
> dtwm on one screen of u8  until I took it off line.  I did that by playing 
> games with CDE.  15 years ago it was the only option.  MATE is tolerable for 
> applications that need all that window management stuff.  But a clean dual 
> screen twm and no external network would be just fine.  Moving the cable on a 
> 4 TB USB OTG disk is just fine with me.
> 
> For some reason, about a month ago u8 quit saving core files.  I spent 
> several hours reading man pages today trying to figure out what is wrong.  
> Dumpadm(1m) will not let me set either swap or /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/dump as 
> the dump device.  It's not a space issue as the root pool has about 50 GB 
> free.  Having worked reliably for 10 years it's  rather annoying.
> 
> I'm *really* tired of this cage fight.
> 
> Reg
> 
> ___
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Replacing Solaris 10 u8

2021-03-24 Thread Udo Grabowski (IMK)



On 24.03.21 09:08, Toomas Soome via openindiana-discuss wrote:




On 24. Mar 2021, at 02:50, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss 
 wrote:

My Solaris 10 u8 instance is rather dated.  I'd like to update it, but there 
are some absolute requirements:

Sun/Forte/Oracle Developer Studio


If that is required, then the only option are solaris 11.4, oracle linux 6 & 7, 
redhat 6 & 7.



SunStudio 12.1u1 can still be transported from one instance of OI to
another if you still have the installation packages or rsync the
/opt/SUNWspro directory and set the links into /usr/bin etc. by
hand. We have it running on an 2018.10 Hipster x86. Don't know if
the same applies to Sparc, but I suspect that it will work, too.

Versions later that 12.1u1 have strict license restrictions, and
since 12.4 it's binary incompatible and only available via the
pkg repositories (for which you need service contracts).

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fresh install of OpenIndiana - can not upgrade nvidia from nvidia-390 to nvidia-460

2021-03-24 Thread russell

Hi Stephen

Thanks for the feedback, now I have a working GUI on my new workstation.
By tweaking the /etc/driver_aliases to add line below my Nvidia Geforce 
GTX1650 OC card is working perfectly, there is a delay while the display 
starts but no reboots


  nvidia "pci10de,1f82"

Now that the motherboard has failed, the problem I reported was probably 
due to a failing motherboard


When my workstation failed, in order to get a working system I had a 
limited choice of parts to build from.
If anyone wants to build a compatible OpenIndiana compatible the MSI MPG 
B550 Gaming Plus, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, Gigabyte Geforce GTX1650 OC, 
Fractal Design XL R2 case


Many thanks

Russell



On 23/03/2021 15:54, Stephan Althaus wrote:

On 03/23/21 04:52 PM, russell wrote:

Hi

When I try the following

# beadm create nvidia-460
# beadm mount nvidia-460 /tmp/nvidia-460
# pkg -R /tmp/nvidia-460 uninstall xorg-video nvidia nvidia-390
Creating Plan (Solver setup): -
pkg uninstall: Unable to remove 
'x11/server/xorg/driver/xorg-video@0.5.11-2020.0.1.2' due to the following 
packages that depend on it:
   mate_install@0.1-2020.0.1.42

If I remove mate_install I can not re-install it as it requires nvidia-390

# pkg -R /tmp/nvidia-460 uninstall xorg-video nvidia nvidia-390 mate_install
Packages to remove: 7
Services to change: 2

PHASE  ITEMS
Removing old actions 862/862
Updating package state database Done
Updating package cache   7/7
Updating image stateDone
Creating fast lookup database   Done
root@tesla:/home/russell# pkg -R /tmp/nvidia-460 install nvidia-460 mate_install
Creating Plan (Checking for conflicting actions): \
pkg install: The following packages all deliver driver actions to 
nvidia_modeset:

   
pkg://openindiana.org/driver/graphics/nvidia-460@0.460.67,5.11-2020.0.1.0:20210319T142607Z
   
pkg://openindiana.org/driver/graphics/nvidia-390@0.390.141,5.11-2020.0.1.0:20210311T151457Z

There is a hardcoded dependency on the nvidia-390 driver

On 03/23/21 11:12 AM, russell wrote:

Hi

My dual opteron motherboard finally died, so I had to build a new
workstation based on a Ryzen 5 5600X.
Once the workstation was built, I started the Openindiana install,
downloading the 2020 October text based iso.
Very happy with the installation, no problems there as I wanted to
create a mirrorred boot pair of SSDs.
After completing the Openindiana install on the mirrored pair, I
performed a pkg refresh, then a pkg update creating a new BE.
After completing the update and I performed pkg install mate_install
it worked fine, though I have noticed a couple of things.

1) when performing a pkg install/update the create plan can take a
very, very long time compared to the Dual Opteron 2435 workstation.
 Things that took seconds or worse a few minutes can now take
hours...(literally being left over night)

2) When I attempted to replace the Nvidia-390 driver with the
Nvidia-460 driver, by removing the Nvidia-390 driver it has a
dependency on nvidia pkg, attempting to remove nvidia pkg results in a
warning that the mate install depends on pkg nvidia.

How can upgrade to the Nvidia-460 driver?

Regards

Russell


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

On 03/19/21 09:07 PM, John D Groenveld wrote:


Try
# beadm create nvidia-460
# beadm mount nvidia-460 /tmp/nvidia-460
# pkg -R /tmp/nvidia-460 uninstall xorg-video nvidia nvidia-390
# pkg -R /tmp/nvidia-460 install nvidia-460
# beadm activate nvidia-460
# init 6

John
groenv...@acm.org

_

Hello!

Thanks to John to point out this possibility of changing the nvidia
driver version and avoid intermediate reboots.


Hello!

You don't need mate-install,
it's only a meta-package, you can leave in un-installed.

Stephan




___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fresh install of OpenIndiana - can not upgrade nvidia from nvidia-390 to nvidia-460

2021-03-24 Thread Stephan Althaus

On 03/24/21 11:24 AM, russell wrote:

Hi Stephen

Thanks for the feedback, now I have a working GUI on my new workstation.
By tweaking the /etc/driver_aliases to add line below my Nvidia 
Geforce GTX1650 OC card is working perfectly, there is a delay while 
the display starts but no reboots


  nvidia "pci10de,1f82"

Now that the motherboard has failed, the problem I reported was 
probably due to a failing motherboard


When my workstation failed, in order to get a working system I had a 
limited choice of parts to build from.
If anyone wants to build a compatible OpenIndiana compatible the MSI 
MPG B550 Gaming Plus, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, Gigabyte Geforce GTX1650 OC, 
Fractal Design XL R2 case


Many thanks

Russell


10de,1f82 is already in /etc/driver_aliases with nvidia-460 installed (?)

Which nvidia package are you using at the moment?

Stephan



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fresh install of OpenIndiana - can, not upgrade nvidia from nvidia-390 to nvidia-460

2021-03-24 Thread russell

Hi Stpehen

When I checked /etc/driver_aliases the nvidia  "10de,1f82"  was not present.

On an unhappy note VirtualBox is not working, I did try and echo "set hma_disable = 
1" > /etc/system.d/hma but it still results in a kernel panic


TIME   UUID SUNW-MSG-ID
Mar 24 2021 10:44:24.407793000 f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9 
SUNOS-8000-KL

  TIME CLASS ENA
  Mar 24 10:44:21.9513 ireport.os.sunos.panic.dump_pending_on_device 
0x

nvlist version: 0
version = 0x0
class = list.suspect
uuid = f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
code = SUNOS-8000-KL
diag-time = 1616582664 336135
de = fmd:///module/software-diagnosis
fault-list-sz = 0x1
fault-list = (array of embedded nvlists)
(start fault-list[0])
nvlist version: 0
version = 0x0
class = defect.sunos.kernel.panic
certainty = 0x64
asru = 
sw:///:path=/var/crash/tesla/.f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
resource = 
sw:///:path=/var/crash/tesla/.f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
savecore-succcess = 0
os-instance-uuid = f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
panicstr = BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=fe003f952700 
addr=fc7fea22f088 occurred in module "" due to an illegal access 
to a user address
panicstack = unix:die+c6 () | unix:trap+1169 () | 
unix:cmntrap+e9 () | fa55b272 () | fa55c185 () | 
fa55c34c () | fa55d697 () | fa4c78e4 () | 
fa52b153 () | fa48f369 () | fa492218 () | 
fa49346d () | fa56cdd6 () | fa49bb77 () | 
vboxdrv:supdrvIOCtlFast+5e () | vboxdrv:VBoxDrvSolarisIOCtl+ea () | 
genunix:cdev_ioctl+2b () | specfs:spec_ioctl+45 () | genunix:fop_ioctl+5b () | 
genunix:ioctl+153 () | unix:brand_sys_syscall+1fe () |
crashtime = 1616582425
panic-time = Wed Mar 24 10:40:25 2021 GMT
(end fault-list[0])

fault-status = 0x1
severity = Major
__ttl = 0x1
__tod = 0x605b1808 0x184e6d68


n 03/24/21 11:24 AM, russell wrote:


Hi Stephen

Thanks for the feedback, now I have a working GUI on my new workstation.
By tweaking the /etc/driver_aliases to add line below my Nvidia
Geforce GTX1650 OC card is working perfectly, there is a delay while
the display starts but no reboots

? nvidia "pci10de,1f82"

Now that the motherboard has failed, the problem I reported was
probably due to a failing motherboard

When my workstation failed, in order to get a working system I had a
limited choice of parts to build from.
If anyone wants to build a compatible OpenIndiana compatible the MSI
MPG B550 Gaming Plus, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, Gigabyte Geforce GTX1650 OC,
Fractal Design XL R2 case

Many thanks

Russell


10de,1f82 is already in /etc/driver_aliases with nvidia-460 installed (?)

Which nvidia package are you using at the moment?

Stephan


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fresh install of OpenIndiana - can, not upgrade nvidia from nvidia-390 to nvidia-460

2021-03-24 Thread Stephan Althaus

On 03/24/21 12:13 PM, russell wrote:

Hi Stpehen

When I checked /etc/driver_aliases the nvidia  "10de,1f82"  was not present.

On an unhappy note VirtualBox is not working, I did try and echo "set hma_disable = 
1" > /etc/system.d/hma but it still results in a kernel panic


TIME   UUID SUNW-MSG-ID
Mar 24 2021 10:44:24.407793000 f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9 
SUNOS-8000-KL

   TIME CLASS ENA
   Mar 24 10:44:21.9513 ireport.os.sunos.panic.dump_pending_on_device 
0x

nvlist version: 0
 version = 0x0
 class = list.suspect
 uuid = f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
 code = SUNOS-8000-KL
 diag-time = 1616582664 336135
 de = fmd:///module/software-diagnosis
 fault-list-sz = 0x1
 fault-list = (array of embedded nvlists)
 (start fault-list[0])
 nvlist version: 0
 version = 0x0
 class = defect.sunos.kernel.panic
 certainty = 0x64
 asru = 
sw:///:path=/var/crash/tesla/.f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
 resource = 
sw:///:path=/var/crash/tesla/.f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
 savecore-succcess = 0
 os-instance-uuid = f6740e47-c8e1-e900-b115-b1b7a870c2b9
 panicstr = BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=fe003f952700 
addr=fc7fea22f088 occurred in module "" due to an illegal access 
to a user address
 panicstack = unix:die+c6 () | unix:trap+1169 () | 
unix:cmntrap+e9 () | fa55b272 () | fa55c185 () | 
fa55c34c () | fa55d697 () | fa4c78e4 () | 
fa52b153 () | fa48f369 () | fa492218 () | 
fa49346d () | fa56cdd6 () | fa49bb77 () | 
vboxdrv:supdrvIOCtlFast+5e () | vboxdrv:VBoxDrvSolarisIOCtl+ea () | 
genunix:cdev_ioctl+2b () | specfs:spec_ioctl+45 () | genunix:fop_ioctl+5b () | 
genunix:ioctl+153 () | unix:brand_sys_syscall+1fe () |
 crashtime = 1616582425
 panic-time = Wed Mar 24 10:40:25 2021 GMT
 (end fault-list[0])

 fault-status = 0x1
 severity = Major
 __ttl = 0x1
 __tod = 0x605b1808 0x184e6d68


n 03/24/21 11:24 AM, russell wrote:

Hi Stephen

Thanks for the feedback, now I have a working GUI on my new workstation.
By tweaking the /etc/driver_aliases to add line below my Nvidia
Geforce GTX1650 OC card is working perfectly, there is a delay while
the display starts but no reboots

? nvidia "pci10de,1f82"

Now that the motherboard has failed, the problem I reported was
probably due to a failing motherboard

When my workstation failed, in order to get a working system I had a
limited choice of parts to build from.
If anyone wants to build a compatible OpenIndiana compatible the MSI
MPG B550 Gaming Plus, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, Gigabyte Geforce GTX1650 OC,
Fractal Design XL R2 case

Many thanks

Russell

10de,1f82 is already in /etc/driver_aliases with nvidia-460 installed (?)

Which nvidia package are you using at the moment?

Stephan



Hi Russell!

i think you need

set disable_smap=1

in either /etc/system

or in a new file within /etc/system.d



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Firefox68esr for testing

2021-03-24 Thread Stephan Althaus

On 03/17/21 03:13 PM, Carsten Grzemba via openindiana-discuss wrote:
the same, I will upload FF78 in the moment so you can test this also. 
But my first impression is needs more resources (RAM), less 
performance, at least on my not so young laptop with 8GRAM ;)

So, here i have a first crash with FF78:

console output:
"$ client_loop: send disconnect: Broken pipe
steven@dell6510:~/src/oi/hoewweken$ Exiting due to channel error.
Crash Annotation GraphicsCriticalError: |[C0][GFX1-]: Receive IPC close 
with reason=AbnormalShutdown (t=99524.5) [GFX1-]: Receive IPC close with 
reason=AbnormalShutdown
Crash Annotation GraphicsCriticalError: |[C0][GFX1-]: Receive IPC close 
with reason=AbnormalShutdown (t=100780) [GFX1-]: Receive IPC close with 
reason=AbnormalShutdown

Exiting due to channel error.
Exiting due to channel error.
Exiting due to channel error.
Crash Annotation GraphicsCriticalError: |[C0][GFX1-]: Receive IPC close 
with reason=AbnormalShutdown (t=20821.4) [GFX1-]: Receive IPC close with 
reason=AbnormalShutdown

Exiting due to channel error.
Crash Annotation GraphicsCriticalError: |[C0][GFX1-]: Receive IPC close 
with reason=AbnormalShutdown (t=101365) [GFX1-]: Receive IPC close with 
reason=AbnormalShutdown
Crash Annotation GraphicsCriticalError: |[C0][GFX1-]: Receive IPC close 
with reason=AbnormalShutdown (t=99485.3) [GFX1-]: Receive IPC close with 
reason=AbnormalShutdown

Exiting due to channel error.
Exiting due to channel error.
Exiting due to channel error.
Exiting due to channel error.
Exiting due to channel error.
"


$ pstack core | c++filt | head -100


core 'core' of 2909:    firefox
- thread# 1 / lwp# 1 -
 7fffaf3fd04a __pollsys () + a
 7fffaf38e1d1 poll (6944390, 9, ) + 51
 7fff9dd529ab PollWrapper(_GPollFD*, unsigned int, int) () + 56
 7fffaee3bbae g_main_context_iterate.isra.23 () + 15e
 7fffaee3be8f g_main_context_iteration () + 2f
 7fff9dd52ab8 nsAppShell::ProcessNextNativeEvent(bool) () + 12
 7fff9dd14617 nsBaseAppShell::DoProcessNextNativeEvent(bool) () + 33
 7fff9dd14728 
nsBaseAppShell::OnProcessNextEvent(nsIThreadInternal*, bool) () + f4

 7fff9b9102ea nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(bool, bool*) () + 520
 7fff9b90ec55 NS_ProcessNextEvent(nsIThread*, bool) () + 2d
 7fff9be5c50b 
mozilla::ipc::MessagePump::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*) () + ef

 7fff9be25b05 MessageLoop::RunInternal() () + 13
 7fff9be25d4d MessageLoop::Run() () + 37
 7fff9dd11672 nsBaseAppShell::Run() () + 2e
 7fff9eadfdde nsAppStartup::Run() () + 4a
 7fff9eba272c XREMain::XRE_mainRun() () + a2c
 7fff9eba333f XREMain::XRE_main(int, char**, 
mozilla::BootstrapConfig const&) () + 7e7
 7fff9eba34f6 XRE_main(int, char**, mozilla::BootstrapConfig 
const&) () + f1
 7fff9eba48ad mozilla::BootstrapImpl::XRE_main(int, char**, 
mozilla::BootstrapConfig const&) () + 11

 00411cb0 do_main(int, char**, char**) () + 20d
 00411d66 main () + 7b
 00411397 _start_crt () + 87
 004112f8 _start () + 18
 thread# 2 / lwp# 2 [Gecko_IOThread] -
 7fffaf3fc70a _portfs () + a
 7fff984c57fd evport_dispatch () + 18d
 7fff984ad83c event_base_loop () + 25c
 7fff9be24b42 
base::MessagePumpLibevent::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*) () + a4

 7fff9be25b05 MessageLoop::RunInternal() () + 13
 7fff9be25d4d MessageLoop::Run() () + 37
 7fff9be3f4c7 base::Thread::ThreadMain() () + 14d
 7fff9be246e9 ThreadFunc(void*) () + a
 7fffaf3f613c _thrp_setup (7fffae270240) + 6c
 7fffaf3f6450 _lwp_start ()
- thread# 4 / lwp# 4 [Timer] -
 7fffaf3f6497 __lwp_park () + 17
 7fffaf3ef94b cond_wait_queue (559f48, 559f28, 7fff9840d9f0) + 5b
 7fffaf3efd9d cond_wait_common (559f48, 559f28, 7fff9840d9f0) + 1dd
 7fffaf3f00fa __cond_timedwait (559f48, 559f28, 7fff9840daf0) + ba
 7fffaf3f0161 cond_timedwait (559f48, 559f28, 7fff9840daf0) + 31
 7fffaf3f01a0 pthread_cond_timedwait (559f48, 559f28, 7fff9840daf0) 
+ 10
 00412c30 
mozilla::detail::ConditionVariableImpl::wait_for(mozilla::detail::MutexImpl&, 
mozilla::BaseTimeDuration const&) 
() + 14a

 7fff9b915e88 TimerThread::Run() () + fe
 7fff9b910404 nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(bool, bool*) () + 63a
 7fff9b90ec55 NS_ProcessNextEvent(nsIThread*, bool) () + 2d
 7fff9be5c8c9 
mozilla::ipc::MessagePumpForNonMainThreads::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*) 
() + 109

 7fff9be25b05 MessageLoop::RunInternal() () + 13
 7fff9be25d4d MessageLoop::Run() () + 37
 7fff9b91b6e4 nsThread::ThreadFunc(void*) () + d8
 7fffa1f84a06 _pt_root () + cb
 7fffaf3f613c _thrp_setup (7fffae271240) + 6c
 7fffaf3f6450 _lwp_start ()
- thread# 5 / lwp# 5 [Socket Thread] -
 7fffaf3fd04a __pollsys () + a
 7fffaf38e1d1 poll (7fff9844e7d0, c, ) + 51
 7fffa1f8329e _pr_poll_with_poll () + 383
 7

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Replacing Solaris 10 u8

2021-03-24 Thread rmd
> My Solaris 10 u8 instance is rather dated.  I'd like to update it, but there 
> are some absolute requirements:
well, still have a 10 usomthing running for SunRay:)

> Sun/Forte/Oracle Developer Studio
the old studiocompiler 12.1u1 runs fine if that is ok with your demands

> twm window manager on at least one screen
not really a MATE fan, I have twm running with xdm-login as login manager.
you”on one screen” puzzles me a bit. That is different window managers on
on parts of a multiheaded gui console? Didn’t know that this works, sounds
strange to me.

> ZFS filesystem
so, well, yes, OI comes with zfs and as I remember, I imported old Solaris 10
pools, but that was some time ago. I recomend that you test that on a test
installation for yourself and share your findings

> must be stable long term
hm, well, that could be a problem, better stay current and isolate those apps
you desperatly need and that demand for old OS versions, virtualised in 
containers. 
I run my SunRay environment that way, have it setup in a Solaris 10 virtual
instance, it serves the still operating SunRay DTUs in kiosk mode.
You may use SmartOS as a virtualizer and setup OI instances and instances 
with other/older OSes as you need them for your applications. Depends a bit
on your needs and the compute power and memory of your systems

Still I need some time to test the new Firefox for OI, maybe over the easter
weekend. It would be great since most stuff needed here is a webbrowser.

Rolf


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fresh install of OpenIndiana - can, , not upgrade nvidia from nvidia-390 to nvidia-460

2021-03-24 Thread russell

HI

Thanks adding  fixes below got VirtualBox working without error

# echo "set  hma_disable = 1" > /etc/system.d/hma

# echo "set disable_smap =1" > /etc/system.d/smap

I tried looking for the tweaks to get VirtualBox running using various 
search engines but could not find them.


Should not these fixes for VirtualBox be included on the Wiki

Regards

Russell


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fresh install of OpenIndiana - can, , not upgrade nvidia from nvidia-390 to nvidia-460

2021-03-24 Thread Andreas Wacknitz

Am 24.03.21 um 16:05 schrieb russell:

HI

Thanks adding  fixes below got VirtualBox working without error

# echo "set  hma_disable = 1" > /etc/system.d/hma

# echo "set disable_smap =1" > /etc/system.d/smap

I tried looking for the tweaks to get VirtualBox running using various
search engines but could not find them.

Should not these fixes for VirtualBox be included on the Wiki


You are welcome to create a PR for it.

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Fresh install of OpenIndiana - can, , not upgrade nvidia from nvidia-390 to nvidia-460

2021-03-24 Thread Stephan Althaus

On 03/24/21 04:07 PM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:

Am 24.03.21 um 16:05 schrieb russell:

HI

Thanks adding  fixes below got VirtualBox working without error

# echo "set  hma_disable = 1" > /etc/system.d/hma

# echo "set disable_smap =1" > /etc/system.d/smap

I tried looking for the tweaks to get VirtualBox running using various
search engines but could not find them.

Should not these fixes for VirtualBox be included on the Wiki


You are welcome to create a PR for it.

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Hm. Wiki or docs?


While you are at it you can enhance or correct the documentation on
https://docs.openindiana.org/dev/distribution-constructor/
The sources are on our docs repository
https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-docs


Stephan


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Howto change NVidia driver version

2021-03-24 Thread Stephan Althaus

On 03/20/21 08:21 AM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:

Hi,

maybe it's time to put something on https://docs.openindiana.org
The sources of it are here: https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-docs
PR's are welcome and can be written by anybody capable of typing and has
some knowledge of markdown...

Regards,
Andreas


Hi!

Reading what is there at the moment,
i think the nvidia parts should be enhanced by a script that 
auto-selects the correct driver for the installed hardware.


I gave it a try to do it myself but i am not satisfied by now..

Stephan


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Replacing Solaris 10 u8

2021-03-24 Thread Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
Thanks to all.

I've still not found the Oracle EULA for 11.4. They've got a manual for a huge 
list of other stuff. I'll probably have to download it to find the terms.

I found a claim on the internet that indefinite use of 11.4 for development and 
non-commercial, non-production use was now acceptable. As I am retired and just 
fooling around,  if similar terms apply to Developer Studio then I'll probably 
get an off lease HP Z620 as my last computer system and load 11.4 and Developer 
Studio. That should outlast me.

I use twm on the RH screen in portrait mode with a stack of full page xterms 
and the icon manager on the side. That let me select whichever xterm I want to 
work in. I had unlimited history and scrollback set. So I could easily switch 
between tasks that went on for months without having to keep detailed notes. 
Each xterm has a name. Two mouse clicks and it's the top terminal in the stack. 
 Very handy if you're doing bespoke research for people.  If they walked in my 
office with questions I immediately had all the work I'd done for them up in 
front of me.  Particularly useful if your standard program name is tst.   I 
had all my command line history and all my files in a directory matching the 
xterm name so it was easy to change some parameter.

To keep the web browser and 3rd party stuff happy, I ran dtwm on the LH screen 
in landscape mode. This was all Solaris 8 on an Ultra 60.  One day  I got a 
call from the sys admin asking if he could take me down after work for some 
patches. It'd been up for 467 days!

I switched to twm on both screens when I started running a netbox for OI151_a6. 
But had to switch to a Z400 when Firefox would no longer run on a system with 2 
GB of RAM.

I used  some now long forgotten feature of the CDE startup to implement the 
dual window managers.

Should someone want to do multiple window managers I'd recommend using a 
console login and starting X explicitly.   With multiple screens you should be 
able to test the same application across multiple window managers simply by 
switching screens.  Disentangling screens in the current X setups is a 
nightmare of complexity.  I think the root cause is the multiple "desktops aka 
workspaces".

Have Fun
Reg

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Howto change NVidia driver version

2021-03-24 Thread Chris

On 2021-03-24 08:12, Stephan Althaus wrote:

On 03/20/21 08:21 AM, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:

Hi,

maybe it's time to put something on https://docs.openindiana.org
The sources of it are here: https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-docs
PR's are welcome and can be written by anybody capable of typing and has
some knowledge of markdown...

Regards,
Andreas


Hi!

Reading what is there at the moment,
i think the nvidia parts should be enhanced by a script that auto-selects 
the

correct driver for the installed hardware.

FreeBSD does it that way. Maybe some good hints might be found in their port.


I gave it a try to do it myself but i am not satisfied by now..

Stephan

--Chris



___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


--
~10yrs a FreeBSD maintainer of ~160 ports
~40yrs of UNIX

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Replacing Solaris 10 u8

2021-03-24 Thread Alan Coopersmith

On 3/24/21 11:13 AM, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss wrote:

I've still not found the Oracle EULA for 11.4.


It depends on whether you're paying for it or not.

If you're not paying, then:
https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/solaris-cluster-express-license.html

If you're paying, I believe the license terms are included with the support
contract terms, but I don't have a handy URL for those.

--
-Alan Coopersmith-   alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/alanc

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss