Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How is this possible? (Solved]

2021-04-16 Thread Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
 To summarize:

I swapped PSUs and graphics cards including putting the card from #3 in #4

I booted from the 2020.10 hard disk and Live Image

I swapped the KVM cables and ports

I tried the other PCIe slot that will take the graphics card. 

I put a scope on the 5 V and 12 V rails.

After all that agony I finally tracked it down. A couple of junk DVI-VGA 
adapters! Somehow in my search for the cause of the kernel panics I failed to 
notice that the display resolution was wrong when I was running 2020.10 in #4

After all this I'm exhausted. But I've never lost a battle with a piece of 
computer HW and was not about to start. I'd like to shoot these, but that would 
require more trouble than they are worth. So I am going to crush them with a 20 
ton hydraulic press. If there were someone I disliked enough, I'd give them 
away.

The moral of this sad tale is, "Don't put untested parts in your spares bin!" I 
bought these to have some spares on hand, but did not test them when i received 
them. They were still in the bags. I damaged my old one for #4 while shifting 
HW.

Unfortunately, I still have the kernel panics to deal with :-( 

Reg  
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How is this possible?

2021-04-16 Thread Chris

On 2021-04-16 11:38, Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss wrote:
I have a pair of almost identical Z400s. (In total I have 4.) One has 4x 2 
GB
DIMMs (#3)  and the other has 2x 8 GB DIMMs (#4) .  Both have Quadro FX 1800 
cards
and trayless SATA bays.  Both are connected to the monitor through an 8 port 
KVM

switch.

Hipster 2020.10 was installed on system #3.  The monitor was recognized and
configured properly as 1600x1200 using the 340.108 driver.   If I move the 
disk to
#4 the nVIDIA driver didn't recognize the monitor or the resolution, set 
1024x768

and would not allow me to set it to 1600x1200.

I  moved the KVM switch port for #4  to #3 and rebooted 2020.10 on #3.  It 
behaves

as expected, recognizes the Samsung Monitor and the correct resolution.

After I installed the 2x 8 GB DIMMs S10 u8 kernel panicked on a null pointer
dereference, so I moved the 2020.10 disk to system #4 and ran it for several 
days
to see if fmd would log ECC errors on the DIMMs.  fmdump -eV reports the log 
file
is empty after 3 days.  I don't know what whether fmd in u8 logs ECC errors 
as
I've never seen any, though I have seen occasional ECC errors on system #2 
which

is running 2017.10

This morning  I put the S10 u8 disks back in the system, booted and started 
scrubs
at which point it immediately kernel panicked.  I rebooted in single user 
mode.
Both the root pool 3 way mirror and the RAIDZ1 export pool scrubs completed 
with

no errors.

The 3 disks forming the 2 pools were in a 6 DIMM slot Z400 (#1).  That MB 
appears

to have a failing SATA controller as it logged so many sector R/W errors it
rebooted.  I replaced the suspect disk with a new drive of the same make, 
model

and vintage.  The errors continued so I switched the  u8 disks to #4.  A
subsequent test of the drive that was reported bad showed no errors after a 
4 hr

scan using the BIOS test.

After verifying that 2020.10 worked properly in #3, I moved the disk back to 
#4.
This time it came up at 960x540!  I changed out the video with the card from 
#1

and again it came up in 960x540. I then moved the video card from #3 to #4.
Again, 960x540.  I reset the BIOS to factory defaults, changed the things 
(e.g

AHCI) I knew had to be changed.  Again.  Same behavior.

If I boot the 2020.10 Live Image on #3 it's 1600x1200.  On #4 it's 1024x768. 
 I

tried the video card in the other PCIe slot.  Same result.

I'm completely baffled.I've never seen anything like this.
Cables? IOW if it is working on one but not others. I'd hazard a guess that 
the

system isn't receiving the EDID from the monitor through the KVM. Some KVMs
can be a problem that way by not providing enough of the power to the 
connections.

Other times (often) (cheap) cables are missing the "sync" wire. In any case,
I'd first start by swapping the cable from the working machine to the port
on the "different" machine and see if that doesn't solve it -- it's the 
fastest
and easiest first step. OTOH If the machine that OI was setup on provides 
video
on a different port than the machine your swapping to. That too may be a 
factor.

In any case; w/o any log output. This is all I feel safe offering. ;-)

HTH

--Chris



Reg

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


--

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How is this possible?

2021-04-16 Thread Jacob Ritorto
Oh but you switched video card into the offending chassis and got same bad
behaviour!!
Shoot sorry, missed that.  Same EFI / BIOS level on both motherboards?

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:49 PM Jacob Ritorto 
wrote:

> Off the cuff guess: differing video card firmware.  My kid's crappy linux
> PC had lingering (despite full blow-away-the-whole-disk reinstall) weird
> settings that harassed us for months until I found a more severe reset
> (different OS), which I presume included fw, but things are so candy-coated
> these days with gui installs and hidden antics that it wasn't even clear
> how / why it worked.  A very microsoft-esque experience, to say it the most
> polite way possible.
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:38 PM Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
>  wrote:
>
>> I have a pair of almost identical Z400s. (In total I have 4.) One has 4x
>> 2 GB DIMMs (#3)  and the other has 2x 8 GB DIMMs (#4) .  Both have Quadro
>> FX 1800 cards and trayless SATA bays.  Both are connected to the monitor
>> through an 8 port KVM switch.
>>
>> Hipster 2020.10 was installed on system #3.  The monitor was recognized
>> and configured properly as 1600x1200 using the 340.108 driver.   If I move
>> the disk to #4 the nVIDIA driver didn't recognize the monitor or the
>> resolution, set 1024x768 and would not allow me to set it to 1600x1200.
>>
>> I  moved the KVM switch port for #4  to #3 and rebooted 2020.10 on #3.
>> It behaves as expected, recognizes the Samsung Monitor and the correct
>> resolution.
>>
>> After I installed the 2x 8 GB DIMMs S10 u8 kernel panicked on a null
>> pointer dereference, so I moved the 2020.10 disk to system #4 and ran it
>> for several days to see if fmd would log ECC errors on the DIMMs.  fmdump
>> -eV reports the log file is empty after 3 days.  I don't know what whether
>> fmd in u8 logs ECC errors as I've never seen any, though I have seen
>> occasional ECC errors on system #2 which is running 2017.10
>>
>> This morning  I put the S10 u8 disks back in the system, booted and
>> started scrubs at which point it immediately kernel panicked.  I rebooted
>> in single user mode.  Both the root pool 3 way mirror and the RAIDZ1 export
>> pool scrubs completed with no errors.
>>
>> The 3 disks forming the 2 pools were in a 6 DIMM slot Z400 (#1).  That MB
>> appears to have a failing SATA controller as it logged so many sector R/W
>> errors it rebooted.  I replaced the suspect disk with a new drive of the
>> same make, model and vintage.  The errors continued so I switched the  u8
>> disks to #4.  A subsequent test of the drive that was reported bad showed
>> no errors after a 4 hr scan using the BIOS test.
>>
>> After verifying that 2020.10 worked properly in #3, I moved the disk back
>> to #4.  This time it came up at 960x540!  I changed out the video with the
>> card from #1 and again it came up in 960x540. I then moved the video card
>> from #3 to #4.  Again, 960x540.  I reset the BIOS to factory defaults,
>> changed the things (e.g AHCI) I knew had to be changed.  Again.  Same
>> behavior.
>>
>> If I boot the 2020.10 Live Image on #3 it's 1600x1200.  On #4 it's
>> 1024x768.  I tried the video card in the other PCIe slot.  Same result.
>>
>> I'm completely baffled.I've never seen anything like this.
>>
>> Reg
>>
>> ___
>> openindiana-discuss mailing list
>> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
>> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>>
>
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How is this possible?

2021-04-16 Thread Jacob Ritorto
Off the cuff guess: differing video card firmware.  My kid's crappy linux
PC had lingering (despite full blow-away-the-whole-disk reinstall) weird
settings that harassed us for months until I found a more severe reset
(different OS), which I presume included fw, but things are so candy-coated
these days with gui installs and hidden antics that it wasn't even clear
how / why it worked.  A very microsoft-esque experience, to say it the most
polite way possible.

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:38 PM Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss <
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org> wrote:

> I have a pair of almost identical Z400s. (In total I have 4.) One has 4x 2
> GB DIMMs (#3)  and the other has 2x 8 GB DIMMs (#4) .  Both have Quadro FX
> 1800 cards and trayless SATA bays.  Both are connected to the monitor
> through an 8 port KVM switch.
>
> Hipster 2020.10 was installed on system #3.  The monitor was recognized
> and configured properly as 1600x1200 using the 340.108 driver.   If I move
> the disk to #4 the nVIDIA driver didn't recognize the monitor or the
> resolution, set 1024x768 and would not allow me to set it to 1600x1200.
>
> I  moved the KVM switch port for #4  to #3 and rebooted 2020.10 on #3.  It
> behaves as expected, recognizes the Samsung Monitor and the correct
> resolution.
>
> After I installed the 2x 8 GB DIMMs S10 u8 kernel panicked on a null
> pointer dereference, so I moved the 2020.10 disk to system #4 and ran it
> for several days to see if fmd would log ECC errors on the DIMMs.  fmdump
> -eV reports the log file is empty after 3 days.  I don't know what whether
> fmd in u8 logs ECC errors as I've never seen any, though I have seen
> occasional ECC errors on system #2 which is running 2017.10
>
> This morning  I put the S10 u8 disks back in the system, booted and
> started scrubs at which point it immediately kernel panicked.  I rebooted
> in single user mode.  Both the root pool 3 way mirror and the RAIDZ1 export
> pool scrubs completed with no errors.
>
> The 3 disks forming the 2 pools were in a 6 DIMM slot Z400 (#1).  That MB
> appears to have a failing SATA controller as it logged so many sector R/W
> errors it rebooted.  I replaced the suspect disk with a new drive of the
> same make, model and vintage.  The errors continued so I switched the  u8
> disks to #4.  A subsequent test of the drive that was reported bad showed
> no errors after a 4 hr scan using the BIOS test.
>
> After verifying that 2020.10 worked properly in #3, I moved the disk back
> to #4.  This time it came up at 960x540!  I changed out the video with the
> card from #1 and again it came up in 960x540. I then moved the video card
> from #3 to #4.  Again, 960x540.  I reset the BIOS to factory defaults,
> changed the things (e.g AHCI) I knew had to be changed.  Again.  Same
> behavior.
>
> If I boot the 2020.10 Live Image on #3 it's 1600x1200.  On #4 it's
> 1024x768.  I tried the video card in the other PCIe slot.  Same result.
>
> I'm completely baffled.I've never seen anything like this.
>
> Reg
>
> ___
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] How is this possible?

2021-04-16 Thread Reginald Beardsley via openindiana-discuss
I have a pair of almost identical Z400s. (In total I have 4.) One has 4x 2 GB 
DIMMs (#3)  and the other has 2x 8 GB DIMMs (#4) .  Both have Quadro FX 1800 
cards and trayless SATA bays.  Both are connected to the monitor through an 8 
port KVM switch.

Hipster 2020.10 was installed on system #3.  The monitor was recognized and 
configured properly as 1600x1200 using the 340.108 driver.   If I move the disk 
to #4 the nVIDIA driver didn't recognize the monitor or the resolution, set 
1024x768 and would not allow me to set it to 1600x1200.

I  moved the KVM switch port for #4  to #3 and rebooted 2020.10 on #3.  It 
behaves as expected, recognizes the Samsung Monitor and the correct resolution.

After I installed the 2x 8 GB DIMMs S10 u8 kernel panicked on a null pointer 
dereference, so I moved the 2020.10 disk to system #4 and ran it for several 
days to see if fmd would log ECC errors on the DIMMs.  fmdump -eV reports the 
log file is empty after 3 days.  I don't know what whether fmd in u8 logs ECC 
errors as I've never seen any, though I have seen occasional ECC errors on 
system #2 which is running 2017.10

This morning  I put the S10 u8 disks back in the system, booted and started 
scrubs at which point it immediately kernel panicked.  I rebooted in single 
user mode.  Both the root pool 3 way mirror and the RAIDZ1 export pool scrubs 
completed with no errors.

The 3 disks forming the 2 pools were in a 6 DIMM slot Z400 (#1).  That MB 
appears to have a failing SATA controller as it logged so many sector R/W 
errors it rebooted.  I replaced the suspect disk with a new drive of the same 
make, model and vintage.  The errors continued so I switched the  u8 disks to 
#4.  A subsequent test of the drive that was reported bad showed no errors 
after a 4 hr scan using the BIOS test.

After verifying that 2020.10 worked properly in #3, I moved the disk back to 
#4.  This time it came up at 960x540!  I changed out the video with the card 
from #1 and again it came up in 960x540. I then moved the video card from #3 to 
#4.  Again, 960x540.  I reset the BIOS to factory defaults, changed the things 
(e.g AHCI) I knew had to be changed.  Again.  Same behavior.

If I boot the 2020.10 Live Image on #3 it's 1600x1200.  On #4 it's 1024x768.  I 
tried the video card in the other PCIe slot.  Same result.

I'm completely baffled.I've never seen anything like this.

Reg

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Realtek RTL8125 Ethernet Card

2021-04-16 Thread Joshua M. Clulow via openindiana-discuss
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 10:05, russell  wrote:
> As my current system already has a Realtek RTL8111/8168/84211 card built
> in and I needed a second interface a installed a Realtek RTL8125 card.
> In order to get it recognised I had add the entry to /etc/driver_aliases
>
> rge "pci10ec,8125"
>
> This allowed the interface to recognised but it autos to 100M full
> duplex while the built in operates at 1000M full duplex.

If the driver is working correctly (including sending and receiving
data on the network) it would be good to get a bug filed to add that
alias to the package in illumos:

https://www.illumos.org/projects/illumos-gate/issues/new

e.g., a similar recent bug for adding an alias for an ahci card:

https://www.illumos.org/issues/13599


Cheers.

-- 
Joshua M. Clulow
http://blog.sysmgr.org

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Realtek RTL8125 Ethernet Card

2021-04-16 Thread russell

Hi,

As my current system already has a Realtek RTL8111/8168/84211 card built 
in and I needed a second interface a installed a Realtek RTL8125 card. 
In order to get it recognised I had add the entry to /etc/driver_aliases


rge "pci10ec,8125"

This allowed the interface to recognised but it autos to 100M full 
duplex while the built in operates at 1000M full duplex.


Any suggestions on how to get it to operate at 1000M full duplex?

TIA

Russell


___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] April May snapshot

2021-04-16 Thread bscuk2






 Forwarded Message 
Subject:April May snapshot
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:58:45 +
From:   
To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org



Hello All,

Wallpapers to be included in next snapshot. I have done a basic
wallpaper for the next snapshot. I was interested if it would be
included in the next snapshot. Usually it would be a png image but I am
unable to understand what size it should be.

Let me know what you think.

Robert

https://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Image+Gallery?preview=/1474670/70156307/VISION21.PNG

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss