Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] USB3 devices needed for driver testing

2016-08-10 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
>

> Hello folks,
>
> there is an ongoing work on USB3 support in illumos and we should
> participate in testing. OI community can provide good testing background as
> I bet there is plenty of USB3 hardware.
>
> I’d like to create a list of person (email), device and driver, so we have
> that ready when actual driver testing comes.  Any exotic USB3 device or
> peripheral will help.
>
> So if anybody is interested in helping, please respond to this email. I’d
> also gladly ask others to not debate off-topic stuff in this thread. Thanks
> for understanding!
>
> Next to my HP Z420 I also have a Zotac RI323 with an unknown USB3 chip. I
haven't been able to run any illumos based OS because it has USB 3.0 only.

Same here. Where ca i find progress on USB3 xhci support in illumos? I cant
find it anywhere on:

https://www.illumos.org/projects/illumos-gate/issues

2016-07-05 18:45 GMT+02:00 Andreas Wacknitz :

>
>
> Am 04.07.16 um 22:13 schrieb Adam Števko:
>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> there is an ongoing work on USB3 support in illumos and we should
>> participate in testing. OI community can provide good testing background as
>> I bet there is plenty of USB3 hardware.
>>
>> I’d like to create a list of person (email), device and driver, so we
>> have that ready when actual driver testing comes.  Any exotic USB3 device
>> or peripheral will help.
>>
>> So if anybody is interested in helping, please respond to this email. I’d
>> also gladly ask others to not debate off-topic stuff in this thread. Thanks
>> for understanding!
>>
> Next to my HP Z420 I also have a Zotac RI323 with an unknown USB3 chip. I
> haven't been able to run any illumos based OS because it has USB 3.0 only.
>
>
> Regards
> Andreas
>
>
> ___
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Multiple monitor support

2015-09-12 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
RIck,

I wrote before that you can always try vesa driver which should work to run
graphical environment.

2015-09-11 23:40 GMT+02:00 ken mays via openindiana-discuss <
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org>:

> Rick,
>
> Try this (and this depends if you are using the Xorg ATI driver (radeon
> driver, make sure it is functioning correctly):
>
> --> xorg.conf
>
>
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
> Driver "kbd"
> Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
> Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
> Option "XkbLayout" "us"
> EndSection
>
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Configured Mouse"
> Driver "mouse"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Configured Video Device"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "DVI-0"
> EndSection
>
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier "DVI-1"
> Option "RightOf" "DVI-0"
>
> Section "Screen"
> Identifier "Default Screen"
> DefaultDepth24
> SubSection "Display"
> Depth 24
> Virtual   2880 2880
> EndSubSection
> EndSection
>
> ->
>
> Also, see:
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26502_01/html/E28056/gmcdj.html
>
> We have not upgraded the kernel radeon DRM so it is a hit-or-miss on
> OI-hipster but you can do this on Solaris/OpenSolaris releases.
>
> Enjoy,
> Ken
>
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Rick C. Hodgin <
> rick.c.hod...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I was able to reboot into the other boot menu option (not openindiana-1,
> >> but something about development) and get it to work.  But, I'm back in
> my
> >> old configuration now before the update.
> >>
> >> How can I copy over the X settings from this boot menu configuration to
> >> the openindiana-1 menu configuration?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Rick C. Hodgin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Rick C. Hodgin <
> rick.c.hod...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:40 PM, John D Groenveld <
> >>> jdg...@elvis.arl.psu.edu> wrote:
> >>>
>  In message

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Multiple monitor support

2015-09-10 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
Consider editing Xorg.conf leaving just very basic sections, and start from
there.

Most problems with X's starting is related to the wrong driver settings in
Device section, something like that:


Section "Device"
Identifier "Device0"
Driver "vesa" #Choose the driver used for this monitor
EndSection

Vesa driver is very generic driver, which work with most of the GPU's, no
acceleration and poor resolution, but you can treat it as a rollback
solution.



2015-09-10 0:40 GMT+02:00 John D Groenveld :

> In message

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Multiple monitor support

2015-09-09 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
Xorg doesn't need configuration file to work, by default. If you create the
file in /etc/X11/ it will overwrite default settings..

2015-09-09 14:01 GMT+02:00 Rick C. Hodgin :

> Where is my xorg.conf file supposed to be?  I searched my entire drive for
> one and could not find it, only a reference to xorg.conf.4, which was
> documentation for the manual.
>
> I am using an ATI video card, and someone suggested that may be the issue
> (not Intel or Nvidia).
>
> Best regards,
> Rick C. Hodgin
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Jim Klimov  wrote:
>
> > 8 сентября 2015 г. 19:07:32 CEST, "Rick C. Hodgin" <
> > rick.c.hod...@gmail.com> пишет:
> > >That should read "in OpenIndiana" and not "in OpenSolaris"... my
> > >mistake.
> > >:-)
> > >
> > >Best regards,
> > >Rick C. Hodgin
> > >
> > >
> > >On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Rick C. Hodgin
> > >
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have a Gigabyte motherboard with an integrated ATI Radeon GPU.  It
> > >works
> > >> properly in OpenSolaris.  However, I have two monitors.  If I mirror
> > >them
> > >> the screen displays on both.  If I try to set them separately, I get
> > >the
> > >> error "required virtual size dose not fit available size".  It shows
> > >me
> > >> 1920,1920 for the maximum virtual size, and it needs 3600x1200.
> > >>
> > >> What can I do to correct this?  I searched online and found several
> > >Linux
> > >> solutions.  They say add the virtual size line to /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
> > > I
> > >> tried that, rebooted, and X wouldn't start.  I removed xorg.conf and
> > >> rebooted and I'm back to where I started.
> > >>
> > >> TYIA!
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Rick C. Hodgin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >___
> > >openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > >openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> > >http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> >
> > I think in your xorg.conf you should have several Display and Monitor
> > clauses, and some clause to combine them intona large canvas.
> >
> > Something similar works for me in OI Hipster running as a VirtualBox
> guest
> > under Windows - there I have variably one or two displays (laptop +
> > ext.mon. at work), and OI with VBox switch it around quite well. There
> are
> > quirks, e.g. I can't get it to remember which display is left and which
> is
> > right, especially as I switch the VM from two fullscreens into a seamless
> > mode. But the engine mostly works and is useful anyhow ;)
> >
> > However, I did not dig deep into xorg files and used the Screen
> Resolution
> > wizard instead.
> >
> > BTW, does your Radeon work as such, or as a VESA VGA (like my APU =
> > CPU+GPU chip on another laptop)? Does standby work for you? :-)
> >
> > Jim
> > --
> > Typos courtesy of K-9 Mail on my Samsung Android
> >
> ___
> openindiana-discuss mailing list
> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
>
___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Multiple monitor support

2015-09-09 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
You can generate xorg.conf file to start work on it, with command:

# Xorg :0 -configure


Regards,

2015-09-09 19:56 GMT+02:00 Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hod...@gmail.com>:

> There isn't an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file already.  And OI comes up and
> displays just fine, but only on one monitor.  If I try to use both it gives
> me an error that my virtual size is too small (1920x1200, needs to be
> 3600x1200).  The fixes online I've seen say it needs a line added to
> xorg.conf setting the larger virtual size.  Sounds good... but, since I
> don't have an xorg.conf already... what do I do to have it create one
> that's correct so I can alter it?  I installed x-server utilities and I see
> xrandr is there, along with several others.  Can I use some sequence to get
> it to generate a valid xorg.conf file?
>
> I realize this is more of an X question than OpenIndiana.  So, I don't mind
> going somewhere else if need be.  I've never had good luck with X unless it
> just worked out of the box, which is mostly has. :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Rick C. Hodgin
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Krzysztof Grzempa <grzem...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Xorg doesn't need configuration file to work, by default. If you create
> the
> > file in /etc/X11/ it will overwrite default settings..
> >
> > 2015-09-09 14:01 GMT+02:00 Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c.hod...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Where is my xorg.conf file supposed to be?  I searched my entire drive
> > for
> > > one and could not find it, only a reference to xorg.conf.4, which was
> > > documentation for the manual.
> > >
> > > I am using an ATI video card, and someone suggested that may be the
> issue
> > > (not Intel or Nvidia).
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Rick C. Hodgin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Jim Klimov <jimkli...@cos.ru> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 8 сентября 2015 г. 19:07:32 CEST, "Rick C. Hodgin" <
> > > > rick.c.hod...@gmail.com> пишет:
> > > > >That should read "in OpenIndiana" and not "in OpenSolaris"... my
> > > > >mistake.
> > > > >:-)
> > > > >
> > > > >Best regards,
> > > > >Rick C. Hodgin
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Rick C. Hodgin
> > > > ><rick.c.hod...@gmail.com>
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I have a Gigabyte motherboard with an integrated ATI Radeon GPU.
> It
> > > > >works
> > > > >> properly in OpenSolaris.  However, I have two monitors.  If I
> mirror
> > > > >them
> > > > >> the screen displays on both.  If I try to set them separately, I
> get
> > > > >the
> > > > >> error "required virtual size dose not fit available size".  It
> shows
> > > > >me
> > > > >> 1920,1920 for the maximum virtual size, and it needs 3600x1200.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What can I do to correct this?  I searched online and found
> several
> > > > >Linux
> > > > >> solutions.  They say add the virtual size line to
> > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
> > > > > I
> > > > >> tried that, rebooted, and X wouldn't start.  I removed xorg.conf
> and
> > > > >> rebooted and I'm back to where I started.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> TYIA!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best regards,
> > > > >> Rick C. Hodgin
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >___
> > > > >openindiana-discuss mailing list
> > > > >openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
> > > > >http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
> > > >
> > > > I think in your xorg.conf you should have several Display and Monitor
> > > > clauses, and some clause to combine them intona large canvas.
> > > >
> > > > Something similar works for me in OI Hipster running as a VirtualBox
> > > guest
> > > > under Windows - there I have variably one or two displays (laptop +
> > > > ext.mon. at work), and OI with VBox switch it around quite well.
> There
> > > are
> > > > quirks, e.g. I can't get it to remember which display is left and
> which
> > > is
&g

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] force svc stop and start when changing SMF property

2015-05-11 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
/usr/sbin/*svcadm* [-v] *refresh* { FMRI | pattern }

??

2015-05-06 10:59 GMT+02:00 wessels wessels...@gmail.com:

 Hi,

 suppose I want to change the portnumber or path of a SMF controlled
 service. No problem, but when I do change the property I can no longer
 reach the service because it's still running using it's o
 previous port or path. Is there an attribute or some way to let SMF stop
 the service (with the old values), set the new values, and restart the
 service? Without creating a wrapper to stop, set, start.

 Thanks,
 Wes
 ___
 openindiana-discuss mailing list
 openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Java 8 plugin for Firefox

2015-04-30 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
Check IcedTea, it works smoothly on my Linux at work..

https://blogs.oracle.com/wangwj/entry/icedtea

2015-04-29 17:00 GMT+02:00 Apostolos Syropoulos via openindiana-discuss 
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org:

 
  The 64-bit binaries do not contain deployment tools such as Java Web
 Start
and Java Plug-in, therefore desktop integration is no longer required.
 


 Required? I guess this is a clever way to say that we provide no support
 for
 Solaris. But of course they do provide support for Linux.


 A.S.
 --
 Apostolos Syropoulos
 Xanthi, Greece

 ___
 openindiana-discuss mailing list
 openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Chm viewer, xchm and Hipster

2015-01-04 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
I would say OmniOS fits better.

2014-12-26 13:10 GMT+01:00 Dmitry Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com:

 I believe you've just described Tribblix


 Thank you, maybe I need to look closer at Tribblix, indeed.


 ___
 openindiana-discuss mailing list
 openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Bash bug issue

2014-09-25 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
I guess you can test it yourself:

$ env x='() { :;}; echo vulnerable' bash -c echo this is a test

2014-09-25 10:42 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Adams t12nsloo...@gmail.com:

 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/24/bash_shell_vuln/

 does anyone know if this affects us?
 ___
 openindiana-discuss mailing list
 openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenSXCE/SPARC: It was a mistake to keep the site online.

2014-09-15 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
Well, for me it is mistake to mix up technology with politics. I respects
the right of having opinion (everybody has it right?) but I strongly belive
that it should be separate from technology blog where expectation was to
find technical data about the distro..

Well, if you decide to drop the project thats your call..

We(me?)(the idiots) will find other way..

Cheers,

2014-09-14 19:02 GMT+02:00 Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org:

 It was a mistake to keep the site online.


 Cordial thanks nevertheless to the few fellows, who have proven to be
 true friends.



 And although I wanted to publish the src long ago (and in fact did
 contribute openly [in real-time openly] from 2005 till 2009), now
 that's the final nail in the coffin.


 p.s. to Nikola: You stated long ago, that you are not a coder, so what
 are your plans with the src?

 Furthermore it is nonsense what you write about the CDDL terms. The
 CDDL permits the developer to keep the src closed, similar to the Xorg
 license.

 For this reason the exact opposite of what Mr. Nikola wrote.

 He is a person who never ever did _anything_ for OpenSXCE, SPARC nor
 for myself. What gives him the riht to place demand after demand after
 demand???



 I saw a number of folks throw around with their plans and technical
 terms.

 It is almost funny.


 The most ridiculous part was with the alldged Putin-backdoor which
 one smart person (from Poland?) expects to be hidden in OpenSXCE.


 For such blind idiots I no longer waste my time.

 Also sad, that only a friend pointed out that OpenSXCE was until today
 also available for x86/x64.

 Even with native Intel gfx support via DRM/GEM

 Plus with native support for the final Adobe Flash plugin (no loading
 order workaround nor anything else LD* related).


 I bet a million that there will never be any distro coming only
 remotely close to OpenSXCE.



 http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2014-September/date.html

 
 NEVER AGAIN!
 What a zombified world  ...:(
 

 http://opensxce.blogspot.de/
 https://www.facebook.com/OpenSXCE
 https://twitter.com/martinbochnig
 http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.de/



 As nobody reading OI lists ever took the time to read my README, now I
 include it here, as opensxce.org is now offline:



 http://svr4.opensxce.org/RELEASE_NOTES__OpenSXCE2014.05_x86_x64_INTEL32-64_AMD32-64sun4u_sun4v_SPARC.txt



 http://svr4.opensxce.org/RELEASE_NOTES__OpenSXCE2014.05_x86_x64_INTEL32-64_AMD32-64sun4u_sun4v_SPARC.txt


 
 ###  WHAT's NEW in 2014.05 x86/x64 Intel32/64 AMD32/64:
 

 


 http://svr4.opensxce.org/201405/i386/DVD/
 http://svr4.opensxce.org/201405/i386/USB/
 http://svr4.opensxce.org/201405/i386/VHDD__7GB_FULLINSTALL/
 http://svr4.opensxce.org/201405/i386/REPO_redist/
 http://svr4.opensxce.org/201405/i386/CD__MinimumBase__UNTESTED/
 http://svr4.opensxce.org/201405/i386/USB__MinimumBase__UNTESTED/
 http://svr4.opensxce.org/201405/i386/5.11/


 Many bugs already fixed, see @BUGS

 Zones now supported (brand: SUNWsvr4pkgutil)
 Adobe flash-player plugin 11.x works
 FF29, TB29, Evolution works now, emacs now ok
 NVIDIA drivers included on x86
 COMPIZ now included on x86, only works with NVIDIA at this time

 OS/Net: Illumos checkout 20140505

 all ZFS compression types now supported

 Now additionally pre-installed onto LiveDVD/USB: Driver utility,
 Evolution, Emacs, FF29, TB29, Rich Lowe's gcc 444   etc ...


 I decided to finally ship the long promised  Intel  DRM/GEM/KMS port,
 although it is still limited and broken at this moment.
 All KMS-only Intel ddx'es (all the way from 2.10 to 2.22.910 / 3.0RC)
 do manage to negotiate GEM and KMS and come up into a typical -retro
 X11 root-window, but then get lost in an indefinite loop of pollsys()
 / ioctl(). The X11 server never gets to the point where it accepts any
 connections.

 Therefore OpenSXCE uses the one of OpenBSD5.3's Xenocara, which is
 mistakenly sometimes referred to as the last UMS-capable driver,
 which is nonsense. While it still contains Mathhieu Herrb's UMS
 backports for older chipsets, new hardware requires KMS to be present,
 anyway in the 2010/2011 state of development. Also it requires at
 least a lot more of GEM support, than the DRM/GEM code included in
 OS/Net 147 (and hence Illumos) had.

 To test this, the easiest is to remove /dev/dri/card0, and then see
 which error messages you get  ;-)


 Whatever, on Sandy and higher I enabled DRI2 for this release, as
 demonstration. glxgears (which needs  AIGLX and not DRI2) works fine.
 xdriinfo and glxinfo also confirm, that DRI2 is up and running on
 Sandy (as indicated by Xorg.0.log), but as soon as you want to start
 compiz, it segfaults and you end up in text mode (if enabled, gdm
 screen).

 Whatever, I

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sparc

2014-09-13 Thread Krzysztof Grzempa 
Im watching this disscusion, and you guys interested me into OpenSXCE
Ilumos distro. I might have get V440 server and i was looking for good
illumos distro to run. I read some about this distro, and instead of solid
knowledge, i started to worry about some Putin's backdoors included...
I dont like to mix up technology and politics and this guy obviously cannot
split these two things.
Anyway I will try OpenSXCE  for testing..

Cheers,

2014-09-12 9:39 GMT+02:00 Peter j...@zeus.net.au:

 I agree with Nikola and I'd also like to add:

 Martin's circumstances and success is inexorably linked to the success of
 Illumos and OI, commercial projects that build upon successful free
 projects are also often successful.  Last I checked the terms and
 conditions, OpenSXCE is a commercial project.  Martin has held on to his
 vision longer than most would due to his conviction and determination.
 Successful commercial projects also contribute back to their free community
 projects.

 Success comes with stability and surety, the only way that can occur is
 for people with different needs and common interests to find a way to
 understand each others needs and find acceptable compromises.

 Regards,

 Peter.

 - Original message -
  On 09/ 6/14 08:03 PM, Dormition Skete (Hotmail) wrote:
   He used to have a mailing list that someone in the Netherlands set up
   for him, but it had very little traffic, and seems to have disappeared
   in recent months.
  Hm, this doesn't seems right. If someone started hosting mailing list
  for him, at least he could get someone else continue hosting for it.
  Till now - I didn't know OpenSXCE mailing list existed.
  
   If you’re interested, write him at mar...@martux.org
  
   It appears to be the only open source distro for sparc, and I have not
   seen anyone else having much interest in it, so if you want an open
   source distro for sparc, I think that is your only option.   And I’m
   not sure I should call this an “open source” project, but it is a free
   one.
  Seems like people are saying enough with not involving. Open source is
  more important then 'free project'.
 
  Being OpenSource or not - is fundamental differentiator between
  something being interesting and usefull and not. Free software Copyleft
  licenses (CDDL, others) require derivative work to be open if
  distributed. Not to mention need for code to be audited by wider
  audience before   wider use and the time needed for the code changes to
  be reviewed   independently, when released.
  All this is not present in OpenSXCE and therefore, results are known.
 
  I really like what Martin is doing, would very much like to help him,
  and would like to see people to contribute to him back by all means,
  only some need of openness in the projects is needed.
 
  Connecting work only and directly to just financial aspect is not
  straightforward, as it seems.
  There is many more things to consider in path between working on
  something and picking fruits of on'e work and most important is: what
  (possibly paying) users would like to have.
  I would like Source code open and Copyleft licensed - like the code that
  is started with.
 
 
  ___
  openindiana-discuss mailing list
  openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

 ___
 openindiana-discuss mailing list
 openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
openindiana-discuss mailing list
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss