Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installing GO in OI
Well I linked to version 1.4, but they got a version 1.5.1: https://pkgsrc.joyent.com/packages/SmartOS/2015Q3/x86_64/lang/go-1.5.1.tgz 2015-10-21 12:33 GMT+02:00 Mads Worsøe Duun : > Joyent got a prebuild go packages (x86_64): > > http://pkgsrc.joyent.com/packages/SmartOS/2015Q3/x86_64/lang/go14-1.4.3.tgz > > It can be installed by using pkgin. You can bootstrap pkgsrc/pkgin > following this guide: > > http://pkgsrc.joyent.com/install-on-illumos/ > > 2015-10-21 12:21 GMT+02:00 Gary Gendel : > >> I made the attempt to build it on OmniOS using pkgsrc. I spent a lot of >> time but was never able to figure this out. I think the easiest would be >> to build gccgo but I didn't have success there either. >> >> >> On 10/21/2015 2:23 AM, Nikola M wrote: >> >>> On 10/21/15 01:42 AM, Mohamed Khalfella wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I want to run GO in OI. >>>> Any ideas where I can install/bootstrap golang in OI? >>>> Does cgo work in OI? >>>> >>>> I guess you are thinking not about gnugo game, but of go language >>> Following GDA's reccomendations, ha? :) >>> >>> I might be interested in theis too, don't know if there is already an >>> package somewhere, >>> but since GDA mentioned it, meybe he knows it it's there somewhere for >>> illumos. >>> >>> Or probably make it install from source and then contribute package to >>> OI, since it is a good ide? >>> http://hipster.openindiana.org:8080/ , hipster.openindiana.org , it's >>> all on Github for oi-userland (and there is also SFE project with IPS >>> publisher for hipster: (http://sfe.opencsw.org/localhostoih/) , >>> sfe.opencsw.org >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> openindiana-discuss mailing list >>> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org >>> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >>> >> >> >> >> ___ >> openindiana-discuss mailing list >> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >> > > ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installing GO in OI
Joyent got a prebuild go packages (x86_64): http://pkgsrc.joyent.com/packages/SmartOS/2015Q3/x86_64/lang/go14-1.4.3.tgz It can be installed by using pkgin. You can bootstrap pkgsrc/pkgin following this guide: http://pkgsrc.joyent.com/install-on-illumos/ 2015-10-21 12:21 GMT+02:00 Gary Gendel : > I made the attempt to build it on OmniOS using pkgsrc. I spent a lot of > time but was never able to figure this out. I think the easiest would be > to build gccgo but I didn't have success there either. > > > On 10/21/2015 2:23 AM, Nikola M wrote: > >> On 10/21/15 01:42 AM, Mohamed Khalfella wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I want to run GO in OI. >>> Any ideas where I can install/bootstrap golang in OI? >>> Does cgo work in OI? >>> >>> I guess you are thinking not about gnugo game, but of go language >> Following GDA's reccomendations, ha? :) >> >> I might be interested in theis too, don't know if there is already an >> package somewhere, >> but since GDA mentioned it, meybe he knows it it's there somewhere for >> illumos. >> >> Or probably make it install from source and then contribute package to >> OI, since it is a good ide? >> http://hipster.openindiana.org:8080/ , hipster.openindiana.org , it's >> all on Github for oi-userland (and there is also SFE project with IPS >> publisher for hipster: (http://sfe.opencsw.org/localhostoih/) , >> sfe.opencsw.org >> >> >> ___ >> openindiana-discuss mailing list >> openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss >> > > > > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Installing GO in OI
2015-10-21 1:42 GMT+02:00 Mohamed Khalfella : > Hi, > > I want to run GO in OI. > Any ideas where I can install/bootstrap golang in OI? > Does cgo work in OI? > > -- > BR, > Mohamed A. Khalfella > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss You can install go using pkgsrc from Joyent (http://pkgsrc.joyent.com/) Mads Worsøe Duun ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Sonicle XStreamOS repo and XStream Desktop in progress
This sounds really great, thanks. I would like to have: Enlightenment (e17) Chromium VLC 2.x Handbrake golang Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Knowledge Base for Compiling and InstallingSoftware Not Available as Packages.
Why not look at pkgsrc? It is working well on Openindiana/Illumos, and is supported by Joyent ( http://www.perkin.org.uk/posts/pkgsrc-2012Q3-packages-for-illumos.html). Joyent even adapt the packages to support SMF on SmartOS. Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The lx brand for OpenIndiana 151a
Hi Andrey >> http://os-solaris.ru/en/lx-brand-dlya-openindiana-151a/ > > This looks great, is it lx or lx26 brandz? Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] KDE
> > Thank you. Added 4.6.0. Installed successfully, but KDE system keeps > playing. > > I guess you mean that all sound notification continues in a endless loop. I have that problem too. Also kde is terrible slow, even if I disable desktop effects. KDE4 on FreeBSD, on the same hardware works perfectly. Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The Illumos pkgsrc project
I have updated the project page, released a new version of the script, and made a forum. It can all be found at http://www.illumos.org/projects/worsoe. The Illumos Pkgsrc Project Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The Illumos pkgsrc project
2011/2/8 Dustin Marquess > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Mads Worsøe Duun wrote: > > Btw my bootstrap script does not support the Sun Studio compiler yet. I > have > > had much more success using the gcc compiler. I know that Studio will > > generate better code, but it will involve much more pkgsrc hacking. My > > script also first use an external gcc compiler to bootstrap pkgsrc, then > > compile and switch to a "native" pkgsrc gcc compiler. The pkgsrc compiler > > used as default in my script is gcc34, but you have the option to use > gcc44, > > and the too experimental compilers clang and pcc. This option will also > > later support Sun Studio. > > I agree. When I used pkgsrc in production on Solaris 10 sun4u > machines, I used gcc34 over gcc44 / gccfs / Studio because it had the > highest 'success' rate. When I started using it on OI amd64 machines, > I started using Studio because it had a high recommendation on the > pkgsrc lists, but there is definitely more pkgsrc hacking involved in > it. > > pkgsrc support for gcc 4.x is getting better (I use 4.4 on my NetBSD > machines), however at least on Sol10/sun4u, I had weird problems with > certain apps when using 4.x, whereas 3.4 just worked. Of course 3.x > also worked better than 4.x for me on my old Tru64 machines, so maybe > I'm just cursed when it comes to gcc 4 :). > > -Dustin > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > Thats why I choosed gcc34 as default, and give the option to select another compiler if you want. Btw I have uploaded a alpha or maybe more a pre alpha version of the bootstrap script. It can be downloaded here http://www.illumos.org/attachments/download/158/ipp ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The Illumos pkgsrc project
Hi Dustin Great to hear, any help is a great help, as this is so fare a one man project. I am not in favor of dictatorship, so decisions should be made by the project members. Therefore I hope that we will have discussion about how changes should be made to the pkgsrc tree. I vote for that we will maintain our own tree, as we could commit changes faster. But of cause, changes should also be sent back upstream. I guess this is something like what DragonFlyBSD do. Btw my bootstrap script does not support the Sun Studio compiler yet. I have had much more success using the gcc compiler. I know that Studio will generate better code, but it will involve much more pkgsrc hacking. My script also first use an external gcc compiler to bootstrap pkgsrc, then compile and switch to a "native" pkgsrc gcc compiler. The pkgsrc compiler used as default in my script is gcc34, but you have the option to use gcc44, and the too experimental compilers clang and pcc. This option will also later support Sun Studio. If you want to be official member of The Illumos pkgsrc project, please register at http://www.illumos.org and let me know. Also please tell me what kind of work you would like to help with. Mads Worsøe Duun 2011/2/8 Dustin Marquess > I would like to help out if I can. I've been using pkgsrc + Studio > 12.2 exclusively on my OI servers, so I've already done quite a bit of > hacking to get packages to compile. > > I assume any changes are going to be sent back upstream? Sort of how > the DFBSD pkgsrc stuff works? > > -Dustin > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Mads Worsøe Duun wrote: > > 2011/2/7 Alasdair Lumsden > > > >> On 2 Feb 2011, at 19:30, Mads Worsøe Duun wrote: > >> > >> > *The Illumos pkgsrc project* > >> > > >> > I have created Illumos pkgsrc project at > >> > http://www.illumos.org/projects/worsoe. > >> > >> Great stuff! > > > > > > Somebody had to do it. > > > > > >> > >> > The is about making NetBSD's pkgsrc http://www.pkgsrc.org shine on > >> > Illumos/Openindiana. Pkgsrc already work on Illumos/Openindiana, but > >> really > >> > need some love to make it shine. Below are some ideas of what is > needed: > >> > > >> > *Script to bootstrap pkgsrc under Illumos/Openindiana (WIP)* > >> > I already have a script to bootstrap pkgsrc, but some of it need to be > >> > rewritten. It also need some more testing. > >> > > >> > *Pkgsrc patches for Solaris/Illumos pkgsrc* > >> > A lot of packages will not build, or do not work very well on > >> > Illumos/Openindiana, so patches need to be written. This is probably > the > >> > most needed and demanding task. Therefore I call for volunteers to > help > >> with > >> > this. For commiting patches to pkgsrc, we can do one of too things: > >> > > >> > 1. Commit the patches to the official pkgsrc repo. > >> > 2. Host our own repo, wich is in sync with the official repo > >> > > >> > With the second solution, we can have patches committed faster. > >> > > >> > *Pkgsrc2ips script* > >> > Develop a script to convert pkgsrc to IPS packages. Creation of SVR4 > >> > packages is not needed, as a utility for this already exist in pkgsrc. > >> > >> I've already written a proof of concept for this. > >> > >> The biggest challenge is dealing with package dependencies - NetBSD > allows > >> strings as versions, such as 0.9.8g, 1.2rc2, 4.5alpha1 or whatever - and > has > >> some stupidly complicated (and as far as I'm concerned, stupid) method > of > >> comparing versions called dewey. > >> > >> So I decided in my proof of concept just to have dependencies based on > >> package name, not version, and to leave dependencies to pkgsrc itself. > >> > > > > The idea was to include a pkgsrc2ips function in that script that I > already > > got. But if you already got a proof of concept for this, there are no > reason > > to reinvent the wheel. > > > > > >> > >> > *Build bulk* > >> > Creation of a build bulk system, to create binary packages (we also > need > >> a > >> > host to provide binaries). > >> > >> OpenIndiana will happily host any repos, build zones or download sites > (eg > >> dlc.openindian.org) for this work. Please do join #oi-dev on > >> irc.freenode.net to discuss this. > >> > > > > > >> Thanks! > >>
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] The Illumos pkgsrc project
2011/2/7 Alasdair Lumsden > On 2 Feb 2011, at 19:30, Mads Worsøe Duun wrote: > > > *The Illumos pkgsrc project* > > > > I have created Illumos pkgsrc project at > > http://www.illumos.org/projects/worsoe. > > Great stuff! Somebody had to do it. > > > The is about making NetBSD's pkgsrc http://www.pkgsrc.org shine on > > Illumos/Openindiana. Pkgsrc already work on Illumos/Openindiana, but > really > > need some love to make it shine. Below are some ideas of what is needed: > > > > *Script to bootstrap pkgsrc under Illumos/Openindiana (WIP)* > > I already have a script to bootstrap pkgsrc, but some of it need to be > > rewritten. It also need some more testing. > > > > *Pkgsrc patches for Solaris/Illumos pkgsrc* > > A lot of packages will not build, or do not work very well on > > Illumos/Openindiana, so patches need to be written. This is probably the > > most needed and demanding task. Therefore I call for volunteers to help > with > > this. For commiting patches to pkgsrc, we can do one of too things: > > > > 1. Commit the patches to the official pkgsrc repo. > > 2. Host our own repo, wich is in sync with the official repo > > > > With the second solution, we can have patches committed faster. > > > > *Pkgsrc2ips script* > > Develop a script to convert pkgsrc to IPS packages. Creation of SVR4 > > packages is not needed, as a utility for this already exist in pkgsrc. > > I've already written a proof of concept for this. > > The biggest challenge is dealing with package dependencies - NetBSD allows > strings as versions, such as 0.9.8g, 1.2rc2, 4.5alpha1 or whatever - and has > some stupidly complicated (and as far as I'm concerned, stupid) method of > comparing versions called dewey. > > So I decided in my proof of concept just to have dependencies based on > package name, not version, and to leave dependencies to pkgsrc itself. > The idea was to include a pkgsrc2ips function in that script that I already got. But if you already got a proof of concept for this, there are no reason to reinvent the wheel. > > > *Build bulk* > > Creation of a build bulk system, to create binary packages (we also need > a > > host to provide binaries). > > OpenIndiana will happily host any repos, build zones or download sites (eg > dlc.openindian.org) for this work. Please do join #oi-dev on > irc.freenode.net to discuss this. > > Thanks! > > Alasdair > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > Thanks Alasdair, it's very nice to have your and Openindiana's support, and I would be very happy to use openindiana.org as host for this project. I have jointed #oi-dev (Worsoe) so we can discuss where to go from here. Regards, Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] The Illumos pkgsrc project
*The Illumos pkgsrc project* I have created Illumos pkgsrc project at http://www.illumos.org/projects/worsoe. The is about making NetBSD's pkgsrc http://www.pkgsrc.org shine on Illumos/Openindiana. Pkgsrc already work on Illumos/Openindiana, but really need some love to make it shine. Below are some ideas of what is needed: *Script to bootstrap pkgsrc under Illumos/Openindiana (WIP)* I already have a script to bootstrap pkgsrc, but some of it need to be rewritten. It also need some more testing. *Pkgsrc patches for Solaris/Illumos pkgsrc* A lot of packages will not build, or do not work very well on Illumos/Openindiana, so patches need to be written. This is probably the most needed and demanding task. Therefore I call for volunteers to help with this. For commiting patches to pkgsrc, we can do one of too things: 1. Commit the patches to the official pkgsrc repo. 2. Host our own repo, wich is in sync with the official repo With the second solution, we can have patches committed faster. *Pkgsrc2ips script* Develop a script to convert pkgsrc to IPS packages. Creation of SVR4 packages is not needed, as a utility for this already exist in pkgsrc. *Build bulk* Creation of a build bulk system, to create binary packages (we also need a host to provide binaries). More to come... Looking forward to hear from people who is interested, and want to help. Regards, Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Root role and root user
2010/12/9 Harry Putnam > Mads Worsøe Duun writes: > > Running root as user is dirty, and for > > lazy persons. > > Exactly! .. now you've got the idea. > > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > LOL! I'll buy you a beer in the airport :-) ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Package buildsystem
2010/12/8 Dustin Marquess > While personally all of my OpenIndianan/Solaris servers use pkgsrc (it > rocks!), I personally think effort would be best spent fixing the existing > packages in pkgsrc upstream. I know the DragonflyBSD devs do this, that > way > they automatically benefit from changes upstream. > > -Dustin > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Mads Worsøe Duun wrote: > > > In the wiki section > > > > > http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/OpenIndiana+Addon+Consolidations?focusedCommentId=4883385#comment-4883385it > > says a BSD-ports buildsystem will be added later to Openindiana. I > > very > > much like this idea, but has anyone thought about witch system to use? > Will > > it be a system designed from scratch, or will an already existing system > be > > ported? > > > > Personally I vote for NetBSD's pkgsrc. It already bootstraps and > partially > > works on Openindiana. Partially because a lot of packages will not build, > > because of missing Solaris patches. In the future, a tool that convert > > packages from pkgsrc to IPS could be developed. > > > > Cheers > > Mads Worsøe Duun > > ___ > > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > I know DragonFlyBSD do that, but thats because it's not always so easy to commit patches to pkgsrc. But your right, patches should be commited upstream. But back to the subject, would you prefer a package buildsystem from scratch, or reuse something like pkgsrc? I just thing it would be waste of time to create something from scratch, when we got eg. pkgsrc or portage for that sake. BTW I love playing with DragonFlyBSD. Mads ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Root role and root user
I really don't like the idea of running as root if I don't need it, not even on my home setup. I really don't see the problem in ssh into my regular user, and from there su into root. Running root as user is dirty, and for lazy persons. Cheers, Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] Package buildsystem
In the wiki section http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/OpenIndiana+Addon+Consolidations?focusedCommentId=4883385#comment-4883385it says a BSD-ports buildsystem will be added later to Openindiana. I very much like this idea, but has anyone thought about witch system to use? Will it be a system designed from scratch, or will an already existing system be ported? Personally I vote for NetBSD's pkgsrc. It already bootstraps and partially works on Openindiana. Partially because a lot of packages will not build, because of missing Solaris patches. In the future, a tool that convert packages from pkgsrc to IPS could be developed. Cheers Mads Worsøe Duun ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
