Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
The only unstable thing seems to be my typing.. Rewrite follows: I have been using OI for development and as a production server and have had NO problems stability wise. On my laptop I found that the SMB service is preventing sleeping. If I disable SMB service, power saving works well. But, something is reenabling the service, which in my opinion should not be happening. I have not had a chance to dig into it further. OI is not unstable, we should stop saying so. It is just not proven to be stable, or unstable for that matter. Mike On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 12:08 -0500, Michael Stapleton wrote: > I have been using OI for development and as a production server and have > had NO problems stability wise. On my laptop I found that the SMB > service is preventing sleeping. If I disable SMB service, power saving > works well. But, something is reenabling the service, > OI is not unstable, we should stop saying so. It is just not proven to > be stable, or unstable for that matter. > > Mike > > > to be so. which in my opinion should not be happening. I have not had a > chance to dig into it further. > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 10:51 -0400, Vasten Tech wrote: > > > Power saving does not work. The machine will not go to sleep. > > > > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 12:08 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > > On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: > > > > On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > > >> I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very > > > >> well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be > > > >> used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In > > > >> other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? > > > > In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out > > > > and have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. > > > > > > Thanks. Other experiences? > > > > > > ___ > > > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > > > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > > > > ___ > > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
I have been using OI for development and as a production server and have had NO problems stability wise. On my laptop I found that the SMB service is preventing sleeping. If I disable SMB service, power saving works well. But, something is reenabling the service, OI is not unstable, we should stop saying so. It is just not proven to be stable, or unstable for that matter. Mike to be so. which in my opinion should not be happening. I have not had a chance to dig into it further. On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 10:51 -0400, Vasten Tech wrote: > Power saving does not work. The machine will not go to sleep. > > On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 12:08 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: > > > On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > >> I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very > > >> well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be > > >> used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In > > >> other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? > > > In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out > > > and have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. > > > > Thanks. Other experiences? > > > > ___ > > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
On 06/11/10 12:08, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out and have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. Thanks. Other experiences? same for me, on my home server from b134 to oi_147. But i only use it as a server, and as we have a mac machine, i installed the latest netatalk. And it is faster than cifs! power saving never worked, and it is a Sun ultra20... ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
Power saving does not work. The machine will not go to sleep. On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 12:08 +0100, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: > > On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > >> I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very > >> well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be > >> used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In > >> other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? > > In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out > > and have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. > > Thanks. Other experiences? > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
On 6/11/10 09:15 PM, taemun wrote: I upgraded a b134 box to OI_147, and the only change I've noticed is that I now get: ... Your "cron" job on mirror /usr/lib/update-manager/update-refresh.sh produced the following output: /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:57: GtkWarning: could not open display warnings.warn(str(e), _gtk.Warning) GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Not running within active session) /usr/bin/pm-updatemanager:93: GtkWarning: file gtkicontheme.c: line 317: assertion `GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed self.icon_theme = gtk.icon_theme_get_default() Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pm-updatemanager", line 408, in set_check_all, set_check_cache) File "/usr/bin/pm-updatemanager", line 95, in __init__ self.icon_theme.append_search_path(pkg_icon_location) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'append_search_path' In /var/mail/root, every day or two. I have gdm disabled, so am not surprised that gtk couldn't open a display. That message is not related to gdm. It's related to root not being able to find a usable DISPLAY variable. I suggest disabling svc:/application/pkg/update:default. M ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >> In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out and >> have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. > > Thanks. Other experiences? Yes, I can confirm that too. We're running few servers on production (*yuck*). PostgreSQL and GlassFish appserver on few nodes each (actually on a sack of zones). No problems at all. P.S. Actually, OI is better than 134. -- Kind regards, BM Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
I upgraded a b134 box to OI_147, and the only change I've noticed is that I now get: >From r...@mirror.local Sat Nov 6 09:48:52 2010 Return-Path: Received: from mirror.local (mirror [127.0.0.1]) by mirror.local (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA5Mmqkf014916 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:48:52 +1100 (EST) Received: (from r...@localhost) by mirror.local (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id oA5Mmq0v014915 for root; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:48:52 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 09:48:52 +1100 (EST) From: Super-User Message-Id: <201011052248.oa5mmq0v014...@mirror.local> To: r...@mirror.local Subject: Output from "cron" command MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 1004 Your "cron" job on mirror /usr/lib/update-manager/update-refresh.sh produced the following output: /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:57: GtkWarning: could not open display warnings.warn(str(e), _gtk.Warning) GConf Error: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information. (Details - 1: Not running within active session) /usr/bin/pm-updatemanager:93: GtkWarning: file gtkicontheme.c: line 317: assertion `GDK_IS_SCREEN (screen)' failed self.icon_theme = gtk.icon_theme_get_default() Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pm-updatemanager", line 408, in set_check_all, set_check_cache) File "/usr/bin/pm-updatemanager", line 95, in __init__ self.icon_theme.append_search_path(pkg_icon_location) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'append_search_path' In /var/mail/root, every day or two. I have gdm disabled, so am not surprised that gtk couldn't open a display. Also, I get: Nov 6 21:10:17 mirror pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 3 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 0 Nov 6 21:10:17 mirror pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 3 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 6 21:11:17 mirror pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 3 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 2 Nov 6 21:11:17 mirror pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 3 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 3 In dmesg. This repeats every two minutes, as above. Neither of these were thrown in logs on b134, but neither really affect the system. Cheers, On 6 November 2010 22:08, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: > >> On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >> >>> I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very >>> well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used >>> to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In other words: is >>> it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? >>> >> In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out and >> have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. >> > > Thanks. Other experiences? > > > ___ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
On 6-11-2010 10:43, Paul Johnston wrote: On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out and have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. Thanks. Other experiences? ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
On 11/ 6/10 09:33 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? Thanks for the advice. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss In my limited experience, I swopped over as soon as Indiana came out and have seen no difference in reliablilty/stability. The only difference is sometimes my mouse dies but killing firefox seems to cure that??? I put this down to having four machines connected to a single keyboard/screen/mouse via a kvm. Otherwise it's hard to tell apart. Cheers Paul ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] stablity
I used to run OpenSolaris-b134 for my home server and it worked very well. What is the status for OpenIndiana in this respect? Could it be used to run a home server or is it still to unstable for this? In other words: is it worse, better or the same as OpenSolaris-b134 was? Thanks for the advice. ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
