Re: [8u-dev announce] Future contributions to openjfx/8u-dev
Well maybe mirror was the wrong term - I think now that 8u-dev is force and won't see any changes anymore. A one time dump is what we should have somewhere on git/github. Tom On 18.01.19 09:27, Tom Schindl wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any documentation how the current javafxports mirror repository > got created? > > Some of our customer projects are going to be stuck on JavaFX-8 for the > forseeable future and while we won't sign up for providing general > support for JavaFX-8 it would be good to have a central place one can > fork JavaFX-8 from. > > Having a central place would allow (at least in theory) that > modifications and patches from different people can be merged without to > much manual work. > > Tom > > On 08.01.19 00:01, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> I'm not sure that an 8u-dev mirror would be suitable for the javafxports >> project, but if someone wanted to set up such a mirror elsewhere they >> could do so. It might be best left to the future maintainer (if any >> suitable party steps forward) to determine whether and where to host a >> git mirror. >> >> -- Kevin >> >> >> On 12/21/2018 1:39 PM, Tom Schindl wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Could we get a mirror of 8u setup for github as well? I wanted to ask >>> for that since some time but always forgot to do so. >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> On 21.12.18 22:32, Kevin Rushforth wrote: As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part of the JDK, Oracle will also no longer contribute to the OpenJFX 8u-dev code line (8u-dev/rt repo) after JDK 8u202 ships. This means that Oracle will be stepping down as the maintainer of the openjfx/8u-dev code line after January, and will call for a new maintainer. If a suitable party steps forward to maintain the OpenJFX 8 Updates code line after the final Oracle-led JDK 8 Update release has been published, we will discuss how to best enable such a transition on this Project's mailing list. I wanted to send this before the holidays, although I realize it might get lost in the shuffle, so I will resend it after the first of the year, along with a formal call for interested parties who wish to put their name forward as a maintainer for the openjfx/8u-dev release. -- Kevin [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-March/007341.html [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-September/007923.html >> > -- Tom Schindl, CTO BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7. A-6020 Innsbruck Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
Re: [8u-dev announce] Future contributions to openjfx/8u-dev
Hi, Is there any documentation how the current javafxports mirror repository got created? Some of our customer projects are going to be stuck on JavaFX-8 for the forseeable future and while we won't sign up for providing general support for JavaFX-8 it would be good to have a central place one can fork JavaFX-8 from. Having a central place would allow (at least in theory) that modifications and patches from different people can be merged without to much manual work. Tom On 08.01.19 00:01, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > I'm not sure that an 8u-dev mirror would be suitable for the javafxports > project, but if someone wanted to set up such a mirror elsewhere they > could do so. It might be best left to the future maintainer (if any > suitable party steps forward) to determine whether and where to host a > git mirror. > > -- Kevin > > > On 12/21/2018 1:39 PM, Tom Schindl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Could we get a mirror of 8u setup for github as well? I wanted to ask >> for that since some time but always forgot to do so. >> >> Tom >> >> On 21.12.18 22:32, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >>> As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer >>> contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly >>> CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part >>> of the JDK, Oracle will also no longer contribute to the OpenJFX 8u-dev >>> code line (8u-dev/rt repo) after JDK 8u202 ships. >>> >>> This means that Oracle will be stepping down as the maintainer of the >>> openjfx/8u-dev code line after January, and will call for a new >>> maintainer. If a suitable party steps forward to maintain the OpenJFX 8 >>> Updates code line after the final Oracle-led JDK 8 Update release has >>> been published, we will discuss how to best enable such a transition on >>> this Project's mailing list. >>> >>> I wanted to send this before the holidays, although I realize it might >>> get lost in the shuffle, so I will resend it after the first of the >>> year, along with a formal call for interested parties who wish to put >>> their name forward as a maintainer for the openjfx/8u-dev release. >>> >>> -- Kevin >>> >>> [1] >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-March/007341.html >>> [2] >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-September/007923.html >>> >>> > -- Tom Schindl, CTO BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7. A-6020 Innsbruck Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
Re: [8u-dev announce] Future contributions to openjfx/8u-dev
I'm not sure that an 8u-dev mirror would be suitable for the javafxports project, but if someone wanted to set up such a mirror elsewhere they could do so. It might be best left to the future maintainer (if any suitable party steps forward) to determine whether and where to host a git mirror. -- Kevin On 12/21/2018 1:39 PM, Tom Schindl wrote: Hi, Could we get a mirror of 8u setup for github as well? I wanted to ask for that since some time but always forgot to do so. Tom On 21.12.18 22:32, Kevin Rushforth wrote: As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part of the JDK, Oracle will also no longer contribute to the OpenJFX 8u-dev code line (8u-dev/rt repo) after JDK 8u202 ships. This means that Oracle will be stepping down as the maintainer of the openjfx/8u-dev code line after January, and will call for a new maintainer. If a suitable party steps forward to maintain the OpenJFX 8 Updates code line after the final Oracle-led JDK 8 Update release has been published, we will discuss how to best enable such a transition on this Project's mailing list. I wanted to send this before the holidays, although I realize it might get lost in the shuffle, so I will resend it after the first of the year, along with a formal call for interested parties who wish to put their name forward as a maintainer for the openjfx/8u-dev release. -- Kevin [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-March/007341.html [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-September/007923.html
[8u-dev announce] Future contributions to openjfx/8u-dev
This is a follow-up to the "heads-up" [0] email I sent before the New Year. As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part of the JDK, Oracle will also no longer contribute to the OpenJFX 8u-dev code line (8u-dev/rt repo) after JDK 8u202 ships. This means that Oracle is stepping down as the maintainer of the openjfx/8u-dev code line after January. As with the JDK 8 Updates Project, a suitable party might step forward to maintain the 8u-dev code line in the OpenJFX Project once the final Oracle-led JDK 8 Update release has been published. If such a party is nominated, we will discuss how to best enable such a transition on this Project's mailing list. -- Kevin [0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-December/023007.html [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-March/007341.html [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-September/007923.html
Re: [8u-dev announce] Future contributions to openjfx/8u-dev
Hi, Could we get a mirror of 8u setup for github as well? I wanted to ask for that since some time but always forgot to do so. Tom On 21.12.18 22:32, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer > contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly > CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part > of the JDK, Oracle will also no longer contribute to the OpenJFX 8u-dev > code line (8u-dev/rt repo) after JDK 8u202 ships. > > This means that Oracle will be stepping down as the maintainer of the > openjfx/8u-dev code line after January, and will call for a new > maintainer. If a suitable party steps forward to maintain the OpenJFX 8 > Updates code line after the final Oracle-led JDK 8 Update release has > been published, we will discuss how to best enable such a transition on > this Project's mailing list. > > I wanted to send this before the holidays, although I realize it might > get lost in the shuffle, so I will resend it after the first of the > year, along with a formal call for interested parties who wish to put > their name forward as a maintainer for the openjfx/8u-dev release. > > -- Kevin > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-March/007341.html > [2] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-September/007923.html > -- Tom Schindl, CTO BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7. A-6020 Innsbruck Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
[8u-dev announce] Future contributions to openjfx/8u-dev
As has been previously announced [1][2], Oracle will no longer contribute to the JDK 8 Updates Project after the January 2019 quarterly CPU release of JDK 8u202. Since JavaFX for JDK 8 is delivered as a part of the JDK, Oracle will also no longer contribute to the OpenJFX 8u-dev code line (8u-dev/rt repo) after JDK 8u202 ships. This means that Oracle will be stepping down as the maintainer of the openjfx/8u-dev code line after January, and will call for a new maintainer. If a suitable party steps forward to maintain the OpenJFX 8 Updates code line after the final Oracle-led JDK 8 Update release has been published, we will discuss how to best enable such a transition on this Project's mailing list. I wanted to send this before the holidays, although I realize it might get lost in the shuffle, so I will resend it after the first of the year, along with a formal call for interested parties who wish to put their name forward as a maintainer for the openjfx/8u-dev release. -- Kevin [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-March/007341.html [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2018-September/007923.html
