[Openocd-development] [patch] doc: arm7_9 fast_memory_access

2009-05-17 Thread David Brownell
It's the faster mode that's potentially less safe,
not the slower one.
--- a/src/target/arm7_9_common.c
+++ b/src/target/arm7_9_common.c
@@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ int arm7_9_register_commands(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx)
 	register_command(cmd_ctx, arm7_9_cmd, "dbgrq", handle_arm7_9_dbgrq_command,
 		COMMAND_ANY, "use EmbeddedICE dbgrq instead of breakpoint for target halt requests ");
 	register_command(cmd_ctx, arm7_9_cmd, "fast_memory_access", handle_arm7_9_fast_memory_access_command,
-		 COMMAND_ANY, "use fast memory accesses instead of slower but potentially unsafe slow accesses ");
+		 COMMAND_ANY, "use fast memory accesses instead of slower but potentially safer accesses ");
 	register_command(cmd_ctx, arm7_9_cmd, "dcc_downloads", handle_arm7_9_dcc_downloads_command,
 		COMMAND_ANY, "use DCC downloads for larger memory writes ");
 
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development


Re: [Openocd-development] [patch] doc: arm7_9 fast_memory_access

2009-05-17 Thread Rick Altherr


On May 17, 2009, at 1:31 PM, David Brownell wrote:






Committed revision 1805.

--
Rick Altherr
kc8...@kc8apf.net

"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split  
it with him."

 -- Unsigned





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development