Re: [Openpbx-dev] best xDSL router with QOS for OpenPBX?
> > At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad > > experiences, basically if someone is using eMule you cannot use VoIP > > lines at all. One very important rule to remember is that you want your shaping to be the bottleneck. Your modem can prioritize all it wants, but if it just sends out packets as fast as it can, the bottleneck is going to be upstream and typically ISPs have very large queues. So the prioritized packets may still end up sitting behind a lot of low priority packets and be subject to be being dropped. To do a good job, the modem needs to know what the upstream bandwidth limits are and make sure to stay a bit below that limit when sending packets out. Inbound policing is harder to do as you are on the wrong side of the bottleneck. You can still have some effect, but you have to typically give up a significant (5-20%) of your bandwidth to get things to work well. The LARTC document is a good (if a bit dated - notably IFB is prefered over IMQ for doing ingress shaping) source of information on this topic. ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] best xDSL router with QOS for OpenPBX?
Our testing shows PLC+JB alone will suffice. We tested multiple simultanous downloads with p2p sortware, and audio was still good roy Den 28.3.2007 kl. 18:45 skrev Antonio Gallo: > wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will > allow > a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 or more) to be used even if all > people > are downloading via FTP and eMule to be used with OpenPBX? > > At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad > experiences, basically if someone is using eMule you cannot use VoIP > lines at all. > > Antonio > ___ > Openpbx-dev mailing list > Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev > > ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] best xDSL router with QOS for OpenPBX?
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 09:55 -0700, Chris Albertson wrote: > I used a Linux box with two Ethernet cards installed. Linux > makes a very nice firewall. I used this www.shorewall.net to > configure the Linux firewall. Shorewall is very powerfull and > a little bit "cisco-like" in the way you set up zones and rules. > > Any low-end PC can make a good router but you can also run other things > on the PC at the same time. You could also put a Sangoma S518[1] into a Linux box and completely forgo a separate DSL modem. Linux has some pretty good QoS mechanisms if you can figure them out. The S518 is fairly stable too, I have problems every now and then that require a reboot of my router box but it's been a long time since I updated the drivers. [1] http://www.sangoma.com/datasheets/p_s518adsl-specs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] best xDSL router with QOS for OpenPBX?
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 18:45:58 +0200, Antonio Gallo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will allow > a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 or more) to be used even if all people > are downloading via FTP and eMule to be used with OpenPBX? > > At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad > experiences, basically if someone is using eMule you cannot use VoIP > lines at all. Instead of using a DSL router, you might use a DSL modem connected to a wireless router with some openwrt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRT54G#Third-party_firmware_projects) type software on it. This will give you all of the power of linux with respect to traffic shaping. ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] best xDSL router with QOS for OpenPBX?
I used a Linux box with two Ethernet cards installed. Linux makes a very nice firewall. I used this www.shorewall.net to configure the Linux firewall. Shorewall is very powerfull and a little bit "cisco-like" in the way you set up zones and rules. Any low-end PC can make a good router but you can also run other things on the PC at the same time. --- Antonio Gallo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will > allow > a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 or more) to be used even if all > people > are downloading via FTP and eMule to be used with OpenPBX? > > At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad > experiences, basically if someone is using eMule you cannot use VoIP > lines at all. > > Antonio > ___ > Openpbx-dev mailing list > Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev > Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] best xDSL router with QOS for OpenPBX?
wich is the best xDSL router with QoS and prioritization that will allow a decent number of VoIP Lines (4 or more) to be used even if all people are downloading via FTP and eMule to be used with OpenPBX? At the moment even if the router claim to support QoS i had very bad experiences, basically if someone is using eMule you cannot use VoIP lines at all. Antonio ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
Re: [Openpbx-dev] opbx-gui
On Mar 28, 2007, at 6:22 PM, Dome Charoenyost wrote: > If someone plan to port from asterisk .1.4 Unlikely. So far, the notion has been not to follow but to gradually move away from Asterisk. > (manager and http) to opbx > please let's me know i and team can help you. I think you will find the consensus is that the Asterisk Manager API is as bad as it gets and that it should be removed altogether. > if not give me some idea what's do youthibk about opbx gui There is a design document in the SVN repository for a replacement of the manager API. The replacement architecture is based on a server- agent-client model and it accommodates different agents speaking different protocols to remote clients. This way it would be possible to build a GUI that speaks -say- SOAP to an agent which in turn talks to the telephony server locally over a domain socket, like so: [server] ---domain-socket--- [agent] ---SOAP--- [client-GUI] The document explains this in more detail. If I remember correctly, it is in a branch called "opbx-cli" right at the top level of the SVN tree. rgds benjk ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
[Openpbx-dev] opbx-gui
Hi all, I;m interesting about asterisk-gui If someone plan to port from asterisk .1.4 (manager and http) to opbx please let's me know i and team can help you. if not give me some idea what's do youthibk about opbx gui Thanks. Dome C. ___ Openpbx-dev mailing list Openpbx-dev@openpbx.org http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
