Re: [opensc-devel] Secure Credential Cloning. Was: Intel's Virtual Smart Card
Martin Paljak wrote: > IIRC it was apple who wants to make a phone self-register. Meaning > there are no parts to add or remove from the phone and you pair it to > your operator "online". The question IMHO is how much do telcos want > to give up the "freedom" of controlling access to their networks... Prepaid SIMs in the US are locked to the phone they ship with, upon "activation" in the store. //Peter ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] Secure Credential Cloning. Was: Intel's Virtual Smart Card
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > Who would buy a $100 solution if they can get one for free? > I don't think even the SIM will survive. IIRC it was apple who wants to make a phone self-register. Meaning there are no parts to add or remove from the phone and you pair it to your operator "online". The question IMHO is how much do telcos want to give up the "freedom" of controlling access to their networks... But in the long run you are probably right. Martin ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
