[opensc-devel] Fwd: Re: [Muscle] pcscd / firefox / ubuntu on android

2012-10-19 Thread Douglas E. Engert
Another user testing 0.13.0pre1 ...


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [Muscle] pcscd / firefox / ubuntu on android
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:30:50 -0400
From: James Southwell 
Reply-To: ja...@thesouthwells.com
To: Douglas E. Engert 

Downloaded 0.13pre1 last night and compiled. Email certs work as
stated with work around. Thank you. I have one last issue, but it is
Citrix related.

Jim

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Douglas E. Engert  wrote:
> Ask on the opensc-mail list. there is a 0.13.0-rc1 available.
>
>
> On 10/18/2012 7:40 PM, James Southwell wrote:
>>
>> When is opensc 0.13 going to be released?
>>
>> Thanks
>> ___
>> Muscle mailing list
>> mus...@lists.musclecard.com
>> http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>  Douglas E. Engert  
>  Argonne National Laboratory
>  9700 South Cass Avenue
>  Argonne, Illinois  60439
>  (630) 252-5444
>
>




___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel


Re: [opensc-devel] PIN not sent to card before signing

2012-10-19 Thread Douglas E. Engert


On 10/19/2012 8:02 AM, Mathias Tausig wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am writing a PKCS#15 application for a (cardos v4.4) smartcard which
> references an external signature application. The RSA key and the PIN are
> stored in that external application, the PIN needs to be verified upon every
> key usage.
>
> To accomplish this, I have set the userConsent value in the
> PrivateKeyDictionaryFile to 1.
>
> Here is the content of the PrkDF (output from openssl):
>
> 0:d=0  hl=2 l=  67 cons: SEQUENCE
>  2:d=1  hl=2 l=  30 cons:  SEQUENCE
>  4:d=2  hl=2 l=  18 prim:   UTF8STRING:Signaturschlüssel
> 24:d=2  hl=2 l=   2 prim:   BIT STRING
> - 07 80 ..
> 28:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   OCTET STRING
> - 11.
> 31:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   INTEGER   :01
> 34:d=1  hl=2 l=  14 cons:  SEQUENCE
> 36:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   OCTET STRING  :B
> 39:d=2  hl=2 l=   2 prim:   BIT STRING
> - 05.
>0002 - 
> 43:d=2  hl=2 l=   2 prim:   BIT STRING
> - 03 b8 ..
> 47:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   INTEGER   :02
> 50:d=1  hl=2 l=  17 cons:  cont [ 1 ]
> 52:d=2  hl=2 l=  15 cons:   SEQUENCE
> 54:d=3  hl=2 l=   6 cons:SEQUENCE
> 56:d=4  hl=2 l=   4 prim: OCTET STRING
> - 3f 00 1f ff   ?...
> 62:d=3  hl=2 l=   2 prim:INTEGER   :0400
> 66:d=3  hl=2 l=   1 prim:INTEGER   :14
> 69:d=0  hl=2 l=   0 prim: EOC
>
> The problem is, that when I try to use the card with pkcs11-tool (either with
> the --test option or with a --sign command), it doesn't verify the pin before
> signing. Here is the relevant part of the APDU output:
>
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 6755 APDU: 00 A4 08 00 02 1F FF
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00024106 SW: 90 00
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 1410 APDU: 00 20 00 81 06 31 32 33 34 
> 35
> 36
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00048516 SW: 90 00
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 5039 APDU: 00 A4 08 00 02 50 15
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00024963 SW: 90 00
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 1737 APDU: 00 A4 08 00 02 1F FF
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00028271 SW: 90 00
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 0164 APDU: 00 22 01 B6 03 83 01 02
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00019795 SW: 90 00
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 0185 APDU: 00 2A 9E 9A 80 00 01 FF FF 
> FF
> FF FF FF FF FF FF F
> F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
> FF FF FF FF FF FF FF F
> F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
> FF FF FF FF FF FF FF F
> F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 00 30 21 30 09 06 05 2B 0E 03 02
> 1A 05 00 04 14 04 75 9
> 5 D0 FA E9 72 FB ED 0C 51 B4 A4 1C 7A 34 9E 0C 47 BB 80
> Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00039821 SW: 69 82
>
> In the first two commands the signature DF (1fff) is entered and the PIN
> verified, thant it switches back to the PKCS#15 DF without doing anything 
> there
> (APDU#3). Than the signature DF is reentered and a signing command is tried
> without prior authentication.
>
> Is this a bug, is the userConsent field not heeded, or am I missing something?
>

It sounds like a bug, in that, the opensc-pkcs11 will support the PKCS#11
CKA_ALWAYS_AUTHENTICATE flag i.e. PKCS15 user_consent, but the pkcs11-tool
does not test for it, and prompt for the pin again or use the pin from
the command line again. It would not take too much to add the code
to pkcs11-tool.

Can you run your test using the pkcs11-spy.so as the module with pkcs11-tool?

(Mozilla NSS used by TB and FF have the same issue.)

OpenSC 0.13.0-rc1 has a new option in the opensc.conf to allow the pin to be
cached for uses be applications that do not yet support CKA_ALWAYS_AUTHENTICATE.




> cheers
> Mathias
>
> ___
> opensc-devel mailing list
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444


___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

[opensc-devel] PIN not sent to card before signing

2012-10-19 Thread Mathias Tausig
Hello!

I am writing a PKCS#15 application for a (cardos v4.4) smartcard which 
references an external signature application. The RSA key and the PIN are 
stored in that external application, the PIN needs to be verified upon every 
key usage.

To accomplish this, I have set the userConsent value in the 
PrivateKeyDictionaryFile to 1.

Here is the content of the PrkDF (output from openssl):

0:d=0  hl=2 l=  67 cons: SEQUENCE  
2:d=1  hl=2 l=  30 cons:  SEQUENCE  
4:d=2  hl=2 l=  18 prim:   UTF8STRING:Signaturschlüssel
   24:d=2  hl=2 l=   2 prim:   BIT STRING
   - 07 80 ..
   28:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   OCTET STRING  
   - 11.
   31:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   INTEGER   :01
   34:d=1  hl=2 l=  14 cons:  SEQUENCE  
   36:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   OCTET STRING  :B
   39:d=2  hl=2 l=   2 prim:   BIT STRING
   - 05.
  0002 - 
   43:d=2  hl=2 l=   2 prim:   BIT STRING
   - 03 b8 ..
   47:d=2  hl=2 l=   1 prim:   INTEGER   :02
   50:d=1  hl=2 l=  17 cons:  cont [ 1 ]
   52:d=2  hl=2 l=  15 cons:   SEQUENCE  
   54:d=3  hl=2 l=   6 cons:SEQUENCE  
   56:d=4  hl=2 l=   4 prim: OCTET STRING  
   - 3f 00 1f ff   ?...
   62:d=3  hl=2 l=   2 prim:INTEGER   :0400
   66:d=3  hl=2 l=   1 prim:INTEGER   :14
   69:d=0  hl=2 l=   0 prim: EOC   

The problem is, that when I try to use the card with pkcs11-tool (either with 
the --test option or with a --sign command), it doesn't verify the pin before 
signing. Here is the relevant part of the APDU output:

Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 6755 APDU: 00 A4 08 00 02 1F FF
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00024106 SW: 90 00
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 1410 APDU: 00 20 00 81 06 31 32 33 34 35 
36
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00048516 SW: 90 00
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 5039 APDU: 00 A4 08 00 02 50 15
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00024963 SW: 90 00
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 1737 APDU: 00 A4 08 00 02 1F FF
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00028271 SW: 90 00
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 0164 APDU: 00 22 01 B6 03 83 01 02
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00019795 SW: 90 00
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 0185 APDU: 00 2A 9E 9A 80 00 01 FF FF FF 
FF FF FF FF FF FF F
F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF F
F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 
FF FF FF FF FF FF FF F
F FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 00 30 21 30 09 06 05 2B 0E 03 02 
1A 05 00 04 14 04 75 9
5 D0 FA E9 72 FB ED 0C 51 B4 A4 1C 7A 34 9E 0C 47 BB 80
Oct 19 14:40:20 off17 pcscd[4590]: 00039821 SW: 69 82

In the first two commands the signature DF (1fff) is entered and the PIN 
verified, thant it switches back to the PKCS#15 DF without doing anything there 
(APDU#3). Than the signature DF is reentered and a signing command is tried 
without prior authentication.

Is this a bug, is the userConsent field not heeded, or am I missing something?

cheers
Mathias

___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel