Re: [opensc-devel] Fork of Debian's openSC repo at Github with ideas for 0.12.2 DEB
On 08/21/2011 12:36 PM, Peter Marschall wrote: > * renable zlib & readline support [...] > what about a new, official Debian package, with my changes as the starting > point > as starting point? i don't think these are compatible with the DFSG, alas. GNU readline (at least) is GPL-licensed, and opensc links against OpenSSL. So building a package that links to both of them creates a non-redistributable work :( http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html Is there any way to have OpenSC build against some crypto libraries other than OpenSSL (preferably licensed in GPL-compatible ways) so we could link it to readline without violating one license or the other? --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] SmartCafe Expert 3.2 72K works fine in some versions but is an "unsupported card" in other versions.
On 08/18/2011 01:39 PM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > 2011/8/18 Thomas De Reyck : >> - Scenario 1: On Debian Squeeze Linux (opensc from debian repository): >> Works perfectly. > > Debian squeeze uses OpenSC 0.11.13-1.1 > The latest version is 0.12.2. > > So it looks like a regression. > I don't know if this problem is already known or not. is it possible that this is due to 0.12 only allowing a single driver backend? I seem to see a similar regression here: http://bugs.debian.org/636553 Any thoughts about what a distribution like debian should do to be able to continue to support multiple backends in a binary distribution of opensc? --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
