Re: [opensc-devel] Status of the server migration
All sources, OpenSC and sub-projects, are in github. A perspective from someone on the outside who is trying to pay attention: It would be helpful if the sourceforge page links to something that is part of the future, and points out the github repos, and that there are no repos on sourceforge. If sourceforge is not ok with this then a new strategy may be needed :-) If the opensc-project.org wiki is going away, it would be good to have the front wiki page have a note about that and pointers to sourceforge and github. pgpcSh48cFLKt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] a few more trivial patches
Anthony Foiani anthony.foi...@gmail.com writes: Ludovic, greetings -- On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Ludovic Rousseau ludovic.rouss...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/12/8 Anthony Foiani anthony.foi...@gmail.com: Greetings -- I have two small patches which you might want to consider integrating. (And given that I can't get git to do what I want, you probably want to just cherry-pick these, as I suspect I've completely destroyed my repo history...) You should rebase your patches above OpenSC/OpenSC master. Ok, but pardon my git ignorance: I thought that one should never rebase a tree that will be published and pulled from? Or only if it's published and someone tries to *base a new tree* off of it? This is somewhat controversial, but from my experience in both open source and large private projects, the key issue is not to rebase branches that other people have made commits on top of, or merged into other branches. I find that it's helpful to rebase branches proposed for merging. The point for me is not so much to have them based off recent master to avoid a merge commit, but to produce the clean series of commits that would have appeared had there been no mistakes. Achieving the goal of not rebasing branches others have derived commits From can be accomplished by not rebasing published branches or having an understanding within the project that branches should not be cross-merged, so that rebasing them is still safe. Even if multitple people commit to a branch, with a little coordination this is not a big deal. pgptpvdzhpga8.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.13.0
https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/tags https://sourceforge.net/projects/opensc/files/OpenSC/ https://opensc.fr/jenkins/ The source used to be at: http://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/ Is that no longer the canonical location? The wiki at https://www.opensc-project.org/opensc still says the latest release is 0.12.2. pgpnh8V0MRO49.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
[opensc-devel] getopt_long_only (portability issue)
I'm in the process of updating the pkgsrc (multi-OS multi-cpu packaging
system originated at NetBSD) entry for opensc from 0.11.13 to 0.12.2.
I'm having a few unrelated issues, and will send separate notes.
In src/common/compat_getopt.{h,c}, replacements are provided for getopt,
getopt_long and getopt_long_only unless all three are found at configure
time. NetBSD has getopt (which is originally from 4.3BSD) and
getopt_long, but not getopt_long_only, which as far as I can tell is
only found on GNU/Linux. The replacement has a type clash with the
builtin declaration.
I believe that getopt_long_only is not actually used. So I have created
a packaging patch to drop the test for getopt_long_only, so that the
replacements are not selected if the system has getopt and getopt_long.
(As a hack, I also changed the test program to use getopt_long so that
it would build.
So if opensc doesn't have a good reason to use getopt_long_only, it
would simplify things and improve portability to remove compat support
for it.
Thanks,
Greg
$NetBSD$
--- src/common/compat_getopt.c.orig 2011-07-05 11:28:53.0 +
+++ src/common/compat_getopt.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#include config.h
-#if ! ( defined(HAVE_GETOPT_H) defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG_ONLY) )
+#if ! ( defined(HAVE_GETOPT_H) defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG) )
#include sys/types.h
#include stdlib.h
$NetBSD$
--- src/common/compat_getopt.h.orig 2011-07-05 11:28:53.0 +
+++ src/common/compat_getopt.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
#include config.h
#endif
-#if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_H) defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG_ONLY)
+#if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_H) defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
#include getopt.h
#else
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ extern C {
#define getopt my_getopt
#define getopt_long my_getopt_long
-#define getopt_long_only my_getopt_long_only
#define _getopt_internal _my_getopt_internal
#define opterr my_opterr
#define optind my_optind
@@ -86,6 +85,6 @@ extern int _my_getopt_internal(int argc,
}
#endif
-#endif /* HAVE_GETOPT_H HAVE_GETOPT_LONG HAVE_GETOPT_LONG_ONLY */
+#endif /* HAVE_GETOPT_H HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */
#endif /* MY_GETOPT_H_INCLUDED */
$NetBSD$
--- src/common/compat_getopt_main.c.orig2011-07-05 11:28:53.0
+
+++ src/common/compat_getopt_main.c
@@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ main(int argc, char * argv[])
progname);
}
+#define getopt_long_only getopt_long
+
/* parse all options from the command line */
while ((opt =
getopt_long_only(argc, argv, shortopts, longopts, longind)) != -1)
pgp9TZVnEqosO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
[opensc-devel] significant changes in installed files, 0.11.13 to 0.12.2
In updating from 0.11.13 to 0.12.2, I found significant changes in installed files. I think these changes are all intended, but I'd like to run the packing list diff by the list to make sure I'm not missing something due to a missing dependency (pkgsrc hides undeclared dependencies). Most of the changes seem to be about making libopensc private. In particular, I am not sure if share/doc/opensc/README being withdrawn is correct. Also, is it believed that all programs that depend on opensc are able to work with 0.12-series versions (in an actuall release)? Thanks, Greg --- PLIST 2010-09-01 11:59:22.0 -0400 +++ PLIST.new 2012-11-25 10:50:06.0 -0500 @@ -1,10 +1,8 @@ @comment $NetBSD: PLIST,v 1.5 2010/09/01 15:59:22 drochner Exp $ -bin/cardos-info bin/cardos-tool bin/cryptoflex-tool bin/eidenv bin/netkey-tool -bin/opensc-config bin/opensc-explorer bin/opensc-tool bin/piv-tool @@ -12,113 +10,43 @@ bin/pkcs15-crypt bin/pkcs15-init bin/pkcs15-tool -bin/rutoken-tool bin/westcos-tool -include/opensc/asn1.h -include/opensc/cardctl.h -include/opensc/compression.h -include/opensc/emv.h -include/opensc/errors.h -include/opensc/log.h -include/opensc/opensc.h -include/opensc/pkcs11-opensc.h -include/opensc/pkcs11.h -include/opensc/pkcs15-init.h -include/opensc/pkcs15.h -include/opensc/scconf.h -include/opensc/types.h -include/opensc/ui.h lib/libopensc.la -lib/libpkcs15init.la -lib/libscconf.la lib/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.la lib/opensc-pkcs11.la lib/pkcs11-spy.la lib/pkcs11/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so lib/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so lib/pkcs11/pkcs11-spy.so -lib/pkgconfig/libopensc.pc -lib/pkgconfig/libpkcs15init.pc -lib/pkgconfig/libscconf.pc man/man1/cardos-tool.1 man/man1/cryptoflex-tool.1 +man/man1/eidenv.1 man/man1/netkey-tool.1 -man/man1/opensc-config.1 man/man1/opensc-explorer.1 man/man1/opensc-tool.1 +man/man1/piv-tool.1 man/man1/pkcs11-tool.1 man/man1/pkcs15-crypt.1 man/man1/pkcs15-init.1 man/man1/pkcs15-tool.1 man/man1/westcos-tool.1 -man/man3/sc_app_info_t.3 -man/man3/sc_append_record.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_decode.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_encode.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_entry.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_find_tag.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_print_tags.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_put_tag.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_read_tag.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_skip_tag.3 -man/man3/sc_asn1_verify_tag.3 -man/man3/sc_base64_decode.3 -man/man3/sc_base64_encode.3 -man/man3/sc_card_ctl.3 -man/man3/sc_card_t.3 -man/man3/sc_card_valid.3 -man/man3/sc_check_sw.3 -man/man3/sc_connect_card.3 -man/man3/sc_copy_asn1_entry.3 -man/man3/sc_create_file.3 -man/man3/sc_delete_file.3 -man/man3/sc_delete_record.3 -man/man3/sc_der_clear.3 -man/man3/sc_der_copy.3 -man/man3/sc_detect_card_presence.3 -man/man3/sc_disconnect_card.3 -man/man3/sc_enum_apps.3 -man/man3/sc_establish_context.3 -man/man3/sc_file_dup.3 -man/man3/sc_file_free.3 -man/man3/sc_file_new.3 -man/man3/sc_file_t.3 -man/man3/sc_find_app_by_aid.3 -man/man3/sc_find_pkcs15_app.3 -man/man3/sc_format_apdu.3 -man/man3/sc_format_asn1_entry.3 -man/man3/sc_free_apps.3 -man/man3/sc_get_cache_dir.3 -man/man3/sc_get_challenge.3 -man/man3/sc_get_data.3 -man/man3/sc_list_files.3 -man/man3/sc_lock.3 -man/man3/sc_make_cache_dir.3 -man/man3/sc_put_data.3 -man/man3/sc_read_binary.3 -man/man3/sc_read_record.3 -man/man3/sc_release_context.3 -man/man3/sc_select_file.3 -man/man3/sc_set_card_driver.3 -man/man3/sc_strerror.3 -man/man3/sc_transmit_apdu.3 -man/man3/sc_unlock.3 -man/man3/sc_update_binary.3 -man/man3/sc_update_dir.3 -man/man3/sc_update_record.3 -man/man3/sc_wait_for_event.3 -man/man3/sc_write_binary.3 -man/man3/sc_write_record.3 man/man5/pkcs15-profile.5 share/doc/opensc/NEWS -share/doc/opensc/README share/examples/opensc/opensc.conf share/opensc/asepcos.profile +share/opensc/authentic.profile share/opensc/cardos.profile share/opensc/cyberflex.profile share/opensc/entersafe.profile share/opensc/flex.profile share/opensc/gpk.profile +share/opensc/ias_adele_admin1.profile +share/opensc/ias_adele_admin2.profile +share/opensc/ias_adele_common.profile +share/opensc/iasecc.profile +share/opensc/iasecc_admin_eid.profile +share/opensc/iasecc_generic_oberthur.profile +share/opensc/iasecc_generic_pki.profile share/opensc/incrypto34.profile share/opensc/jcop.profile share/opensc/miocos.profile pgplMJykwbyLN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
