Re: [opensc-devel] opensc 0.11.11-pre1 with openssl 0.9.7 fix

[Andreas Jellinghaus]

Am Mittwoch 21 Oktober 2009 15:21:43 schrieb Martin Paljak:
 Start with a 0.12 tree and stop pushing the limits of 0.11 other than
 for security/stability issues.

true. but I applied the lastest westcos cleanups and will also
apply the myeid cleanup (including a fix for a buffer overrun).

I asked people for help with silencing warnings, without thinking
prior about a freeze for 0.12, and it would be bad to drop those
patches or delay them.

Regards, Andreas
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

[opensc-devel] opensc 0.11.11-pre1 with openssl 0.9.7 fix

[Andreas Jellinghaus]

here is a preview to 0.11.11, it contains a fix
for compiling with openssl 0.9.7. please give it a try.

http://www.opensc-project.org/files/opensc/testing/opensc-0.11.11-pre1.tar.gz

Regards, Andreas
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Re: [opensc-devel] opensc 0.11.11-pre1 with openssl 0.9.7 fix

[Aktiv Co. Aleksey Samsonov]

Hello,

Andreas Jellinghaus:
 here is a preview to 0.11.11, it contains a fix
 for compiling with openssl 0.9.7. please give it a try.

I'm going to support GOST in tools, also I have some time to cleanup and 
fix warnings. Do we need a new branch?
Thanks
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Re: [opensc-devel] opensc 0.11.11-pre1 with openssl 0.9.7 fix

[Andreas Jellinghaus]

Am Mittwoch 21 Oktober 2009 12:47:47 schrieb Aktiv Co. Aleksey Samsonov:
 I'm going to support GOST in tools, also I have some time to cleanup and
 fix warnings. Do we need a new branch?

lets say: branching is easy and cheap, and it much easier to merge your work
later, than to cherry pick only some changes in /trunk/ if we want to create
a new release with only some of those changes.

still, merging is a bit of a pain in subversion, at least compared to other
version control systems. but I think a new branch for that is a good idea.

or maybe better I should branch away trunk into an official 0.11 maint
branch, and then we merge all the stuff from martins 0.12 branch, and
make that the official 0.12 changes?

even cleanups and most new features should better go into 0.12 development,
or else we will have two branches for a long time.

what does everyone else think about it?

Regards, Andreas
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Re: [opensc-devel] opensc 0.11.11-pre1 with openssl 0.9.7 fix

[Martin Paljak]

Hi.
On 21.10.2009, at 15:48, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:

 Am Mittwoch 21 Oktober 2009 12:47:47 schrieb Aktiv Co. Aleksey  
 Samsonov:
 I'm going to support GOST in tools, also I have some time to  
 cleanup and
 fix warnings. Do we need a new branch?

 even cleanups and most new features should better go into 0.12  
 development,
 or else we will have two branches for a long time.

 what does everyone else think about it?

Start with a 0.12 tree and stop pushing the limits of 0.11 other than  
for security/stability issues.


-- 
Martin Paljak
http://martin.paljak.pri.ee
+372.515.6495




___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel