Re: [ug-jposug] ndis-1.2.2で カーネル パニック
? ? ???ndis?hp mini 1000? myk? hp mini 1000?myk ?? ?grub? ?? ??PC (FM V6800MG)??OScardbus? cardbus?opensolaris?CD? ?? ??? ??? myk ?update?Sun?Darren Kenny???8040?? ?system shutdown??panic?? resume??sony vaio??marvel?nic?device Id? ???web?prtconf?? ?? ?? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
Tor [PSARC/2009/175 FastTrack timeout 03/19/2009]
I exchanged email with the lead engineer for the Tor project and he told me that Tor will use whatever it considers reasonable defaults if it doesn't find a config file (/etc/torrc). So, instead of delivering a sample config file, I think it is better to deliver a working config file in /etc/torrc with 2 ports enabled by default - 9050 for socks, and 9001 for the standard Tor relay connections. I will not deliver the sample file. Also, Tor may be configured to listen on privileged ports such as 443 if it is set up as a bridge relay, so it will need the priv_net_privaddr privilege in addition to the basic set, I will add this to the /usr/lib/tor entry in /etc/security/exec_attr. I have updated the spec and put a copy in the case directory. I've also attached it to this email for reference. -Wyllys -- next part -- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: tor-ft-2.txt URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090316/9cf1d3f1/attachment.txt
PSARC 2008/769 - Multiple disk sector size support
Larry Liu wrote: Hi Rick, Thanks for your suggestion. We made the changes accordingly. That said, by default, sd(7D) will do RMW to misaligned I/O with warning message. Custormers can configure the behavior as do RMW without warning message and do not do RMW with error returned. The configuration will be per device based (PSARC 2008/465 [s]sd-config-list). We don't have a mechanism to configure the behavior per partition based. I attached the modified rmw design doc. Thanks, Larry I am happier with the proposed changes. Thank you -- - Rick Matthews email: Rick.Matthews at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. phone:+1(651) 554-1518 1270 Eagan Industrial Road phone(internal): 54418 Suite 160 fax: +1(651) 554-1540 Eagan, MN 55121-1231 USAmain: +1(651) 554-1500 -
Tor [PSARC/2009/175 FastTrack timeout 03/19/2009]
Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I exchanged email with the lead engineer for the Tor project and he told me that Tor will use whatever it considers reasonable defaults if it doesn't find a config file (/etc/torrc). So, instead of delivering a sample config file, I think it is better to deliver a working config file in /etc/torrc with 2 ports enabled by default - 9050 for socks, and 9001 for the standard Tor relay connections. I will not deliver the sample file. Also, Tor may be configured to listen on privileged ports such as 443 if it is set up as a bridge relay, so it will need the priv_net_privaddr privilege in addition to the basic set, I will add this to the /usr/lib/tor entry in /etc/security/exec_attr. I'm confused. Isn't /usr/lib/tor started by an SMF service? I would think you'd need to specify the privilege in the service manifest rather than exec_attr. Scott -- Scott Rotondo Principal Engineer, Solaris Security Technologies President, Trusted Computing Group Phone/FAX: +1 408 850 3655 (Internal x68278)
Tor [PSARC/2009/175 FastTrack timeout 03/19/2009]
Scott Rotondo wrote: Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I exchanged email with the lead engineer for the Tor project and he told me that Tor will use whatever it considers reasonable defaults if it doesn't find a config file (/etc/torrc). So, instead of delivering a sample config file, I think it is better to deliver a working config file in /etc/torrc with 2 ports enabled by default - 9050 for socks, and 9001 for the standard Tor relay connections. I will not deliver the sample file. Also, Tor may be configured to listen on privileged ports such as 443 if it is set up as a bridge relay, so it will need the priv_net_privaddr privilege in addition to the basic set, I will add this to the /usr/lib/tor entry in /etc/security/exec_attr. I'm confused. Isn't /usr/lib/tor started by an SMF service? I would think you'd need to specify the privilege in the service manifest rather than exec_attr. Scott Yes, correct, it needs to be added there as well. -Wyllys
