Re: [osol-discuss] Performance of opensolaris
Anon Y Mous wrote: SXCE and OpenSolaris are both unfinished "works in progress" and the performance changes radically from one build to another. In my particular case, I didn't notice any change between the different builds I installed. The 8.4 postgresql version however is not that old. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Performance of opensolaris
Anon Y Mous wrote: What build of SXCE are you using? What do you see as output from these commands: uname -a cat /etc/release amber ~ # uname -a SunOS amber 5.11 snv_117 i86pc i386 i86xpv amber ~ # cat /etc/release Solaris Express Community Edition snv_117 X86 Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 15 June 2009 The box is a fresh install for the system part (I have install almost every build from snv75 up). zfs is up-to date : amber ~ # zfs upgrade This system is currently running ZFS filesystem version 4. All filesystems are formatted with the current version. amber ~ # zpool upgrade This system is currently running ZFS pool version 16. All pools are formatted using this version. postgres is the 8.4-community build version string : PosgreSQL 8.4.0 on i386-pc-solaris-2.11, compiled by cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-07 2008/10/07, 64-bit ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Performance of opensolaris
What build of SXCE are you using? What do you see as output from these commands: uname -a cat /etc/release SXCE and OpenSolaris are both unfinished "works in progress" and the performance changes radically from one build to another. Read this thread: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=98800&tstart=15 If you look closely at Scott's posts, you'll see that build 110 of OpenSolaris was 3000% faster than build 109 on the particular benchmark he was running. There are also a lot of regressions that happen during the development process, so a later build number is not necessarily faster than an earlier build number. It also comes down to the idiosyncratic peculiarities of whatever build number you happen to be running. So what build are you running? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] running benchmark hard locks opensolaris
@scott That's pretty impressive stuff. Are you ever going to put up a blog or something on the internet with the results of your benchmarks and how you ran them? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Performance of opensolaris
James Mansion wrote: Bruno Damour wrote: The surprising fact is that the performance is still slightly better on my laptop than on the server. This has been true with postgresql 8.3 and now with postgresql 8.4 as well. ... Is there any explanation you would think of ? If you examine the disk in device manager on XP, what is the caching policy set to? cache is on ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Performance of opensolaris
Bruno Damour wrote: The surprising fact is that the performance is still slightly better on my laptop than on the server. This has been true with postgresql 8.3 and now with postgresql 8.4 as well. ... Is there any explanation you would think of ? If you examine the disk in device manager on XP, what is the caching policy set to? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?
I am sure they will do such things...much like the existing appliance they have done with HP but this time a totally in-house affair! On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote: > Has anybody heard of an old project that Oracle and Sun worked together on > that was called "Raw Iron": > > > http://news.cnet.com/Oracles-Raw-Iron-plan-not-fully-forged/2100-1001_3-219129.html > > I wonder if we're going to get a similar Oracle-Solaris powered, pre-tuned > and pre-configured server appliance running on top of ZFS if the acquisition > goes through? > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Performance of opensolaris
Hello, The previous thread reminds me of one surprising fact I've been fundering over for some time. Now I love opensolaris and I have SXCE 64bit installed on my home server (Quad Core E6600, Asus P5W-DH mobo, 8G ram PC6400, SATA disks in AHCI mode). Zfs of course. My work machine is a 2 year old Dell laptop (Core 2, 1G ram), running WindowsXP. I use postgresql quite a lot (though rather small databases), and I have a backup on the server. The surprising fact is that the performance is still slightly better on my laptop than on the server. This has been true with postgresql 8.3 and now with postgresql 8.4 as well. I find this quite surprising as both hardware and OS (64bit) seem to be a lot better on the server. Furthermore, I had to tweak postgresql a bit to even get on the same level of performance than the default windows setup. Is there any explanation you would think of ? Bruno ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle buys AmigaOS to merge it with Solaris ?!?!
It must be fake. It only make waves...what is not bad, by the way ;-) Best regards, HeCSa. On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 19:34 -0700, Anon Y Mous wrote: > Must be fake then. Just when I thought this was the most interesting thing to > happen since OpenSolaris was ported to the iphone. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?
Has anybody heard of an old project that Oracle and Sun worked together on that was called "Raw Iron": http://news.cnet.com/Oracles-Raw-Iron-plan-not-fully-forged/2100-1001_3-219129.html I wonder if we're going to get a similar Oracle-Solaris powered, pre-tuned and pre-configured server appliance running on top of ZFS if the acquisition goes through? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] can we change hostname without resintalling when network is on NWAM?
Change /etc/nodename and reboot. I do it all the time. Cheers, Jim karun gahlawat wrote: network is on nwam. can i change the hostname without breaking anything or reinstalling? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] no user mount of nfs filesystem
Harry Putnam wrote: On the client.. as user reader (uid 1000) mount -Fnfs vzfs:/vzfsTest /vzfsTest nfs mount: insufficient privileges Most mounts need PRIV_SYS_MOUNT, meaning in practice that you need to use pfexec or have root privileges. CIFS mounts were the exception that you saw first, unfortunately. Rob T ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle buys AmigaOS to merge it with Solaris ?!?!
Must be fake then. Just when I thought this was the most interesting thing to happen since OpenSolaris was ported to the iphone. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle buys AmigaOS to merge it with Solaris ?!?!
Yep, reads like BS to me On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Anon Y Mous wrote: > > I can't believe this is real: > > I can't either, since Oracle would not issue any press release referring to > "their Solaris OS", since they yet don't own Solaris nor Sun. > > The lack of any information on Oracle.com and the content of the other > postings > on http://commodoretoday.blogspot.com/ (like references to Steve Wozniak > as the > CEO of "Commodore") makes it seem much more like an early April Fool's > joke. > > -- >-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering > > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle buys AmigaOS to merge it with Solaris ?!?!
Anon Y Mous wrote: > I can't believe this is real: I can't either, since Oracle would not issue any press release referring to "their Solaris OS", since they yet don't own Solaris nor Sun. The lack of any information on Oracle.com and the content of the other postings on http://commodoretoday.blogspot.com/ (like references to Steve Wozniak as the CEO of "Commodore") makes it seem much more like an early April Fool's joke. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle buys AmigaOS to merge it with Solaris ?!?!
Also note this: "The Amiga is able to emulate other computer platforms ranging from many 8-bit systems such as the Sinclair ZX Spectrum, Commodore 64, Nintendo Game Boy, Nintendo Entertainment System, Apple II and the TRS-80, up to platforms such as the IBM PC, Apple Macintosh and Atari ST. MAME (the arcade machine emulator) is also available for Amiga systems with PPC accelerator card upgrades." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emulation_on_the_Amiga I always wanted to get all the old Nintendo and MAME arcade games running under OpenSolaris. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAME It's good to know that Oracle and I are on the same page ;-) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle buys AmigaOS to merge it with Solaris ?!?!
I was reading this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga and I came up with one possible (albeit unlikely) theory. The wikipedia article says the following: "The Amiga is not limited to solely the 68k CPU architecture; although Commodore never shipped one, it is possible to install a PowerPC coprocessor that can be used by PowerPC-aware software and libraries,[13] and later the AmigaOne used a PowerPC CPU instead of a 68k CPU." -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Oracle buys AmigaOS to merge it with Solaris ?!?!
I can't believe this is real: http://commodoretoday.blogspot.com/2009/07/oracle-open-sources-amiga-os-desktop.html It is VERY cool though. Two thumbs up to Larry Ellison and McNealy and co. Basic summary is this: (1) Oracle buys AmigaOS and releases a press statement where they claim that the "reasons for obtaining the AmigaOS were for technologies to integrate into their own Solaris server OS, not to continue development of a desktop OS." (2) Oracle open-sources AmigaOS and releases the source code to a crowd of enthusiastic long-in-the-tooth Amiga die-hards who still want to continue development of AmigaOS as an open source community outside of Oracle. What do you guys think about this? Anybody have any guesses or ideas as to what AmigaOS technologies might be integrated into Solaris? On a different note: I always thought Sun probably should have acquired SGI IRIX many, many years ago and merged it with Solaris. It would have made sense to do this back in the late 1990's or very early 2000's since a lot of the Hollywood film studios were using SGI IRIX to do the modeling, animation, shading , lighting, etc. for their films, and then after the IRIX machines had done their job, the footage would get passed on to a massive cluster of Solaris SPARC servers that would act as a "rendering farm" that would take the hundreds of thousands of individual frames and render them into the actual film. It seems like it's much too late for it to be financially worthwhile to merge IRIX and Solaris now though, as I'm guessing most of those Hollywood film studios have already dumped all their SGI boxes and now use a mix of Mac OS X and Linux, am I right? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] can we change hostname without resintalling when network is on NWAM?
network is on nwam. can i change the hostname without breaking anything or reinstalling? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris graphics performance in Java 2D Microbenchmark beats Linux!!!
Some Istanbul vs Nehalem data can be found here : http://blogs.sun.com/MrBenchmark -benoit W. Wayne Liauh wrote: A few days ago, I upgraded one of my PCs at home to an AMD Quad, and I have noticed a similar surprise in performance differences between OpenSolaris and various Linux distros. (I have no intent of going back to OpenSolaris at least for a while; the reason I did this was because I was unable to install Ubuntu Jaunty from an external CD drive and a 2009.06 LiveCD happened to be nearby.) Of course, I am talking about a totally different issue here--this was about the (reputedly superior) scalability of Solaris as a whole rather than about a particular video driver. (And I am very curious as to how Solaris benchmarks against RedHat on the new six-core AMD Istanbul--or SunFire X4640.) However, getting back to the original thread, the inability of Linux to allow proprietary drivers to be included in the kernel can IMO create great inconveniences. As I am sure many here are aware, nowadays, chipsets are so complex that they, just like today's software code, will, unfortunately and inenvitably, contain bugs, many of them not yet identified. As a common practice, drivers are written by chipset designers deliberatly to circumvent those bugs (which typically will not be published). When some of those bugs are identified and removed, drivers written strictly according to the specs may no longer work. This may explain why Ubuntu Remix, which works flawlessly on the Acer Aspire One netbooks, suddenly has no wi-fi on the newest models although supposedly the same Atheros chipset is used. This leads me to a much bigger issue. Chairman Larry made a big fuss that he wanted to see an alternative to Android on netbooks. I have not seen many discussions on this. However, for pretty much the same reason as I mentioned above, Android may go the same way as Linux did--no netbook manufacturers now are taking it seriously. Perhaps Chairman Larry's idea should be given a serious thought--perhaps an authentic Java plus a scaled-down OpenSolaris should be the way to go? We are not talking about just the netbook market (which is expected to reach 30 million units this year), but also AMD's upcoming traditional notebooks which are thin, light-weight, and low-power-consumption, and will cost not much more than the netbooks. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] LDAP Authentication without LDAP :-)
This is a mapping issue, I am very close. Even though I have specified a base of "o=stmarys" (our unusual LDAP base), the ldap client is looking in "ou=people,o=stmarys", i.e. prepending ou=people, this is not in my config. So I am very close, I think the right serviceSearchDescriptorparameter can be found: Snoop of ldap query: LDAP: - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol Header - LDAP:*[LDAPMessage] LDAP: [Message ID] LDAP: Operation *[APPL 3: Search Request] LDAP: [Base Object] LDAP: ou=people,o=stmarys LDAP: [Scope] LDAP: singleLevel ldap_client_file: NS_LDAP_FILE_VERSION= 2.0 NS_LDAP_SERVERS= 149.137.1.130 NS_LDAP_SEARCH_BASEDN= ou=CATS,o=stmarys NS_LDAP_AUTH= simple NS_LDAP_CACHETTL= 0 NS_LDAP_CREDENTIAL_LEVEL= proxy NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= shadow:userpassword=userPassword NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= shadow:shadowflag=shadowFlag NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:loginshell=loginShell NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:homedirectory=unixHomeDirectory NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:uidnumber=uidNumber NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:gidnumber=gidNumber NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= passwd:gecos=cn NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= group:gidnumber=gidNumber NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= group:memberuid=memberUid NS_LDAP_ATTRIBUTEMAP= group:userpassword=userPassword NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= shadow:shadowAccount=person NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= passwd:posixAccount=person -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris graphics performance in Java 2D Microbenchmark beats Linux!
> (I have no intent of going > back to OpenSolaris at least for a while..) Waynel used to be the biggest OpenSolaris die-hard fan in these forums. Well maybe third biggest die-hard after Martin and Joerg, but Waynel actually used the official Sun sponsored "Indiana" OpenSolaris distribution whereas I suspect Martin and Joerg never touched the Indiana live distribution as they were always designing and building their own custom UNIX-based operating systems from their own self-modified versions of the Solaris source code. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris graphics performance in Java 2D Microbenchmark beats Linux!
> (I have no intent of going > back to OpenSolaris at least for a while..) > Did you typo and mean to say Ubuntu here? Because your text suggests you had slightly worse performance between Solaris & linux plus scalability concerns but then after it is negative towards linux chipset drivers and suggest opensolaris would be the way to go? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] no user mount of nfs filesystem
Summary: What do I need to do so that my user can mount an nfs filesystem being offered by another osol OS? Details: The server (osol 2010.10 b118) created a zfs fs with sharenfs=on (no special options) mounted it at /vzfsTest chown 1000:15 /vzfsTest (reader:wheel) chmod g+s /vzfsTest (set-gid) On a client (osol 2009.06 b111): user reader is also uid 1000 gid 15 (reader:wheel) mkdir /vzfsTest chown 1000:15 /vzfsTest On the client.. as user reader (uid 1000) mount -Fnfs vzfs:/vzfsTest /vzfsTest nfs mount: insufficient privileges ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris graphics performance in Java 2D Microbenchmark beats Linux!!!
A few days ago, I upgraded one of my PCs at home to an AMD Quad, and I have noticed a similar surprise in performance differences between OpenSolaris and various Linux distros. (I have no intent of going back to OpenSolaris at least for a while; the reason I did this was because I was unable to install Ubuntu Jaunty from an external CD drive and a 2009.06 LiveCD happened to be nearby.) Of course, I am talking about a totally different issue here--this was about the (reputedly superior) scalability of Solaris as a whole rather than about a particular video driver. (And I am very curious as to how Solaris benchmarks against RedHat on the new six-core AMD Istanbul--or SunFire X4640.) However, getting back to the original thread, the inability of Linux to allow proprietary drivers to be included in the kernel can IMO create great inconveniences. As I am sure many here are aware, nowadays, chipsets are so complex that they, just like today's software code, will, unfortunately and inenvitably, contain bugs, many of them not yet identified. As a common practice, drivers are written by chipset designers deliberatly to circumvent those bugs (which typically will not be published). When some of those bugs are identified and removed, drivers written strictly according to the specs may no longer work. This may explain why Ubuntu Remix, which works flawlessly on the Acer Aspire One netbooks, suddenly has no wi-fi on the newest models although supposedly the same Atheros chipset is used. This leads me to a much bigger issue. Chairman Larry made a big fuss that he wanted to see an alternative to Android on netbooks. I have not seen many discussions on this. However, for pretty much the same reason as I mentioned above, Android may go the same way as Linux did--no netbook manufacturers now are taking it seriously. Perhaps Chairman Larry's idea should be given a serious thought--perhaps an authentic Java plus a scaled-down OpenSolaris should be the way to go? We are not talking about just the netbook market (which is expected to reach 30 million units this year), but also AMD's upcoming traditional notebooks which are thin, light-weight, and low-power-consumption, and will cost not much more than the netbooks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to "mirror" an entire zfs pool to another pool
Thomas Walker wrote: We are upgrading to new storage hardware. We currently have a zfs pool with the old storage volumes. I would like to create a new zfs pool, completely separate, with the new storage volumes. I do not want to just replace the old volumes with new volumes in the pool we are currently using. I don't see a way to create a mirror of a pool. Note, I'm not talking about a mirrored-pool, meaning mirrored drives inside the pool. I want to mirror pool1 to pool2. Snapshots and clones do not seem to be what I want as they only work inside a given pool. I have looked at Sun Network Data Replicator (SNDR) but that doesn't seem to be what I want either as the physical volumes in the new pool may be a different size than in the old pool. It sounds like you want the equivalent of zfs send/receive, but for pools instead of filesystems. Does anyone know how to do this? My only idea at the moment is to create the new pool, create new filesystems and then use rsync from the old filesystems to the new filesystems, but it seems like there should be a way to mirror or replicate the pool itself rather than doing it at the filesystem level. I think your best bet is to create the new pool and then use zfs send/receive for each filesystem. Scott -- Scott Rotondo Principal Engineer, Solaris Security Technologies President, Trusted Computing Group Phone/FAX: +1 408 850 3655 (Internal x68278) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [caiman-discuss] AI scenario: Installing particular build
Abdel Jalal stated: < I am having problem installing build opensolaris 116. I included the build# into the manifest as shown below in the installation log and the installation failed with error: pkg missing. Note: the same manifest was used to install other clients but without specifying the build number. < < Note:The AI server has build 111 < ... < list of packages to be installed is: < ent...@0.5.11-0.116 Perhaps there should be a comma instead ',': ent...@0.5,11-0.116 Have a look at /var/svc/log/application-auto-installer:default.log too, it may have more info. May need to check whatever IPS repository server your using to be sure the build is there too. It is on pkg.opensolaris.org/dev < SUNWcsd < SUNWcs < SUNWiscsi < SUNWiscsitgt < SUNWscp < babel_install < ... < < IPS initialization phase 1 succeeded < IPS action 2 will be carried out < pkg missing < Installation of packages failed < Transfer failed with error -1 < Transfer failed with error -1 < om_perform_install failed with error 114 < Auto install failed < < Is the syntax correct or am I misunderstanding the way the manifest work? Or 116 doesn't exist? Can't see the syntax here, pastbin or post the manifest xml file ? -- Regards, Sean. . ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [caiman-discuss] AI scenario: Installing particular build
I am having problem installing build opensolaris 116. I included the build# into the manifest as shown below in the installation log and the installation failed with error: pkg missing. Note: the same manifest was used to install other clients but without specifying the build number. Note:The AI server has build 111 ... list of packages to be installed is: ent...@0.5.11-0.116 SUNWcsd SUNWcs SUNWiscsi SUNWiscsitgt SUNWscp babel_install ... IPS initialization phase 1 succeeded IPS action 2 will be carried out pkg missing Installation of packages failed Transfer failed with error -1 Transfer failed with error -1 om_perform_install failed with error 114 Auto install failed Is the syntax correct or am I misunderstanding the way the manifest work? Or 116 doesn't exist? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] unexpected trap in early boot (Build 118)
Hi It looks I also ran into Bug http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=15d317fc349cf085fd9fbd247b25?bug_id=6844241 I have a slightly differen Mainboard: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA78G-DS3H # prtdiag -v System Configuration: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA78G-DS3H BIOS Configuration: Award Software International, Inc. FB 01/16/2009 Processor Sockets Version Location Tag -- AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor Socket M2 Memory Device Sockets TypeStatus Set Device Locator Bank Locator --- -- --- --- unknown in use 0 A0 Bank0/1 unknown in use 0 A1 Bank2/3 unknown empty 0 A2 Bank4/5 unknown empty 0 A3 Bank6/7 On-Board Devices = Upgradeable Slots ID StatusType Description --- - 7 available PCI PCI 6 available PCI PCI 0 unknown PCI Express PCI Express x16 0 unknown PCI Express PCI Express x8 0 unknown PCI Express PCI Express x1 0 unknown PCI Express PCI Express x1 0 unknown PCI Express PCI Express x1 #scanpci pci bus 0x cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1022 device 0x9600 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 Host Bridge pci bus 0x cardnum 0x01 function 0x00: vendor 0x1022 device 0x9602 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (int gfx) pci bus 0x cardnum 0x0a function 0x00: vendor 0x1022 device 0x9609 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 5) pci bus 0x cardnum 0x11 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4391 ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] pci bus 0x cardnum 0x12 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4397 ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x12 function 0x01: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4398 ATI Technologies Inc SB700 USB OHCI1 Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x12 function 0x02: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4396 ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x13 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4397 ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI0 Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x13 function 0x01: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4398 ATI Technologies Inc SB700 USB OHCI1 Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x13 function 0x02: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4396 ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB EHCI Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x14 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4385 ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x14 function 0x01: vendor 0x1002 device 0x439c ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 IDE Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x14 function 0x03: vendor 0x1002 device 0x439d ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 LPC host controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x14 function 0x04: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4384 ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge pci bus 0x cardnum 0x14 function 0x05: vendor 0x1002 device 0x4399 ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 USB OHCI2 Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x00: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1200 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] HyperTransport Configuration pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x01: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1201 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Address Map pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x02: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1202 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] DRAM Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x03: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1203 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Miscellaneous Control pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x04: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1204 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Link Control pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x05 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x9610 ATI Technologies Inc Radeon HD 3200 Graphics pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x05 function 0x01: vendor 0x1002 device 0x960f ATI Technologies Inc RS780 Azalia controller pci bus 0x0002 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x10ec device 0x8168 Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller pci bus 0x0003 cardnum 0x0e function 0x00: vendor 0x104c device 0x8024 Texas Instruments TSB43AB23 IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] why two bug trackers? (was: HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118)
Thanks for the explanation, I thought it must be something like that. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Looking to limit SSH brute force connections
I just posted this to that board. Sorry, I did not realize those other boards were outside of the OpenSolaris board. This post can be deleted on this board. I could not find a way to move or remove this post. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Looking to limit SSH brute force connections
Scott: This seems a better question for security-disc...@opensolaris.org. Brian I have recently setup OpenSolaris to use as a file server (I like ZFS) and I connect to this server remotely using SSH. In the past I used iptable rules on Linux to limit connection attempts to SSH within 60 seconds to 4 attempts. This eliminated the Brute Force attempts at guessing userids and password, or at least drastically limited them. I have been looking at ipfilter which is available for OpenSolaris, is this the right tool to limit these login attempts in the same manner as I did with iptables or is there a better option on OpenSolaris? While I have found some information on writing ipfilter rules I have not found any examples for limiting SSH login attempts. At least nothing solid that I am certain I can do on OpenSolaris. Thanks in advance. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris graphics performance in Java 2D Microbenchmark beats Linux!!!
Scott N. stated: < Yeah, but it still gets destroyed in some other benchmarks, like this tidbit from the all important Suduku solving one... < < "Using Sudokut to simulate the Suoku solving performance, Ubuntu 9.04 was over twice as fast as OpenSolaris 2009.06" < < Since solving sudoku is what these kickass modern OS's are meant to do.. http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6857103 < < ;) < -- < This message posted from opensolaris.org < ___ < opensolaris-discuss mailing list < opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org -- Sean. . ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] zfs create -V and LDom disk image
Hi, I followed the example to create a disk image using zfs on page 98 of the LDoms 1.1 Admin guide and am running into issues. I created and used them fine however the disk images expanded on their own causing all 8 LDoms to fail. I managed to get a few of them back by decreasing the disk image on a few of them. I then set quotas on the top level zfs area for the disk image. My questions is what is the best way to prevent this from happening? Why no mentioned of it in the manual? Here is my sequence: zpool create ldmpool zfs create ldmpool/hostname-1 zfs create -V 99gb ldmpool/hostname-1/disk0 I only left a few gig free on ldmpool thinking the create -V was finite. It appears to not be the case as one of the LDom disk0 went to 105GB filled up ldmpool and brought down all 8 LDoms. What should I do to ensure that only 99gb is allowed on disk0? Below is the zfs list of the issue. Note that dnagac08-1 expanded to 105G which filled up ldmpool. I tried decreasing a few with volsize which at least allowed me to get the others working but the ones I decreased now panic and will have to be re-imaged. ldmpool786G 11.8G 46.0K /ldmpool ldmpool/dnagac08-1 105G 1.07G 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-1 ldmpool/dnagac08-1/disk0 105G 1.07G 105G - ldmpool/dnagac08-299.2G 844M 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-2 ldmpool/dnagac08-2/disk0 99.2G 844M 99.2G - ldmpool/dnagac08-399.0G 1024M 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-3 ldmpool/dnagac08-3/disk099G 63.7G 36.3G - ldmpool/dnagac08-495.0G 1024M 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-4 ldmpool/dnagac08-4/disk095G 81.9G 14.1G - ldmpool/dnagac08-599.0G 1024M 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-5 ldmpool/dnagac08-5/disk099G 81.6G 18.4G - ldmpool/dnagac08-695.0G 1024M 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-6 ldmpool/dnagac08-6/disk095G 81.9G 14.1G - ldmpool/dnagac08-795.0G 1024M 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-7 ldmpool/dnagac08-7/disk095G 82.0G 14.0G - ldmpool/dnagac08-899.0G 1024M 30.7K /ldmpool/dnagac08-8 ldmpool/dnagac08-8/disk099G 19.4G 80.6G - Thanks for any help with this, Kevin -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Looking to limit SSH brute force connections
I have recently setup OpenSolaris to use as a file server (I like ZFS) and I connect to this server remotely using SSH. In the past I used iptable rules on Linux to limit connection attempts to SSH within 60 seconds to 4 attempts. This eliminated the Brute Force attempts at guessing userids and password, or at least drastically limited them. I have been looking at ipfilter which is available for OpenSolaris, is this the right tool to limit these login attempts in the same manner as I did with iptables or is there a better option on OpenSolaris? While I have found some information on writing ipfilter rules I have not found any examples for limiting SSH login attempts. At least nothing solid that I am certain I can do on OpenSolaris. Thanks in advance. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] supported attributes for __attribute__
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey > > I would like to know if the following attributes (supported by gcc) are > supported with Sun compilers, and which version should I test with __SUNPRO_C > to know if it is supported: > > warn_unused_result > nonnull > __deprecated__ > malloc > pure > format > format_arg > const Hello, there are a few good reference porting manuals and HOWTO's. Just a quick summary: http://www.ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html http://wikis.sun.com/display/SunStudio/Using+Sun+Studio+for+open+source+apps http://cooltools.sunsource.net/gcc/porting.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Studio_%28software%29 First though, you might want to read all bundled man-pages and documentation that ship with the compilers themselves. Or, if you want a shortcut, browse through some big existing (relevant) src repo and look how others did the things you are interested in, accordingly. For example have a look at ON or x.org (which both include support the 2 compilers). Martin ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] supported attributes for __attribute__
Hey I would like to know if the following attributes (supported by gcc) are supported with Sun compilers, and which version should I test with __SUNPRO_C to know if it is supported: warn_unused_result nonnull __deprecated__ malloc pure format format_arg const thank you Vincent Torri -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] How to "mirror" an entire zfs pool to another pool
We are upgrading to new storage hardware. We currently have a zfs pool with the old storage volumes. I would like to create a new zfs pool, completely separate, with the new storage volumes. I do not want to just replace the old volumes with new volumes in the pool we are currently using. I don't see a way to create a mirror of a pool. Note, I'm not talking about a mirrored-pool, meaning mirrored drives inside the pool. I want to mirror pool1 to pool2. Snapshots and clones do not seem to be what I want as they only work inside a given pool. I have looked at Sun Network Data Replicator (SNDR) but that doesn't seem to be what I want either as the physical volumes in the new pool may be a different size than in the old pool. Does anyone know how to do this? My only idea at the moment is to create the new pool, create new filesystems and then use rsync from the old filesystems to the new filesystems, but it seems like there should be a way to mirror or replicate the pool itself rather than doing it at the filesystem level. Thomas Walker -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] warning with variadic macro
Hey, i am contributing to a project (the Enlightenment windows manager) and we use variadic macros. More precisely, this one: # define EINA_ARG_NONNULL(idx, ...) __attribute__ ((nonnull(idx, ## __VA_ARGS__))) and we use it like that (for example): EAPI void eina_rectangle_pool_free(Eina_Rectangle_Pool *pool) EINA_ARG_NONNULL(1); On Linux, no problem, but on opensolaris, a guy reported the warning using SunStudio12 : "warning: argument mismatch" I'm not very familiar with variadic macro, and even if google found some pages about that (like http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-code/2008-September/006029.html ), i didn't find the solution. So, is there a flag to pass to the SunStudio12 preprocessor and/or modifying the above macro ? thank you Vincent Torri -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] running benchmark hard locks opensolaris
Wow.
I decided to update my mainboard BIOS. Rebooted then ran blogbench again just
out of curiosity:
Final score for writes: [b]460[/b]
Final score for reads : 33603
{jaw-drop}
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Any idea of how to get SEtoolkit NIC statistics on SNV?
Hi Does anyone have an idea of how to get NIC statistics on SNV? When trying to add support for a driver, e.g. vr0 you grep for vr.0.vr0 in the output of dumpkstat.se But the closest that can be found is link.0.vr0. http://wikis.sun.com/display/BigAdmin/Performance+Monitoring+Short+Cuts#PerformanceMonitoringShortCuts-AddinganewNIC Any idea on how to address this issue? Thanks Henry ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
