[osol-discuss] interrupts shared issue
I got irq shared between wpi, usb, and nvidia. I get random freezes to the gui. how do I fix this? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Exception Handling in 64bit C++ Processes on Intel Xeon
Nicolas Michael wrote: Hi, when running our c++ application on Intel's Xeon 5570 processors with the latest Solaris 10 Update 7 (141415-10), we're having problems with exceptions not being caught properly when running 64bit processes. After some analysis, it seems that if an exception is thrown in a shared library B which was loaded through dlopen() and has its exception handler in its parent library A, the exception handler is sometimes ignored (not found on the stack or whatever...), so the exception runs all the way through and causes the process to crash due to an uncaught exception. You should ask on the Studio C++ forum: http://forums.sun.com/forum.jspa?forumID=850 -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Are there bounties?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote: Given a little foresight (and unless one is trying to do stuff on the extreme cheap), how many situations are there really that _need_ the additional option? Even if I think that the fact that this question is being asked regularly is a best proof that there is a need for this feature. I personally have a number of friends that decided to implement ZFS server (well, home server) believing that at some point in the future this feature will be implemented. That said I agree that in medium business and up growing storage like that could be counterproductive. Side note - NetApp does support adding disks on one-by-one basis, although the implementation details are totally different. -- Regards, Cyril ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Raid-Z broken in 121
Gary, many thanks for the quick response. Is there any defect number/link? Thanks. Chris Chris, The target build for the fix is 124. Gary Hello, has this defect been fixed? Can someone provide the defect number/link? I would like to update to 122, from 118. Just want to be sure that Raid-Z is working... Thanks. Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Are there bounties?
This would be a great first run for the newly created use-case project. Is there anyone interested in helping me to create a formal use-case from this? On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 19:01, Cyril Plisko cyril.pli...@mountall.comwrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote: Given a little foresight (and unless one is trying to do stuff on the extreme cheap), how many situations are there really that _need_ the additional option? Even if I think that the fact that this question is being asked regularly is a best proof that there is a need for this feature. I personally have a number of friends that decided to implement ZFS server (well, home server) believing that at some point in the future this feature will be implemented. That said I agree that in medium business and up growing storage like that could be counterproductive. Side note - NetApp does support adding disks on one-by-one basis, although the implementation details are totally different. -- Regards, Cyril ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] SCX get panics after install on nv122 with cluster 06/09.
Hi all, I was trying to get install the cluster in Virtual box with nv122 build. On installation i hit with the bug 6722138, then workaround it (LD_PRELOAD=c_synonyms.so.1 export LD_PRELOAD).the installation went well. i configured a single node cluster. On Reboot the node get panics, even with -xs. finally i removed /etc/cluster/nodeid file. now the system is able to boot. I'm not sure what was the problem.. Is my os build compatible with SCX 06/09? Which is OS build is compatible SCX or SC 3.2 u2? [OR] can i troubleshoot with current installation to solve? ravinayag -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] interrupts shared issue
How Wong wrote: I got irq shared between wpi, usb, and nvidia. I get random freezes to the gui. how do I fix this? Treating the two sentences as possibly unrelated. If your system and NVIDIA graphics card supports MSI, you can enable MSI for the nvidia driver by commenting out the last line in /kernel/drv/nvidia.conf: ... #Comment out the following line or set the value to 1 if you want to enable #the use of MSI interrupts AllowMSI=0; Follow this with pfexec reboot -p. As for random GUI freezes, the output of /usr/bin/nvidia-SunOS-bug-report.sh is a good starting point. You can send it to me directly and I will summarize. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] interrupts shared issue
John Martin wrote: How Wong wrote: I got irq shared between wpi, usb, and nvidia. I get random freezes to the gui. how do I fix this? Treating the two sentences as possibly unrelated. If your system and NVIDIA graphics card supports MSI, you can enable MSI for the nvidia driver by commenting out the last line in /kernel/drv/nvidia.conf: ... #Comment out the following line or set the value to 1 if you want to enable #the use of MSI interrupts AllowMSI=0; Follow this with pfexec reboot -p. Also, if you download a driver from the NVIDIA download page (185.18.36 on this system), you will not get MSI support. NVIDIA is still evaluating the changes for MSI. NVIDIA's driver will not mention MSI in /kernel/drv/nvidia.conf. The Sun enhanced driver with MSI support was delivered to b124. In the meantime, you can grab the web installer with SYSV packages at: http://home.comcast.net/~jdmartin99/NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-185.18.36-xVM.run After installing, repeat the step commenting out the line in /kernel/drv/nvidia.conf. From the log file, I don't see any reported failures from the NVIDIA driver, but I am nervous about changing the default behavior of PowerMizer in /etc/X11/xorg.conf: OptionRegistryDwords PowermizerEnable=0x1;PerfLevelSrc=0x;PowerMizerLevelAC=0x2 I don't regression test any of these settings. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem using snoop
man snoop: -a Listen to packets on /dev/audio (warning: can be noisy). That's why you get no output on screen. I'm assuming you have no speakers/audio device, and I'll also assume you expected to see packets on screen rather than hear them (which in itself is a nice gimmick, but otherwise slightly useless :-) ) Brian Amit kumar nayak wrote: Hi I got problem using snoop command. Here is the details as follows. I am using VMware workstation and running solaris10 in windows platform. when am trying to using command [b][i]snoop -a dhcp[/i][/b] it gives the message [b]Using device /dev/e1000g0 (promiscuous mode)[/b]. without any further proceed. Please any help regarding the problem. Thanks in advance. -- Brian Ruthven Solaris Revenue Product Engineering Sun Microsystems UK Sparc House, Guillemont Park, Camberley, GU17 9QG ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] EON 0.59.3 based on snv_122 released
EON ZFS NAS 0.59.3 based on snv_122 released! Embedded Operating system/Networking (EON), RAM based live ZFS NAS appliance is released on Genunix! Much thanks to Al at Genunix.org for download hosting and serving the opensolaris community. It is available in a CIFS and Samba flavor EON 64-bit x86 CIFS ISO image version 0.59.3 based on snv_122 * eon-0.593-122-64-cifs.iso * MD5: 8be86fb315b5b4929a04e0346ed0168c * Size: ~89Mb * Released: Monday 14-September-2009 EON 64-bit x86 Samba ISO image version 0.59.3 based on snv_122 * eon-0.593-122-64-smb.iso * MD5: f68fefdc525a517b9c4b66028ae4347e * Size: ~101Mb * Released: Monday 14-September-2009 EON 32-bit x86 CIFS ISO image version 0.59.3 based on snv_122 * eon-0.593-122-32-cifs.iso * MD5: fa71f059aa1eeefbcda597b98006ba9f * Size: ~56Mb * Released: Monday 14-September-2009 EON 32-bit x86 Samba ISO image version 0.59.3 based on snv_122 * eon-0.593-122-32-smb.iso * MD5: 1b9861a780dc01da36ca17d1b4450132 * Size: ~69Mb * Released: Monday 14-September-2009 New/Fixes: - added 32/64-bit drivers: bnx, igb - Workaround fix for IP validation in setup.sh - added /usr/local/sbin for bin kit to bashrc -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Raid-Z broken in 121
Conner, Check out: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=412972 I don't see a bug number, but Alan is pretty confident that it will be fixed in 124. Gary -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Running Large Zones From Earlier Release On Later Released Global Zone
Hello All, Firstly apologies as I am going to use Sun Solaris 10 terminology as this is what I am more familiar with. Is it possible to run large zones that are have been built using Solaris 11/06 update 3 within a global zone of Solaris 05/08 Update 5 and above? Kind Regards, SRG By large zones I take it you are refering to non-sparse zones. The answer is yes, for 5/08 you do not have the option to upgrade the zone and you will have to use -F option to force it in. I believe it is update 6 that the -u option was introduced. If you go to update 6 or abouve use the -u option to zoneadm attach and it will upgrade the packages to match the global -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem using snoop
man snoop: -a Listen to packets on /dev/audio (warning: can be noisy). That's why you get no output on screen. snoop -a produces both a packet dump on stdout, and produces noise on the audio device. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfs support ?
Hi! Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfs support ?
I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it appears to be so... ZFS opensolaris% touch /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% TMPFS opensolaris% touch /tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /tmp/bar chmod: ERROR: Failed to set ACL: Operation not supported opensolaris% -Norm Roland Mainz wrote: Hi! Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? Bye, Roland ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfs support ?
Roland Mainz wrote: Hi! Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? tmpfs does not support ACLs see _PC_ACL_ENABLED in [f]pathconf(2). You can query the file system for what type of ACLs it supports. Bye, Roland ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfs support ?
Norm Jacobs wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it appears to be so... Is there any RFE which requests the implementation of NFSv4-like ACLs for tmpfs yet ? ZFS opensolaris% touch /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% TMPFS opensolaris% touch /tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /tmp/bar chmod: ERROR: Failed to set ACL: Operation not supported opensolaris% Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? [1]=The idea is to have a test module which checks whether ACL operations work correctly, however the testing framework must only run as normal, unpriviledged user... Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfs support ?
Roland Mainz wrote: Norm Jacobs wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it appears to be so... Is there any RFE which requests the implementation of NFSv4-like ACLs for tmpfs yet ? ZFS opensolaris% touch /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% TMPFS opensolaris% touch /tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /tmp/bar chmod: ERROR: Failed to set ACL: Operation not supported opensolaris% Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? Use function interposition. I am currently updating an ACL manipulation application and I use mocks for the acl get/set functions. -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?
Ian Collins wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Norm Jacobs wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it appears to be so... Is there any RFE which requests the implementation of NFSv4-like ACLs for tmpfs yet ? ZFS opensolaris% touch /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% TMPFS opensolaris% touch /tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /tmp/bar chmod: ERROR: Failed to set ACL: Operation not supported opensolaris% Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? Use function interposition. Umpf... the matching code is linked with -Bdirect ... AFAIK I can't interpose library functions linked with this option, right ? Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?
Roland Mainz wrote: Ian Collins wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Norm Jacobs wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it appears to be so... Is there any RFE which requests the implementation of NFSv4-like ACLs for tmpfs yet ? ZFS opensolaris% touch /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /var/tmp/bar opensolaris% TMPFS opensolaris% touch /tmp/bar opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /tmp/bar chmod: ERROR: Failed to set ACL: Operation not supported opensolaris% Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? Use function interposition. Umpf... the matching code is linked with -Bdirect ... AFAIK I can't interpose library functions linked with this option, right ? I never build test harnesses with explicit ld options (I use the C or C++ compiler for linking). There is a note about interposition in the ld man page description of -B. -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfs support ?
Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that: # mkfile 64m /zpool.file # zpool create test /zpool.file # zfs list test 67.5K 27.4M18K /test Rob T ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?
Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that: # mkfile 64m /zpool.file # zpool create test /zpool.file # zfs list test 67.5K 27.4M18K /test I know... but AFAIK this requires root priviledges which the test suite won't have... Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?
Roland Mainz wrote: Umpf... the matching code is linked with -Bdirect ... AFAIK I can't interpose library functions linked with this option, right ? You could set LD_NODIRECT to defeat direct bindings --- see ld.so.1(1). However, I agree with the thought that it would be easier to just have a ZFS filesystem to test against. - Ali ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?
Roland Mainz wrote: Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that: # mkfile 64m /zpool.file # zpool create test /zpool.file # zfs list test 67.5K 27.4M18K /test I know... but AFAIK this requires root priviledges which the test suite won't have... If the test suite is going to be running on nv_128 or later, then you are guaranteed to have a zfs filesystem, since root must be zfs then (since the only install method will be IPS, which requires zfs root). Until then you could just document to run it on a system with a zfs filesystem available. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?
Roland Mainz wrote: Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that: # mkfile 64m /zpool.file # zpool create test /zpool.file # zfs list test 67.5K 27.4M18K /test I know... but AFAIK this requires root priviledges which the test suite won't have... Bye, Roland You can delegate the ability to create ZFS filesystems. -Norm ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Link Aggregation + vlan tagging + Network Boot
Hi Planning the following setup nxge1+nxge2+nxge3+nxge4 = aggr1 aggr10001 = vlan10 aggr20001 = vlan20 aggr30001 = vlan30 aggr40001 = vlan40 aggr10001:1 - interface for 1st zone in vlan10 aggr10001:2 - interface for 2nd zone in vlan10 etc On switch side LACP + trunking is configured, the problem is that now I am unable to boot the system on the network for install using jumpstart Is it supported in Solaris 10 to boot up from the network using a NIC card which is part of an aggregation, ie I would like to boot the system off network using the nxge4 interface. Any pointers is highly appreciated. Sorry for being OT -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Are there bounties?
It is great to know there is a conceptual solution to the problem; I wish I even had time to look in to it more just for fun. I'd be happy to make a reasonable donation to such a project. I also like the idea of bounties for open source projects in general; perhaps an adjunct organization that works with OpenSolaris could manage them? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?
Roland Mainz wrote: Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that: # mkfile 64m /zpool.file # zpool create test /zpool.file # zfs list test 67.5K 27.4M18K /test I know... but AFAIK this requires root priviledges which the test suite won't have... It is also more difficult to test error conditions. Unless you really have to, don't use fancy link options for a test harness so you can easily interpose (or simply define) mock library calls. If you stick with regular dynamic linking, you can simply define your mock/stub library functions in your test code. Easy. -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] poor iscsi performance in open solaris
I tried out sequential write using filebench on a raidz pool of 3 SATA disks and got I/O bandwidth of 0.3mb/s. iscsi target OS version :Open solaris 2009.06 iscsi iniator OS version :Open solaris 2009.06 IO Summary: 21 ops, 0.3 ops/s, (0/0 r/w) 0.3mb/s, 62850us cpu/op, 1993.3ms latency (opensolaris target) Can any one furnish me the reason for such behaviour ? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
