[osol-discuss] kernel panic on zpool import
I have searched the forums and google wide, but cannot find a fix for the issue I'm currently experiencing. Long story short - I'm now at a point where I cannot even import my zpool (zpool import -f tank) without causing a kernel panic I'm running OpenSolaris snv_111b and the zpool is version 14. This is the panic from /var/adm/messages; (full output attached); genunix: [ID 361072 kern.notice] zfs: freeing free segment (offset=3540185931776 size=22528) This is the output I get from zpool import; # zpool import pool: tank id: 15136317365944618902 state: ONLINE status: The pool was last accessed by another system. action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier and the '-f' flag. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-EY config: tankONLINE raidz1ONLINE c9t4d0 ONLINE c9t5d0 ONLINE c9t6d0 ONLINE c9t7d0 ONLINE raidz1ONLINE c9t0d0 ONLINE c9t1d0 ONLINE c9t2d0 ONLINE c9t3d0 ONLINE I tried pulling back some info via this zdb command, but i'm not sure if i'm on the right track here (as zpool import seems to see the zpool without issue). This result is similar from all drives; # zdb -l /dev/dsk/c9t4d0 LABEL 0 failed to unpack label 0 LABEL 1 failed to unpack label 1 LABEL 2 failed to unpack label 2 LABEL 3 failed to unpack label 3 I also can complete zdb -e tank without issues – it lists all my snapshots and various objects without problem (this is still running on the machine at the moment) I have put the following into /etc/system; set zfs:zfs_recover=1 set aok=1 i've also tried mounting the zpool read only with zpool import -f -o ro tank but no luck.. I dont know where to go next? – am I meant to try and recover using an older txg? E. I would be extremely grateful to anyone who can offer advice on how to resolve this issue as the pool contains irreplaceable photos. Unfortunately I have not done any backups for a while as I thought raidz would be my savour. :( please help -- This message posted from opensolaris.orgOct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice] Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ff000b6f7c60: Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 361072 kern.notice] zfs: freeing free segment (offset=3540185931776 size=22528) Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f75f0 genunix:vcmn_err+2c () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f76e0 zfs:zfs_panic_recover+ae () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7770 zfs:space_map_remove+13c () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7820 zfs:space_map_load+260 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7860 zfs:metaslab_activate+64 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7920 zfs:metaslab_group_alloc+2b7 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7a00 zfs:metaslab_alloc_dva+295 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7aa0 zfs:metaslab_alloc+9b () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7ad0 zfs:zio_dva_allocate+3e () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7b00 zfs:zio_execute+a0 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7b60 zfs:zio_notify_parent+a6 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7b90 zfs:zio_ready+188 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7bc0 zfs:zio_execute+a0 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7c40 genunix:taskq_thread+193 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff000b6f7c50 unix:thread_start+8 () Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 672855 kern.notice] syncing file systems... Oct 11 17:16:55 opensolaris genunix: [ID 904073 kern.notice] done Oct 11 17:16:56 opensolaris genunix: [ID 111219 kern.notice] dumping to /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/dump, offset 65536, content: kernel Oct 11 17:17:09 opensolaris genunix: [ID 409368 kern.notice] ^M100% done: 168706 pages dumped, compression ratio 3.58, Oct 11 17:17:09 opensolaris genunix: [ID 851671 kern.notice] dump succeeded___
[osol-discuss] scanner of hp officejet all in one 4288 not working on osol
hi! i've an hp office jet all in one f4288. the printer gets detected and works if i configure cups but the scanner doesn't. sane gives the error a...@opensolaris:~# scanimage -L No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages). here is an output of /var/adm/messages Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 2.0 device (usb3f0,2504) operating at full speed (USB 1.x) on USB 1.10 root hub: dev...@2, usb_mid2 at bus address 2 Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] HP Deskjet F4200 series CN9154Z0FW05BR Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] usb_mid2 is /p...@0,0/pci1043,8...@13,2/dev...@2 Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /p...@0,0/pci1043,8...@13,2/dev...@2 (usb_mid2) online Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] usba: no driver found for interface 0 (nodename: 'interface') of HP Deskjet F4200 series CN9154Z0FW05BR Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] usba: no driver found for interface 2 (nodename: 'interface') of HP Deskjet F4200 series CN9154Z0FW05BR Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris usba: [ID 912658 kern.info] USB 2.0 interface (usbif3f0,2504.config1.1) operating at full speed (USB 1.x) on USB 1.10 root hub: prin...@1, usbprn0 at bus address 2 Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] HP Deskjet F4200 series CN9154Z0FW05BR Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] usbprn0 is /p...@0,0/pci1043,8...@13,2/dev...@2/prin...@1 Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /p...@0,0/pci1043,8...@13,2/dev...@2/prin...@1 (usbprn0) online Oct 10 22:38:08 opensolaris pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 3 irq 0xf vector 0x45 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 regds, Arun Tomar. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] b124: root window terminal
Dear Alan, So, all the users with no shell specified in /etc/passwd had to be changed, done. next is: Accessories-Terminator doesn't work. and sometimes running tasks of previously logout users hold up CPU cycles. I'm seriously considering putting Mwm into Xclients and not to use fancy interfaces. Best wishes, Clarence CHU -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 32bit broken - so when will it get discontinued ?
What makes you think a company would necessarily _have_ a policy on something like that they make it available and i don`t read from sun something like please don`t use, we don`t support it as good as 64bit if i would readmade just for your convenience, use at your own risk somewhere that would be something different. it`s just that i like to know it solaris 32bit is a dead child for sun or not and if it`s having really severe issues or if this is just FUD from single individuals... If it were me, I'd say ok for an older desktop or laptop, but I'd prefer the best I could afford for any kind of server. Besides, zfs on a file or media server would probably be happier with more RAM than most 32-bit only systems can handle. So...still useful? Depending on the use, sure. As good as 64-bit? Maybe not, even outside of any reliability concerns. In the long run, I suspect 32-bit of any OS will only be on embedded devices, phones, GPS receivers, and so on. Maybe on SCs for larger systems, too. :-) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] About the pkg manager on default desktop
Regarding the pkg manager tool (icon) on the default desktop. How does one use this thing ... whenever I've tried at some point I'm told I lack privileges to use it. Why is the icon on the default desktop? I'm assuming it is there to use, But how? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] About the pkg manager on default desktop
Did you set your login during installation or after that? What show roles and privileges commands? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] About the pkg manager on default desktop
Harry Putnam wrote: Regarding the pkg manager tool (icon) on the default desktop. How does one use this thing ... whenever I've tried at some point I'm told I lack privileges to use it. Why is the icon on the default desktop? I'm assuming it is there to use, But how? Harry, What do you get in the terminal after typing: pfexec packagemanager or gksu packagemanager best Michal Pryc ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] About the pkg manager on default desktop
Tomas Bodzar bodz...@openbsd.cz writes: Did you set your login during installation or after that? What show roles and privileges commands? roles postgres,root,zfssnap I'm not sure what you mean by `privileges' command. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] About the pkg manager on default desktop
Michal Pryc michal.p...@sun.com writes: Harry Putnam wrote: Regarding the pkg manager tool (icon) on the default desktop. How does one use this thing ... whenever I've tried at some point I'm told I lack privileges to use it. Why is the icon on the default desktop? I'm assuming it is there to use, But how? Harry, What do you get in the terminal after typing: pfexec packagemanager or gksu packagemanager Well yes, of course, I know about pfexec, gksu or just su or sudo or in fact just starting a root shell. But then that isn't using the provided icon is it? I'm asking about the icon specifically. For example... I tried adding pfexec to the call, using `properties' on the icon but I'm still not allowed to make changes if I start the pkg manager with the icon. In fact... even with the command you suggested: pfexec packagemanager I'm still not allowed to make changes like setting the publisher or whatever. But again that is by-passing the icon anyway. for me `roles' shows: postgres,root,zfssnap Do I need something more there? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] About the pkg manager on default desktop
Harry Putnam wrote: Michal Pryc michal.p...@sun.com writes: Harry Putnam wrote: Regarding the pkg manager tool (icon) on the default desktop. How does one use this thing ... whenever I've tried at some point I'm told I lack privileges to use it. Why is the icon on the default desktop? I'm assuming it is there to use, But how? Harry, What do you get in the terminal after typing: pfexec packagemanager or gksu packagemanager Well yes, of course, I know about pfexec, gksu or just su or sudo or in fact just starting a root shell. But then that isn't using the provided icon is it? I'm asking about the icon specifically. For example... I tried adding pfexec to the call, using `properties' on the icon but I'm still not allowed to make changes if I start the pkg manager with the icon. In fact... even with the command you suggested: pfexec packagemanager I'm still not allowed to make changes like setting the publisher or whatever. But again that is by-passing the icon anyway. for me `roles' shows: postgres,root,zfssnap Do I need something more there? Harry, Icon on the desktop is invoking: gksu packagemanager Which de facto is calling pfexec. So it looks like your privilages are broken. Here is what I have for my user migi: # cat /etc/user_attr | grep migi migiprofiles=Primary Administrator;roles=root -- best Michal Pryc ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] About the pkg manager on default desktop
Michal Pryc michal.p...@sun.com writes: [...] Harry, Icon on the desktop is invoking: gksu packagemanager whoops... I missed that... thanks Which de facto is calling pfexec. So it looks like your privilages are broken. Here is what I have for my user migi: # cat /etc/user_attr | grep migi migiprofiles=Primary Administrator;roles=root The same command for me shows a massive list, including `Software Installation'. Looks like I should be up for about anything I'd probably want to go with what you have eh? (wrapped for mail below): readertype=normal;profiles=acctadm,Apache 22 Administration Application Server Management,Audit Control,Audit Review Basic Actions,Brightness,Console User,Contract Observer CPU Power Management,Cron Management,Crypto Management CUPS Administration,DAT Administration,D-BUS Management Desktop Configuration,Device Management,Device Security DHCP Management,dtwm,Extended Accounting Flow Management Extended Accounting Net Management Extended Accounting Process Management Extended Accounting Task Management,File System Management File System Security,FTP Management,HAL Management Idmap Name Mapping Management,Idmap Service Management Inetd Management,Information Security,IP Filter Management ISCSI Target Administration,ISCSI Target Management ISNS Server Management,Kerberos Client Management Kerberos Server Management,Lighttpd 14 Administration Log Management,Mail Management,Maintenance and Repair,Media Backup Media Restore,Memcached Administration,MMS Administrator,MMS Operator MMS User,MySQL Administration,Name Service Management Name Service Security,NDMP Management,Network Autoconf Network IPsec Management,Network Link Security,Network Management Network Observability,Network Security,Network Wifi Info Network Wifi Management,Network Wifi Security,Object Access Management Object Label Management,OpenLDAP Server Administration,Operator Outside Accred,Postgres Administration,Primary Administrator Printer Management,Process Management,Project Management Rights Delegation,Rmvolmgr Management,Service Management Service Operator,shutdown,SMBFS Management,SMB Management Software Installation,STMF Administration,STMF Management Stunnel Administration,Suspend,Suspend To Disk,Suspend To RAM System Administrator,System Event Management,System Power TPM Administration,User Management,User Security,VSCAN Management Web Console Management,ZFS File System Management ZFS Storage Management,Zone Management roles=postgres,root,zfssnap ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [belenix-discuss] scanner of hp officejet all in one 4288 not working on osol
Moinak Ghosh wrote: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Arun Tomar tomar.a...@gmail.com wrote: hi! i've an hp office jet all in one f4288. the printer gets detected and works if i configure cups but the scanner doesn't. sane gives the error a...@opensolaris:~# scanimage -L No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages). In osol you should enable CUPS as mentioned here: http://blogs.sun.com/gheet/entry/how_to_turn_on_cups I'm assuming that the SANE support for this comes from the HPLIP SANE driver and not one of the drivers in the SANE distribution. The HPLIP SANE driver isn't delivered until build 126. -Norm ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to configure a new window manager in OpenSolaris?
Pen-Yuan: Please excuse my ignorance as a totally new user of OpenSolaris (and unix/linux systems!). Is there a way to easily install alternative window mangers such as Openbox or Fluxbox for this system? I've got two questions that are more specific: 1. Are there any specific tips for compiling and installing these window managers in OpenSolaris? 2. How do I add them to the sessions menu at the login screen? What files should I configure and where should I place .Xclient files, if at all? Thank you very much! By default, OpenSolaris ships with two window managers: compiz and metacity. You can switch by going to Preference-Appearance and go to the Visual Effects tab. If None is chosen, then metacity is used. If any other choice is selected, then compiz is used. The spec-files-extra SVN repository has a number of alternative window managers you can use, such as enlightenment, mutter, windowmaker, xmonad, fluxbox, openbox, LXDE, etc. Information about spec-files-extra is here: http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/ To build these spec-files, you need to install and use the CBE. Instructions are here: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/jds/contributing/building/ If you run gconf-editor, and go to the key: desktop-gnome-session-required_components, then you can specify a different window manager program if you install one. Whatever window manager is specified in this key will be used with GNOME. However, some alternative window managers install a desktop file to /usr/share/xsessions, so that you can launch them via picking an alternative session from the login screen, GDM. Brian ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] kernel panic on zpool import
Darren Taylor wrote: I have searched the forums and google wide, but cannot find a fix for the issue I'm currently experiencing. Long story short - I'm now at a point where I cannot even import my zpool (zpool import -f tank) without causing a kernel panic Please don't post to so many lists, zfs-discuss was the correct list to use. -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Nvidia graphics cards
Nvidia and Ati are set to make changes.The disput with chip partner intel may set back development at Nvidia leaving Ati the dominent player in the market.Does this mean the community will be developing the much requested 3 d support for ATI graphics as a priority? http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10370767-1.html?tag=mncol -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] 128 bit technology
Microsoft has announced that the next release windows 8 will be a 128 bit system.Apart from haveing few applications,isv,isv,on their side.Is this a marketing gimmick or saine thinking? Will opensolaris work on 128 bit? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 128 bit technology
Peter Jones wrote: Microsoft has announced that the next release windows 8 will be a 128 bit system.Apart from haveing few applications,isv,isv,on their side.Is this a marketing gimmick or saine thinking? Will opensolaris work on 128 bit? Which 128 bit platform do you have in mind? -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nvidia graphics cards
Peter Jones wrote: Nvidia and Ati are set to make changes.The disput with chip partner intel may set back development at Nvidia leaving Ati the dominent player in the market.Does this mean the community will be developing the much requested 3 d support for ATI graphics as a priority? http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10370767-1.html?tag=mncol What does that have to do with graphics chipsets? -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 128 bit technology
That is a very vague statement, is that 128 bit CPU architecture or 128 bit file system? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:42, Peter Jones bloosk...@netscape.net wrote: Microsoft has announced that the next release windows 8 will be a 128 bit system.Apart from haveing few applications,isv,isv,on their side.Is this a marketing gimmick or saine thinking? Will opensolaris work on 128 bit? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nvidia graphics cards
NForce is a motherboard chipset that NVidia produce, I have not seen any statements regarding their graphics chipsets. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:33, Peter Jones bloosk...@netscape.net wrote: Nvidia and Ati are set to make changes.The disput with chip partner intel may set back development at Nvidia leaving Ati the dominent player in the market.Does this mean the community will be developing the much requested 3 d support for ATI graphics as a priority? http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10370767-1.html?tag=mncol -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] 64-bit embedded technology
[ taken from some other thread that should die .. real soon now ] In the long run, I suspect 32-bit of any OS will only be on embedded devices, phones, GPS receivers, and so on. Maybe on SCs for larger systems, too. What do we have for 64-bit embedded processor technology? There is the UltraSparc IIi that was in the little Netra units a while ago. Those were low cache and not too quick but certainly 64-bit. What else is there that would fit on a really small motherboard and run off a car battery for a week? -- Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64-bit embedded technology
Dennis Clarke wrote: [ taken from some other thread that should die .. real soon now ] In the long run, I suspect 32-bit of any OS will only be on embedded devices, phones, GPS receivers, and so on. Maybe on SCs for larger systems, too. What do we have for 64-bit embedded processor technology? The main driver for 64 bit is the extend address space and applications that use it. Such applications haven't really made an impact on the embedded space yet. There is the UltraSparc IIi that was in the little Netra units a while ago. Those were low cache and not too quick but certainly 64-bit. What else is there that would fit on a really small motherboard and run off a car battery for a week? Intel Atom, ARM, PowerPC, take your pick. -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64-bit embedded technology
Dennis Clarke wrote: [ taken from some other thread that should die .. real soon now ] In the long run, I suspect 32-bit of any OS will only be on embedded devices, phones, GPS receivers, and so on. Maybe on SCs for larger systems, too. What do we have for 64-bit embedded processor technology? The main driver for 64 bit is the extend address space and applications that use it. Such applications haven't really made an impact on the embedded space yet. There is the UltraSparc IIi that was in the little Netra units a while ago. Those were low cache and not too quick but certainly 64-bit. What else is there that would fit on a really small motherboard and run off a car battery for a week? Intel Atom, ARM, PowerPC, take your pick. None of those are 64-bit. That was what I was thinking. Somehow my inner geek wants a hand held device with 16GB of ECC memory and a 64bit CMT processor that also includes mirrored SSD storage. All about the size of an iPhone but at lower cost than say, a Porsche. -- Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 128 bit technology
Peter Jones wrote: Microsoft has announced No it hasn't. -Artem ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64-bit embedded technology
--- On Sun, 10/11/09, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote: From: Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] 64-bit embedded technology To: Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com Cc: rlha...@smart.net, opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Date: Sunday, October 11, 2009, 8:22 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: [ taken from some other thread that should die .. real soon now ] In the long run, I suspect 32-bit of any OS will only be on embedded devices, phones, GPS receivers, and so on. Maybe on SCs for larger systems, too. What do we have for 64-bit embedded processor technology? The main driver for 64 bit is the extend address space and applications that use it. Such applications haven't really made an impact on the embedded space yet. There is the UltraSparc IIi that was in the little Netra units a while ago. Those were low cache and not too quick but certainly 64-bit. What else is there that would fit on a really small motherboard and run off a car battery for a week? Intel Atom, ARM, PowerPC, take your pick. None of those are 64-bit. That was what I was thinking. Somehow my inner geek wants a hand held device with 16GB of ECC memory and a 64bit CMT processor that also includes mirrored SSD storage. All about the size of an iPhone but at lower cost than say, a Porsche. -- Dennis Hi Dennis, There are the 64-bit VIA Nano and Intel Atoms like the Intel Atom 330 you may have overlooked. Also, modern PowerPC chips are 64-bit. You can pop in that 16GB RAM and explore strange new worlds...today... ~ Ken Mays ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] R a stistical package
I am trying to install R, a statistical package that is very popular among real statitical users. However, I cannot even make through the configure step. Is there any one succeeded in doing so? Regards, -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 64-bit embedded technology
Intel Atom, ARM, PowerPC, take your pick. None of those are 64-bit. That was what I was thinking. Somehow my inner geek wants a hand held device with 16GB of ECC memory and a 64bit CMT processor that also includes mirrored SSD storage. All about the size of an iPhone but at lower cost than say, a Porsche. -- Dennis Hi Dennis, There are the 64-bit VIA Nano and Intel Atoms like the Intel Atom 330 you may have overlooked. Also, modern PowerPC chips are 64-bit. You can pop in that 16GB RAM and explore strange new worlds...today... okay ... you know what I am all about .. let's build something just for fun. Pick a mobo if you can find it. :-) -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@opensolaris.ca - Email related to the open source Solaris dcla...@blastwave.org - Email related to open source for Solaris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] R a stistical package
Look for prebuilt binaries. Google. Also, look at blastwave.org opencsw.org etc and as a last resort, install R for Linux ontop Solaris: A) Install VirtualBox and install Linux, and then install R for Linux. B) Install Brandz, and install Linux R. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to configure a new window manager in OpenSolaris?
Thanks for the info! I will give it a shot. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] R a stistical package
On Oct 11, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Shizoom Wang wrote: I am trying to install R, a statistical package that is very popular among real statitical users. However, I cannot even make through the configure step. Is there any one succeeded in doing so? ./configure --prefix=/opt/R --with-iconv=no R is now configured for i386-pc-solaris2.11 Source directory: . Installation directory:/opt/R C compiler:/usr/bin/suncc -fast Fortran 77 compiler: /usr/bin/sunf77 -g C++ compiler: /usr/bin/sunCC -g Fortran 90/95 compiler:f95 -g Obj-C compiler:cc Interfaces supported: X11, tcltk External libraries:readline Additional capabilities: PNG, JPEG, TIFF, NLS, cairo Options enabled: shared BLAS, R profiling, Java Recommended packages: yes ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] 128 bit technology
Microsoft has announced that the next release windows 8 will be a 128 bit system.Apart from haveing few applications,isv,isv,on their side.Is this a marketing gimmick or saine thinking? Will opensolaris work on 128 bit? http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/10/08/excited-about-128-bit-windows-8-dont-hold-your-breath/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
