Re: [osol-discuss] BFU to b128a
Ian Allison wrote:
This leaves me in the bfu shell, from where I run the automatic
conflict resolution (/opt/onbld/bin/acr). Everything seems to go fine,
but when I try to reboot, I see an error like...
df: Could not find mount point for /tmp
//boot/solaris/bin/create_ramdisk[510]: tmp_free = tmp_free / 3 : bad
number
//boot/solaris/bin/create_ramdisk[2]: 12100 Segmentation Fault(coredump)
//boot/solaris/bin/create_ramdisk[3]: 12101 Segmentation Fault(coredump)
bootadm: boot-archive creation FAILED, command:
'//boot/solaris/bin/create_ramdisk'
I'm pretty sure this is a dependency thing because if I do a full
install rather than "Core System Support" everything seems to work
find and I can reboot into b128.
These errors you are getting come from this section of create_ramdisk:
if [ $format = ufs ] ; then
# calculate image size
getsize
# check to see if there is sufficient space in tmpfs
#
tmp_free=`df -b /tmp | tail -1 | awk '{ printf ($2) }'`
(( tmp_free = tmp_free / 3 ))
It would seem (from experimentation with failing commands in the
pipeline) that one of df / tail / awk failed. It would seem to be df:
df: Could not find mount point for /tmp
So, as a starting point, we need to see why df is complaining. What is
the output of the following commands (run from before the bfu starts):
1) type df
2) df -b /tmp
3) df /tmp
4) grep /tmp /etc/mnttab
Regards,
Brian
--
Brian Ruthven
Solaris Revenue Product Engineering
Sun Microsystems UK
Sparc House, Guillemont Park, Camberley, GU17 9QG
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
Just in the last week, I've started to experience very slow boot times, upwards of 35minutes. Looking in the log, I see the following message repeated for around 30 minutes before the boot finally completes Nov 30 09:29:14 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 821790 daemon.warning] svc:/system/device/local:default never came up Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device: pci1458,a...@14,2, audiohd0 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] audiohd0 is /p...@0,0/pci1458,a...@14,2 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: pci10ec,8168 (rge) instance 0 irq 0x18 vector 0x60 ioapic 0xff intin 0xff is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova rge: [ID 801725 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0: Using MSI interrupt type Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova mac: [ID 469746 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0 registered Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 116842 daemon.error] sysevent_bind_handle: Permission denied Nov 30 09:30:04 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:04 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:30:05 supernova mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0 link up, 100 Mbps, full duplex Nov 30 09:30:08 supernova /sbin/dhcpagent[64]: [ID 778557 daemon.warning] configure_v4_lease: no IP broadcast specified for rge0, making best guess Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. and then repeated ... Nov 30 09:33:27 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:33:27 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:33:28 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:33:28 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. It may or may not be relevant, but I briefly did install an ide (ata) disk in the box about a week ago. Normally, the box includes 4 sata disks and no pata disks. What is going wrong with the boot process and what can I do to return to the more usual 3-5minute boot time? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
So at least... what devices do you have on IRQ 16? What shows 'pfexec intrstat' command? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:45:39AM -0800, Chris wrote: > Just in the last week, I've started to experience very slow boot times, > upwards of 35minutes. Looking in the log, I see the following message > repeated for around 30 minutes before the boot finally completes You don't have a lot of ZFS snapshots, do you? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
pfexec intrstat device | cpu0 %tim cpu1 %tim -+-- ahci#0 | 250 0.2 0 0.0 audiohd#1 | 1 0.0 0 0.0 ehci#0 | 0 0.0 0 0.0 ehci#1 | 1 0.0 0 0.0 hci1394#0 | 250 0.1 0 0.0 and also ch...@supernova:~# echo ::interrupts -d | mdb -k IRQ Vect IPL BusTrg Type CPU Share APIC/INT# Driver Name(s) 10x41 5 ISAEdg Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x1 i8042#0 40xb0 12 ISAEdg Fixed 0 1 0x0/0x4 asy#0 60x40 5 ISAEdg Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x6 fdc#0 70x43 5 ISAEdg Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x7 ecpp#0 90x81 9 PCILvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x9 acpi_wrapper_isr 12 0x42 5 ISAEdg Fixed 0 1 0x0/0xc i8042#0 16 0x84 9 PCILvl Fixed 1 2 0x0/0x10 audiohd#0, ohci#-1 17 0x82 9 PCILvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x11 ehci#0 18 0x85 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 3 0x0/0x12 ohci#4, ohci#3, ohci#2 19 0x83 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 2 0x0/0x13 audiohd#1, ehci#1 22 0x86 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 2 0x0/0x16 hci1394#0, ahci#0 24 0x60 6 PCIEdg MSI1 1 - rge#0 25 0x61 6 PCIEdg MSI1 1 - rge#0 160 0xa0 0 Edg IPIall 0 - poke_cpu 192 0xc0 13 Edg IPIall 1 - xc_serv 208 0xd0 14 Edg IPIall 1 - kcpc_hw_overflow_intr 209 0xd1 14 Edg IPIall 1 - cbe_fire 210 0xd3 14 Edg IPIall 1 - cbe_fire 240 0xe0 15 Edg IPIall 1 - xc_serv 241 0xe1 15 Edg IPIall 1 - apic_error_intr -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
What is a lot? zfs list reports 773 snapshots. Most of those are from the auto snapshot service. I have 33 zfs file systems. The auto snapshot service has been running for a long time. I wouldn't think there would have been a significant change in the number of snapshots in the last week. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] attaching 2nd interface to a non-routed network
Greetings, I've manually configured two network interfaces on two very different subnets. # netstat -r Routing Table: IPv4 Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface - - -- - default 140.yyy.yyy.yyy UG1 2310 140.yyy.yyy.yyy xxx.xxx.edu U 1274 bge0 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.139 U 1 2 bge1 bge0 is correct, but I cannot get any traffic for bge1. 172.16.0.139/16 is the ipaddress of bge1. bge1 is attached to a layer2 switch and shouldn't have any routing. should the gateway entry for this interface be deleted, set to the local interface IP as is currently, or something else? thanks all! ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I install patches for sun studio 12 update 1 for opensolaris?
Hi Keith, Are you on an OpenSolaris 2009.06, a more recent build, or something else? We are planning on updating the /dev repo with SS12u1 + patches, likely during the build 128 timeframe, b/c of some issues we've seen on OSol builds after 2009.06 (116 and later to be exact). /kso Keith wrote: John Martin wrote: keithk wrote: Hi: I am getting some compilation error which I think one of the patches listed on http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/patches/ss12u1_patches.jsp for Sun Studio 12 update 1 would fix the problem. I downloaded the patches, but could not patch the software because patchadd is not part of opensolaris. How do I patch Sun Studio in Opensolaris? Before trying the patch route, I would recommend loading the Sept 2009 CBE which is Studio 12 with select patches. http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+tools/sun_studio_12_tools and see if that solves your compilation errors. Assuming this doesn't work, do you have the sunstudio12u1 or sunstudioexpress IPS package loaded? John, I have the sunstudio12u1 IPS package loaded. The current patch for the C++ compiler is Nov 28, 2009. http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-128229-03-1 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [osol-help] Opensolaris 2009.06 users forced to pay for security update
On 24 Nov 2009, at 14:30, Chad Welsh wrote: > Well they need to fix the IPS issues that are all around and they might get > someone to pay,b ut until that part is rock solid like other pay for > Operating Systems they will be hard pressed to get consumer financial > support! People who want a 'rock solid' version of Solaris should, at this stage, still be using Solaris 10 (which does, indeed, generate a great deal of support income for Sun). Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:calum.ben...@sun.comOpenSolaris Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Bootable Sparc DVD?
* Ken Mandelberg (k...@mathcs.emory.edu) wrote: > > > > OpenSolaris 2009.06 and /dev include XVR-100 support. > > > > I thought that was the case. Now back to my original question, when > will see a Sparc bootable build from DVD? No firm commitments as regards to time, but there are two projects underway (one pretty complete but not integrated) in the Caiman project which will address bootable SPARC installation media. The first is the text installer project. The second is the bootable AI project. The latter should be available 'soon' in the development builds. It is a piece of cd media that performs an automated installation entirely from media instead of having to set up an AI server and whatnot. Cheers, -- Glenn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How do I install patches for sun studio 12 update 1 for opensolaris?
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Shawn Walker wrote: > keithk wrote: >> >> Hi: >> I am getting some compilation error which I think one of the patches >> listed on >> http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/patches/ss12u1_patches.jsp for >> Sun Studio 12 update 1 would fix the problem. I downloaded the patches, but >> could not patch the software because patchadd is not part of opensolaris. >> How do I patch Sun Studio in Opensolaris? > > You don't. The only way to get updated versions of packaged software in > OpenSolaris is using the package system. > > pfexec pkg install sunstudio12u1 > > ...will install the newest version of sunstudio12 update 1 available, or > update the already installed version. > > It was last updated on June 17, 2009 at 10:54:13 PM CST. As of last week the versions of Sun Studio (12u1, express) available through the dev repository can not build ~b128 ON because it gets stuck trying to build ksh93 components[1]. 1. http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=116483#437006 I ran into many other problems with C++ code as well. If memory serves, this thread[2] discusses the type of problems I saw. 2. http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=110262 With slight modifications[3] I was able to get a good build with the Sept 2009 CBE[4]. 3. http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=118399&tstart=0 4. http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+tools/sun_studio_12_tools It looks like there might be an effort[5] with the Use Case Project to fix this up. Rich may appreciate a little help with this. 5. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/usecase-discuss/2009-November/51.html -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
Quite recently it was fixed to import lots of ZFS snapshots which took a long time. If you run an old build, try a new one and see if it helps. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
I'm running OpenSolaris 2009.06. I've twice tried updating to the development version, the latest being SVN_125. I've only been able to get it to boot to console - which it does manage in much less time than 35+ minutes. I'm haven't figured out what I need to do to get it passed the console. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] BFU to b128a
Hi Brian
Thanks for helping with this.
Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote:
These errors you are getting come from this section of create_ramdisk:
if [ $format = ufs ] ; then
# calculate image size
getsize
# check to see if there is sufficient space in tmpfs
#
tmp_free=`df -b /tmp | tail -1 | awk '{ printf ($2) }'`
(( tmp_free = tmp_free / 3 ))
It would seem (from experimentation with failing commands in the
pipeline) that one of df / tail / awk failed. It would seem to be df:
df: Could not find mount point for /tmp
So, as a starting point, we need to see why df is complaining. What is
the output of the following commands (run from before the bfu starts):
1) type df
df is hashed (/usr/bin/df)
2) df -b /tmp
Filesystem avail
swap 45349600
3) df /tmp
/tmp (swap ):90699216 blocks 7150927 files
4) grep /tmp /etc/mnttab
swap/tmptmpfs xattr,dev=5780002 1259622433
If I try these commands again after bfu, I get the following results
1) type df
df is hashed (/usr/bin/df)
2) df -b /tmp, 3) df /tmp
df: Could not find mount point for /tmp
4) grep /tmp /etc/mnttab
swap/tmptmpfs xattr,dev=5780002 1259622433
I tried to umount /tmp, but it fails with a Segmentation Fault. /tmp is
still visible
ls /tmp
AdDrEm.lck bfulib driver_classes.orig
acr.5Jai5v bfurepo.db iconf_entries.1141
bfu-extract-log.5966 bl minor_perm.orig
bfu.5966 buildname_to_major.orig
bfu.time_ref.5966crypt_eof.$$ network:dlmgmt.xml.5966
bfubin driver_aliases.orig
Does this help?
-Ian.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] virtualbox 3.0.12 IPS?
I'm not in the VirtualBox organization, but I'm not aware of any beta releases. VirtualBox has been releasing on a cadence of a new version about every 4 weeks. We've tried to keep the gap between SVR4 package and IPS availability as small as possible. -- Alan Robert Milkowski wrote: Hi, It would also be nice if you would provide your beta releases in IPS packaging... On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Alan Steinberg wrote: We hope to have the IPS version up in the next day or so. I don't think you would want to manually download and install the tarballs from the virtualbox.org website, since you would first have to uninstall the IPS version, then uninstall the tarball when you switch back to the IPS version. I would recommend just waiting the extra day or so. -- Alan keithk wrote: Hi: I have not been able to upgrade my virtualbox 3.0.12 because the IPS version has not been made available through the sun extra repository. Is there any way I can do a manual upgrade from my existing IPS package? Thanks, Keith ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Build snv_127 error RTMP & TZ_THRM
Good evening, I'm running the latest build and I'm quite happy about it. The hardware is a shuttle X27D with an SSD 64GB, the only thing is I keep getting this error message over and over. I googled the error and could trace back a similar error in 2007 !! The workaround was/is to disable a driver which causes another type of warnings. Not too sure what to do. Anybody knows how to resolve this? Your help is appreciated. parse-0633): Method parse/execution failed [\RTMP] (Node ff014736f338), AE_NOT_FOUND Nov 30 20:47:12 neo.lab.henoc.com acpica: [ID 740063 kern.notice] ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.THRM._TMP] (Node ff014736f068), AE_NOT_FOUND -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] VirtualBox Network Driver problem with Marvell Yukon
Hi Ted, I recommend that you post on the device driver discuss forum and/or get in contact with Garret D'Amore (see URL link below): http://gdamore.blogspot.com/2009/08/test-marvell-yukon-2-ethernet-driver.html He is a device driver engineer / UNIX jedi master that works on Solaris and NetBSD and I have a vague suspicion that he wrote a lot of the code that is in the yge driver and would be able to debug and troubleshoot your problem very quickly. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Static Ip Issue
If I may suggest, use # sys-unconfig, you will need to reboot (it'll take you), but this process will ensure you change every part correctly. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is there a driver for Marvell?
This is the official "yge" Marvell Yukon driver that is going to be incorporated into future builds of OpenSolaris: http://gdamore.blogspot.com/2009/08/test-marvell-yukon-2-ethernet-driver.html It should already be in there by default if you're running one of the newer, more bleeding edge development builds of Opensolaris. If you're having problems with it, you can try contacting Garret D'Amore or one of the other device driver developers and see if they can help you. An older device driver that used to work well for me in the past was the "YukonX" driver (see link below): http://weblogs.java.net/blog/2008/05/27/opensolaris-200805-meet-macbook-pro But I recommend not using that one anymore as it is not written or maintained / supported by Sun. It's better to just start off using Garret D'Amore's newer (and vastly improved) driver now so that way you don't need to un-install the yukonx driver later on when you want to upgrade to a newer build of OpenSolaris some time in the future. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] any work on bug ID 6807184
Is there any word on when this improved device driver will be incorporated into an "official" build of OpenSolaris Indiana or Solaris Express distributed by Sun? The URL for the bug id is here: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6807184 The reason I'm asking is because I have a bunch of motherboards with RealTek NIC's in them and I want to install OpenSolaris on them and run them as servers and buy support from Sun and have my hardware and software setup be "officially supported". I'm sure you guys can understand why my bosses would not want to use 3rd party patches that would take them "off the supported reservation" because the patches aren't officially blessed by Sun's support team and distributed as part of the official OpenSolaris Indiana distribution that Sun sells support for. On a different note I don't know why Sun doesn't just give Masayuki Murayama "core device driver contributor" status so that he can freely work on fixing bugs in NIC drivers without having to run through the whole "sponsorship obstacle course". If you look at how many Solaris device drivers he has written over the years, I think he has earned the it. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris Cluster
Hey Leoric, have you read the OpenSolaris Bible yet: http://www.amazon.com/OpenSolaris-Bible-Wiley-Nicholas-Solter/dp/0470385480/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259649986&sr=8-1 One of the authors of the OpenSolaris Bible is Nicholas A. Solter, who is one of the core contributors to the OpenSolaris HA Clusters group. Thus it is not surprising that Chapter 16 of the OpenSolaris Bible, which is called "Clustering OpenSolaris for High Availability" has the one of the best introductions to Sun's cluster software that I have ever read. The O.S. Bible also has the most clear and easy to understand introduction to dtrace that I have ever read as well... IMO the chapter on Dtrace alone is worth the price of the book, never mind the other good info on zones, fault management architecture, Link Aggregation, CIFS, iSCSI, xVM, SNMP, etc. If you have more than a passing interest in OpenSolaris, it's really worth tracking down a copy of the book if you haven't already. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
Chris wrote: I'm running OpenSolaris 2009.06. I've twice tried updating to the development version, the latest being SVN_125. I've only been able to get it to boot to console - which it does manage in much less time than 35+ minutes. I'm haven't figured out what I need to do to get it passed the console. How did you upgrade it to snv_125 then? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( > 35minutes)
Chris wrote: Just in the last week, I've started to experience very slow boot times, upwards of 35minutes. Looking in the log, I see the following message repeated for around 30 minutes before the boot finally completes Nov 30 09:29:14 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 821790 daemon.warning] svc:/system/device/local:default never came up Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device: pci1458,a...@14,2, audiohd0 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] audiohd0 is /p...@0,0/pci1458,a...@14,2 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: pci10ec,8168 (rge) instance 0 irq 0x18 vector 0x60 ioapic 0xff intin 0xff is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova rge: [ID 801725 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0: Using MSI interrupt type Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova mac: [ID 469746 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0 registered Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 116842 daemon.error] sysevent_bind_handle: Permission denied Nov 30 09:30:04 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:04 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:30:05 supernova mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0 link up, 100 Mbps, full duplex Nov 30 09:30:08 supernova /sbin/dhcpagent[64]: [ID 778557 daemon.warning] configure_v4_lease: no IP broadcast specified for rge0, making best guess Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. and then repeated ... Nov 30 09:33:27 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:33:27 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:33:28 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:33:28 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. It may or may not be relevant, but I briefly did install an ide (ata) disk in the box about a week ago. Normally, the box includes 4 sata disks and no pata disks. What is going wrong with the boot process and what can I do to return to the more usual 3-5minute boot time? try to boot with -kv and -m verbose options ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Why is using Package Manager such a pain in the A$$?
Is anybody interested in tacking a crack at re-writing IPS in the C programming language if that would make it run faster? Maybe it might be useful add an optional choice where local OpenSolaris user's groups could use an algorithm similar to bit-torrent to accelerate the downloading of packages from a distributed network of "volunteer" package seeders. As it is right now, apt-get on Nexenta seems to run subjectively faster than IPS on OpenSolaris Indiana for whatever reason. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] *.deb equivalent in IPS
If you're using Solaris 10 or Solaris Express, the older "SysV" packages do let you download a package from a remote FTP server and then install it using the "pkgadd -d" command. OpenSolaris still supports legacy SysV packages and the "pkgadd -d" command for backwards compatibility with Solaris 10 provided that you have the "SUNWpkgcmds" package installed in whatever server or zone you are trying to install the packages in to. The SUNWpkgcmds package should be automatically installed in the global zone by default if you are using OpenSolaris versions 2008.05 through 2009.06 or later. In non-global ipkg zones you install it through IPS by typing in: pkg install SUNWpkgcmds to check if you have it installed type in either of these commands: (1) The SysV command: pkginfo | grep SUNWpkgcmds or (2) The IPS command: pkg info SUNWpkgcmds -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] IRQ confilct warning logged at the console.
Hi ejannet, Can you try running these commands: pfexec scanpci prtdiag -v and copy and paste the output here? Also try running this command: pfexec intrstat and then hit control C after the first couple of pages of output and then copy and paste that output here as well. The "intrstat" command gives you statistics about the interrupts. Type in: man intrstat at the command line to read more about it. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
