[osol-discuss] SUNWgmake download

2010-03-27 Thread lcd_user
hi, I run the pkgrm SUNWgmake command , now I'd like to reinstall that 
package , can I find it on the net , I'searched on the open solaris but it 
doesn't contain that package. I've even have a Solaris 10 dvd , if this can 
help. another problem is that i've  not an internet connection on my pc so 
can't use the application manager.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread Bob Palowoda
 There is more information here:
 
 http://www.cio.com/article/588163/Oracle_Enacts_all_Or
 _Nothing_Hardware_Support_Policy?taxonomyId=3234

 Is the hardware OEM's that supply the chips, controllers etc supporting 
Oracle's support strategy?

---Bob
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] SUNWgmake download

2010-03-27 Thread Cyril Plisko
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 1:18 PM, lcd_user neo3li...@hotmail.it wrote:
 hi, I run the pkgrm SUNWgmake command , now I'd like to reinstall that 
 package , can I find it on the net , I'searched on the open solaris but it 
 doesn't contain that package. I've even have a Solaris 10 dvd , if this can 
 help. another problem is that i've  not an internet connection on my pc so 
 can't use the application manager.

If you run SVR4 pkg based Solaris distribution you may find SUNWgmake
on its installation media.
For example:

pkgadd -d /cdrom/cdrom/Solaris_10/Product SUNWgmake


-- 
Regards,
Cyril
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] SUNWgmake download

2010-03-27 Thread John Martin

On 03/27/10 06:18 AM, lcd_user wrote:

hi, I run the pkgrm SUNWgmake command , now I'd like to reinstall that 
package , can I find it on the net , I'searched on the open solaris but it doesn't 
contain that package. I've even have a Solaris 10 dvd ,
   

If you are using development builds, starting with 133 the IPS
package name changed from SUNWgmake to developer/build/gnu-make.

  pkg install developer/build/gnu-make



___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread john kroll
The hardware components used within a given system would not have to have the 
same policy when the end product machine is used in registry.

This page is © Copyright 2001-2010 helpwithpcs.com
An example of OEM hardware would be: A hardware company that manufactures one 
type of circuit board (such as a motherboard) buys hardware (for example, an 
audio module) from another. The purchaser (motherboard manufacturer) then 
integrates the hardware (audio module) into their own product and puts it out 
to market.

The purchasing manufacturer will usually re-brand the hardware (the audio 
module in our example) under their own name. They also provide the technical 
support and warranty.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Bug 6932552: B134 Splashscreen crasch Kernel must be fixed for 2010.3

2010-03-27 Thread David . Comay

It sounds like you may be running into 6914346 which is documented in
the release notes:

6914346 upgrade from OpenSolaris 2009.06 (111b2) to 130 fails with stale
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914346

After updating to build 130 or beyond, the system may panic
with messages of the form

/kernel/misc/amd64/pci_autoconfig:
undefined symbol 'pcie_get_rc_dip'
WARNING: mod_load: cannot load module 'pci_autoconfig'

panic[cpu0]/thread=fbc2e3a0:
failed to load misc/pci_autoconfig

Work-around: Boot the original boot environment (BE) instead
and correct the boot archive as follows

reboot into the earlier BE
u...@host:~$ pfexec beadm mount name of new BE /mnt
u...@host:~$ pfexec bootadm update-archive -F -R /mnt
u...@host:~$ pfexec beadm unmount name of new BE

At this point, the new BE can be booted into.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Latestst LiveCD download?

2010-03-27 Thread Chris Pickett
Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?

Chris
-- 
^---^
   (@)v(@)  Chris Pickett
   |/   IT consultant
 ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Latestst LiveCD download?

2010-03-27 Thread Nikola M
Chris Pickett wrote:
 Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?
   
http://www.genunix.org/ when available.
135 Not released yet.

As topic on #opensolaris is saying:
134 IS NOT 2010.03! | 2010.03 will be released when it's ready. If you
rush it, you get what you deserve.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Latestst LiveCD download?

2010-03-27 Thread Chris Pickett
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nikola M minik...@gmail.com wrote:
 Chris Pickett wrote:
 Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?

 http://www.genunix.org/ when available.
 135 Not released yet.

134 is too old - it predates the 'big'ol package rename' and an
attempt to update runs out of memory. My box only has 2GB.

Chris
-- 
^---^
   (@)v(@)  Chris Pickett
   |/   IT consultant
 ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Latestst LiveCD download?

2010-03-27 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Chris Pickett wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nikola M minik...@gmail.com wrote:
 Chris Pickett wrote:
 Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?

 http://www.genunix.org/ when available.
 135 Not released yet.
 
 134 is too old - it predates the 'big'ol package rename' and an
 attempt to update runs out of memory. My box only has 2GB.

No it doesn't - the mass package renaming happened in build 133.

-- 
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread B
Have these policies already gone into place, because I am still (crossing 
fingers) getting security updates on my Solaris 10 box with no agreement. I 
just got a new one today. Thanks!
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Latestst LiveCD download?

2010-03-27 Thread Shawn Walker

On 03/27/10 11:21 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:

Chris Pickett wrote:

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nikola Mminik...@gmail.com  wrote:

Chris Pickett wrote:

Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?


http://www.genunix.org/ when available.
135 Not released yet.


134 is too old - it predates the 'big'ol package rename' and an
attempt to update runs out of memory. My box only has 2GB.


No it doesn't - the mass package renaming happened in build 133.


I might also add that if you boot to single-user mode, or temporary 
disable X using svcadm disable gdm (be certain you've closed all 
applications, etc.) you should have enough memory then to perform the 
update to the 134 /dev build.


Alternatively, waiting for the official release in the /release 
repository will also use less memory for the upgrade.


-Shawn
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread Matthias Pfützner

Visualisation? In the DataCenter?

I guess, you're talking about Virtualization, right?

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

Von: Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Someone's overlooked the whole visualisation thing.  What's one of 
OpenSolaris's bit selling points? Visualisation.  What's the biggest growth 
sector in the data centre? Visualisation.

--
Ian.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread john kroll
I would have to guess no not from the current manufacturer. Maybe possible from 
someone else in the net framework if what your doing is important enough ??
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread Ian Collins

On 03/28/10 07:15 AM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:

Visualisation? In the DataCenter?

I guess, you're talking about Virtualization, right?


Right, trust me to copy and paste a typo!

--
Ian.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread James Mansion

Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
Personally I'm an open source advocate so any software business model 
that is closed will have to try hard to convince me that it's better 
than all the community can provide in testing, bug reporting, free 
marketing, free support, etc.
You might be an advocate, but have you tried to make money 'doing open 
source'?  Red Hat makes money essentially by providing a de facto 
standard and having got there first so that third party support got 
there - and its self-fulfilling then.  As consumers, we basically want a 
near monopoly (for ubiquity and standardisation) and an also ran to keep 
the main player honest.


There are a lot of people with big opinions advocating free software, so 
long as someone else pays for it, and takes all the business risk.  
Oracle is a successuful business, and what makes it successful is that 
it has lots of customers who pay, not lots of advocates who think the 
sun shines from you know where.


But if Oracle is exclusively focusing on taking market share from AIX 
and HP-UX, perhaps Larry can look at it as a I have more developers 
working on Solaris then you and disregard the outside contributions 
completely.
He has more than Red Hat too, at least in terms of engineers he can 
focus and instruct.  Lets wait and see what he does with it.


James

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread Ken Gunderson

On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 10:35 -0700, B wrote:
 Have these policies already gone into place, because I am still (crossing 
 fingers) getting security updates on my Solaris 10 box with no agreement. I 
 just got a new one today. Thanks!

I just took another look at it - the download page has been update again
and is a bit clearer than what was initially referenced at link that
started this thread.  Or maybe I'm just less irate of a mode about it
and reading it more clearly.  In any event:

Please remember, your right to use Solaris acquired as a download is
limited to a trial of 90 days, unless you acquire a service contract for
the downloaded Software.

Non Sun hardware - no service contract - no entitlement to use S10
beyond 90 evaluation.

I've been waiting since Monday of last week for call back from two
different Oracle/Sun contacts for confirmation on the no service for non
Sun hardware bit but I'm still waiting and during interim such seems to
have panned out to be the case.

Good luck.

-- 
Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Read/Write NTFS Partitions

2010-03-27 Thread Orvar Korvar
All NTFS solutions I tried, are extremely slow. Like 5MB/sec or so. What read 
and write speeds do you get?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 - no longer free

2010-03-27 Thread B
Good luck to us all!
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Read/Write NTFS Partitions

2010-03-27 Thread rosso
As I just built my new OSOL system, here is what I got:

Intel i7-860
Asus P7P55D
4 GB RAM

One 750 GB Seagate HD with Windows and data, three of the same HDs for a raidz1 
zpool with OSOL. When copying the data from ntfs into my pool using ntfs-3g I 
averaged about 19 MB/s.
But much more interesting is doing an rsync of the data in my newly created 
pool into an external 1.5 TB Seagate one disk backup pool using e-sata ... for 
the large files I got ( mostly ISOs ) I end up at 76 MB/s ...
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] About b134 and fixes to it.

2010-03-27 Thread Harry Putnam
Seems there have been real rash of problems with b 134 and booting
into X.  Will any of those fixes be put out in newer b 134 or only in
b 135?

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] About b134 and fixes to it.

2010-03-27 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Harry Putnam wrote:
 Seems there have been real rash of problems with b 134 and booting
 into X.  Will any of those fixes be put out in newer b 134 or only in
 b 135?

Several are planned for inclusion in b134a.

-- 
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
 Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org