Re: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support
On 01/ 6/11 02:13 PM, ken mays wrote: > I hope that once a fully "compliant" Xorg 7.6 XNV implementation is in place > with the additional kernel-side DRM/KMS updates from the Intel/Oracle > team(s), we can test it and work towards a fully supported Intel 2.14.0 > driver as well as the Mesa 7.10.x Intel DRI driver updates. Sorry, as I said on xwin-discuss yesterday, I don't think the kernel driver binaries needed to test that will be available to the public until the next full release on the Solaris 11/Express train. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support
Guido & Alan, I hope that once a fully "compliant" Xorg 7.6 XNV implementation is in place with the additional kernel-side DRM/KMS updates from the Intel/Oracle team(s), we can test it and work towards a fully supported Intel 2.14.0 driver as well as the Mesa 7.10.x Intel DRI driver updates. Thanks Alan for your work and support as well, ~ Ken Mays --- On Thu, 1/6/11, Guido Berhoerster wrote: > From: Guido Berhoerster > Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support > To: "Alan Coopersmith" > Cc: "ken mays" , opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 11:19 AM > * Alan Coopersmith > [2011-01-06 16:49]: > > This is also why we're still on Xorg 1.7.7, since the > older intel drivers > > that still work on non-KMS kernels don't support Xorg > 1.8 & later, and > > while we could port it, we've been focusing our effort > on getting the > > combined Xorg 1.9 + KMS solution working well instead > with the newer drivers. > > FYI, > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=xf86-video-intel-2.9.1-xorg-server-1.7.3-fixes.patch&package=xorg-x11-driver-video-intel-legacy&project=openSUSE%3A11.3&srcmd5=9d240defdeccb1320edcf92bc02ccf08 > is all I had to modify in order to get the 2.9.1 Intel > driver > (the last version supporting UMS) to build with the 1.8.0 > Xorg > server. It works just fine. > > -- > Guido Berhoerster > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Mounting hard drive NTFS
I have to make create code in konf file, which will make automatically mounting partition with NTFS of id "usb-Seagate_FreeAgent_2GAV9H30-0:0-part1"(mounting point/mnt/seagate) -lack of divice cannot make error on starting the system I have to solve this problem, because this is my homework and I really don't have any idea how to start. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support
* Alan Coopersmith [2011-01-06 16:49]: > This is also why we're still on Xorg 1.7.7, since the older intel drivers > that still work on non-KMS kernels don't support Xorg 1.8 & later, and > while we could port it, we've been focusing our effort on getting the > combined Xorg 1.9 + KMS solution working well instead with the newer drivers. FYI, https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=xf86-video-intel-2.9.1-xorg-server-1.7.3-fixes.patch&package=xorg-x11-driver-video-intel-legacy&project=openSUSE%3A11.3&srcmd5=9d240defdeccb1320edcf92bc02ccf08 is all I had to modify in order to get the 2.9.1 Intel driver (the last version supporting UMS) to build with the 1.8.0 Xorg server. It works just fine. -- Guido Berhoerster ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support
On 01/ 6/11 06:55 AM, ken mays wrote: > I'm reviewing the intel 2.13.903/2.14.x 2D driver/Xserver 1.9.2 package > integration for testing. It should be thoroughly unusable, which is why we've not integrated it yet. Current Intel driver versions will *NOT* run on kernels without KMS support. They've dropped the user-mode setting that was in older versions of their Xorg driver. This is also why we're still on Xorg 1.7.7, since the older intel drivers that still work on non-KMS kernels don't support Xorg 1.8 & later, and while we could port it, we've been focusing our effort on getting the combined Xorg 1.9 + KMS solution working well instead with the newer drivers. -- -Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support
Chris, Yes, the Xserver 1.9.2 package implementation is part of the basic requirements as well as Mesa 7.10 and the updated Xorg Intel 2.14.x driver. You'll need a package set as I proposed for IPS updates: xf86-video-intel 2.14.0 Mesa 7.10 libdrm-2.4.23 cairo-1.10.2 libva-1.0.7 xserver-1.9.3 Note: ON (snv) kernel patches needed for kernel-side Intel DRI/DRM support for the Intel GMA HD 2000/3000 IGPs. Otherwise, you'll continue to have have 2D/3D performance regressions and other oddities. You can get Alan's Xserver 1.9.2 build for testing at: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/x/downloads/Xorg-1.9/build-2010-11-18/Xorg-1.9.2-20101118-i386.tar.bz2 I'm reviewing the intel 2.13.903/2.14.x 2D driver/Xserver 1.9.2 package integration for testing. Mesa 7.10 is proposed for release tomorrow. Tests ran on: Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale & Clarkdale) IGPs. ~ Ken Mays P.S. When it rans, it pours. --- On Wed, 1/5/11, Chris Ridd wrote: > From: Chris Ridd > Subject: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support > To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > Date: Wednesday, January 5, 2011, 4:17 PM > Does Solaris have any enhancements > (in public commits?) to support the new Intel "SandyBridge" > chips? > > AIUI some X support for SandyBridge was due in Solaris > "later this year" (2010), so possibly is in S11 Express. > > But what about support for other SandyBridge features? > (UEFI, vector processing extensions?) > > Cheers, > > Chris > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
