Re: [osol-discuss] Where can I find a full Walk thru setting up nfs4 from scratch
On 11/14/11 02:38 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: Running openindiana b 151a as vm guest on host win7 Where can I find an up to date detailed description of setting up nfs4 from scratch on a home lan zfs server with linux nfs4 clients. There really isn't that much to it, just set snarenfs=true on the filesystem(s) you want to share. I've turned up loads of stuff googling, way too much to paw through it all. I'm running openindiana and have posted a similar request on that group. Some of the directions I've found insist on setting up nis. Do I really need nis to be setup to share fs with nfs on a home lan? No. Just make sure the file permissions are correct for clients to access the shares. -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Where can I find a full Walk thru setting up nfs4 from scratch
Running openindiana b 151a as vm guest on host win7 Where can I find an up to date detailed description of setting up nfs4 from scratch on a home lan zfs server with linux nfs4 clients. I've turned up loads of stuff googling, way too much to paw through it all. I'm running openindiana and have posted a similar request on that group. Some of the directions I've found insist on setting up nis. Do I really need nis to be setup to share fs with nfs on a home lan? This is a home lan with no real internet address on the inner network, just a homemade 192.168.1.0/24 setup. With a domain name of `local.lan'. I'm not sure how that effects how I setup nfs4. I need the most basic guidance on this... I do not have a working knowledge of nfs. Hopefully there is some url online for real greenhorns that describes how to do this in detail. When I start to edit /etc/default/nfs as described in some of the directions I've found I see: # Moved to SMF. Use sharectl(1M) to manage NFS properties. So at least several of the guides I've run across are apparently out of date and insist on editing /etc/default/nfs. Hard to tell what guides hold water for modern solaris and offshoots. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] First Cloud OS? Really?
> From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pa...@iki.fi] > > Solaris support contracts are required, and they're priced > per *physical* sockets/servers! Holy crap, that's awesome! So it's like a joke we should all laugh at when they call it the "first cloud os." I just wasn't getting the satirical humor before. :-) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] First Cloud OS? Really?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:10:50AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >Anybody know why they're calling it "the first cloud os?" > >Just cuz they wanted to throw in a buzzword? Yeah.. and if the customer wants to run Solaris 11 on any IaaS Cloud service, say on Rackspace cloud, or on Amazon EC2, they can't do it, because Solaris support contracts are required, and they're priced per *physical* sockets/servers! So it's impossible to use Solaris elsewhere than on Oracle hw/sw. That's not how things should be in 2011. Oracle should be selling support contracts per instance as well.. (for VM/cloud use). -- Pasi ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
