Re: [osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1

2009-03-25 Thread Uwe Dippel
[i]and yes, it works[/i]

and yes, it prints A4! (Evince doesn't)

Thanks for the link!

Uwe
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1

2009-03-25 Thread Ché Kristo
We should all head over to Adobe's acroread blog and post comments thanking 
them for this...we've done enough whining, we may as well show our gratitude :-P

http://blogs.adobe.com/acroread/
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1

2009-03-24 Thread Paul Gress

Hi all,

I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new 
directory was posted for v9.1.  It contains both x86 and x64 versions of 
acroreader.  What it does not contain is a Sparc version.


ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/

Paul
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1

2009-03-24 Thread Anon Y Mous
I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new
directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64 versions of
acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc version.
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/

I haven't tried downloading and installing it yet, but this is very good news! 
Do the tar balls contain binaries in standard SysV package format?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1

2009-03-24 Thread Scott Rotondo

Anon Y Mous wrote:

I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a
new directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64
versions of acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc
version. ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/


I haven't tried downloading and installing it yet, but this is very
good news! Do the tar balls contain binaries in standard SysV package
format?


No, it contains more tar archives and a shell script called INSTALL. 
Package format would be nice, but this was pretty painless to install.


I just installed this and used it to view and print a handful of PDF 
files. This is so much better than the 20th century Acroread 4.x we had 
before that it's hard to describe. Now I never have to run Evince again!


Scott

--
Scott Rotondo
Principal Engineer, Solaris Security Technologies
President, Trusted Computing Group
Phone/FAX: +1 408 850 3655 (Internal x68278)
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1

2009-03-24 Thread Dennis Clarke

I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new
directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64 versions of
acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc version.
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/

 I haven't tried downloading and installing it yet, but this is very good
 news! Do the tar balls contain binaries in standard SysV package format?

It is in both a tar ball and SVR4 pkg thus :

# pkgadd -G -d ./AdbeRdr9.1.0-1_i386solaris_enu.pkg

The following packages are available:
  1  ADBEreadr-enu Adobe Reader
   (i386) 9.1.0

Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process
all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]:

Processing package instance ADBEreadr-enu from
/export/home/dclarke/AdbeRdr9.1.0-1_i386solaris_enu.pkg

Adobe Reader(i386) 9.1.0
Copyright: Commercial
Using / as the package base directory.
## Processing package information.
## Processing system information.
   9 package pathnames are already properly installed.
## Verifying package dependencies.
## Verifying disk space requirements.
## Checking for conflicts with packages already installed.

The following files are already installed on the system and are being
used by another package:
  /opt attribute change only

* - conflict with a file which does not belong to any package.

Do you want to install these conflicting files [y,n,?,q] y
## Checking for setuid/setgid programs.

This package contains scripts which will be executed with super-user
permission during the process of installing this package.

Do you want to continue with the installation of ADBEreadr-enu [y,n,?] y
.
.
.

Note that it installs things in /usr/bin and /usr/local and it changes the
ownership on /opt ( wrongly ) from root:bin to root:sys.

It was built with GCC 4.1.0 :

# mcs -p /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intelsolaris/bin/acroread | sort -u

/opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intelsolaris/bin/acroread:
@(#)SunOS 5.10 Generic January 2005
GCC: (GNU) 4.1.0

So that pretty much tells you that they stuck in libgcc_s.so.1 as well as
a bucket of other things, none of which are in the RPATH/RUNPATH
correctly. That exaplins the script to get it to work and hack in the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH eenv var.

Not a pretty package but it is a massive step in the right direction.

Dennis


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Acroreader 9.1

2009-03-24 Thread Dennis Clarke

I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new
directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64 versions of
acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc version.
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/

 I haven't tried downloading and installing it yet, but this is very good
 news! Do the tar balls contain binaries in standard SysV package format?

and yes, it works :

http://www.blastwave.org/dclarke/Adobe_Reader_9_Solaris_10_i386.png


-- 
Dennis Clarke
sig du jour : An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will
eat him last., Winston Churchill

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org