Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
If I continue to use samba until some of these differences/evolution are ironed out. 1. What added overhead if any, is there to the new zfs code with sharesmb? 2. Are there any switches or settings to completely disable the sharesmb additions? thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
team, thanks for the help. I decided to wait for nexentastor 0.99.5 and the cifs fix. Meantime, I took my two esata drives and put them on my ncp vm. I got gnome, zfs, cifs, & vmware tools working. haven't tried any of that on the nexentastor. mini howto is at: http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=44&func=view&id=108&catid=11 joseph This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
hello, quick snapshot: I also followed the instructions at http://opensolaris.org/os/project/cifs-server/gettingstarted.html and did get share access from vista on ncp, but following the same instructions in nexentastor resulted in authentication errors when trying to access from vista. joseph This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
Janice, Below you have 2 files where the first one is written from a windows system. It seems to pick up the right owner but the file protection is set up to disallow users on the solaris system to access the file. This means that if I want to access the file when logged in on Solaris I need to change the protection. The parent directory have the protection set up to allow everybody full access and I work in workgroup mode. --+ 1 backlin staff 1109Jan 31 11:09 nsswitch.conf drwxrwxrwx+ 2 backlin staff 3Jan 1 11:09 Solaris 10 I assume there must be a way to set up zfs to allow files to be accessed by the same user on the solaris system and also manage who has access to a file created from a networked windows system. In addition I can't create folders from a windows system, I get access denied. Is there something I have missed when setting up the system? TIA, Jerry Janice Chang wrote: Hi Jerry. Thank you for your inquiry. Would appreciate some examples showing the permissions set from Windows and what is seen vs. what is expected on the Solaris server. Thanks! Janice Jerry Backlin wrote: I'm using sharesmb (b82) in my home office server with XP & W2K clients. Upgrades have caused some hickups and the smbpasswd file had been reset for me but that is addressed now. I can not get my hands around how file protection should be set up. currently a file written into the zfs share does not inherit the protection parent filesystem, from solaris you have no access. I assume this has not been addressed yet Jerry This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org begin:vcard fn:Jerry Backlin n:Backlin;Jerry org:Sun Microsystems email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:CNE Storage Marketing Mgr tel;work:+33 4 9377 6888 tel;cell:+33 6 8035 9394 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
Hi Jerry. Thank you for your inquiry. Would appreciate some examples showing the permissions set from Windows and what is seen vs. what is expected on the Solaris server. Thanks! Janice Jerry Backlin wrote: > I'm using sharesmb (b82) in my home office server with XP & W2K clients. > Upgrades have caused some hickups and the smbpasswd file had been reset for > me but that is addressed now. > I can not get my hands around how file protection should be set up. currently > a file written into the zfs share does not inherit the protection parent > filesystem, from solaris you have no access. > I assume this has not been addressed yet > > Jerry > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > ___ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
I'm using sharesmb (b82) in my home office server with XP & W2K clients. Upgrades have caused some hickups and the smbpasswd file had been reset for me but that is addressed now. I can not get my hands around how file protection should be set up. currently a file written into the zfs share does not inherit the protection parent filesystem, from solaris you have no access. I assume this has not been addressed yet Jerry This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
> A fix for this problem will be coming in the near > future. One simple workaround is to run the > command: > sharemgr start zfs > et the ZFS shares reshared. You don't need to change > the ZFS sharesmb property to get them reshared. By the way, I tried this and it did solve the problem for me. Thanks, Haik This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
> > One other problem is that after I rebooted the > OpenSolaris CIFS server, > the shares were inaccessible. Meaning I couldn't > connect to them with > either an OS X or XP client. After resetting the ZFS > sharesmb > properties, it worked again. I will do a reboot test > to confirm this is > what is really happening. A fix for this problem will be coming in the near future. One simple workaround is to run the command: sharemgr start zfs to get the ZFS shares reshared. You don't need to change the ZFS sharesmb property to get them reshared. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
I'm using it on my personal LAN at home. I've connected to a share with
from both OS X Tiger and Windows XP. I followed the steps at
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/cifs-server/gettingstarted.html
I still need to investigate these, but so far I've hit two problems.
I've seen the smb/server service go into maintenance mode four times.
Log is attached.
One other problem is that after I rebooted the OpenSolaris CIFS server,
the shares were inaccessible. Meaning I couldn't connect to them with
either an OS X or XP client. After resetting the ZFS sharesmb
properties, it worked again. I will do a reboot test to confirm this is
what is really happening.
Haik
Andre Lue wrote:
Is anyone out there using and testing zfs and sharesmb yet?
If so can you please provide some feedback and any observations you might have
in comparison with samba?
thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[ Dec 8 01:23:47 Disabled. ]
[ Dec 8 01:23:47 Rereading configuration. ]
[ Jan 3 01:35:17 Enabled. ]
[ Jan 3 01:35:18 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
smbd: Netbios Name service started.smbd: Netbios Datagram service started.smbd:
Netbios Browser client started.smbd: Netbios Timer service started.[ Jan 3 01:35:22 Method "start" exited with status 0. ]
[ Jan 3 02:44:02 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Jan 3 02:44:02 Executing stop method (:kill). ]
[ Jan 3 20:27:58 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
smbd: Netbios Name service started.smbd: Netbios Datagram service started.smbd:
Netbios Browser client started.smbd: Netbios Timer service started.[ Jan 3 20:28:07 Method "start" exited with status 0. ]
[ Jan 4 10:02:58 Stopping because process dumped core. ]
[ Jan 4 10:02:58 Executing stop method (:kill). ]
[ Jan 4 10:02:58 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
[ Jan 4 10:03:00 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
[ Jan 6 21:30:44 Leaving maintenance because disable requested. ]
[ Jan 6 21:30:44 Disabled. ]
[ Jan 6 21:30:50 Enabled. ]
[ Jan 6 21:30:51 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
smbd: Netbios Name service started.smbd: Netbios Datagram service started.smbd:
Netbios Browser client started.smbd: Netbios Timer service started.[ Jan 6 21:30:55 Method "start" exited with status 0. ]
[ Jan 6 21:38:30 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Jan 6 21:38:30 Executing stop method (:kill). ]
[ Jan 6 21:38:57 Enabled. ]
[ Jan 6 21:38:57 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
smbd: Netbios Name service started.smbd: Netbios Datagram service started.smbd:
Netbios Browser client started.smbd: Netbios Timer service started.[ Jan 6 21:39:01 Method "start" exited with status 0. ]
[ Jan 7 20:09:40 Stopping because process dumped core. ]
[ Jan 7 20:09:40 Executing stop method (:kill). ]
[ Jan 7 20:09:40 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
[ Jan 7 20:09:42 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
[ Jan 13 23:30:52 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
smbd: Netbios Name service started.smbd: Netbios Datagram service started.smbd:
Netbios Browser client started.smbd: Netbios Timer service started.[ Jan 13 23:31:00 Method "start" exited with status 0. ]
[ Jan 15 09:00:21 Stopping because process dumped core. ]
[ Jan 15 09:00:21 Executing stop method (:kill). ]
[ Jan 15 09:00:21 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
[ Jan 15 09:00:23 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
[ Jan 16 22:27:24 Leaving maintenance because disable requested. ]
[ Jan 16 22:27:24 Disabled. ]
[ Jan 16 22:27:29 Enabled. ]
[ Jan 16 22:27:29 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
smbd: Netbios Name service started.smbd: Netbios Datagram service started.smbd:
Netbios Browser client started.smbd: Netbios Timer service started.[ Jan 16 22:27:33 Method "start" exited with status 0. ]
[ Jan 17 09:47:16 Stopping because process dumped core. ]
[ Jan 17 09:47:16 Executing stop method (:kill). ]
[ Jan 17 09:47:17 Executing start method ("/usr/lib/smbsrv/smbd start"). ]
[ Jan 17 09:47:19 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Anyone using zfs and CIFS yet?
Is anyone out there using and testing zfs and sharesmb yet? If so can you please provide some feedback and any observations you might have in comparison with samba? thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
