Re: [opensource-dev] Setup a Release configuration for VS2010 build -- Need testers.
Applied change to autobuild.xml for -VC10msbuildRelease. Applied change to CMakeLists.txt to remove the Colon from /MAP the colon was being passed through cmake and causing a bad path. Failed in an attempt to place the CMakeList.txt change to Review Board. Oz's repository is out of sync with mine. And, mine isn't a review board repository. https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-autobuild2010-wip @ WolfPup Know you intended to work on this. I was trying to work 32 bit memory issues and was trying to see if release was better and it fell in place. Sorry, if I stepped on your toes. Memory is slightly better. On XP 32bit 1:20 minutes before crash. Nicky Don't know exactly what needed testing, but it compiled for me on Win XP Pro 64-bit, using VCE 2010. commands used autobuild configure -c VC10msbuildRelWithDebInfo -- -DLL_TESTS:BOOL=OFF autobuild build --no-configure -c VC10msbuildRelWithDebInfo Managed to log into SL today with it (last night I couldn't stay connected for more than 30 seconds). All appears to work except for audio (I assumed FMOD was disabled). -- Ima Mechanique ima.mechanique(at)blueyonder.co.uk ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
[opensource-dev] Review Request: Incorrect library names in the windows section of XmlRpcEpi.cmake
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/178/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- Incorrect library names in the windows section of XmlRpcEpi.cmake This addresses bug OPEN-42. Diffs - doc/contributions.txt 8a50c1a8428d indra/cmake/XmlRpcEpi.cmake 8a50c1a8428d Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/178/diff Testing --- patched and correct libraries were found. Thanks, Nicky ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Incorrect library names in the windows section of XmlRpcEpi.cmake
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/178/#review424 --- Not needed LL changed the autobuild.xml libraries and cmake and I was using an older autobuild.xml. - Nicky On March 6, 2011, 1:39 p.m., Nicky Perian wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/178/ --- (Updated March 6, 2011, 1:39 p.m.) Review request for Viewer. Summary --- Incorrect library names in the windows section of XmlRpcEpi.cmake This addresses bug OPEN-42. Diffs - doc/contributions.txt 8a50c1a8428d indra/cmake/XmlRpcEpi.cmake 8a50c1a8428d Diff: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/178/diff Testing --- patched and correct libraries were found. Thanks, Nicky ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
[opensource-dev] Added repository. Windows Autobuild
Last week I merged in viewer-development into https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-autobuild2010-wip. Yesterday, I found some pre-autobuild behavior. While not broken it does lead to maintenance problems when trying to submit changes that are intended to correct autobuild issues. Change set 14899 is an example of one such issue. This was chasing a problem present in viewer-development but not in viewer-autobuild2010. That section of code isn't in viewer-autobuild2010 at all. The code from that change set will most likely be in viewer-development someday and was likely a make work removal in viewer-autobuild 2010. It concerns making a secondlife-bin.map when in Release. Since the code to make a map isn't present there is no map in viewer-autobuild2010. Repository http://bitbucket.org/NickyP/viewer-autobuild2010-msbuild, added today, has only those viewer-development changes that were present in the source repository from which it was forked. I have added changes and tested builds for VC10msbuildRelease and VC10msbuildRelWithDebInfo which included configure, build, and log to aditi. This repository will be maintained to track its fork and only have commits of those changes and necessary changes to use with msbuild. I am sorry for any confusion this may have caused. Nicky ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Is 'STANDALONE' confusing?
On 2011-03-03 1:45, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: Dropping privately built 3rd party libs though was always a bit of a black art. Now that most 3rd party libs have a public repo available at lindenlab/3p-package though, you have another possibility which is to build the package yourself and point autobuild.xml to it using a file:///path url (don't forget to also change the md5 hash...). That will extract libs and includes and drop them in build-plat/packages. I experimented with that in OPEN-6 and it works fine. I'd really like to some experiences from open devs trying to use this method. Essentially, it means maintaining your own version of the autobuild configuration file (either in autobuild.xml, being careful not to include those changes in any changeset meant to be merged to viewer-development, or by using a copy and pointing to the copy either with a --config-file option to autobuild or with the AUTOBUILD_CONFIG_FILE environment variable). Even if you build your own prebuilds, you probably won't need to do it very often - check them all out once, build each one, construct the packages portion of the autobuild.xml file and then copy it into any working copy you've got for doing viewer work. The only time you should need to rebuild any of them is when a package is modified either by you or from upstream. I spent 3-4 hours playing with this today. I started by updating local copies of the 3p repoes,and was encouraged to see several commits for VS2010 compatibility. That didn't last long though, as when I checked the autobuild.xml files there was nothing in them for Windows users :-( There are entries under platform claiming to be windows, but in reality all but one appear to be for cygwin only, and I'm not sure about the last. Cygwin really needs to be treated as a platform in its own right here. Otherwise when the OS community creates *real* windows configurations you will not be able to accept them because of a naming conflict. Not to mention it annoys Windows users to see a window entry and it doesn't work. ;-) I tried using the cygwin configs, but was unable to get any of them working because of errors calling python scripts. Pretty sure the path isn't being translated back into MSDOS style. I tried the note on the https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Autobuild page, installing the module and including the Script directory in path, but that didn't work either. -- Ima Mechanique ima.mechanique(at)blueyonder.co.uk ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
