[opensource-dev] HG-Repositories

[Boroondas Gupte]

>From recent changes

on the wiki, I take that the role of the various official mercurial
repositories has changed again. Which repository should contributions be
based on, now? And which one is now the recommended base for third party
viewers?

Cheers,
B.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories

[Kadah]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 8/7/2012 3:18 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote:
> From recent changes 
> 
>
> 
on the wiki, I take that the role of the various official mercurial
> repositories has changed again. Which repository should
> contributions be based on, now? And which one is now the
> recommended base for third party viewers?

- From what I know, viewer-release is still the preferred for pulling
upstream changes from, and that viewer-dev won't have changesets being
removed from it now.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQIZw5AAoJEIdLfPRu7qE21awH/0QcxMxjszriyI4mwcexJcvH
B7PacY+q1mL+fEzRy2JoEclQjyKbFSzRlbZr8uB3Eq53+xtRCyiGqvH4KRFFUBPC
AWKNHlf4/Cc9FjhZYZKNcjnw3njaA8B3zeXnjnagx8l/i8vEgAnMMnc8xGlrPvsD
0khP0XFP+xeaktq82WtHkakY3k/x4W0lC7i9CkTmq+3F95hq3TFeO0cZzF4B33UN
7321tL6ik9T4HAfuig82UIvW8lHTLj/mU1zkfMGlo1rIP+W5CRllwLUgZ7+3pn0B
JhrEje3EVmeCAYUGX8qVLsKbwe5/5wcokGD04YeJrLpfdsdZ/pWYFeRfVgMPwbw=
=XeDs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] New HTTP Library & Project Viewer

[Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)]

On 2012-08-02 12:47 , Dahlia Trimble wrote:
>
> So, if pipelining is implemented and it works, what other bottlenecks 
> are there that make multiple connections work so well?
>

Pipelining is not, unfortunately, supported yet on the servers... we're 
working on that.  And despite Carlos assertions to the contrary your 
thoughts are appreciated, thank you.  You're logic is in all important 
respects correct.

___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] ok this may sound dumb but what is the llphysicsextention package

[Angel Dreams]

its something i saw i never seen that package before is it new or something?
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] ok this may sound dumb but what is the llphysicsextention package

[Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)]

On 2012-08-07 16:09 , Angel Dreams wrote:
> its something i saw i never seen that package before is it new or 
> something?

It is the wrapper around the Havok functionality in the viewer.  It 
replaces (and incorporates) llconvexdecomposition.

For open source, there is a stub version.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories

[Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)]

On 2012-08-07 15:18 , Boroondas Gupte wrote:
From recent changes 
 
on the wiki, I take that the role of the various official mercurial 
repositories has changed again. Which repository should contributions 
be based on, now? And which one is now the recommended base for third 
party viewers?


Contributions should be based on viewer-development.

Third party viewers are advised / requested to not include anything in 
their own general releases until it is at least in our Beta versions 
(and you'll probably save yourselves some duplicated effort pulling 
fixes if you do).


___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories

[Nicky Perian]

As I understand.

1. Code reviews are against viewer-release only.
2. With viewer-development and viewer-beta, LL retains the right (not 
intention) to strip features and bug fixes at any time.
3. The development loop is closed at viewer-release and at times both 
viewer-release and viewer-beta can be reset to viewer-release. This reset would 
occur to remove all traces of an not in viewer-release feature. 

IMO, it is fairly safe (not 100%) for TPV's to develop against viewer-beta.

Nicky




>
> From: Boroondas Gupte 
>To: Second Life Open Source Developer Mailing List 
>; Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) 
> 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 5:18 PM
>Subject: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories
> 
>
>From recent changes on the wiki, I take that the role of the various official 
>mercurial repositories has changed again. Which repository should 
>contributions be based on, now? And which one is now the recommended base for 
>third party viewers?
>
>Cheers,
>B.
>
>___
>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>
>___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories

[Nicky Perian]

>>Contributions should be based on viewer-development.

The review board was changed to viewer-release just a couple months ago. Is it 
changed back?

I tried to look but, password reset doesn't work. 





>
> From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) 
>To: Boroondas Gupte  
>Cc: Second Life Open Source Developer Mailing List 
> 
>Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 6:50 PM
>Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories
> 
>
>On 2012-08-07 15:18 , Boroondas Gupte wrote:
>
>From recent changes on the wiki, I take that the role of the various official 
>mercurial repositories has changed again. Which repository should 
>contributions be based on, now? And which one is now the recommended base for 
>third party viewers?
>>
>Contributions should be based on viewer-development.
>
>Third party viewers are advised / requested to not include anything
in their own general releases until it is at least in our Beta
versions (and you'll probably save yourselves some duplicated effort
pulling fixes if you do).
>
>
>___
>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>
>___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges