[opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Phox p...@modularsystems.sl wrote: (Since then, all additional metadata information has been removed from emkdu). The change in encryption was simply a result of inertia being able to decode the viewer window title information. It is my understanding that the emku was placing the hidden viewer window title information into the baked textures. So in one sentence you are saying the information was removed. And in the next you are saying it is still there just encrypted better so others cannot decode it and out you. Which is it? ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Brown-bag meeting to continue dialog on TVPV
ยง7.7 makes the TPVP effective with the ToS. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Brown-bag meeting to continue dialog on TVPV
Why does creating an alt mean your jumping on LL's side? Why are there sides anyway? If it is an important enough issue to you, you should find a way. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] Brown-bag meeting to continue dialog on TVPV
I understand it, the ToS and associated policies are by account, every alt account you sign in with has to accept them individually. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
Re: [opensource-dev] New TOS - Compulsory patent licensing gone?
Could be wrong but I read the new ToS as lumping patent rights under Intelectual Property Rights and then compelling the user to grant a license under IPR (and therefore also patent rights). Under section 4.1 it defines IPR as: Intellectual Property Rights means copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade dress, publicity rights, database rights, *patent rights*, and other intellectual property rights or proprietary rights recognized by law. Then under section 7.1: You retain any and all *Intellectual Property Rights* you already hold under applicable law in Content you upload, publish, and submit to or through the Servers, Websites, and other areas of the Service, subject to the rights, licenses, and other terms of this Agreement, including any underlying rights of other users or Linden Lab in Content that you may use or modify. Then under 7.2: You agree that by uploading, publishing, or submitting any Content to or through the Servers, Websites, or other areas of the Service, you hereby automatically grant Linden Lab a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, sublicenseable, and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the Content solely for the purposes of providing and promoting the Service. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
[opensource-dev] A note on preserving NO WARRANTY for SL TPV developers
I think I have read a different TPV policy than most people here. I do not see how clauses 11 and 12 are being overridden. Both clauses stipulate that the GPL cannot be used to violate the law. So when you use a TPV and connect to the SL grid and then steal content that you did not create or disrupt Linden Lab's service, those clauses no longer apply to you. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
