Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3928] openssl version 1.0.2c compilation error for 32 bit
Hello OpenSSL, Thank you for your quick response. I could compile 64 bit with VS2008 but getting error for 32 bit.I think NASM is already there with VS2008. However I will download and try with NASM once. Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3928] openssl version 1.0.2c compilation error for 32 bit From: Kurt Cancemi via RT To: amits...@rocketmail.com CC: openssl-dev@openssl.org NASM (http://nasm.us) is the only officially supported assembler for OpenSSL on Windows. So install NASM and add it to your path and then retry. -- Kurt Cancemi https://www.x64architecture.com On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Amit Shil via RT wrote: > Hello OpenSSL, > I can compile openssl version 1.0.2c for 64 bits successfully but getting > following error while compiling for 32 bits.Could you please help me in the > issue. > ml /nologo /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Zi /Fotmp32dll\sha1-586.obj >tmp32dll\sha1-586.asm Assembling: >tmp32dll\sha1-586.asmtmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1427) : error A2070:invalid >instruction operandstmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1571) : error A2070:invalid >instruction operandsNMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files >(x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\BIN\ml.EXE"' : return code '0x1'Stop. > Please find below my Compiling Environment: > > 1. Compiler VS20082.Windows 7 64 Bit SP13. ActivePerl-5.20.2.2001 > Is there any specific steps I need to follow for compiling for 32 bits. > Thanks in advance!! > Best RegardsAmit > > ___ > openssl-bugs-mod mailing list > openssl-bugs-...@openssl.org > https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-bugs-mod > ___ > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev > ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3928] openssl version 1.0.2c compilation error for 32 bit
NASM (http://nasm.us) is the only officially supported assembler for OpenSSL on Windows. So install NASM and add it to your path and then retry. -- Kurt Cancemi https://www.x64architecture.com On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Amit Shil via RT wrote: > Hello OpenSSL, > I can compile openssl version 1.0.2c for 64 bits successfully but getting > following error while compiling for 32 bits.Could you please help me in the > issue. > ml /nologo /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Zi /Fotmp32dll\sha1-586.obj > tmp32dll\sha1-586.asm Assembling: > tmp32dll\sha1-586.asmtmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1427) : error A2070:invalid > instruction operandstmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1571) : error A2070:invalid > instruction operandsNMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files > (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\BIN\ml.EXE"' : return code '0x1'Stop. > Please find below my Compiling Environment: > > 1. Compiler VS20082.Windows 7 64 Bit SP13. ActivePerl-5.20.2.2001 > Is there any specific steps I need to follow for compiling for 32 bits. > Thanks in advance!! > Best RegardsAmit > > ___ > openssl-bugs-mod mailing list > openssl-bugs-...@openssl.org > https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-bugs-mod > ___ > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev > ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3928] openssl version 1.0.2c compilation error for 32 bit
NASM (http://nasm.us) is the only officially supported assembler for OpenSSL on Windows. So install NASM and add it to your path and then retry. -- Kurt Cancemi https://www.x64architecture.com On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Amit Shil via RT wrote: > Hello OpenSSL, > I can compile openssl version 1.0.2c for 64 bits successfully but getting > following error while compiling for 32 bits.Could you please help me in the > issue. > ml /nologo /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Zi /Fotmp32dll\sha1-586.obj > tmp32dll\sha1-586.asm Assembling: > tmp32dll\sha1-586.asmtmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1427) : error A2070:invalid > instruction operandstmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1571) : error A2070:invalid > instruction operandsNMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files > (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\BIN\ml.EXE"' : return code '0x1'Stop. > Please find below my Compiling Environment: > > 1. Compiler VS20082.Windows 7 64 Bit SP13. ActivePerl-5.20.2.2001 > Is there any specific steps I need to follow for compiling for 32 bits. > Thanks in advance!! > Best RegardsAmit > > ___ > openssl-bugs-mod mailing list > openssl-bugs-...@openssl.org > https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-bugs-mod > ___ > openssl-dev mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev > ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3928] openssl version 1.0.2c compilation error for 32 bit
Hello OpenSSL, I can compile openssl version 1.0.2c for 64 bits successfully but getting following error while compiling for 32 bits.Could you please help me in the issue. ml /nologo /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Zi /Fotmp32dll\sha1-586.obj tmp32dll\sha1-586.asm Assembling: tmp32dll\sha1-586.asmtmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1427) : error A2070:invalid instruction operandstmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1571) : error A2070:invalid instruction operandsNMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\BIN\ml.EXE"' : return code '0x1'Stop. Please find below my Compiling Environment: 1. Compiler VS20082.Windows 7 64 Bit SP13. ActivePerl-5.20.2.2001 Is there any specific steps I need to follow for compiling for 32 bits. Thanks in advance!! Best RegardsAmit ___ openssl-bugs-mod mailing list openssl-bugs-...@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-bugs-mod___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
[openssl-dev] opnssl version 1.0.2c compilation error for 32 bit
Hello OpenSSL, I can compile openssl version 1.0.2c for 64 bits successfully but getting following error while compiling for 32 bits.Could you please help me in the issue. ml /nologo /Cp /coff /c /Cx /Zi /Fotmp32dll\sha1-586.obj tmp32dll\sha1-586.asm Assembling: tmp32dll\sha1-586.asmtmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1427) : error A2070:invalid instruction operandstmp32dll\sha1-586.asm(1571) : error A2070:invalid instruction operandsNMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\BIN\ml.EXE"' : return code '0x1'Stop. Please find below my Compiling Environment: 1. Compiler VS20082.Windows 7 64 Bit SP13. ActivePerl-5.20.2.2001 Is there any specific steps I need to follow for compiling for 32 bits. Thanks in advance!! Best RegardsAmit ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
[openssl-dev] Old "RSA_NET" key format
We are thinking about removing the old "RSA_NET" format for private keys. This is used by very old Netscape and IIS. This would remove the d2i/i2d RSA_NET API's, and the "nss" format flag from the openssl program. It would not remove the SPKI stuff. If this would cause a problem for you, please respond soon. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3922] Bug: EVP_get_digestbynid() does not support ECDSA
Thanks a lot Steve for your constructive comments. > That's expected behaviour. The EVP_get_digestbynid funtion expects a digest > NID > whereas you are passing a signature NID instead. It does accept some signature > NIDs for historical compatibility reasons. I now understand that the code I extended for EC support was abusing EVP_get_digestbynid(), which worked just for compatibility reasons for RSA (only). Yet why not broaden this function (or better its underlying mapping) to handle ECDSA (and possibly any other types of) signatures. > The thread you mention shows you how to convert a signature NID into the > digest > and public key algorithm NID. The hint you gave in that thread was to use OBJ_find_sigid_algs() and this indeed works fine and is cleaner :-) > However I suspect you shouldn't be trying to do things at that level for > signatures. If you need to sign or verify ASN.1 data you can use > ASN1_item_sign > or ASN1_item_verify and key and digest handling and lookup is handled > automatically. Good point that they better should have used a more high-level signature/verification function. Yet the proposed functions, as well as ASN1_sign and ASN1_verify, still require the (plain) md parameter. And for instance the more abstract function int PKCS7_SIGNER_INFO_sign(PKCS7_SIGNER_INFO *si) uses again md = EVP_get_digestbyobj(si->digest_alg->algorithm); such that the use of OBJ_find_sigid_algs() appears indispensable. David. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
[openssl-dev] AES-GCM for ARM: what is the status of the new work published by
Hi, What is the status of the improvements on security and performance for AES-GCM on ARM published recently by Conrado P. L. Gouvêa, Julio López ? Implementing GCM on ARMv8. Conrado P. L. Gouvêa, Julio López. 2015 [1]Which details also the ARMv7 case, and was presented at the RSA Conference 2015 in the US, 2 months ago.The paper is here [2].The code is available here [3] My question goes primarily to Andy Polyakov. Is there any plan for integrating the code into openssl ? Best regards, Niko [1] https://www.rsaconference.com/writable/presentations/file_upload/cryp-w01-secure-and-efficient-implementation-of-aes-based-cryptosystems.pdf [2] http://conradoplg.cryptoland.net/files/2010/12/gcm14.pdf [3] https://github.com/conradoplg/authenc ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
