RE: [openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
I've updated to the latest snapshot and the problem has gone. If it appears again, I will try what you advise. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Stephen Henson via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:14 AM To: bigmus...@centrum.cz Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: [openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC > [bigmus...@centrum.cz - Wed Feb 03 22:37:19 2010]: > > Thanks. I tried your patch and now it compiles well. > > However, I'm not able to make TLS connections with that. I often get >"sslv3 alert bad record mac" or "decryption failed or bad record >mac". No problem when using x64 with no-asm, but I guess it will be >different problem. > You could also try nasm. That's not tricky to do, all you need to do is download the latest version from for example: http://www.nasm.us/pub/nasm/releasebuilds/2.07/nasm-2.07.zip and extract nasm.exe somewhere on your path. Don't have access to Win64 or I'd test this myself. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
[openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
> [bigmus...@centrum.cz - Wed Feb 03 22:37:19 2010]: > > Thanks. I tried your patch and now it compiles well. > > However, I'm not able to make TLS connections with that. I often get >"sslv3 alert bad record mac" or "decryption failed or bad record >mac". No problem when using x64 with no-asm, but I guess it will be >different problem. > You could also try nasm. That's not tricky to do, all you need to do is download the latest version from for example: http://www.nasm.us/pub/nasm/releasebuilds/2.07/nasm-2.07.zip and extract nasm.exe somewhere on your path. Don't have access to Win64 or I'd test this myself. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
[openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
> [bigmus...@centrum.cz - Wed Feb 03 22:37:19 2010]: > > Thanks. I tried your patch and now it compiles well. > > However, I'm not able to make TLS connections with that. I often get >"sslv3 alert bad record mac" or "decryption failed or bad record >mac". No problem when using x64 with no-asm, but I guess it will be >different problem. > Does the self test work i.e. nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak test Otherwise one for Andy I think... Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
RE: [openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
Thanks. I tried your patch and now it compiles well. However, I'm not able to make TLS connections with that. I often get "sslv3 alert bad record mac" or "decryption failed or bad record mac". No problem when using x64 with no-asm, but I guess it will be different problem. -Original Message- From: Stephen Henson via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 7:27 PM To: bigmus...@centrum.cz Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: [openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC > [bigmus...@centrum.cz - Wed Feb 03 17:40:50 2010]: > > No, I didn't. Since I'm not too familiar with assembler things, I just >wanted to use only that one which is available with MSVS2008. > > Anyway, I'm not sure if it would help. If I look at errorneous lines, >they look like " DD 1h, 0x0002, 0x0004, >0x0008". Question is why 1st hexa-value has different format >(01h) than the rest (0x02)? > Ah, good catch. I've fixed the asm translation script now. Now compiles but don't have a WIN64 platform to test it on. Try the next shapshot, current CVS or just apply this patch: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19243 Let me know if that works for you. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
[openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
> [bigmus...@centrum.cz - Wed Feb 03 17:40:50 2010]: > > No, I didn't. Since I'm not too familiar with assembler things, I just >wanted to use only that one which is available with MSVS2008. > > Anyway, I'm not sure if it would help. If I look at errorneous lines, >they look like " DD 1h, 0x0002, 0x0004, >0x0008". Question is why 1st hexa-value has different format >(01h) than the rest (0x02)? > Ah, good catch. I've fixed the asm translation script now. Now compiles but don't have a WIN64 platform to test it on. Try the next shapshot, current CVS or just apply this patch: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19243 Let me know if that works for you. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
RE: [openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
No, I didn't. Since I'm not too familiar with assembler things, I just wanted to use only that one which is available with MSVS2008. Anyway, I'm not sure if it would help. If I look at errorneous lines, they look like " DD 1h, 0x0002, 0x0004, 0x0008". Question is why 1st hexa-value has different format (01h) than the rest (0x02)? -Original Message- From: Stephen Henson via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:27 PM To: bigmus...@centrum.cz Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: [openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC > [bigmus...@centrum.cz - Mon Jan 25 11:42:47 2010]: > > > I’m trying to build version 1.0 (doesn’t depend which beta snapshot, >0.9.8l is ok) under MS Visual Studio 2008 and it fails if building >64-bit version (switch VC-WIN64A). 32-bit builds ok, also 64-bit >with “no-asm” builds ok, but it is about 4x slower which is >unacceptable for our application. OS is Windows 7 Professional x64, >CPU AMD Athlon II X4 620. > > The 64-bit build ends up with following errors: > > Microsoft (R) Macro Assembler (x64) Version 9.00.30729.01 Copyright >(C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > Assembling: tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm > tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2197) : error A2206:missing operator in >expression > tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2198) : error A2206:missing operator in >expression Have you tried installing and using nasm instead? Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
[openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
> [bigmus...@centrum.cz - Mon Jan 25 11:42:47 2010]: > > > I’m trying to build version 1.0 (doesn’t depend which beta snapshot, >0.9.8l is ok) under MS Visual Studio 2008 and it fails if building >64-bit version (switch VC-WIN64A). 32-bit builds ok, also 64-bit >with “no-asm” builds ok, but it is about 4x slower which is >unacceptable for our application. OS is Windows 7 Professional x64, >CPU AMD Athlon II X4 620. > > The 64-bit build ends up with following errors: > > Microsoft (R) Macro Assembler (x64) Version 9.00.30729.01 Copyright >(C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > Assembling: tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm > tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2197) : error A2206:missing operator in >expression > tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2198) : error A2206:missing operator in >expression Have you tried installing and using nasm instead? Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
[openssl.org #2155] [Bug report] OpenSSL 1.0.0 64-bit build fails under MSVC
I’m trying to build version 1.0 (doesn’t depend which beta snapshot, 0.9.8l is ok) under MS Visual Studio 2008 and it fails if building 64-bit version (switch VC-WIN64A). 32-bit builds ok, also 64-bit with “no-asm” builds ok, but it is about 4x slower which is unacceptable for our application. OS is Windows 7 Professional x64, CPU AMD Athlon II X4 620. The 64-bit build ends up with following errors: Microsoft (R) Macro Assembler (x64) Version 9.00.30729.01 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Assembling: tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2197) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2198) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2199) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2200) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2491) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2492) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2525) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2526) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2559) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2560) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2593) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2594) : error A2206:missing operator in expression tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2624) : error A2075:jump destination too far : by 31 by te(s) tmp32.dbgaes-x86_64.asm(2631) : error A2075:jump destination too far : by 11 by te(s) NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:Program Files (x86)Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0 VCBINx86_amd64ml64.EXE"' : return code '0x1' Stop. - Big Muscle __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
