Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/ Configure TABLE
Nils Larsch wrote: Hello Nils, OpenSSL CVS Repository http://cvs.openssl.org/ Modified files: openssl Configure TABLE Log: replace the deprecated -m486 gcc option with -march=i486 PR: 1049 I did a test and the compiler warnings are gone. It seems you can close 1049... Bye Goetz (BTW: I still get an out of memory in bn_test if I build OpenSSL with efence on linux... :-( ) -- DMCA: The greed of the few outweighs the freedom of the many smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/ Configure TABLE
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: ... Log: replace the deprecated -m486 gcc option with -march=i486 PR: 1049 I did a test and the compiler warnings are gone. It seems you can close 1049... yep, will do so Bye Goetz (BTW: I still get an out of memory in bn_test if I build OpenSSL with efence on linux... :-( ) I thought the problem was in ectest ? It's on my todo list but it's not really trivial to resolve (well one could disable the ec mult pre-computation but that's not a real solution). Cheers, Nils __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/ Configure TABLE
Nils Larsch wrote: Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: (BTW: I still get an out of memory in bn_test if I build OpenSSL with efence on linux... :-( ) I thought the problem was in ectest ? It's on my todo list but it's not really trivial to resolve (well one could disable the ec mult pre-computation but that's not a real solution). Ough. ElectricFence Exiting: mprotect() failed: Cannot allocate memory make[1]: *** [test_ec] Fehler 255 Naturally the error is in test_ec... I think for today I've lost the right to complain about stupid users... ;-) Bye Goetz -- DMCA: The greed of the few outweighs the freedom of the many smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/ Configure TABLE
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 21:18:21 +0200 (CEST), Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: appro Log: appro Win64 placeholder targets. This is merely naming suggestion. As we know appro Win64 comes in two flavors, IA-64/Itanium and AMD64/Opteron. The appro suggestion is to refer to former as WIN64I and latter - WIN64A Uhmm, wanna tell us why you removed VC-NT? - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44 \ SWEDEN \ Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ - A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/ Configure TABLE
appro Log: appro Win64 placeholder targets. This is merely naming suggestion. As we know appro Win64 comes in two flavors, IA-64/Itanium and AMD64/Opteron. The appro suggestion is to refer to former as WIN64I and latter - WIN64A Uhmm, wanna tell us why you removed VC-NT? I'd rather not:-) I was pondering over regrouping the lines for aesthetic purposes and VC-NT was taken away by mistake. Sorry! Putting it back... A. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/ Configure TABLE
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 23 Jul 2004 22:46:27 +0200, Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: appro appro Log: appro appro Win64 placeholder targets. This is merely naming suggestion. As we know appro appro Win64 comes in two flavors, IA-64/Itanium and AMD64/Opteron. The appro appro suggestion is to refer to former as WIN64I and latter - WIN64A appro appro Uhmm, wanna tell us why you removed VC-NT? appro appro I'd rather not:-) I was pondering over regrouping the lines for appro aesthetic purposes and VC-NT was taken away by mistake. Sorry! Putting appro it back... A. That's good enough for me :-) - Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44 \ SWEDEN \ Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ - A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
