Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4461] No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'

2016-03-21 Thread Richard Levitte 
In message  
on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:35:16 -0400, Jeffrey Walton  said:

noloader> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Salz, Rich via RT  
wrote:
noloader> >
noloader> >> $ make depend && make clean && make
noloader> >> ...
noloader> >>
noloader> >> No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'
noloader> >
noloader> > Shouldn't that be clean ; make depend?
noloader> >
noloader> > At any rate, yes, some header files moved around.  Old dependencies 
are out of date ...
noloader> 
noloader> I think it need depends first to get the dependencies right (for
noloader> clean); then it needs the clean to ensure old artifacts are gone.

'make depend' will only ensure that the existing .d files get appended
to Makefile if one of them is newer than the Makefile.  In all
likelyhood, it's going to be a noop.

noloader> At any rate, what does the Dev team recommend/want? I'm happy to do 
either.

In this case, the safest thing to do is to have Makefile recreated
from scratch, like this:

perl Configure reconf

Cheers,
Richard

-- 
Richard Levitte levi...@openssl.org
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org/~levitte/
-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4461] No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'

2016-03-20 Thread Jeffrey Walton 
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Salz, Rich via RT  wrote:
>
>> $ make depend && make clean && make
>> ...
>>
>> No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'
>
> Shouldn't that be clean ; make depend?
>
> At any rate, yes, some header files moved around.  Old dependencies are out 
> of date ...

I think it need depends first to get the dependencies right (for
clean); then it needs the clean to ensure old artifacts are gone.

At any rate, what does the Dev team recommend/want? I'm happy to do either.

Jeff
-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4461] No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'

2016-03-20 Thread noloa...@gmail.com via RT 
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Salz, Rich via RT  wrote:
>
>> $ make depend && make clean && make
>> ...
>>
>> No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'
>
> Shouldn't that be clean ; make depend?
>
> At any rate, yes, some header files moved around.  Old dependencies are out 
> of date ...

I think it need depends first to get the dependencies right (for
clean); then it needs the clean to ensure old artifacts are gone.

At any rate, what does the Dev team recommend/want? I'm happy to do either.

Jeff


-- 
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4461
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted

-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4461] No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'

2016-03-20 Thread Salz, Rich via RT 

> $ make depend && make clean && make
> ...
> 
> No rule to make target 'crypto/include/internal/blake2_locl.h'

Shouldn't that be clean ; make depend?

At any rate, yes, some header files moved around.  Old dependencies are out of 
date ...


-- 
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4461
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted

-- 
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev