PEM_read_privatekey

2001-09-30 Thread Andrew Finnell
Title: Message



 I'm having some difficulty using PEM_read_privatekey. 
When I link my application with the debug dll ms runtime PEM_read_privateKey 
works, but if I link against the release dll ms runtime then PEM_read_PrivateKey 
exceptions out.. Anyone have a clue why this is?

-Andrew T. 
FinnellSoftware EngineereSecurity Inc(321) 394-2485



RE: NO_BIO

2001-09-30 Thread Tim Michals
Title: NO_BIO



Liming,

No 
hard drive, we are using a primitive flash file system. Just didn't what 
to start reading and writing to flash a lot. I also found the same issue, 
it is hard to pull out some of the modules to make the library 
smaller.

Tim

  -Original Message-From: Liming Sun 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:58 
  AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: NO_BIO 
  
  HI, 
  Tim. This morning, I tried to compile using NO_BIO and then found that 
  there is really no easy way that I can get rid of BIO altogether. Examples, I 
  would need to redefine BIO_flush, BIO_read(), BIO_write(), 
  etc.
  
  I do 
  not know what you mean by an issue with have no File 
  System.
  
  Cheers
  
  /liming
  
-Original Message-From: Tim Michals 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, September 28, 
2001 8:24 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: 
RE: NO_BIO 
I've also ported to VxWorks, but I was having an issue with have no 
File System, did you over come this issue? I was compiling with 
NO_BIO, NO_STDIO

T

  -Original Message-From: Liming Sun 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 
  3:38 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Cc: 
  '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: NO_BIO 

  Good day, all. 
  (1) I compiled OpenSSL-0.9.6b in vxWorks. When using 
  it, a server receives clientHello from client and it looks ok. But 
  when the server flushes serverHello, Certificate, and KeyExchange, and 
  serverHelloDone back to the client, the server crashes at sock_write(). I 
  used SnifferPro to monitor traffic on the client side and found that 
  client received most part of the data from server. When processing the 
  received data, the client also crashes inside BIO_read(). Any 
  suggestions?
  (2) Because of (1), I am trying 
  NOT to use BIO interface in OpenSSL. 
  It appears that SSL_set_fd(SSL *s,int fd) allows me to 
  connect socket directly to SSL object (without using BIO interface). 
  But a closer look at SSL_set_fd()implemenation tells me that BIO is still 
  used between SSL layer and socket. 
  So, how do I use the flag NO_BIO (does it really mean no 
  BIO interface between socket and SSL)? 
  Thank you very much for your suggestions and have a nice 
  day. 
  /liming 
   
  
  From: Tim Michals Subject: 
  Questions about NO_BIO and NO_STDIO Date: Mon, 17 
  Sep 2001 06:03:27 -0700 
   
  
  All, 
  I'm trying to build the cryptolib without file 
  access(fopen, fclose, etc) and general tty. The 
  main reason for this, trying to use a small embedded OS, that is very primitive and does not have a Unix file system 
  interface. 
  The certificate file will be stored in non-volatile 
  ram. The applications I'm trying to use are 
  LDAP (OpenLDAP) and web server (Goahead). So this helps limit issues with the test and example apps. 
  Noticed some defines NO_BIO and NO_STDIO but if 
  these are defined it causes some errors during 
  compile. 
  Some of the issues:  - in the bio directory 
  bss_file (it loads and manage the certificate files) I can hack a fix but concerned about a reason if a 
  file needs to be created? What be the case 
  for creating a file for ssl?  - in the crypto 
  directory read_pwd.c uses tty to read the password. 
  Any insight? 
  Thanks 



RE: Major OpenSSL/mod_ssl install problems.

2001-09-30 Thread John . Airey

Your statement I'm using RH 7.1 is the critical one for me.

RedHat 7.1 (Which I assume you mean) includes openssl by default. If you
build openssl from source and replace that which comes with it, you will
break about 24 packages, including sendmail (I can send you a list if you
want).

Specifically, Apache 1.3.19 comes with RedHat 7.1, which is probably the
package that owns the httpd.conf file you are looking at

Try the following to check this:
rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf

(Although of course it is likely that you've overwritten this file)

I suggest you look at http://www.redhat.com/errata/ and
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide for updates to RedHat 7.1 and
the latest packages for Apache and mod_ssl.

You can build from source RPMS, which gives you just as much control over
what you build, although it is more fiddly. I've offered to help with
installing these before on either this list or the mod_ssl list (and
unfortunately I deleted my last offer!)

John


-Original Message-
From: The_polymorph
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29/09/01 21:12
Subject: Major OpenSSL/mod_ssl install problems.

Hi all.

 After building OpenSSL 0.9.6b, the latest version of mod_ssl for
apache 1.3.20 and rsaref 2.0 ( all without incident ), I experienced
the following problems:

1). My httpd.conf file has *no* mention of SSL *anywhere =* in the
file.

2). After starting apache in SSL mode ( apachectl startssl ), it works
fine but I cannot connect to port 443. The message is connection
refused by server. For the record I am using RH 7.1.

 What might the problem(s) be?

 Thanks,

 -Caitlin.
 



=


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Error during installation

2001-09-30 Thread Mani



Hi,
I have been trying to installl openssl0.9.6a on 
redhat linux 6.2. I get an error inconsistency between crypto.h and 
cryptlib.c.
Can someone help me solve this.

Regards,

Mani