Hi,
As far as I know, there is no point going again to the loop when we have
SSL_ERROR_SSL.
Suppose in case of SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ or SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE this would
have made sense.
Maybe there is a timeout or watchdog which stops it from consuming a lot of
time and closes the socket.
Since even I m not sure, lets wait for some experts comments.
BR,
Bharadwaj
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/SSL_ERROR_SSL-tp32496288p32503812.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
