RE: Cross Certification
I would like to add to the original question. How chaining is different then cross-certification ?. If cross-certification means then two CAs sign each other then how we can scale to a scenario of more than two CAs in a fully meshed cross-certification model ?. Thanks for a help. Tariq Habib > -- > From: Vadim Fedukovich > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cross Certification > > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Ravi Prakash B.V. wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I do not receive any reply for this. > > Any pointers will be appreciated. > > What is the application that could benefit from cross certification? > Alternatively, what is the logic that requires cross certification? > > thank you, > Vadim > > > Ravi Prakash B.V. > > > > > > > > "Ravi Prakash B.V." wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I want to establish cross certification between two different > independent > > > CAs. How is it possible? > > > > > > Any pointers/links/docs for the above. > > > > > > Thanks in Advance, > > > Ravi Prakash B.V. > > > > > > __ > > > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > > > User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > I am NOMAD! > > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The paper I wrote once...
Hi Leonid: It is sad to hear that. The name of your paper seems to be very interesting. Once somebody returns the original copy, can we have it again over the mailing list. I would like to have a copy myself. Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lenya Khachaturov > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 10:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: The paper I wrote once... > > > Hello everybody, > > About a month ago I posted a paper to this list, called "Client-server > authentication with Apache using OpenSSL". Unfortunately, I've > recently lost all my data, and want somebody to send me a copy of this > paper to my e-mail, if you still have it. Thanks ahead for your help. > > > -- > With best regards, > Leonid Khachaturov > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Verisign
I fully support your point of view. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 5:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Verisign > > > I just found out that Verising has aquired NSI. A short while back they > aquired Thawte . > > > > I think some of us should be looking into ways to get certs from a "real" > competitor to Verisign recognized by IE and Netscape. > > I know that netscape allows easy importation of a cert and that IE is a > bit of a bugger - but for the vast majority of the great unwashed public > they need a "clean" simple and brain-dead solution or they will continue > to go with the flow. > > Consentration of economic power like we see in Verisign at this point is > NEVER healthy - or am I overreacting? > > > > > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Subprime into A Paper in SIX Months ! !
I really wonder what the attached mail has to do on this mailing list. Please exercise control. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 10:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Subprime into A Paper in SIX Months ! ! > > > > Dear Professional, > > More individuals today are being told they don't qualify > for the lowest interest rates available. Some can't even > get their career started. All this because of bad credit! > > Late Payments Repossessions Child Support > Foreclosures Judgments Student Loans > Tax Liens BankruptciesEvictions > > Now there is a solution! > > We provide a service that may be the solution for a > potential client, or anyone who wants the advantage of > having a clean credit rating and improved FICO SCORE! > > Credit Bureaus are notified by us to comply > with the law set by the FTC. If Credit Bureaus don't, > the negative entry is DELETED! PERMANENTLY! Guaranteed > in Writing! > > 110% Money-back Guarantee > > If we do not improve the credit report, > the client receives 110% of his fee repaid. Not a > single client has ever asked for their money back! > > We have repaired 50,000+ credit reports with > 100% success over the past 10 years! > > Help your business explode! Give your client the > advantages of the most advanced and effective consumer > program in America today. Hundreds or even thousands > of dollars could be potentially saved. > > Although we have been in business for over > twelve years, three years ago we began aggressively > expanding nationwide and are currently in the process > of going international seeking qualified associates > such as yourself to provide this great service. > > I extend to you an offer to take part in helping > families get a fresh start. The potential for growth > is exponential! Many professionals have already seen > the value of this great service and currently are > servicing the clients themselves for more return business. > > I welcome your phone call. Or you can email me your number > and I'll call you. We need to talk. > > Regards, > > Donna Rojas > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 909-949-6012 > > === > To be removed from future mailings reply to this email. > Under Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress > this letter can not be considered spam as long as we include: > Contact information & a Remove Link (email address) > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s
