Re: [openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"
> $ tar zxf openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz > tar: A lone zero block at 46120 Perhaps this? http://askubuntu.com/questions/169223/tar-a-lone-zero-block-at-343398 ___ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Re: [openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"
avery.a.tara...@securityengineer.pro wrote: >> Was the md5 hash of the archive matching the one on openssl >> website? Yes. It matches. $ tar zxf openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz tar: A lone zero block at 46120 ~ $ md5sum openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz 139568bd5a56fa49b72a290d37113f30 *openssl-1.0.1n.tar.gz ~ $ >> >> On Fri, Jun 12 at 06:49 PM (UTC), "Kevin Layer" wrote: >> >> > It seems to build fine, though. >> > >> > I downloaded it via different means (directly to a Windows >> > machine and >> > on CentOS 6.6) and it did it on all copies. >> > >> > Just curious if anyone else had the issue. >> > >> > I'm running Cygwin 1.7.35 on Server 2008 R2. >> > >> > ___ >> > openssl-users mailing list >> > To unsubscribe: >> > https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users >> >> ___ >> openssl-users mailing list >> To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users ___ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Re: [openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Was the md5 hash of the archive matching the one on openssl website? On Fri, Jun 12 at 06:49 PM (UTC), "Kevin Layer" wrote: > It seems to build fine, though. > > I downloaded it via different means (directly to a Windows > machine and > on CentOS 6.6) and it did it on all copies. > > Just curious if anyone else had the issue. > > I'm running Cygwin 1.7.35 on Server 2008 R2. > > ___ > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: > https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Charset: UTF8 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 3.0 wsBcBAEBAgAGBQJVezykAAoJEFXbLWdqxjhau0AIAJm7ouwddcTJixc7U+eqnvZgdLcR etN9VhONFRN0zU6hmdanMUb8WAmHeujUpu+yhvolO9bP21pE7xDtdRRbyrwAwl2vYvzU 68klgLaRE2LeoPy/9iSLnr9Y1i2yXuiVaYC4TtPR4g3vbVryiLjPuVAOJejUKHq9oet1 i9DZyNZvs2X+0Qk65vjLsnN1QS8n22YbsORDV76scJ2XoGjura+Y6gKJ3spJgu8+kU3Z sQTLbnD4zJEniNvjpAbboLRBOFtrj2QnY6N4NdAY4zllwR44He93X+7w3GAEPcrShlnT eD6MnNeG0vkblVpQOEw3APGh0iK5yfl9eNaQUD/ijH0= =XZl9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
[openssl-users] Cygwin untar of 1.0.1n gives "tar: A lone zero block at 46120"
It seems to build fine, though. I downloaded it via different means (directly to a Windows machine and on CentOS 6.6) and it did it on all copies. Just curious if anyone else had the issue. I'm running Cygwin 1.7.35 on Server 2008 R2. ___ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
