libcrypto.so.2
Hello, I am trying to install a VPN software package that requires libcrypto.so.2 and I having problems locating it... I have upgraded my openssl package to openssl.0.9.6.c and apparently libcrypto.so.2 did not come with that package. Does anyone know where I can get the libcrypto.so.2. ??? I am using Linux Mandrake 8.1 Sincerely, Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libcrypto.so.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Monday, February 11, 2002 11:13 PM, "Daniel Northam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to install a VPN software package that requires > libcrypto.so.2 and I having problems locating it... I have upgraded > my openssl package to openssl.0.9.6.c and apparently libcrypto.so.2 > did not come with that package. Does anyone know where I can get > the libcrypto.so.2. ??? cd /usr/lib && ln -s -f libcrypto.so.0.9.6 libcrypto.so.2 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEAREDAAYFAjxotAEACgkQxYudVOIJPHtmZACgvBt78EFM9m0MOIhWwt7nGie2 2PYAoIbhrvv+sMyyFzn/Iixgim/I4Btq =FS6r -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libcrypto.so.2
From: "Duke Ionescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> duke> On Monday, February 11, 2002 11:13 PM, "Daniel Northam" duke> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: duke> > I am trying to install a VPN software package that requires duke> > libcrypto.so.2 and I having problems locating it... Do you have the source to that package? In that case, the best thing would probably be to recompile it against whatever libcrypto you happen to have installed. duke> > I have upgraded duke> > my openssl package to openssl.0.9.6.c and apparently libcrypto.so.2 duke> > did not come with that package. Does anyone know where I can get duke> > the libcrypto.so.2. ??? duke> duke> cd /usr/lib && ln -s -f libcrypto.so.0.9.6 libcrypto.so.2 Unless libcrypto.so.2 is supposed to be in the 0.9.6 series, expect a big KABOOOM... or something like that. If you get a big KABOOOM, I'd recommend getting libcrypto.so.2 through the proper RPM. I can't tell you what RPM has it, however. If you can, you should check exactly which OpenSSL your VPN software requires and see if it matches something you have, and then make the appropriate softlinks. It bears repeating: until OpenSSL 1.0 is out, we give NO GUARANTEE of binary compatibility between versions. And no, we haven't reached a stage where we can even talk about 1.0 yet... Therefore, trying to replace one version's .so with another is bound to be a bad experience (see "big KABOOOM" above). -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-733-72 88 11 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, GemPlus: http://www.gemplus.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libcrypto.so.2
Daniel Northam wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to install a VPN software package that requires > libcrypto.so.2 and I having problems locating it... I have upgraded my > openssl package to openssl.0.9.6.c and apparently libcrypto.so.2 did not > come with that package. Does anyone know where I can get the > libcrypto.so.2. ??? > > I am using Linux Mandrake 8.1 > libcrypto.so.x is included in the libopenssl0-0.9.6c-2mdk rpm-package. Gerd -- -- -- Gerd Schering, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libcrypto.so.2
on 2/11/02 9:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] purportedly said: > I am trying to install a VPN software package that requires > libcrypto.so.2 and I having problems locating it... I have upgraded my > openssl package to openssl.0.9.6.c and apparently libcrypto.so.2 did not > come with that package. Does anyone know where I can get the > libcrypto.so.2. ??? Did you build one yourself? I could never find an up to date RPM. I had to roll my own, and force RPM to recognize legacy .so files. But of course, you can get the "kaboom" mentioned, but it's really just a matter of getting the source rpm's of the problem apps and rebuilding. That generally forces the app to re-link to the new libs, and I haven't had any problems doing this. Keary Suska Esoteritech, Inc. "Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet" __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libcrypto.so.2 problem
Hello! I try to install rpm package but i need libcrypto.so.2 and libssl.so.2. I install openssl (last version) but i get the same errors. Can U tell me what i need to do? My workstation is a suse linux 7.3. Thank U! Darius __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libcrypto.so.2 problem
Hi, All, I am installing pvktool to convert .p12 certificate file into p7b and then the private key file pvk. I am following the paper of http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/crtimprt-org.html On the Fedora 7 or 10 and even SuSeLinux, I tried to install pvktool, but always got the problem as, rpm -i pvk-0.12-3jdl.i386.rpm warning: pvk-0.12-3jdl.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID fd37b537 error: Failed dependencies: libcrypto.so.2 is needed by pvk-0.12-3jdl.i386 I definitely have openssl installed on the linux box, rpm -qa | grep ssh libssh2-0.18-7.fc9.i386 openssh-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386 openssh-server-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386 openssh-askpass-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386 ganymed-ssh2-210-6.fc9.i386 openssh-clients-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386 - just could not figure out why the system complained about libcrypto. Could you please give me some information on fix the problem? Thank you very much, Kind regards, George Ping
libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2
Hi I have a question which I haven't been able to answer myself, I tried to update my current Kde 2.1 to Kde 2.2 and then kdebase-2.2-3 asks for libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 which I have been able to locate in openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm. The problem is that I have a newer (I think, becouse when trying install 0.9.6b-6 it says it is older than current) version of opensll namely openssl-0.9.6-9. In openssl-0.9.6-9 I can't locate libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2. If I remember correctly openssl-0.9.6-9 is an update from RH. Currently using RH 7.1 kernelversion 2.4. How do I install libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 so that RPM understands that they are there? With regards //Ola P. O. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: libcrypto.so.2 problem
> Hello! > I try to install rpm package but i need libcrypto.so.2 and libssl.so.2. > I install openssl (last version) but i get the same errors. > Can U tell me what i need to do? > My workstation is a suse linux 7.3. Talk to whoever gave you the RPM you're trying to install. RPMs general look for specific capabilities as registered in the RPM database. They won't know about OpenSSL if you installed it yourself from a non-RPM distribution or an RPM distribution other than the one they were expecting. DS __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: libcrypto.so.2 problem
George what you have is openssh; what you need is openssl.
HTH
_
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of George Ping
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 11:09 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: libcrypto.so.2 problem
Hi, All,
I am installing pvktool to convert .p12 certificate file into p7b and then
the private key file pvk.
I am following the paper of
<http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/crtimprt-org.html>
http://www.jacco2.dds.nl/networking/crtimprt-org.html
On the Fedora 7 or 10 and even SuSeLinux, I tried to install pvktool, but
always got the problem as,
rpm -i pvk-0.12-3jdl.i386.rpm
warning: pvk-0.12-3jdl.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
fd37b537
error: Failed dependencies:
libcrypto.so.2 is needed by pvk-0.12-3jdl.i386
I definitely have openssl installed on the linux box,
rpm -qa | grep ssh
libssh2-0.18-7.fc9.i386
openssh-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386
openssh-server-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386
openssh-askpass-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386
ganymed-ssh2-210-6.fc9.i386
openssh-clients-5.1p1-3.fc10.i386
- just could not figure out why the system complained about libcrypto.
Could you please give me some information on fix the problem?
Thank you very much,
Kind regards,
George Ping
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.18/1936 - Release Date: 02/05/09
11:34:00
RE: libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2
Hi! Did you get all of the openssl packages from Red Hat? I can't verify right now because I am booted into the Windows side of my machine, but I suspect that those 2 libraries are probably in openssl-devel... or possibly one of the sources rpms. Janet Shea -Original Message- From: Ola Persson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 Hi I have a question which I haven't been able to answer myself, I tried to update my current Kde 2.1 to Kde 2.2 and then kdebase-2.2-3 asks for libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 which I have been able to locate in openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm. The problem is that I have a newer (I think, becouse when trying install 0.9.6b-6 it says it is older than current) version of opensll namely openssl-0.9.6-9. In openssl-0.9.6-9 I can't locate libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2. If I remember correctly openssl-0.9.6-9 is an update from RH. Currently using RH 7.1 kernelversion 2.4. How do I install libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 so that RPM understands that they are there? With regards //Ola P. O. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2
There is a openssl rpm in the Roswell(Red Hat 7.1 beta?) relaese from Red Hat and its so version is 2. -- NONAKA Akira Miraclelinux Tokyo, Japan - Original Message - From: "Ola Persson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 > Hi I have a question which I haven't been able to answer myself, > > I tried to update my current Kde 2.1 to Kde 2.2 and then kdebase-2.2-3 asks > for libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 which I have been able to locate in > openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm. The problem is that I have a newer (I think, > becouse when trying install 0.9.6b-6 it says it is older than current) > version of opensll namely openssl-0.9.6-9. In openssl-0.9.6-9 I can't locate > libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2. > If I remember correctly openssl-0.9.6-9 is an update from RH. > Currently using RH 7.1 kernelversion 2.4. > > How do I install libcrypto.so.2 & libssl.so.2 so that RPM understands that > they are there? > > With regards > //Ola P. O. > > _ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
>-Original Message- >From: Xia Shang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 05 October 2001 13:55 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2 > > >Hello,everyone >I know now that KDE 2.2 is not for Redhat 7.1 but for Roswell, >but what is Rawhide? >Another version of Redhat Linux? >I have downloaded "openssl0.9.6b" from www.openssl.org and >unpacked it, but I still >can't find "libssl.so.2" and "libcrypto.so.2". >I guess I must install it so that these two files can be >created. Am I right? >Another foolish question:What's the difference between the >installations from "*.rpm" >package and from "*.tar.gz" package(with "make", >"install" and so on)? >Thank you > "Rawhide" is not another version of Linux, it is simply the name of a repository for optional updates to the current version of RedHat Linux. Of course, that question is a little off-topic for this list. As I have said repeatedly, openssl is included with RedHat 7.1. openssh, sendmail and bind all rely on the package being there. This has been the case since RedHat 7.0, and will undoubtedly be the case for 7.2. I haven't checked out roswell (aka 7.1.93) yet, as RedHat have locked off the file permissions on their ftp site! RPM packages contain either pre-built binaries or a source package that will compile in a pre-arranged way (specified in a "spec" file). They are useful for maintaining a common installation on multiple systems, or for administrators who haven't a clue what "make" or "configure" does. Anyone who upgrades or changes openssl without using the RedHat updates (details at www.redhat.com/errata/) runs the risk of breaking a lot of code. Also, the version of openssl with RedHat 7.1 is "hobbled" and does not include all the cipher support. I've asked an employee of RedHat who has OK'd the making available of a package that contains all the support for non-US users. I've yet to get round to doing that though. - John Airey Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the Blind, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
>-Original Message- >From: Xia Shang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 05 October 2001 13:55 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2 > > >Hello,everyone >I know now that KDE 2.2 is not for Redhat 7.1 but for Roswell, >but what is Rawhide? >Another version of Redhat Linux? >I have downloaded "openssl0.9.6b" from www.openssl.org and >unpacked it, but I still >can't find "libssl.so.2" and "libcrypto.so.2". >I guess I must install it so that these two files can be >created. Am I right? >Another foolish question:What's the difference between the >installations from "*.rpm" >package and from "*.tar.gz" package(with "make", >"install" and so on)? >Thank you > Correction to my previous post, RawHide is indeed another version of Linux, but it is not supported, might destroy all your data, etc. However, I have taken packages from it (apache-mod_ssl 1.3.20-2.8.4 for example) and they've worked for me. Details are at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/README - John Airey Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the Blind, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
Hi, I've written up a page which hopefully answers these questions: http://www.manyfish.co.uk/openssl.html Let me know if anything is not clear. As John said, the RPM you need is from Raw Hide, so none of this stuff is supported or recommended by Red Hat. On your own head be it... Regards, joe __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:28:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> "Rawhide" is not another version of Linux, it is simply the name of a
> repository for optional updates to the current version of RedHat Linux. Of
> course, that question is a little off-topic for this list.
No, it's not optional updates to the current release. It's
an alpha thread that you use at your own risk. It's basically a
pre-beta rolling release. It is definitely a good spot to catch up
on recent kernel releases before they make it to the main updates site.
> As I have said repeatedly, openssl is included with RedHat 7.1. openssh,
> sendmail and bind all rely on the package being there. This has been the
> case since RedHat 7.0, and will undoubtedly be the case for 7.2. I haven't
> checked out roswell (aka 7.1.93) yet, as RedHat have locked off the file
> permissions on their ftp site!
Looks like they just did that a couple of days ago. I had downloaded
both Beta1 and Beta2 from ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/beta/roswell but
permissions are now set to deny. Simultanious to that, a 7.2 directory has
now appeared as /pub/redhat/linux/7.2 also with access permissions denied.
Looks like we are on the verge of the 7.2 release and they are preping the
site... :-) Wheee...
> RPM packages contain either pre-built binaries or a source package that will
> compile in a pre-arranged way (specified in a "spec" file). They are useful
> for maintaining a common installation on multiple systems, or for
> administrators who haven't a clue what "make" or "configure" does.
> Anyone who upgrades or changes openssl without using the RedHat updates
> (details at www.redhat.com/errata/) runs the risk of breaking a lot of code.
> Also, the version of openssl with RedHat 7.1 is "hobbled" and does not
> include all the cipher support. I've asked an employee of RedHat who has
> OK'd the making available of a package that contains all the support for
> non-US users. I've yet to get round to doing that though.
Relative to the latest RawHide SRPMS (openssl-0.9.6b-9.src.rpm)...
1) Replace the openssl-engine-0.9.6b-usa.tar.bz2 source ball
with the real thing from the OpenSSL site. (The source
tarball with the RPM has had some things stripped. That's
part of the hobbling.)
2) Edit the spec file and remove the "-usa" from "Source".
2) Down in %prep, kill off %{SOURCE1} by commenting it out. (That's
another part of the hobbling).
3) Remove no-idea, no-rc5, etc on the config line. (Last part of
the hobbling.)
4) Build. All the RedHat "patches" seem to be compatible with the
non-crippled source tarball.
5) Enjoy.
> -
> John Airey
> Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the
> Blind,
> Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
> Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael H. Warfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 08 October 2001 22:02
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:28:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> "Rawhide" is not another version of Linux, it is simply the name of a
>> repository for optional updates to the current version of
>RedHat Linux. Of
>> course, that question is a little off-topic for this list.
>
> No, it's not optional updates to the current release. It's
>an alpha thread that you use at your own risk. It's basically a
>pre-beta rolling release. It is definitely a good spot to catch up
>on recent kernel releases before they make it to the main updates site.
I know, see my follow up!
>
>> As I have said repeatedly, openssl is included with RedHat
>7.1. openssh,
>> sendmail and bind all rely on the package being there. This
>has been the
>> case since RedHat 7.0, and will undoubtedly be the case for
>7.2. I haven't
>> checked out roswell (aka 7.1.93) yet, as RedHat have locked
>off the file
>> permissions on their ftp site!
>
> Looks like they just did that a couple of days ago. I
>had downloaded
>both Beta1 and Beta2 from
>ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/beta/roswell but
>permissions are now set to deny. Simultanious to that, a 7.2
>directory has
>now appeared as /pub/redhat/linux/7.2 also with access
>permissions denied.
>Looks like we are on the verge of the 7.2 release and they are
>preping the
>site... :-) Wheee...
>
I think it's worse than that. It appears (looking at all the other betas)
that they've inadvertently deleted roswell from their site and locked off
the directory so that all the other mirrors that use rsync don't delete
their copy! (They might be running short of disk space, but that would be
odd).
I found this out because the md5 checksum on the roswell iso images doesn't
match the entry in the MD5SUM file, so I tried to download from the master
site.
I'm eagerly awaiting 7.2, not least because I hope to upgrade all our 6.2
machines straight to it, and then be able to put off another upgrade for a
bit longer. I suspect 6.2 support will be dropped very soon anyway.
>> RPM packages contain either pre-built binaries or a source
>package that will
>> compile in a pre-arranged way (specified in a "spec" file).
>They are useful
>> for maintaining a common installation on multiple systems, or for
>> administrators who haven't a clue what "make" or "configure" does.
>
>> Anyone who upgrades or changes openssl without using the
>RedHat updates
>> (details at www.redhat.com/errata/) runs the risk of
>breaking a lot of code.
>> Also, the version of openssl with RedHat 7.1 is "hobbled"
>and does not
>> include all the cipher support. I've asked an employee of
>RedHat who has
>> OK'd the making available of a package that contains all the
>support for
>> non-US users. I've yet to get round to doing that though.
>
> Relative to the latest RawHide SRPMS
>(openssl-0.9.6b-9.src.rpm)...
>
> 1) Replace the openssl-engine-0.9.6b-usa.tar.bz2 source ball
> with the real thing from the OpenSSL site. (The source
> tarball with the RPM has had some things
>stripped. That's
> part of the hobbling.)
>
> 2) Edit the spec file and remove the "-usa" from "Source".
>
> 2) Down in %prep, kill off %{SOURCE1} by commenting it
>out. (That's
> another part of the hobbling).
>
> 3) Remove no-idea, no-rc5, etc on the config line.
>(Last part of
> the hobbling.)
>
> 4) Build. All the RedHat "patches" seem to be
>compatible with the
> non-crippled source tarball.
>
> 5) Enjoy.
>
Exactly what I've done already, except I haven't made it available to anyone
yet!
-
John Airey
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB
