Link to libssl.so.0 instead of libssl.so.2
Hi, My destination machine only has libssl.so.0 and libssl.so.0.9.6 that all symbolic link to libssl.so.0.9.7. I cannot do any changes on that machine. On my development machine, I tried to compile my codes and the binary always depends on libssl.so.2 which is symbolic links to libssl.so.0.9.6. How can I make my binary depending on libssl.so.0 instead of libssl.so.2? Thanks, Jin
libssl.so.2
Hello all, I am using Linux Redhat 7.1 and attempting to install the latest release of progresql but run into a problem on libssl.so.2 not found. I have downloaded and compiled both OpenSSL 0.9.6c and OpenSSL 0.9.6b but I don't get a libssl.so.2 file. (I did a ./config shared) Some questions. 0. Is this the right place to ask? 1. does openssl provide libssl.so.2? 2. If so, how do I get it? 3. If not, any clues on where? Many thanks, Clem. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libssl.so.2
Hi there, I've removed OpenSSL 0.9.6.b ( which was installed during the RH72 installation ) and I installed OpenSSL 0.9.6.c. Now I have the problem that certain applications ( sendmail as an example ) is complaining that it can not find the library libssl.so.2 Now this library will not be installed with OpenSSL 0.9.6.c . Can anybody tell me what to do to solve this problem ( without a downgrade to 0.9.6.b ) Thanks, Mich
RE: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
-Original Message-
From: Michael H. Warfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 October 2001 22:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:28:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Rawhide is not another version of Linux, it is simply the name of a
repository for optional updates to the current version of
RedHat Linux. Of
course, that question is a little off-topic for this list.
No, it's not optional updates to the current release. It's
an alpha thread that you use at your own risk. It's basically a
pre-beta rolling release. It is definitely a good spot to catch up
on recent kernel releases before they make it to the main updates site.
I know, see my follow up!
As I have said repeatedly, openssl is included with RedHat
7.1. openssh,
sendmail and bind all rely on the package being there. This
has been the
case since RedHat 7.0, and will undoubtedly be the case for
7.2. I haven't
checked out roswell (aka 7.1.93) yet, as RedHat have locked
off the file
permissions on their ftp site!
Looks like they just did that a couple of days ago. I
had downloaded
both Beta1 and Beta2 from
ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/beta/roswell but
permissions are now set to deny. Simultanious to that, a 7.2
directory has
now appeared as /pub/redhat/linux/7.2 also with access
permissions denied.
Looks like we are on the verge of the 7.2 release and they are
preping the
site... :-) Wheee...
I think it's worse than that. It appears (looking at all the other betas)
that they've inadvertently deleted roswell from their site and locked off
the directory so that all the other mirrors that use rsync don't delete
their copy! (They might be running short of disk space, but that would be
odd).
I found this out because the md5 checksum on the roswell iso images doesn't
match the entry in the MD5SUM file, so I tried to download from the master
site.
I'm eagerly awaiting 7.2, not least because I hope to upgrade all our 6.2
machines straight to it, and then be able to put off another upgrade for a
bit longer. I suspect 6.2 support will be dropped very soon anyway.
RPM packages contain either pre-built binaries or a source
package that will
compile in a pre-arranged way (specified in a spec file).
They are useful
for maintaining a common installation on multiple systems, or for
administrators who haven't a clue what make or configure does.
Anyone who upgrades or changes openssl without using the
RedHat updates
(details at www.redhat.com/errata/) runs the risk of
breaking a lot of code.
Also, the version of openssl with RedHat 7.1 is hobbled
and does not
include all the cipher support. I've asked an employee of
RedHat who has
OK'd the making available of a package that contains all the
support for
non-US users. I've yet to get round to doing that though.
Relative to the latest RawHide SRPMS
(openssl-0.9.6b-9.src.rpm)...
1) Replace the openssl-engine-0.9.6b-usa.tar.bz2 source ball
with the real thing from the OpenSSL site. (The source
tarball with the RPM has had some things
stripped. That's
part of the hobbling.)
2) Edit the spec file and remove the -usa from Source.
2) Down in %prep, kill off %{SOURCE1} by commenting it
out. (That's
another part of the hobbling).
3) Remove no-idea, no-rc5, etc on the config line.
(Last part of
the hobbling.)
4) Build. All the RedHat patches seem to be
compatible with the
non-crippled source tarball.
5) Enjoy.
Exactly what I've done already, except I haven't made it available to anyone
yet!
-
John Airey
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
__
OpenSSL Project http
RE: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
-Original Message- From: Xia Shang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2001 13:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2 Hello,everyone I know now that KDE 2.2 is not for Redhat 7.1 but for Roswell, but what is Rawhide? Another version of Redhat Linux? I have downloaded openssl0.9.6b from www.openssl.org and unpacked it, but I still can't find libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2. I guess I must install it so that these two files can be created. Am I right? Another foolish question:What's the difference between the installations from *.rpm package and from *.tar.gz package(with make, install and so on)? Thank you Rawhide is not another version of Linux, it is simply the name of a repository for optional updates to the current version of RedHat Linux. Of course, that question is a little off-topic for this list. As I have said repeatedly, openssl is included with RedHat 7.1. openssh, sendmail and bind all rely on the package being there. This has been the case since RedHat 7.0, and will undoubtedly be the case for 7.2. I haven't checked out roswell (aka 7.1.93) yet, as RedHat have locked off the file permissions on their ftp site! RPM packages contain either pre-built binaries or a source package that will compile in a pre-arranged way (specified in a spec file). They are useful for maintaining a common installation on multiple systems, or for administrators who haven't a clue what make or configure does. Anyone who upgrades or changes openssl without using the RedHat updates (details at www.redhat.com/errata/) runs the risk of breaking a lot of code. Also, the version of openssl with RedHat 7.1 is hobbled and does not include all the cipher support. I've asked an employee of RedHat who has OK'd the making available of a package that contains all the support for non-US users. I've yet to get round to doing that though. - John Airey Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the Blind, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
-Original Message- From: Xia Shang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2001 13:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2 Hello,everyone I know now that KDE 2.2 is not for Redhat 7.1 but for Roswell, but what is Rawhide? Another version of Redhat Linux? I have downloaded openssl0.9.6b from www.openssl.org and unpacked it, but I still can't find libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2. I guess I must install it so that these two files can be created. Am I right? Another foolish question:What's the difference between the installations from *.rpm package and from *.tar.gz package(with make, install and so on)? Thank you Correction to my previous post, RawHide is indeed another version of Linux, but it is not supported, might destroy all your data, etc. However, I have taken packages from it (apache-mod_ssl 1.3.20-2.8.4 for example) and they've worked for me. Details are at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/README - John Airey Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the Blind, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
Hi, I've written up a page which hopefully answers these questions: http://www.manyfish.co.uk/openssl.html Let me know if anything is not clear. As John said, the RPM you need is from Raw Hide, so none of this stuff is supported or recommended by Red Hat. On your own head be it... Regards, joe __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About libssl.so.2 and libcrypto.so.2
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:28:52AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Rawhide is not another version of Linux, it is simply the name of a
repository for optional updates to the current version of RedHat Linux. Of
course, that question is a little off-topic for this list.
No, it's not optional updates to the current release. It's
an alpha thread that you use at your own risk. It's basically a
pre-beta rolling release. It is definitely a good spot to catch up
on recent kernel releases before they make it to the main updates site.
As I have said repeatedly, openssl is included with RedHat 7.1. openssh,
sendmail and bind all rely on the package being there. This has been the
case since RedHat 7.0, and will undoubtedly be the case for 7.2. I haven't
checked out roswell (aka 7.1.93) yet, as RedHat have locked off the file
permissions on their ftp site!
Looks like they just did that a couple of days ago. I had downloaded
both Beta1 and Beta2 from ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/beta/roswell but
permissions are now set to deny. Simultanious to that, a 7.2 directory has
now appeared as /pub/redhat/linux/7.2 also with access permissions denied.
Looks like we are on the verge of the 7.2 release and they are preping the
site... :-) Wheee...
RPM packages contain either pre-built binaries or a source package that will
compile in a pre-arranged way (specified in a spec file). They are useful
for maintaining a common installation on multiple systems, or for
administrators who haven't a clue what make or configure does.
Anyone who upgrades or changes openssl without using the RedHat updates
(details at www.redhat.com/errata/) runs the risk of breaking a lot of code.
Also, the version of openssl with RedHat 7.1 is hobbled and does not
include all the cipher support. I've asked an employee of RedHat who has
OK'd the making available of a package that contains all the support for
non-US users. I've yet to get round to doing that though.
Relative to the latest RawHide SRPMS (openssl-0.9.6b-9.src.rpm)...
1) Replace the openssl-engine-0.9.6b-usa.tar.bz2 source ball
with the real thing from the OpenSSL site. (The source
tarball with the RPM has had some things stripped. That's
part of the hobbling.)
2) Edit the spec file and remove the -usa from Source.
2) Down in %prep, kill off %{SOURCE1} by commenting it out. (That's
another part of the hobbling).
3) Remove no-idea, no-rc5, etc on the config line. (Last part of
the hobbling.)
4) Build. All the RedHat patches seem to be compatible with the
non-crippled source tarball.
5) Enjoy.
-
John Airey
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute for the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Mike
--
Michael H. Warfield| (770) 985-6132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471| possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2
Hi! Did you get all of the openssl packages from Red Hat? I can't verify right now because I am booted into the Windows side of my machine, but I suspect that those 2 libraries are probably in openssl-devel... or possibly one of the sources rpms. Janet Shea -Original Message- From: Ola Persson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 10:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 Hi I have a question which I haven't been able to answer myself, I tried to update my current Kde 2.1 to Kde 2.2 and then kdebase-2.2-3 asks for libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 which I have been able to locate in openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm. The problem is that I have a newer (I think, becouse when trying install 0.9.6b-6 it says it is older than current) version of opensll namely openssl-0.9.6-9. In openssl-0.9.6-9 I can't locate libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2. If I remember correctly openssl-0.9.6-9 is an update from RH. Currently using RH 7.1 kernelversion 2.4. How do I install libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 so that RPM understands that they are there? With regards //Ola P. O. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2
There is a openssl rpm in the Roswell(Red Hat 7.1 beta?) relaese from Red Hat and its so version is 2. -- NONAKA Akira Miraclelinux Tokyo, Japan - Original Message - From: "Ola Persson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 Hi I have a question which I haven't been able to answer myself, I tried to update my current Kde 2.1 to Kde 2.2 and then kdebase-2.2-3 asks for libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 which I have been able to locate in openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm. The problem is that I have a newer (I think, becouse when trying install 0.9.6b-6 it says it is older than current) version of opensll namely openssl-0.9.6-9. In openssl-0.9.6-9 I can't locate libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2. If I remember correctly openssl-0.9.6-9 is an update from RH. Currently using RH 7.1 kernelversion 2.4. How do I install libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 so that RPM understands that they are there? With regards //Ola P. O. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2
Hi I have a question which I haven't been able to answer myself, I tried to update my current Kde 2.1 to Kde 2.2 and then kdebase-2.2-3 asks for libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 which I have been able to locate in openssl-0.9.6b-6.i386.rpm. The problem is that I have a newer (I think, becouse when trying install 0.9.6b-6 it says it is older than current) version of opensll namely openssl-0.9.6-9. In openssl-0.9.6-9 I can't locate libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2. If I remember correctly openssl-0.9.6-9 is an update from RH. Currently using RH 7.1 kernelversion 2.4. How do I install libcrypto.so.2 libssl.so.2 so that RPM understands that they are there? With regards //Ola P. O. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
