Re: regarding binary size in OpenSSL 1.0.0a
On 23-09-2010 07:53, Madhu Gowda wrote: Hi All, We are using OpenSSL (binaries built as static version) in our application. We are using the version 0.9.8i and the size of libeay32.lib (built in 32 bit windows) is 3.392 MB. We are thinking of updating to latest version of OpenSSL 1.0.0a. When we built the binaries for 1.0.0a (static version on 32 bit windows) from source code we are getting the size of libeay32.lib as 12.374 MB. Is there any reason for such a huge difference in size of libeay32.lib ? Or I am missing something while building the binaries ? Regards, Madhu Gowda F.Y.I. 1. My compile of OpenSSL 1.0.0a is also 12.something MB 2. I don't know if the added size is due to additional featueres (that you don't need to call and link in) or not. Personally, I worry much more about the size of the linked program or DLL than the size of the .lib files. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
Re: regarding binary size in OpenSSL 1.0.0a
Jakob Bohm wrote: On 23-09-2010 07:53, Madhu Gowda wrote: Hi All, We are using OpenSSL (binaries built as static version) in our application. We are using the version 0.9.8i and the size of libeay32.lib (built in 32 bit windows) is 3.392 MB. We are thinking of updating to latest version of OpenSSL 1.0.0a. When we built the binaries for 1.0.0a (static version on 32 bit windows) from source code we are getting the size of libeay32.lib as 12.374 MB. Is there any reason for such a huge difference in size of libeay32.lib ? Or I am missing something while building the binaries ? Regards, Madhu Gowda F.Y.I. 1. My compile of OpenSSL 1.0.0a is also 12.something MB 2. I don't know if the added size is due to additional featueres (that you don't need to call and link in) or not. Personally, I worry much more about the size of the linked program or DLL than the size of the .lib files. For us 1.0.0a static release build 32-bit windows resulted in libeay32.lib being 11,5 MB (12 157 804 bytes). Same for 0.9.8b was 9,13 MB (9 584 330 bytes). Can't tell why your 0.9.8i was so much smaller. Good luck, Per __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
regarding binary size in OpenSSL 1.0.0a
Hi All, We are using OpenSSL (binaries built as static version) in our application. We are using the version 0.9.8i and the size of libeay32.lib (built in 32 bit windows) is 3.392 MB. We are thinking of updating to latest version of OpenSSL 1.0.0a. When we built the binaries for 1.0.0a (static version on 32 bit windows) from source code we are getting the size of libeay32.lib as 12.374 MB. Is there any reason for such a huge difference in size of libeay32.lib ? Or I am missing something while building the binaries ? Regards, Madhu Gowda
