Re: [Openstack] trusted computing and nova
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 17:27 -0500, Mark Washenberger wrote: Does code specific to Trusted Computing belong in Nova? It seems like it should be supported through Scheduler plugins and API plugins (if necessary). Just a general thought on this - it's all very well deciding to not support a feature like this in-tree because people can use out-of-tree plugins, but IMHO that's only reasonable if we have backwards compat guarantees around the API that out-of-tree plugins are using A better alternative might be to add it as a plugin, but maintain that plugin in-tree so that anyone making an API change which affects the plugin also has to update it Cheers, Mark. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] why swift proxy server use poll not epoll??
hi all , can any one tell my the reson of swift proxy server http service use python eventlet poll not epoll? i think epoll is more effcient than poll and if i just use one process, many upload action at same time, poll will not work well i think. thanks. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] openstack-poc [was Re: A possible alternative to Gerrit ...]
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 11:26 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 09:27 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: Hey, On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 19:47 +, Chris Behrens wrote: On Sep 7, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: Some conversations about GitHub, project autonomy, and migration going back to June: http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net/msg00176.html https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack-poc/msg00150.html http://osdir.com/ml/openstack-cloud-computing/2011-08/msg00077.html Sorry, I don't read openstack-poc. Maybe I should. I don't feel like that's 'public discussion', though. So, I hadn't see openstack-poc before: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc It looks like some interesting conversations happen there. The archives are public, but is there any way for interested folks to subscribe so that don't have to regularly check the archives? Unfortunately, the way LP mailing lists are managed, subscriptions are based on teams, and the OpenStack POC is a closed team :( That said, folks like Chuck Thier are members of the OpenStack POC team and are not on the PPB, so perhaps you can just join the team and Jonathan Bryce, our illustrious PPB chair, will just add you to the team so you can subscribe? Thanks for the idea Jay, but it looks like you can't request to join closed groups through launchpad. Jonathan? I never got an answer to this and I just now noticed that at least one other important discussion happened on the list: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack-poc/msg00278.html This isn't so much of a personal concern - I probably just would have skimmed over the thread - but why are discussions like this happening on a list that isn't open to new folks to join? Cheers, Mark. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] openstack-poc [was Re: A possible alternative to Gerrit ...]
Mark McLoughlin wrote: I never got an answer to this and I just now noticed that at least one other important discussion happened on the list: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack-poc/msg00278.html This isn't so much of a personal concern - I probably just would have skimmed over the thread - but why are discussions like this happening on a list that isn't open to new folks to join? This discussion was actually cross-posted to the main list, so I think in this precise case it was appropriate use of that ML: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg05325.html My understanding is that openstack-poc should not be the place for discussions, but rather a convenient way to send an email to the PPB members. As soon as it goes beyond the usual no topic this week, should we really have a meeting, I agree the discussion should happen on a more public medium. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] bug management for developer infrastructure pieces
Hey guys! As we get bigger and there are more and more people, it might become a little opaque to understand how you can appropriately bitch about pieces of the dev tooling that aren't working for you. The openstack-ci project on launchpad is the place to do that. Bugs against the OpenStack gerrit, jenkins, irc bots and doc publishing can all be filed there. I've added official tags to the project for gerrit and jenkins, so that if you want to see what's going on with gerrit, for instance, you can go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bugs?field.tag=gerrit Devstack and git-review both have their own projects and their own bug trackers - but I betcha if you file bugs in the wrong place we'll figure it out. I've also got a todo list of things for all of the systems above that I'm in the process of turning in to blueprints... hopefully that should be done soon. Monty ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Nova Subteam Changes
2011/12/11 Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org: Any time you find will be in someone's evening and in someone else's middle-of-the-night, and most of us probably also have busy calendars. What is not clear to me is if you would like to reduce the amount of meetings or just not add more. One step at a time :) Which ones of the meetings listed on http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ are the most difficult for you to attend to? I'm sorry that I can't attend the QA team meeting, the orchestration team meeting and the nova-db team meeting. I've accepted that my Tuesday evening is sacrificed on the altar of IRC meetings. After all, it's only the evening and only one of them. I feel quite sad that it's virtually impossible for anyone East of here to attend as it'll be during their night, though. My business hours are 9 - 17 (5 PM) CET. In my experience many employers are happy to give brilliant and experienced developers like you ample flexibility in terms of business hours, offering compensation (monetary, free time, and other perks). Are these hours your choice or are they mandated by your employer? I define my own working hours, but that's really beside the point. Calling from 2 AM - 3 AM working hours doesn't make it a convenient time slot, even if that means I take an hour off at a different time. No matter what you call it and how much time you take off at another time, it still means you have to get up in the middle of the night for a meeting. And if I have a meeting mid-evening, that evening is lost. -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] why swift proxy server use poll not epoll??
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:08 AM, pf shineyear shin...@gmail.com wrote: hi all , can any one tell my the reson of swift proxy server http service use python eventlet poll not epoll? Sure. We had a problem where epoll failed to report a socket close event roughly one out of every bazillion times. Then eventlet would freak out because it didn't know that some socket was closed but the OS re-used its file descriptor. I spent some time trying to debug it, but never figured it out. It might have been a problem with the specific kernel we were using, or python not checking an error condition, or some of our aggressive TCP tuning causing trouble. Poll didn't have the same problem and didn't measurably impact performance for the number of connections we do, so I just decided to go with it. i think epoll is more effcient than poll and if i just use one process, many upload action at same time, poll will not work well i think. Epoll is definitely more efficient, but poll does work just fine. If you want to write a bug report or submit a patch to make the eventlet hub configurable, I think that'd be reasonable. -- Mike ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Ryu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Ryu OSS Network Operating System
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 09:02:09AM -0800, Dan Wendlandt wrote: Oh, definitely. I really should have set create a blueprint and target it as essex-3 as a place-holder. We'll definitely need to talk through the design first (though we probably don't need to flood the entire OS community with such detailed discussions, so we can move it to the netstack list). - introduce OVS driver/OVS agent driver I think, there can be several kind of openflow controllers, so this is reasonable. The code refactoring and new options would be easily merged, I hope. I haven't looked at the entire patch yet, but yes, we'll have to figure out how to handle different capabilities in the agent. I know of others doing similar things, so coming up with a pattern for this will be valuable. I registered the blueprint. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/ovs-driver-extension Other discussion point is how to pass driver-specific parameters to OVS agent. passing parameters to OVS agent The current implementation uses ovs_quantum_plugin.ini on each compute-node. Maybe there are several options. My preference is the option B. A. All parameters in ovs_quantum_plugin.ini for ovs agent Each ovs_quantum_plugin.ini in compute-node has all necessary parameters. The administrator must guarantee all of them are consistent. B. ovs_quantum_plugin.ini in quantum server. ovs_quantum_plugin.ini for ovs agent only have [DATABASE] section and OVS:integration-bridge. Other options which would be commont to drivers or specific to each driver are passed to quantum-server, and stored in DB table. Each agent get those parameters from DB C. Other ideas thanks, -- yamahata ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Exploit multiple network cards (NIC) per guest
Hi openstack list, I 'd like to setup instances with multiple network interfaces for different zones such as public, administrative ... But I couldn't find any documents about how to implement this in openstack (using Diablo). I found a bluesprint about this, and wonder is it available in Diablo ? If it is, then how can I set it up ? This is the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multi-nic Thanks. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Exploit multiple network cards (NIC) per guest
Hi, This is available in Diablo. This link describes multi-nic: http://nova.openstack.org/devref/multinic.html If you want all VMs to be connected to the same set of networks, use the FlatManager or FlatDHCPManager and then create several networks using nova-manage. Each VM will get a network interface connected to each network. Dan Essentially, just create multiple networks with nova-manage, and the VM will get a NIC on each network. On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:00 PM, mailer regs mailer.r...@gmail.com wrote: Hi openstack list, I 'd like to setup instances with multiple network interfaces for different zones such as public, administrative ... But I couldn't find any documents about how to implement this in openstack (using Diablo). I found a bluesprint about this, and wonder is it available in Diablo ? If it is, then how can I set it up ? This is the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multi-nic Thanks. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- ~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira Networks: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
