[Openstack] [Swift]
Hi, I am following the OpenStack WalkThrough instructions and I am failing to verify my setup as described here: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/verify-swift-installation.html In this forum I have found that the instructions are not exactly correct so I tried what was suggested but without any success. Following command always return '404 Not Found' curl -k -v -H 'X-Storage-User: service:swift' -H 'X-Storage-Pass: 12345678' -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/auth But when for following it works: curl -k -v -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens -d '{auth:{passwordCredentials:{username:swift, password:12345678}, tenantName:service}}' -H 'Content-type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/xml' What am I missing here? Thanks Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com http://www.range-software.com (+420) 776-843-663 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [Quantum] Why is 'subnet' introduced in Quantum API v2?
I am confused by the existence of both 'network' and 'subnet'. According to v2 API spec[1], subnet is introduced to support IPAM capabilities. Can anyone elaborate it to me? For example, what is the benefit of creating 1 network and 2 subnets by comparison with creating 2 networks that implicitly has one and only one subnet for each? I do know that the original network did not support IP overlapping before subnet is introduced. But it is just an implementation issue, right? Thanks, Zhidong [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/APIv2-specification ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Swift]
Forgot to attach /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf [DEFAULT] bind_port = user = swift [pipeline:main] pipeline = healthcheck cache authtoken keystone proxy-server [app:proxy-server] use = egg:swift#proxy allow_account_management = true account_autocreate = true [filter:keystone] paste.filter_factory = keystone.middleware.swift_auth:filter_factory operator_roles = Member,admin, swiftoperator [filter:authtoken] paste.filter_factory = keystone.middleware.auth_token:filter_factory # Delaying the auth decision is required to support token-less # usage for anonymous referrers ('.r:*'). delay_auth_decision = 10 service_port = 5000 service_host = 127.0.0.1 auth_port = 35357 auth_host = 127.0.0.1 auth_protocol = http auth_uri = http://127.0.0.1:5000/ auth_token = 12345678 admin_token = 12345678 admin_tenant_name = service admin_user = swift admin_password = 12345678 [filter:cache] use = egg:swift#memcache set log_name = cache [filter:catch_errors] use = egg:swift#catch_errors [filter:healthcheck] use = egg:swift#healthcheck 2013/3/15 Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com Hi, I am following the OpenStack WalkThrough instructions and I am failing to verify my setup as described here: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/verify-swift-installation.html In this forum I have found that the instructions are not exactly correct so I tried what was suggested but without any success. Following command always return '404 Not Found' curl -k -v -H 'X-Storage-User: service:swift' -H 'X-Storage-Pass: 12345678' -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/auth But when for following it works: curl -k -v -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens -d '{auth:{passwordCredentials:{username:swift, password:12345678}, tenantName:service}}' -H 'Content-type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/xml' What am I missing here? Thanks Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com http://www.range-software.com (+420) 776-843-663 -- Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com http://www.range-software.com (+420) 776-843-663 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [Quantum] Access problem to Metadata server
I am following this nice guide to configure Quantum. https://github.com/mseknibilel/OpenStack-Folsom-Install-guide/blob/GRE/2NICs/OpenStack_Folsom_Install_Guide_WebVersion.rst my ttylinux VM is successfully reaching internet, ping 8.8.8.8 successfully. Although iptables got a DNAT rule by Quantum. Chain quantum-l3-agent-PREROUTING (1 references) target prot opt source destination DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0169.254.169.254 tcp dpt:80 to: 1.2.3.4:8775 I got timeout on HTTP request to 169.254.169.254 connecting from VM. $ wget http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id Connecting to 169.254.169.254 (169.254.169.254:80) wget: can't connect to remote host (169.254.169.254): Connection timed out But I got 404 Not Found if I connect to public IP port 8775 connecting from VM. $ wget http://1.2.3.4:8775/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id Connecting to 1.2.3.4:8775 (1.2.3.4:8775) wget: server returned error: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found Anything I can try for debug/solving it ? Thanks. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Swift PUT error
rfile.readline().split(;, 1)[0] here is empty string. Could give the size of object your uploaded, in bytes. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Lokare, Bageshree bageshree.lok...@hp.comwrote: Hello Suchi, ** ** We are doing some similar stress testing for Swift and its working fine for a normal 100 user (1sec ramp-up)/1MB object size. Can you please give some more details on your set-up like, **- **Object size **- **Load/concurrent users **- **Size of cluster **- **# of LG and ramp-up time **- **LG and swift target set-up (both in-cloud/out of cloud) ** ** Thanks, SHREE ** ** *From:* openstack-bounces+nayna.patel=hp@lists.launchpad.net [ mailto:openstack-bounces+nayna.patel=hp@lists.launchpad.netopenstack-bounces+nayna.patel=hp@lists.launchpad.net] *On Behalf Of *Suchi Sinha (susinha) *Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:35 PM *To:* openstack@lists.launchpad.net *Subject:* [Openstack] Swift PUT error ** ** We are seeing lot of this error when we do load/ stress testing on our swift cluster.. Our assumption connection time between proxy and object server is timeing out. We increase client time out option. Still no luck.. Anybody else has seen this erro.. ** ** ERROR __call__ error with PUT ** ** Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/obj/server.py, line 932, in __call__ res = method(req) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/utils.py, line 1459, in wrapped return func(*a, **kw) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/obj/server.py, line 612, in PUT for chunk in iter(lambda: reader(self.network_chunk_size), ''): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/obj/server.py, line 612, in lambda for chunk in iter(lambda: reader(self.network_chunk_size), ''): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py, line 147, in read return self._chunked_read(self.rfile, length) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py, line 137, in _chunked_read self.chunk_length = int(rfile.readline().split(;, 1)[0], 16) ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: '' ** ** ** ** ** ** ~Suchi ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Gareth *Cloud Computing, Openstack, Fitness, Basketball * *Novice Openstack contributer* *My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistake in my email from Mar 1 2013, notice me * *and I'll donate 1$ or 1¥ to open organization specified by you.* ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Swift]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com wrote: curl -k -v -H 'X-Storage-User: service:swift' -H 'X-Storage-Pass: 12345678' -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/auth But when for following it works: curl -k -v -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens -d '{auth:{passwordCredentials:{username:swift, password:12345678}, tenantName:service}}' -H 'Content-type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/xml' What am I missing here? The first one is auth v1 style auth the second one is v2 it seems that there is a bug in the manual (feel free to raise a bug in openstack-manuals launchpad project). To verify an installation with a keystone install (i.e: v2) the swift -V2.0 command is enough above the curl command is enough. Chmouel. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] question on the GRE Communication
Thanks Logan On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Logan McNaughton lo...@bacoosta.comwrote: I'm not sure about verifying the GRE tunnels, so I can't be much help there. As far as understanding how the tunneling happens, GRE is an open protocol, not specific to OpenStack, or any vendor, and googling GRE should give you plenty of information about it. On Mar 14, 2013 5:21 AM, Aru s arumo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Logan, Thanks for the reply. I have one more question. How we will check whether the tunneling is established or not? I have gone through lot of documents of gre setup and all are says that the ovs-vsctl show command will show the tunnel info. Also is there a doc to understand how the magic happens for tunneling. Regards, Arumon On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Logan McNaughton lo...@bacoosta.comwrote: For Quantum GRE tunneling, the network node and compute nodes need a NIC on your data network. You assign each of those NIC's an IP (for instance, 192.168.1.1-3). Then (assuming you are using openvswitch with GRE tunneling) you set up your quantum configs. Look at the Quantum administration guide for an example of GRE tunneling with openvswitch. After that you just let it work its magic. All VM traffic is encapsulated inside GRE packets traveling between the nodes, it'll all look like packets in that 192.168.1-3 network. Once the packet reaches its destination node, the GRE encapsulation is removed and the VM packet is read. On Mar 12, 2013 6:36 AM, Aru s arumo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to configuring openstack with one controller and one network and two compute nodes. I am not able to understand how the communication of the VM's happens which are for the same tenant with same ip range but on the different compute hosts. Please help me to understand how GRE communication happens. Regards, Arumon ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] question on the GRE Communication
Thanks Robert. On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Robert van Leeuwen robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com wrote: Thanks for the reply. I have one more question. How we will check whether the tunneling is established or not? tcpdump can show you the GRE traffic: tcpdump -i ethX proto gre Cheers, Robert ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Access problem to Metadata server
Le 15/03/2013 08:20, Sammy Fung a écrit : I am following this nice guide to configure Quantum. https://github.com/mseknibilel/OpenStack-Folsom-Install-guide/blob/GRE/2NICs/OpenStack_Folsom_Install_Guide_WebVersion.rst SNIP I got timeout on HTTP request to 169.254.169.254 connecting from VM. $ wget http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id Connecting to 169.254.169.254 (169.254.169.254:80 http://169.254.169.254:80) wget: can't connect to remote host (169.254.169.254): Connection timed out But I got 404 Not Found if I connect to public IP port 8775 connecting from VM. $ wget http://1.2.3.4:8775/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id Connecting to 1.2.3.4:8775 http://1.2.3.4:8775 (1.2.3.4:8775 http://1.2.3.4:8775) wget: server returned error: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found Anything I can try for debug/solving it ? As said in the guide, make sure your host running nova-api (incl. metadata, ie. 1.2.3.4) does have a route to the public IPs of your VMs. -Sylvain ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Swift PUT error
I just know some basic about chunked data. Our codes build chunked data with '%x\r\n%s\r\n' and '0\r\n\r\n', but in eventlet.wsgi, it split with ';' I found that and have no more ideas. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Gareth academicgar...@gmail.com wrote: rfile.readline().split(;, 1)[0] here is empty string. Could give the size of object your uploaded, in bytes. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Lokare, Bageshree bageshree.lok...@hp.com wrote: Hello Suchi, ** ** We are doing some similar stress testing for Swift and its working fine for a normal 100 user (1sec ramp-up)/1MB object size. Can you please give some more details on your set-up like, **- **Object size **- **Load/concurrent users **- **Size of cluster **- **# of LG and ramp-up time **- **LG and swift target set-up (both in-cloud/out of cloud)*** * ** ** Thanks, SHREE ** ** *From:* openstack-bounces+nayna.patel=hp@lists.launchpad.net [ mailto:openstack-bounces+nayna.patel=hp@lists.launchpad.netopenstack-bounces+nayna.patel=hp@lists.launchpad.net] *On Behalf Of *Suchi Sinha (susinha) *Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:35 PM *To:* openstack@lists.launchpad.net *Subject:* [Openstack] Swift PUT error ** ** We are seeing lot of this error when we do load/ stress testing on our swift cluster.. Our assumption connection time between proxy and object server is timeing out. We increase client time out option. Still no luck.. Anybody else has seen this erro.. ** ** ERROR __call__ error with PUT ** ** Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/obj/server.py, line 932, in __call__ res = method(req) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/utils.py, line 1459, in wrapped return func(*a, **kw) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/obj/server.py, line 612, in PUT for chunk in iter(lambda: reader(self.network_chunk_size), ''): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/obj/server.py, line 612, in lambda for chunk in iter(lambda: reader(self.network_chunk_size), ''): File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py, line 147, in read return self._chunked_read(self.rfile, length) File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/eventlet/wsgi.py, line 137, in _chunked_read self.chunk_length = int(rfile.readline().split(;, 1)[0], 16) ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: '' ** ** ** ** ** ** ~Suchi ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Gareth *Cloud Computing, Openstack, Fitness, Basketball * *Novice Openstack contributer* *My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistake in my email from Mar 1 2013, notice me * *and I'll donate 1$ or 1¥ to open organization specified by you.* -- Gareth *Cloud Computing, Openstack, Fitness, Basketball * *Novice Openstack contributer* *My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistake in my email from Mar 1 2013, notice me * *and I'll donate 1$ or 1¥ to open organization specified by you.* ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Why is 'subnet' introduced in Quantum API v2?
Hi Zhidong, Please look inline for answers to your questions. On 15 March 2013 08:05, Zd Yu zdyu2...@gmail.com wrote: I am confused by the existence of both 'network' and 'subnet'. According to v2 API spec[1], subnet is introduced to support IPAM capabilities. Can anyone elaborate it to me? For example, what is the benefit of creating 1 network and 2 subnets by comparison with creating 2 networks that implicitly has one and only one subnet for each? Even if you're right that for most application you always have one network and one subnet, conceptually they're different concepts, and they have been kept separated to allow either L2-only networks (where for instance, you might want to use your own IPAM system), or enable multiple subnets on the same network, which is not an uncommon scenario. I do know that the original network did not support IP overlapping before subnet is introduced. But it is just an implementation issue, right? Folsom actually supported overlapping IPs, but they were switched off by default because this created problem with nova's security groups and metadata servers. In the Grizzly release Quantum supports security groups natively, and metadata can now work with overlapping IPs. You just need to ensure that allow_overlapping_ips is set to True in your quantum.conf. Thanks, Zhidong [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Quantum/APIv2-specification ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] questions on if openstack as a public cloud
Hi, I have some general questions which are mentioned below at the time of considering openstack as a public cloud. Please help to understand. 1. strategy of creating new tenents. 2. outside network connectivity from VPC. 3. Billing and monitoring mechanism. 4. Roles and privillages assignes to the tenant user. (believe admin role cannot be given) Let me know if you have any refference case study for this. Regards, Arumon ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [OSSG] Security Note: Selecting LXC as Nova Virtualization Driver can lead to data compromise.
The following is the first of a series of OpenStack Security Notes that will be issued by the OpenStack Security Group. Security notes are similar to advisories; they address vulnerabilities in 3rd party tools typically used within OpenStack deployments and provide guidance on common configuration mistakes that can result in an insecure operating environment. Selecting LXC as Nova Virtualization Driver can lead to data compromise. -- ### Summary ### LXC does not provide the same level of separation as hypervisors when chosen as the Nova 'virtualization driver'. Attempting to use LXC as a drop in replacement for a hypervisor can result in data exposure between tenants. ### Affected Services / Software ### Nova, LXC, Libvirt, 'Virtualization Driver' ### Discussion ### LXC (also known as Linux containers) is a virtualization technology that works at the operating system level. This is different from hardware virtualization, the approach used by other hypervisors such as KVM, Xen, and VMWare. The quality of container isolation in LXC heavily depends on implementation. While pure LXC is generally well-isolated through various mechanisms (for example AppArmor in Ubuntu), LXC through libvirt is not. A guest who operates within one container is able to affect another containers cpu share, memory limit and block devices among other issues. For more information on the effects of this issue see this [bug] (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1088295) ### Recommended Actions ### The OSSG advises that anyone deploying Nova in environments that require any level of separation use a hypervisor such as Xen, KVM, VMware or Hyper-V. LXC security pivots on a system known as DAC (discretionary access control) which is not currently capable of providing strong isolation of guests. Work is underway to improve DAC but it's not ready for production use at this time. The OSSG recommends against using LXC for enforcing secure separation of guests. Even with appropriate AppArmour policies applied. ### Contacts / References ### Nova : http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/ LXC : http://lxc.sourceforge.net/ Libvirt : http://libvirt.org/ KVM : http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page Xen: http://xen.org/products/xenhyp.html LXC DAC : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserNamespace LXC LibVirt Discussion : https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/09/27/getting-started-with-lxc-using-libvirt/ OpenStack Security Group : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ossg ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Call for help on Grizzly documentation
Hi Anne, I'm a newbie in the documentation area but, I would like to give an help. I haven't found any documentations (or open bug) regarding the cinder multi-backend feature ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder-multi-backend -- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21815/ ). Do you know if this documentation is planed to be written? Can I open a bug for this? Thanks a lot, Jérôme On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: Hi all, You all did great with DocImpact, but now that we're less than a month from release, the tiny doc team is facing a long list of doc bugs that won't be done by April 4th, many generated by DocImpact flags. We typically do a release of the docs about a month after the actual release date, to ensure packages are available and to try to get our doc bug backlog to a manageable level. As you can see from our backlog for operator docs in openstack-manuals [1] and API docs in api-site [2], there are over 50 confirmed doc bugs for Grizzly operator and admin docs and less than 20 for API docs. With those numbers we need all the help we can get. Please dive in, the patch process is just like code and fully documented. [3] We're on IRC in #openstack-doc and can answer any questions you have as you go. Thanks! Anne, Tom, Diane, Laura, Emilien, Daisy, and all the other doc peeps 1. https://launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+milestone/grizzly 2. https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-site/+milestone/grizzly 3. http://wiki.openstack.org/Documentation/HowTo ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] OpenStack on OpenSuse 12.2
Hi folks, Has anybody on the list tried installing OpenStack [Folsom] on OpenSuSE 12.2 64 bit system ? Is there any documentation available for the same ? Thank you, -- Ashutosh Narayan http://ashutoshn.wordpress.com/ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] User permissions on openstack compute nodes
Hi, Could anyone please point me to a specification of user permissions that OpenStack Nova requires when deployed on a compute node? The installation manualhttp://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/manual-ubuntu-installation.html directly states that sudo/root permissions are required. My question is, beyond installation of packages, are there any reasons for Nova to be deployed within a user with root access on the compute nodes? What I'm after is understanding whether a minimalistic set only consisting of necessary user permissions (file access,etc) can be created for the user that runs Nova (hoping that the list will be a subset of the root's permissions). cheers, /Nicoae. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [OSSG] Security Note: Selecting LXC as Nova Virtualization Driver can lead to data compromise.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:44:40AM +, Clark, Robert Graham wrote: The following is the first of a series of OpenStack Security Notes that will be issued by the OpenStack Security Group. Security notes are similar to advisories; they address vulnerabilities in 3rd party tools typically used within OpenStack deployments and provide guidance on common configuration mistakes that can result in an insecure operating environment. Selecting LXC as Nova Virtualization Driver can lead to data compromise. -- ### Summary ### LXC does not provide the same level of separation as hypervisors when chosen as the Nova 'virtualization driver'. Attempting to use LXC as a drop in replacement for a hypervisor can result in data exposure between tenants. ### Affected Services / Software ### Nova, LXC, Libvirt, 'Virtualization Driver' ### Discussion ### The quality of container isolation in LXC heavily depends on implementation. While pure LXC is generally well-isolated through various mechanisms (for example AppArmor in Ubuntu), LXC through libvirt is not. A guest who operates within one container is able to affect another containers cpu share, memory limit and block devices among other issues. This is really wrong / misleading. Libvirt with LXC is perfectly capable of using mandatory access control frameworks like SELinux / AppArmour to isolate LXC containers from each other. The issue is that such use of MAC whether with libvirt LXC or other LXC impls is not practical when you want to be able to run full OS installs in LXC. As such it is not possible to have OpenStack to make use of it. I'd like this paragraph to be re-written to something like this ### Discussion ### The Libvirt LXC functionality exposed by OpenStack is built on the kernel namespace cgroup technologies. Until Linux 3.8, there has been no support for separate user namespaces in the kernel. As such, there has been no way to securely isolate containers from each other or the host environment using DAC (discretionary access control). For example, they can escape their resource constraints by modifying cgroups settings, or attack the host via various files in the proc and sysfs filesystems. The use of MAC (mandatory access control) technologies like SELinux or AppArmour can mitigate these problems, but it is not practical to write MAC policies that would allow running full OS installs in LXC under OpenStack. Although initial user namespace support was merged in Linux 3.8, it is not yet complete, or mature enough to be considered secure. Work is ongoing to finish the kernel namespace support and enhance libvirt LXC to take advantage of it. For more information on the effects of this issue see this [bug] (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1088295) ### Recommended Actions ### The OSSG advises that anyone deploying Nova in environments that require any level of separation use a hypervisor such as Xen, KVM, VMware or Hyper-V. LXC security pivots on a system known as DAC (discretionary access control) which is not currently capable of providing strong isolation of guests. Work is underway to improve DAC but it's not ready for production use at this time. The OSSG recommends against using LXC for enforcing secure separation of guests. Even with appropriate AppArmour policies applied. ### Contacts / References ### Nova : http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/ LXC : http://lxc.sourceforge.net/ Libvirt : http://libvirt.org/ KVM : http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Main_Page Xen: http://xen.org/products/xenhyp.html LXC DAC : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserNamespace LXC LibVirt Discussion : https://www.berrange.com/posts/2011/09/27/getting-started-with-lxc-using-libvirt/ OpenStack Security Group : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ossg ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] OpenStack on OpenSuse 12.2
On 03/15/2013 12:20 PM, Ashutosh Narayan wrote: Hi folks, Has anybody on the list tried installing OpenStack [Folsom] on OpenSuSE 12.2 64 bit system ? Is there any documentation available for the same ? Hi Ashutosh, yes, a couple of guys have, packages are available as documented at http://wiki.openstack.org/Packaging/SUSE and also Vincent's blog post: http://www.vuntz.net/journal/post/2012/12/21/DevStack-on-openSUSE%2C-or-how-to-quickly-setup-OpenStack-on-openSUSE Please see http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:OpenStack for further information. Btw. I suggest to use openSUSE 12.3 since openSUSE 12.3 comes with Folsom packages, see Vincent's blog post at: http://www.vuntz.net/journal/post/2013/03/13/openSUSE-12.3-is-out%2C-with-OpenStack-love Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] How can I know the version if I installed from source code?
You can try this $sudo grep Version.*20 $(find {/opt/stack,/usr/local/lib/python2.{6,7}/dist-packages} -type f -name PKG-INFO) Четверг, 7 марта 2013, 11:09 +08:00 от Ray Sun qsun01...@cienet.com.cn: Is there any method to get the openstack version if I installed from openstack source code? Thanks a lot. - Ray Best Regards CIeNET Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd Technical Manager Email: qsun01...@cienet.com.cn Office Phone: +86-01081470088-7079 Mobile Phone: +86-13581988291 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] hostname change on hardware nodes
Hi David: Some useful tables for your needs: nova.services, nova.instances... Regards, --- JuanFra 2013/3/15 David Stearns dstea...@gnipcentral.com Hi all, I'm trying to recover from a mass renaming of our hardware nodes and have been having a bit of trouble. After changing the hostname on all of them nova-manage service list show all the old hostname (in the dead state) and all the new host names. My first question is how do I remove old services from this list. (eg, if the hardware dies) and I just want to remove it from the list completely. My second question is what else do I need to change to get the hostname change to work correctly. Right now I believe most operations on instances are broken because the host entry on the table points to the old host instead of the new one, so deleting a host will hang, etc. Thanks -David Stearns ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Call for help on Grizzly documentation
Yes, go ahead. Use the guidelines we have for Doc bug triage. [1] Hey Bas, a DocImpact would have been ideal on that commit message so we could already have a doc bug logged. [2] Thanks, Anne 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/HowTo#Doc_Bug_Triaging_Guidelines 2. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/HowTo#Using_the_DocImpact_Flag_in_a_Commit_Message On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Jérôme Gallard jeronimo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Anne, I'm a newbie in the documentation area but, I would like to give an help. I haven't found any documentations (or open bug) regarding the cinder multi-backend feature ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder-multi-backend -- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21815/ ). Do you know if this documentation is planed to be written? Can I open a bug for this? Thanks a lot, Jérôme On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: Hi all, You all did great with DocImpact, but now that we're less than a month from release, the tiny doc team is facing a long list of doc bugs that won't be done by April 4th, many generated by DocImpact flags. We typically do a release of the docs about a month after the actual release date, to ensure packages are available and to try to get our doc bug backlog to a manageable level. As you can see from our backlog for operator docs in openstack-manuals [1] and API docs in api-site [2], there are over 50 confirmed doc bugs for Grizzly operator and admin docs and less than 20 for API docs. With those numbers we need all the help we can get. Please dive in, the patch process is just like code and fully documented. [3] We're on IRC in #openstack-doc and can answer any questions you have as you go. Thanks! Anne, Tom, Diane, Laura, Emilien, Daisy, and all the other doc peeps 1. https://launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+milestone/grizzly 2. https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-site/+milestone/grizzly 3. http://wiki.openstack.org/Documentation/HowTo ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Cinder Multi-Backend Documentation
Hi John, Michael, I would like to help for the Cinder documentation. I have noticed that there is no open bug for the multi-backend documentation. Anne allowed me to open a bug ( https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg21938.html ). Is it OK for you if I assign this bug to me or do you have any other plans for the writing of this documentation? If it's OK for you, I will write this documentation with the help of: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder-multi-backend Thanks a lot, Jérôme ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Call for help on Grizzly documentation
Of course... I spaced. I'd love to review the doc for this. Sent from my digital shackles On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:47 AM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.orgmailto:a...@openstack.org wrote: Yes, go ahead. Use the guidelines we have for Doc bug triage. [1] Hey Bas, a DocImpact would have been ideal on that commit message so we could already have a doc bug logged. [2] Thanks, Anne 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/HowTo#Doc_Bug_Triaging_Guidelines 2. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/HowTo#Using_the_DocImpact_Flag_in_a_Commit_Message On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Jérôme Gallard jeronimo...@gmail.commailto:jeronimo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anne, I'm a newbie in the documentation area but, I would like to give an help. I haven't found any documentations (or open bug) regarding the cinder multi-backend feature ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder-multi-backend -- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21815/ ). Do you know if this documentation is planed to be written? Can I open a bug for this? Thanks a lot, Jérôme On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.orgmailto:a...@openstack.org wrote: Hi all, You all did great with DocImpact, but now that we're less than a month from release, the tiny doc team is facing a long list of doc bugs that won't be done by April 4th, many generated by DocImpact flags. We typically do a release of the docs about a month after the actual release date, to ensure packages are available and to try to get our doc bug backlog to a manageable level. As you can see from our backlog for operator docs in openstack-manuals [1] and API docs in api-site [2], there are over 50 confirmed doc bugs for Grizzly operator and admin docs and less than 20 for API docs. With those numbers we need all the help we can get. Please dive in, the patch process is just like code and fully documented. [3] We're on IRC in #openstack-doc and can answer any questions you have as you go. Thanks! Anne, Tom, Diane, Laura, Emilien, Daisy, and all the other doc peeps 1. https://launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+milestone/grizzly 2. https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-site/+milestone/grizzly 3. http://wiki.openstack.org/Documentation/HowTo ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] PTL Election Results
The PTL elections for the Havana cycle have completed. The new PTL's are: Nova: Russell Bryant Ceilometer: Julien Danjou Keystone: Dolph Matthews Congratulations! As a side note, we had over 50% participation in each of the three elections, which I have been told is actually a really good turnout. Monty ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] question on the GRE Performance
Hi Guys, *in my test, i found OVS GRE performance so lower, for example:* *100Mbits Switch, GRE just 26Mbits speed,but use linux bridge 95Mbits,* * * *so, my question is: why GRE speed low, or may be my config not right,* * * * * *Thanks,* *Tommy* ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Technical Committee Nominations are Open
Now that the TC elections have ended, we now have three at-large seats open. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TC_Elections_Spring_2013 Mar 15 - 21: Open candidacy to directly-elected TC positions Mar 22 - 28: TC elections The persons ranking 1st and 2nd will get one-year seats on the TC, and the person ranking 3rd will be elected for a 6-month seat as a replacement for Russell Bryant who is now granted a PTL seat. The electorate for the TC direct seats election are the Foundation individual members that are also committers for an official OpenStack project, over the Folsom-Grizzly timeframe, up to 23:59 PST on February 28, 2013. Any member of the election electorate can propose his candidacy for this election. No nomination is required. They do so by sending an email to the openstack@lists.launchpad.net mailing-list, which the subject: TC candidacy. The email can include a description of the candidate platform. The candidacy is then confirmed by one of the election officials, after verification of the electorate status of the candidate. Note: PTLs that just got elected in the previous election are automatically granted a 6-month term seat on the TC, and therefore cannot run for this election. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] [Cinder] OpenStack Block Storage Grizzly RC1 available
Hello everyone, The second project to publish a release candidate in preparation for the Grizzly release is OpenStack Block Storage (code named Cinder). The RC1 is available for download at: https://launchpad.net/cinder/grizzly/grizzly-rc1 Congrats to the Cinder crew! Unless release-critical issues are found that warrant a release candidate respin, this RC1 will be formally released as the 2013.1 final version on April 4. You are therefore strongly encouraged to test and validate this tarball. Alternatively, you can directly test the milestone-proposed branch at: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/tree/milestone-proposed If you find an issue that could be considered release-critical, please file it at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+filebug and tag it *grizzly-rc-potential* to bring it to the release crew's attention. Note that the master branch of Cinder is now open for Havana development, and feature freeze restrictions no longer apply. Regards, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] TC candidacy
Hi. I'd like to run for the TC Spring 2013 election. I am a senior software engineer at Rackspace in their OpenStack group, and have worked in a variety of cloud devops roles for the last seven years. I think my operations experience gives me an interesting perspective into where OpenStack should be going in the next few years. My basic platform is the same as for the Nova PTL election [1] -- I think we need to get better at closing bugs, and selecting defaults which work out of the box for OpenStack deployers. We are blessed with a very engaged user community, and we need to focus us much as possible on giving new users a good experience. I am an active Nova and Oslo core reviewer and frequently appear in the top ten contributors for Nova in a given month. I am a very active code reviewer, especially for Nova. I am also serve on the OpenStack Vulnerability Management Team. I strongly believe in the future of OpenStack and want to be part of that success in any way I can. For the last two years my non-OpenStack open source contributions have mainly been as Director for linux.conf.au 2013, which was the largest OpenStack event to be run in Australia so far. Thanks, Michael 1: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-March/006417.html ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Cinder Multi-Backend Documentation
Jerome, I would love for you to assign it to yourself :) You've already done quite a bit of work here with Tempest etc, so as long as hubcap has no objections I say go for it. Just make sure you put him on the review since he's the master-mind. John On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Jérôme Gallard jeronimo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi John, Michael, I would like to help for the Cinder documentation. I have noticed that there is no open bug for the multi-backend documentation. Anne allowed me to open a bug ( https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg21938.html ). Is it OK for you if I assign this bug to me or do you have any other plans for the writing of this documentation? If it's OK for you, I will write this documentation with the help of: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder-multi-backend Thanks a lot, Jérôme ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] TC candidacy
Hi everyone, I'd like to run for reelection to one of the Technical Committee directly-elected seats. For those who don't know me, I've been handling release management duties for OpenStack since November 2010, a work currently sponsored by the OpenStack Foundation. My involvement is mostly around project coordination, keeping a global view and trying to anticipate issues as our development community grows even larger. I'm also heading the Vulnerability Management team, which handles incoming security issues reports. On the development side, I authored the rootwrap framework which is being used by a few of our projects, and whenever I find some free time, I'm working on improving it. I've been regularly elected by our community to the Project Policy Board and Technical Committee directly-elected seats for the last two years. I was heavily involved in the transition to our new governance, authored the Technical Committee charter, and have been chosen to chair it for the past 6 months. I think it's important that the Technical Committee contains representation from the horizontal functions within the project (Docs, QA, Infrastructure, Vulnerability management, Release management...), since each project is already represented by the seats granted for all PTLs. Over the last 30 months we grew from 2 projects to 10 projects, and I'm proud to be part of this community which successfully managed to handle growth and adoption while preserving our ideals of open design and open development. The challenges ahead of us include accommodating further growth, resist fragmentation, and maintaining efficiency and coherence as we grow well past Dunbar's number. I hope that you place me in a position where I can help us through those challenges. Thanks, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Cinder Multi-Backend Documentation
+my openstack email. I'd love to review. Sent from my digital shackles On Mar 15, 2013, at 8:30 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Jerome, I would love for you to assign it to yourself :) You've already done quite a bit of work here with Tempest etc, so as long as hubcap has no objections I say go for it. Just make sure you put him on the review since he's the master-mind. John On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Jérôme Gallard jeronimo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi John, Michael, I would like to help for the Cinder documentation. I have noticed that there is no open bug for the multi-backend documentation. Anne allowed me to open a bug ( https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg21938.html ). Is it OK for you if I assign this bug to me or do you have any other plans for the writing of this documentation? If it's OK for you, I will write this documentation with the help of: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder-multi-backend Thanks a lot, Jérôme ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] using vlan tagged ports in cluster
Hi, JR, You should check your route. Before ovs-vsctl add-port br-ex p1p1.4, you should have the route entry like: 192.168.251.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 p1p1.4 But after that, since p1p1.4 is plugged in br-ex, you should change the above route to go through br-ex, and may also change other (default route) to this interface as well, if they originally go through p1p1.4. Regards, Rain On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:22 AM, JR botem...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, I'm setting up openstack on some machines using https://github.com/mseknibilel/OpenStack-Folsom-Install-guide/blob/master/OpenStack_Folsom_Install_Guide_WebVersion.rst . I'm using 3 nodes: a controller, network node and compute node. All the network interfaces are VLAN tagged use the same underlying physical 10G, e.g., controller: p1p1.4 (public net: 192.168.251.*/24), p1p1.5 (management net: 10.10.10.*/24) network:p1p1.4 (public net: 192.168.251.*/24), p1p1.5 (management net: 10.10.10.*/24), p1p1.6 (vm net: 10.20.20.*/24) # I haven't gotten to the compute node yet but it should be compute: p1p1.5 (management net: 10.10.10.*/24), p1p1.6 (vm net: 10.20.20.*/24) When I bring up my openvswitch bridges on the network node, I can not longer get out to the public net (see *MORE* below). I'm running ubuntu 12.10 and have run apt-get dist-upgrade. The 10G nics are intel 82599EB. ubuntu seems a bit flakey; initially I'd created /etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-net.rules to map p1p1 to eth2, however, the config was ignored and eth2 wound up being a 1G NIC. Is it not allowed to use VLAN interfaces for my networks? If I remove, say, the br-ex bridge I can get out again: root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.1 PING 192.168.251.1 (192.168.251.1) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- 192.168.251.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms root@nebula03:~# ovs-vsctl del-port p1p1.4 root@nebula03:~# ovs-vsctl del-br br-ex root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.1 PING 192.168.251.1 (192.168.251.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.251.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.650 ms ^C --- 192.168.251.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.650/0.650/0.650/0.000 ms root@nebula03:~# Thanks for any help, JR *MORE* root@nebula03:~# ovs-vsctl show 1bdf2f73-1a5d-4893-b745-7501557acaea Bridge br-int Port br-int Interface br-int type: internal Bridge br-ex Port br-ex Interface br-ex type: internal Port p1p1.4 Interface p1p1.4 Bridge br-vm Port br-vm Interface br-vm type: internal Port p1p1.6 Interface p1p1.6 ovs_version: 1.4.3 root@nebula03:~# ifconfig p1.4 p1.4: error fetching interface information: Device not found root@nebula03:~# ifconfig p1p1.4 p1p1.4Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 90:e2:ba:2c:8a:08 inet addr:192.168.251.92 Bcast:192.168.251.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::92e2:baff:fe2c:8a08/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:20964 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:22269341 (22.2 MB) TX bytes:594 (594.0 B) root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.1 PING 192.168.251.1 (192.168.251.1) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- 192.168.251.1 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1007ms root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.91` ^C root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.91 PING 192.168.251.91 (192.168.251.91) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Horizon logging?
I want to put some debug logging statements in a custom overrides.py module for Horizon. But I can't figure out where the messages will be logged. They don't go in the apache logs and they don't appear in any of the nova logs. Horizon doesn't appear to have its own logging, so Im a little stumped. Im using the standard LOGGING definition in /etc/openstack_dashboard/local_settings.py: LOGGING = { 'version': 1, # When set to True this will disable all logging except # for loggers specified in this configuration dictionary. Note that # if nothing is specified here and disable_existing_loggers is True, # django.db.backends will still log unless it is disabled explicitly. 'disable_existing_loggers': False, 'handlers': { 'null': { 'level': 'DEBUG', 'class': 'django.utils.log.NullHandler', }, 'console': { # Set the level to DEBUG for verbose output logging. 'level': 'DEBUG', 'class': 'logging.StreamHandler', }, }, 'loggers': { # Logging from django.db.backends is VERY verbose, send to null # by default. 'django.db.backends': { 'handlers': ['null'], 'propagate': False, }, 'horizon': { 'handlers': ['console'], 'propagate': False, }, 'openstack_dashboard': { 'handlers': ['console'], 'propagate': False, }, 'novaclient': { 'handlers': ['console'], 'propagate': False, }, 'keystoneclient': { 'handlers': ['console'], 'propagate': False, }, 'glanceclient': { 'handlers': ['console'], 'propagate': False, }, 'nose.plugins.manager': { 'handlers': ['console'], 'propagate': False, } } } My custom override module just uses LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__) and then when I want to log something, I'm using: LOG.debug(Some message…) Ideally, I think I'd like to have horizon stuff go into its own log file, but if that's too involved, I'd be happy to have them in the standard syslog file or even one of the nova logs. Any suggestions here would be greatly appreciated. thanks, Wyllys ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] TC candidacy
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: Hi. I'd like to run for the TC Spring 2013 election. I am a senior software engineer at Rackspace in their OpenStack group, and have worked in a variety of cloud devops roles for the last seven years. I think my operations experience gives me an interesting perspective into where OpenStack should be going in the next few years. I was just asked what my thoughts on integrated projects are, so I figured I should address that in public. First off, the TC has oversight on all technical matters [1], so while project incubation and integration is a topic that the TC handles, it isn't the only thing I'd expect a well running TC to handle. Examples of other things that the TC should be caring about are: - what languages we develop in - what libraries we standardise on and if the existing standards are still the best choices (for example, is sqlalchemy still the best way of handling database abstraction?) - how our CI infrastructure helps us run the project To specifically address the incubation / integration question, I think that OpenStack runs the risk of becoming distracted with too many projects. We need to remember that the foundation is still quite young, as is our community in general. I personally think that OpenStack should be focussing on Infrastructure as a Service problems for now, with the intention of expanding that scope later when we have a solid stable base of infrastructure projects. I can see why it is attractive for projects to want to become incubated, especially because it means they get a bunch of (mainly CI) infrastructure for free, as well as a lot of mind share from the association. We need to remember that our CI resources are limited however, and we need to be careful not to overload that team. Additionally, each project we add makes it hard for us to define who is distributing OpenStack. Do they have to ship every integrated project? Even if its not relevant to the product they're trying to build? We live in a complicated world though. I think each of these decisions should be made on its individual merits based on the facts that are true at the time. I also think the TC is on the right track here at the moment, so I don't think we need to wrap a bunch of super formal policy around this area at the moment. Hopefully that helps. Cheers, Michael 1: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Swift]
It should be a doc bug in the instruction . The first one is v1.0 auth (legacy auth) The URL suppose to be http://localhost:5000/auth/v1.0 Hope it help 2013/3/15 Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com Hi, I am following the OpenStack WalkThrough instructions and I am failing to verify my setup as described here: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/verify-swift-installation.html In this forum I have found that the instructions are not exactly correct so I tried what was suggested but without any success. Following command always return '404 Not Found' curl -k -v -H 'X-Storage-User: service:swift' -H 'X-Storage-Pass: 12345678' -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/auth But when for following it works: curl -k -v -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens -d '{auth:{passwordCredentials:{username:swift, password:12345678}, tenantName:service}}' -H 'Content-type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/xml' What am I missing here? Thanks Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com http://www.range-software.com (+420) 776-843-663 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- +Hugo Kuo+ h...@swiftstack.com tonyt...@gmail.com +886 935004793 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [OSSG] Security Note: Selecting LXC as Nova Virtualization Driver can lead to data compromise.
The quality of container isolation in LXC heavily depends on implementation. While pure LXC is generally well-isolated through various mechanisms (for example AppArmor in Ubuntu), LXC through libvirt is not. A guest who operates within one container is able to affect another containers cpu share, memory limit and block devices among other issues. This is really wrong / misleading. snip Although initial user namespace support was merged in Linux 3.8, it is not yet complete, or mature enough to be considered secure. Work is ongoing to finish the kernel namespace support and enhance libvirt LXC to take advantage of it. Point taken and thank you for the clarification. As you note, doing lxc securely is basically not possible on a current OpenStack deployment. This was the main take home point of the security note. I'm happy to see that work is ongoing to help improve this feature, and look forward to reviewing it when it is stable. If you'd like to help with the wording of future notes, I encourage you to take part in the weekly OSSG meetings: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/OpenStackSecurity Cheers, -bryan ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [OSSG] Security Note: Selecting LXC as Nova Virtualization Driver can lead to data compromise.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:05:30AM -0700, Bryan D. Payne wrote: The quality of container isolation in LXC heavily depends on implementation. While pure LXC is generally well-isolated through various mechanisms (for example AppArmor in Ubuntu), LXC through libvirt is not. A guest who operates within one container is able to affect another containers cpu share, memory limit and block devices among other issues. This is really wrong / misleading. snip Although initial user namespace support was merged in Linux 3.8, it is not yet complete, or mature enough to be considered secure. Work is ongoing to finish the kernel namespace support and enhance libvirt LXC to take advantage of it. Point taken and thank you for the clarification. As you note, doing lxc securely is basically not possible on a current OpenStack deployment. This was the main take home point of the security note. I'm happy to see that work is ongoing to help improve this feature, and look forward to reviewing it when it is stable. If you'd like to help with the wording of future notes, I encourage you to take part in the weekly OSSG meetings: Where/when was this wording discussed though ? I don't see anything about LXC mentioned in the logs of the last two meetings in March ? While IRC may be a good place for ad-hoc discussions around an issue, I don't really think it is a good forum for reviewing of these final notices prior to an announcement. Due to its real-time nature, IRC hits timezone problems which can prevent relevant from people attending. A posting to an email list gives time for all relevant parties to provide feedback. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [OSSG] Security Note: Selecting LXC as Nova Virtualization Driver can lead to data compromise.
Where/when was this wording discussed though ? It was discussed at the meetings on Jan 24, Jan 31, and Feb 7. may be a good place for ad-hoc discussions around an issue, I don't really think it is a good forum for reviewing of these final notices prior to an The notes are also tracked through launchpad. For example, this note was done here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/osn/+bug/1098582 We are also actively working to setup an OSSG mailing list to allow for asynchronous discussion of such topics. The openstack dev mailing list is also perfectly suitable (usually we put [OSSG] in the subject). Finally, you are always welcome to read the meeting minutes online and open discussions on the mailing list. Since you are a member of OSSG, it's really just a matter of getting involved through one of these many avenues and making your voice heard as we work on new notes. Cheers, -bryan ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] using vlan tagged ports in cluster
Rain, I owe you a beer! That did the trick. Thanks. JR On 3/15/2013 11:32 AM, Rain Li wrote: Hi, JR, You should check your route. Before ovs-vsctl add-port br-ex p1p1.4, you should have the route entry like: 192.168.251.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 p1p1.4 But after that, since p1p1.4 is plugged in br-ex, you should change the above route to go through br-ex, and may also change other (default route) to this interface as well, if they originally go through p1p1.4. Regards, Rain On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:22 AM, JR botem...@gmail.com mailto:botem...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, I'm setting up openstack on some machines using https://github.com/mseknibilel/OpenStack-Folsom-Install-guide/blob/master/OpenStack_Folsom_Install_Guide_WebVersion.rst. I'm using 3 nodes: a controller, network node and compute node. All the network interfaces are VLAN tagged use the same underlying physical 10G, e.g., controller: p1p1.4 (public net: 192.168.251.*/24), p1p1.5 (management net: 10.10.10.*/24) network:p1p1.4 (public net: 192.168.251.*/24), p1p1.5 (management net: 10.10.10.*/24), p1p1.6 (vm net: 10.20.20.*/24) # I haven't gotten to the compute node yet but it should be compute: p1p1.5 (management net: 10.10.10.*/24), p1p1.6 (vm net: 10.20.20.*/24) When I bring up my openvswitch bridges on the network node, I can not longer get out to the public net (see *MORE* below). I'm running ubuntu 12.10 and have run apt-get dist-upgrade. The 10G nics are intel 82599EB. ubuntu seems a bit flakey; initially I'd created /etc/udev/rules/70-persistent-net.rules to map p1p1 to eth2, however, the config was ignored and eth2 wound up being a 1G NIC. Is it not allowed to use VLAN interfaces for my networks? If I remove, say, the br-ex bridge I can get out again: root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.1 PING 192.168.251.1 (192.168.251.1) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- 192.168.251.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms root@nebula03:~# ovs-vsctl del-port p1p1.4 root@nebula03:~# ovs-vsctl del-br br-ex root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.1 PING 192.168.251.1 (192.168.251.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.251.1 http://192.168.251.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.650 ms ^C --- 192.168.251.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.650/0.650/0.650/0.000 ms root@nebula03:~# Thanks for any help, JR *MORE* root@nebula03:~# ovs-vsctl show 1bdf2f73-1a5d-4893-b745-7501557acaea Bridge br-int Port br-int Interface br-int type: internal Bridge br-ex Port br-ex Interface br-ex type: internal Port p1p1.4 Interface p1p1.4 Bridge br-vm Port br-vm Interface br-vm type: internal Port p1p1.6 Interface p1p1.6 ovs_version: 1.4.3 root@nebula03:~# ifconfig p1.4 p1.4: error fetching interface information: Device not found root@nebula03:~# ifconfig p1p1.4 p1p1.4Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 90:e2:ba:2c:8a:08 inet addr:192.168.251.92 Bcast:192.168.251.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::92e2:baff:fe2c:8a08/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:20964 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:22269341 (22.2 MB) TX bytes:594 (594.0 B) root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.1 PING 192.168.251.1 (192.168.251.1) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- 192.168.251.1 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1007ms root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.91` ^C root@nebula03:~# ping 192.168.251.91 PING 192.168.251.91 (192.168.251.91) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Swift]
Kuo's answering is the point. But v1.0 is not the answer because keystone use v2.0 now. Look at your docuement, http://AUTH_HOSTNAME:5000/auth/v2.0 and http://AUTH_HOSTNAME:5000/v2.0 have been used. The second works for me. Try these two yourself. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote: It should be a doc bug in the instruction . The first one is v1.0 auth (legacy auth) The URL suppose to be http://localhost:5000/auth/v1.0 Hope it help 2013/3/15 Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com Hi, I am following the OpenStack WalkThrough instructions and I am failing to verify my setup as described here: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/verify-swift-installation.html In this forum I have found that the instructions are not exactly correct so I tried what was suggested but without any success. Following command always return '404 Not Found' curl -k -v -H 'X-Storage-User: service:swift' -H 'X-Storage-Pass: 12345678' -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/auth But when for following it works: curl -k -v -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens -d '{auth:{passwordCredentials:{username:swift, password:12345678}, tenantName:service}}' -H 'Content-type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/xml' What am I missing here? Thanks Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com http://www.range-software.com (+420) 776-843-663 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- +Hugo Kuo+ h...@swiftstack.com tonyt...@gmail.com +886 935004793 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Gareth *Cloud Computing, Openstack, Fitness, Basketball * *Novice Openstack contributer* *My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistake in my email from Mar 1 2013, notice me * *and I'll donate 1$ or 1¥ to open organization specified by you.* ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Swift]
As I know that legacy auth was been removed from ESSEX release in Keystone. 2013/3/15 Gareth academicgar...@gmail.com Kuo's answering is the point. But v1.0 is not the answer because keystone use v2.0 now. Look at your docuement, http://AUTH_HOSTNAME:5000/auth/v2.0 and http://AUTH_HOSTNAME:5000/v2.0 have been used. The second works for me. Try these two yourself. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote: It should be a doc bug in the instruction . The first one is v1.0 auth (legacy auth) The URL suppose to be http://localhost:5000/auth/v1.0 Hope it help 2013/3/15 Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com Hi, I am following the OpenStack WalkThrough instructions and I am failing to verify my setup as described here: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/verify-swift-installation.html In this forum I have found that the instructions are not exactly correct so I tried what was suggested but without any success. Following command always return '404 Not Found' curl -k -v -H 'X-Storage-User: service:swift' -H 'X-Storage-Pass: 12345678' -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/auth But when for following it works: curl -k -v -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens -d '{auth:{passwordCredentials:{username:swift, password:12345678}, tenantName:service}}' -H 'Content-type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/xml' What am I missing here? Thanks Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com http://www.range-software.com (+420) 776-843-663 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- +Hugo Kuo+ h...@swiftstack.com tonyt...@gmail.com +886 935004793 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Gareth *Cloud Computing, Openstack, Fitness, Basketball * *Novice Openstack contributer* *My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistake in my email from Mar 1 2013, notice me * *and I'll donate 1$ or 1¥ to open organization specified by you.* -- +Hugo Kuo+ h...@swiftstack.com tonyt...@gmail.com +886 935004793 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] download ec2 creds fails consistently in horizon
It's actually not nova-cert that you need. It is the Keystone EC2 credentials API extension that is the problem. It only works for users with admin role. I logged a bug on it and am working on a fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1136190 Best, -jay On 03/14/2013 10:57 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I figured it out - nova-cert was not installed and running. I need to add this to my setup when EC2 is enabled, I wasn't aware of the dependency. -Wyllys On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wyllys.ingers...@evault.com wrote: I have EC2 configured correctly as far as I can tell because I am able to view my containers using the S3 APIs and S3 tools such as CyberDuck or s3curl.pl, using ec2 credentials returned by the keystone command line tool. However, when I use the Horizon user settings interface and select Download EC2 Credentials, nothing happens and it eventually returns yet another System Error. According to the logs, the failure is because the call to request os-certificates is timing out. I know this is probably because some other nova service is not running, but Im not sure which one it needs to complete this transaction. It'd be nice if the error message somewhere that indicated which service was not responding or what to do about it. Can someone tell me which nova service I need to have running and configured to issue os-certificates? Also, I really only want the EC2 credentials to be created and downloaded, Im not so much interested in the X509 certificates at this point. It'd be nice if the user settings EC2 panel had more options, such as just creating and/or listing the EC2 access ID and Key for a particular user rather than assuming you want/need everything all at once. thanks, Wyllys Ingersoll EVault ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Unauthenticated service probe for OpenStack components
Or, alternately, you can post to the endpoint root (without the version) and that should respond with a 300 Multiple Choice for most of the OpenStack service endpoints. Best, -jay On 03/14/2013 04:52 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: Currently, curl to the service URL just gives 401 error. Check the exit code, it should be 0 because that 401 error is generated by the api server. It's alive and responding, just not with 200 codes. If the server doesn't respond curl's exit code is non-zero (7 I think?). We did the same thing in DevStack for checking api server responses. dt ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] [Swift]
I'm not familiar with that legacy auth =,= In my experience, v1.0 works for tempauth, and v2.0 works for keystone. The format of two kinds of url is not totally same. My keystone env use http://AUTH_HOSTNAME:5000/v2.0 in this case. And my tempauth use http://127.0.0.1:8080/auth/v1.0 I think Tomáš Šoltys has misused path as /auth/v2.0. It should be /v2.0 or /auth/v2.0 BTW, I use newest codes. Any misunderstanding from me? On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote: As I know that legacy auth was been removed from ESSEX release in Keystone. 2013/3/15 Gareth academicgar...@gmail.com Kuo's answering is the point. But v1.0 is not the answer because keystone use v2.0 now. Look at your docuement, http://AUTH_HOSTNAME:5000/auth/v2.0 and http://AUTH_HOSTNAME:5000/v2.0 have been used. The second works for me. Try these two yourself. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Kuo Hugo tonyt...@gmail.com wrote: It should be a doc bug in the instruction . The first one is v1.0 auth (legacy auth) The URL suppose to be http://localhost:5000/auth/v1.0 Hope it help 2013/3/15 Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com Hi, I am following the OpenStack WalkThrough instructions and I am failing to verify my setup as described here: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/install/yum/content/verify-swift-installation.html In this forum I have found that the instructions are not exactly correct so I tried what was suggested but without any success. Following command always return '404 Not Found' curl -k -v -H 'X-Storage-User: service:swift' -H 'X-Storage-Pass: 12345678' -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/auth But when for following it works: curl -k -v -X 'POST' http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens -d '{auth:{passwordCredentials:{username:swift, password:12345678}, tenantName:service}}' -H 'Content-type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/xml' What am I missing here? Thanks Tomáš Šoltys tomas.sol...@gmail.com http://www.range-software.com (+420) 776-843-663 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- +Hugo Kuo+ h...@swiftstack.com tonyt...@gmail.com +886 935004793 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Gareth *Cloud Computing, Openstack, Fitness, Basketball * *Novice Openstack contributer* *My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistake in my email from Mar 1 2013, notice me * *and I'll donate 1$ or 1¥ to open organization specified by you.* -- +Hugo Kuo+ h...@swiftstack.com tonyt...@gmail.com +886 935004793 -- Gareth *Cloud Computing, Openstack, Fitness, Basketball * *Novice Openstack contributer* *My promise: if you find any spelling or grammar mistake in my email from Mar 1 2013, notice me * *and I'll donate 1$ or 1¥ to open organization specified by you.* ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] download ec2 creds fails consistently in horizon
I am able to login as a non-admin user and access the containers. In addition to missing nova-cert, I also had to change the keystoneauth settings in /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf to add Member to the operator_roles list, which I suppose is equivalent to making a Member user the equivalent of an administrator for Swift. -Wyllys On Mar 15, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: It's actually not nova-cert that you need. It is the Keystone EC2 credentials API extension that is the problem. It only works for users with admin role. I logged a bug on it and am working on a fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1136190 Best, -jay On 03/14/2013 10:57 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I figured it out - nova-cert was not installed and running. I need to add this to my setup when EC2 is enabled, I wasn't aware of the dependency. -Wyllys On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wyllys.ingers...@evault.com wrote: I have EC2 configured correctly as far as I can tell because I am able to view my containers using the S3 APIs and S3 tools such as CyberDuck or s3curl.pl, using ec2 credentials returned by the keystone command line tool. However, when I use the Horizon user settings interface and select Download EC2 Credentials, nothing happens and it eventually returns yet another System Error. According to the logs, the failure is because the call to request os-certificates is timing out. I know this is probably because some other nova service is not running, but Im not sure which one it needs to complete this transaction. It'd be nice if the error message somewhere that indicated which service was not responding or what to do about it. Can someone tell me which nova service I need to have running and configured to issue os-certificates? Also, I really only want the EC2 credentials to be created and downloaded, Im not so much interested in the X509 certificates at this point. It'd be nice if the user settings EC2 panel had more options, such as just creating and/or listing the EC2 access ID and Key for a particular user rather than assuming you want/need everything all at once. thanks, Wyllys Ingersoll EVault ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] TC candidacy
Hi, I'd like to run for the Technical Committee in the up and coming elections. I am a Principle Software Engineer at Red Hat. I have been actively developing OpenStack since the Essex release. I am currently a Quantum core developer. In addition to this I am also core on the Stable Maintenance team. I also have contribute to Nova, OSLO, documentation and devstack. In Nova the work was mainly focused on the Quantum integrations. My latest contribution was the VM ensembles, part of which was added in Grizzly release and hopefully will be completed in the up and coming Havana release. I spend most of my days reviewing, testing, debugging, documenting and developing with the goal of making OpenStack better. I am thankful to my employer Red Hat to have the opportunity and time to work on such and amazing project. I have close to 18 years of experience in the industry. Over that course of time I have strived to produce quality, usable, robust and optimal solutions. I would like to bring all that experience to the table to ensure that we have a better product. We are working in a very healthy, dynamic and vibrant community. A few things that I would like to improve are the following: - cross project interaction - growth of the community - sharing of ideas and information In my spare time I run. Thanks Gary ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] question on the GRE Performance
On 03/15/2013 08:05 AM, tommy(小包) wrote: Hi Guys, in my test, i found OVS GRE performance so lower, for example: 100Mbits Switch, GRE just 26Mbits speed,but use linux bridge 95Mbits, so, my question is: why GRE speed low, or may be my config not right,/ 95 and 26 Mbit/s measured at what level? On the wire (including all the protocol headers) or to user level (after all the protocol headers)? That you were seeing 95 Mbit/s suggests user level but I'd like to make certain. GRE adds header overhead, but I wouldn't think enough to take one from 95 down to 26 Mbit/s to user level. I would suggest looking at, in no particular order: *) Netstat stats on your sender - is it retransmitting in one case and not the other? *) per-CPU CPU utilization - is any one CPU on the sending, receiving or intervening iron saturating in one case and not the other? and go from there. I'm guessing your tests are all bulk-transfer - you might want to consider adding some latency and/or aggregate small-packet performance tests. happy benchmarking, rick jones the applicability varies, but attached is some boilerplate I've built-up over time, on the matter of why is my network performance slow? PS - the beforeafter utility mentioned is no longer available via ftp.cup.hp.com because ftp.cup.hp.com no longer exists. I probably aught to put it up on ftp.netperf.org... Some of my checklist items when presented with assertions of poor network performance, in no particular order, numbered only for convenience of reference: 1) Is *any one* CPU on either end of the transfer at or close to 100% utilization? A given TCP connection cannot really take advantage of more than the services of a single core in the system, so average CPU utilization being low does not a priori mean things are OK. 2) Are there TCP retransmissions being registered in netstat statistics on the sending system? Take a snapshot of netstat -s -t from just before the transfer, and one from just after and run it through beforeafter from ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/tools: netstat -s -t before transfer or wait 60 or so seconds if the transfer was already going netstat -s -t after beforeafter before after delta 3) Are there packet drops registered in ethtool -S statistics on either side of the transfer? Take snapshots in a manner similar to that with netstat. 4) Are there packet drops registered in the stats for the switch(es) being traversed by the transfer? These would be retrieved via switch-specific means. 5) What is the latency between the two end points. Install netperf on both sides, start netserver on one side and on the other side run: netperf -t TCP_RR -l 30 -H remote and invert the transaction/s rate to get the RTT latency. There are caveats involving NIC interrupt coalescing settings defaulting in favor of throughput/CPU util over latency: ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/briefs/nic_latency_vs_tput.txt but when the connections are over a WAN latency is important and may not be clouded as much by NIC settings. This all leads into: 6) What is the *effective* TCP (or other) window size for the connection. One limit to the performance of a TCP bulk transfer is: Tput = W(eff)/RTT The effective window size will be the lesser of: a) The classic TCP window advertised by the receiver. This is the value in the TCP header's window field shifted by the window scaling factor which was exchanged during connection establishment. The window scale factor is why one wants to get traces including the connection establishment. The size of the classic window will depend on whether/what the receiving application has requested via a setsockopt(SO_RCVBUF) call and the sysctl limits set in the OS. If the receiving application does not call setsockopt(SO_RCVBUF) then under Linux the stack will autotune the advertised window based on other sysctl limits in the OS. Other stacks may or may not autotune. b) The computed congestion window on the sender - this will be affected by the packet loss rate over the connection, hence the interest in the netstat and ethtool stats. c) The quantity of data to which the sending TCP can maintain a reference while waiting for it to be ACKnowledged by the receiver - this will be akin to the classic TCP window case above, but on the sending side, and concerning setsockopt(SO_SNDBUF) and sysctl settings. d) The quantity of data the sending application is willing/able to send at any one time before waiting for some sort of application-level acknowledgement. FTP and rcp will just blast all the data of the file into the socket as fast as the socket will take it. Scp has some application-layer windowing which may cause it to put less data out onto the connection
Re: [Openstack] download ec2 creds fails consistently in horizon
On 03/15/2013 01:12 PM, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I am able to login as a non-admin user and access the containers. Your original post talked about the Download EC2 Credentials link not working. That's what I was referring to. Nothing to do with Swift containers. -jay In addition to missing nova-cert, I also had to change the keystoneauth settings in /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf to add Member to the operator_roles list, which I suppose is equivalent to making a Member user the equivalent of an administrator for Swift. -Wyllys On Mar 15, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: It's actually not nova-cert that you need. It is the Keystone EC2 credentials API extension that is the problem. It only works for users with admin role. I logged a bug on it and am working on a fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1136190 Best, -jay On 03/14/2013 10:57 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I figured it out - nova-cert was not installed and running. I need to add this to my setup when EC2 is enabled, I wasn't aware of the dependency. -Wyllys On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wyllys.ingers...@evault.com wrote: I have EC2 configured correctly as far as I can tell because I am able to view my containers using the S3 APIs and S3 tools such as CyberDuck or s3curl.pl, using ec2 credentials returned by the keystone command line tool. However, when I use the Horizon user settings interface and select Download EC2 Credentials, nothing happens and it eventually returns yet another System Error. According to the logs, the failure is because the call to request os-certificates is timing out. I know this is probably because some other nova service is not running, but Im not sure which one it needs to complete this transaction. It'd be nice if the error message somewhere that indicated which service was not responding or what to do about it. Can someone tell me which nova service I need to have running and configured to issue os-certificates? Also, I really only want the EC2 credentials to be created and downloaded, Im not so much interested in the X509 certificates at this point. It'd be nice if the user settings EC2 panel had more options, such as just creating and/or listing the EC2 access ID and Key for a particular user rather than assuming you want/need everything all at once. thanks, Wyllys Ingersoll EVault ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] download ec2 creds fails consistently in horizon
Yup, you are correct, I confused 2 different issues. sorry for the confusion… On Mar 15, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/15/2013 01:12 PM, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I am able to login as a non-admin user and access the containers. Your original post talked about the Download EC2 Credentials link not working. That's what I was referring to. Nothing to do with Swift containers. -jay In addition to missing nova-cert, I also had to change the keystoneauth settings in /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf to add Member to the operator_roles list, which I suppose is equivalent to making a Member user the equivalent of an administrator for Swift. -Wyllys On Mar 15, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: It's actually not nova-cert that you need. It is the Keystone EC2 credentials API extension that is the problem. It only works for users with admin role. I logged a bug on it and am working on a fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1136190 Best, -jay On 03/14/2013 10:57 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote: I figured it out - nova-cert was not installed and running. I need to add this to my setup when EC2 is enabled, I wasn't aware of the dependency. -Wyllys On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Wyllys Ingersoll wyllys.ingers...@evault.com wrote: I have EC2 configured correctly as far as I can tell because I am able to view my containers using the S3 APIs and S3 tools such as CyberDuck or s3curl.pl, using ec2 credentials returned by the keystone command line tool. However, when I use the Horizon user settings interface and select Download EC2 Credentials, nothing happens and it eventually returns yet another System Error. According to the logs, the failure is because the call to request os-certificates is timing out. I know this is probably because some other nova service is not running, but Im not sure which one it needs to complete this transaction. It'd be nice if the error message somewhere that indicated which service was not responding or what to do about it. Can someone tell me which nova service I need to have running and configured to issue os-certificates? Also, I really only want the EC2 credentials to be created and downloaded, Im not so much interested in the X509 certificates at this point. It'd be nice if the user settings EC2 panel had more options, such as just creating and/or listing the EC2 access ID and Key for a particular user rather than assuming you want/need everything all at once. thanks, Wyllys Ingersoll EVault ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Rebooted, now can't ping my guest
Perhaps somebody could give me the contents of their quantum node's ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-tun and I could figure out what mine *should* look like? On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, The King in Yellow yellowk...@gmail.comwrote: Okay, I have worked around my problem-- but I don't quite understand it, and hope somebody can help me. It appears to be a problem with the Open vSwitch flows in br-tun on both compute and network. Here are the flows as they are now, working. I have manually added the priority=5 lines. Without those added manually on both sides, traffic from the guest's doesn't work properly. root@os-network:~# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-tun NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=5331.934s, table=0, n_packets=, n_bytes=171598, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=01:00:00:00:00:00/01:00:00:00:00:00 actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,output:1 cookie=0x0, duration=3.119s, table=0, n_packets=6, n_bytes=496, priority=5,dl_vlan=1 actions=NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=10.759s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=4,in_port=1,dl_vlan=1 actions=set_tunnel:0x1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=5331.725s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:36:2e:54 actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=5331.898s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:e2:38:da actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=5332.499s, table=0, n_packets=3502, n_bytes=286312, priority=1 actions=drop root@os-network:~# root@os-compute-01:~# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-tun NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4): cookie=0x0, duration=22348.618s, table=0, n_packets=20165, n_bytes=991767, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=01:00:00:00:00:00/01:00:00:00:00:00 actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,output:1 cookie=0x0, duration=177.949s, table=0, n_packets=151, n_bytes=21830, priority=5,dl_vlan=1 actions=NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=411.826s, table=0, n_packets=80, n_bytes=9566, priority=4,in_port=1,dl_vlan=1 actions=set_tunnel:0x1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=22348.567s, table=0, n_packets=, n_bytes=252718, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:ee:9e:b2 actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=22348.128s, table=0, n_packets=1107, n_bytes=123234, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:8d:6d:13 actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=22348.353s, table=0, n_packets=1494, n_bytes=124036, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:95:94:9c actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=22347.912s, table=0, n_packets=3334, n_bytes=425776, priority=3,tun_id=0x1,dl_dst=fa:16:3e:7b:e3:ee actions=mod_vlan_vid:1,NORMAL cookie=0x0, duration=22349.47s, table=0, n_packets=879, n_bytes=75279, priority=1 actions=drop root@os-compute-01:~# Here is a sample packet that would have been blocked, sniffed in GRE. The yellow background (if you can see the color) is the GRE header. Inside the GRE payload, MAC (red) is1272.590f.cf56, and MAC (orange) is fa16.3e7b.e3ee are exchanging ping packets. 00 50 56 81 44 e7 00 50 56 81 25 73 08 00 45 00 .PV.D..PV.%s..E. 0010 00 82 64 93 40 00 40 2f ad a3 0a 0a 0a 02 0a 0a ..d.@.@/ 0020 0a 01 20 00 65 58 00 00 00 00 12 72 59 0f cf 56 .. .eX.rY..V 0030 fa 16 3e 95 94 9c 81 00 00 01 08 00 45 00 00 54 ...E..T 0040 00 00 40 00 40 01 1d 00 0a 05 05 04 0a 2a 04 77 ..@.@*.w 0050 08 00 00 9f 0e 17 00 08 17 87 3f 51 00 00 00 00 ..?Q 0060 d3 96 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0070 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 !#$%' 0080 28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ()*+,-./01234567 00 50 56 81 25 73 00 50 56 81 44 e7 08 00 45 00 .PV.%s.PV.D...E. 0010 00 82 95 e3 40 00 40 2f 7c 53 0a 0a 0a 01 0a 0a @.@/|S.. 0020 0a 02 20 00 65 58 00 00 00 00 fa 16 3e 95 94 9c .. .eX. 0030 12 72 59 0f cf 56 81 00 00 01 08 00 45 00 00 54 .rY..V..E..T 0040 1e 24 00 00 3e 01 40 dc 0a 2a 04 77 0a 05 05 04 .$...@..*.w 0050 00 00 08 9f 0e 17 00 08 17 87 3f 51 00 00 00 00 ..?Q 0060 d3 96 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0070 18 19 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 !#$%' 0080 28 29 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ()*+,-./01234567 The source MAC does match the MAC for his gateway, 10.5.5.1: root@os-network:~# ovs-ofctl show br-int OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x1): ver:0x1, dpid:862cf391d546 n_tables:255, n_buffers:256 features: capabilities:0xc7, actions:0xfff 1(qr-9f9041ce-65): addr:12:72:59:0f:cf:56 config: 0 state: 0 : ...which is the understandable problem. That MAC address is not specifically entered in the OVS bridge br-tun. Any clue why? This is across reboots, service restarts, etc... I guess it is the /etc/openswitch/conf.db that is corrupted? What I don't understand at this point is why removing the priority 5 flow on the compute
[Openstack] TC candidacy
Hello all, I would like to run for a seat on The Technical Comittee. I have been working on Nova since it was a project as Nasa and I have been heavily involved in openstack since it was founded. I was elected to the precursor to TC (the Project Oversight Committee, later named the Project Policy Board) when it was first created. I was also elected as the first PTL for Nova and have been filling that role for the last two years. I am the top contributor to Nova over the lifetime of the project, and the third most frequent contributor over the past 12 months. I helped to create Devstack, Keystone, and Cinder. In addition, I have contributed to Oslo and I am a member of the stable-maintenance team. Despite passing on the mantle of Nova PTL, I am still deeply involved with OpenStack and I want to make sure that it continues to be a huge success. As OpenStack grows, one of the most important challenges we face is integration. It is vital that we have technical leaders that are focused cross-project and dedicated to making OpenStack as a whole successful. I currently work as the Director of Open Source at Nebula, Inc. Previously I was a principal engineer on the private cloud team at Rackspace, and before that I was a senior developer on the Nebula project at NASA where Nova was created. Thanks, Vish ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] TC candidacy
Greetings - I would like to run for a TC seat as well. My platform is a focus on deployment and operations for OpenStack. I'm not going to mince words: deploying OpenStack is hard. Maintaining it is even harder. I don't think it needs to be this way. I spent two years designing and deploying a cloud based on OpenStack and it really seemed much harder to do than it should have been, especially when you factor in configuration management tools. I would like to promote a more operational approach to the decisions made inside the OpenStack community. Some of it is easy, some of it is hard. I don't expect things to change overnight, but I do feel that a course correction is needed, that it's going to need to come from a whole project approach as well as code contribution, and that now is the time to make it. As I said, I spent the last two years as an implementor of OpenStack with the DreamCompute project at DreamHost and have now moved on to a new position as a solutions architect at Midokura. These positions have given (and continue to give) me a customer perspective of what it takes to deploy, maintain, and upgrade OpenStack in production. While my company supports me and my desire to run for the TC, I'm running independent of my company in order to keep a vendor neutral approach. Thanks for your time! -Carl ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Grizzly Dashboard Quota Problem...
Hi! Finally I have my Grizzly G3 + RC1 working! But, when I tried to setup the Project quotas, an error appear on the Dashboard and at Apache error.log. The error appear even when creating a Project, with default quota settings... Dashboard message: Error: Unable to set project quotas. error.log: [Fri Mar 15 23:35:57 2013] [error] \x1b[31;1mRecoverable error: Bad key(s) gigabytes,volumes in quota_set (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-555844dc-3cdc-4a33-a7e8-c1836b8f)\x1b[0m Is this a know BUG? Can I do something about it? Thanks! Thiago ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Testing Grizzly - What repository is the recommended?
Hi! Just for the record, Ubuntu PPA grizzly-trunk-testing repository is working (with Ubuntu 12.04)! Best, Thiago On 14 March 2013 19:35, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, I'm about to test Grizzly but, I'm seeing two alternatives: 1- Install Ubuntu 12.04 and add http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise-updates/grizzly main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/grizzly.list ( http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/install/apt/content/osfolubuntu-prerquisite.html ) 2- Install Ubuntu 12.04 and add https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing/+archive/grizzly-trunk-testing?field.series_filter=precise ... From what I'm seeing, the PPA grizzly-trunk-testing is more updated... Right? BTW, even if I'm going to try it with Raring, the PPA seems more updated for it too, if I'm not wrong... Is Quantum RC1 at this PPA ? Thanks! Thiago ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Grizzly Dashboard Quota Problem...
Hi! I don't know if it is related to this issue but, when I Terminate an Instance, nova-conductor.log shows: 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 ERROR nova.quota [req-558f180c-4092-4dad-9be0-04b105e6a51b 773fad6638fe4def95dd996db7af5161 7428cb7265d04ff398202b45f84d96bf] Failed to commit reservations [u'73a2da17-7b5a-4913-87f2-33bf47b7ab02', u'd2e4334a-679d-4664-bdc9-abff1247c89c', u'b284d408-2788-4fad-b191-9fc6f857cdee'] 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota Traceback (most recent call last): 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/quota.py, line 982, in commit 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota self._driver.commit(context, reservations, project_id=project_id) 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/quota.py, line 370, in commit 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota db.reservation_commit(context, reservations, project_id=project_id) 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/db/api.py, line 972, in reservation_commit 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota project_id=project_id) 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/db/sqlalchemy/api.py, line 112, in wrapper 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota return f(*args, **kwargs) 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/nova/db/sqlalchemy/api.py, line 2681, in reservation_commit 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota usage = usages[reservation.resource] 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota KeyError: u'instances' 2013-03-15 20:56:33.739 6218 TRACE nova.quota Tks, Thiago On 15 March 2013 20:37, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Finally I have my Grizzly G3 + RC1 working! But, when I tried to setup the Project quotas, an error appear on the Dashboard and at Apache error.log. The error appear even when creating a Project, with default quota settings... Dashboard message: Error: Unable to set project quotas. error.log: [Fri Mar 15 23:35:57 2013] [error] \x1b[31;1mRecoverable error: Bad key(s) gigabytes,volumes in quota_set (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-555844dc-3cdc-4a33-a7e8-c1836b8f)\x1b[0m Is this a know BUG? Can I do something about it? Thanks! Thiago ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Grizzly Dashboard Quota Problem...
Hi Thiago, I haven't seen that before. Can you file a bug for it? https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+filebug It may be something to do with a missing volume service, but that service should be optional. Cheers, Kieran On 16 March 2013 10:37, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Finally I have my Grizzly G3 + RC1 working! But, when I tried to setup the Project quotas, an error appear on the Dashboard and at Apache error.log. The error appear even when creating a Project, with default quota settings... Dashboard message: Error: Unable to set project quotas. error.log: [Fri Mar 15 23:35:57 2013] [error] \x1b[31;1mRecoverable error: Bad key(s) gigabytes,volumes in quota_set (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-555844dc-3cdc-4a33-a7e8-c1836b8f)\x1b[0m Is this a know BUG? Can I do something about it? Thanks! Thiago ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] Unable to successfully create instances with horizon
Hello list, I've been following along with these instructions to get an openstack environment setup: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/basic-install/content/basic-install_intro.h tml - I am a total newbie with openstack. I am using virtualbox with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS guests and I have all three nodes setup and operational. After some troubleshooting I was finally able to create volumes in cinder, but now I can't successfully create any instances. I use horizon and navigate through the process of setting up the instance, and when I click launch the instance shows up in the list, but the status is always error. I'm not sure what to post that would be relevant, but here are some log entries and output: # -- nova-scheduler.log --# 2013-03-15 09:40:13 1475 DEBUG nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp [-] received {u'_context_roles': [u'Member', u'admin'], u'_context_request_id': u'req-cccd3bed-8a37-4166-be5d-02f74221a2b6', u'_context_quota_class': None, u'_context_project_name': u'demo', u'_context_service_catalog': [{u'endpoints': [{u'adminURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8774/v2/ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a', u'region': u'RegionOne', u'internalURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8774/v2/ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a', u'id': u'110f0468149c42c88256f02a01aa54d0', u'publicURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8774/v2/ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a'}], u'endpoints_links': [], u'type': u'compute', u'name': u'nova'}, {u'endpoints': [{u'adminURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:9696/', u'region': u'RegionOne', u'internalURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:9696/', u'id': u'45faf59eb6c747daaae2ef16a68e7eef', u'publicURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:9696/'}], u'endpoints_links': [], u'type': u'network', u'name': u'quantum'}, {u'endpoints': [{u'adminURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:9292/v2', u'region': u'RegionOne', u'internalURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:9292/v2', u'id': u'16938ca8049446688ce57f7f98a71c32', u'publicURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:9292/v2'}], u'endpoints_links': [], u'type': u'image', u'name': u'glance'}, {u'endpoints': [{u'adminURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8776/v1/ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a', u'region': u'RegionOne', u'internalURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8776/v1/ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a', u'serviceName': u'cinder', u'id': u'f7a1448a776c4aa2b6a5843f38c33022', u'publicURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8776/v1/ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a'}], u'endpoints_links': [], u'type': u'volume', u'name': u'cinder'}, {u'endpoints': [{u'adminURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8773/services/Admin', u'region': u'RegionOne', u'internalURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8773/services/Cloud', u'id': u'0bb938dbb76d44ae94fa24998c3c8a94', u'publicURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8773/services/Cloud'}], u'endpoints_links': [], u'type': u'ec2', u'name': u'ec2'}, {u'endpoints': [{u'adminURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8080/v1', u'region': u'RegionOne', u'internalURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8080/v1/AUTH_ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a', u'id': u'169ad8d8a930442ba189b626e1f574f7', u'publicURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:8080/v1/AUTH_ef28e5b6b9d143c4baa15b271440586a'}], u'endpoints_links': [], u'type': u'object-store', u'name': u'swift'}, {u'endpoints': [{u'adminURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:35357/v2.0', u'region': u'RegionOne', u'internalURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:5000/v2.0', u'id': u'457ce03d6aa5479e819cae931760ab62', u'publicURL': u'http://192.168.1.1:5000/v2.0'}], u'endpoints_links': [], u'type': u'identity', u'name': u'keystone'}], u'_context_user_name': u'demo', u'_context_auth_token': 'SANITIZED', u'args': {u'request_spec': {u'block_device_mapping': [{u'volume_size': u'', u'device_name': u'vda', u'delete_on_termination': False, u'volume_id': u'b26596e4-f142-4692-9507-5bcdd44ea0ca'}], u'image': {u'status': u'active', u'name': u'Ubuntu', u'deleted': False, u'container_format': u'bare', u'created_at': u'2013-03-13T02:48:56.00', u'disk_format': u'qcow2', u'updated_at': u'2013-03-13T02:48:57.00', u'properties': {}, u'min_disk': 0, u'min_ram': 0, u'checksum': None, u'owner': None, u'is_public': True, u'deleted_at': None, u'id': u'dd89f63f-4b2a-44c5-96f2-084e198dd9aa', u'size': 251068416}, u'instance_type': {u'memory_mb': 512, u'root_gb': 0, u'deleted_at': None, u'name': u'm1.tiny', u'deleted': False, u'created_at': None, u'ephemeral_gb': 0, u'updated_at': None, u'disabled': False, u'vcpus': 1, u'extra_specs': {}, u'swap': 0, u'rxtx_factor': 1.0, u'is_public': True, u'flavorid': u'1', u'vcpu_weight': None, u'id': 2}, u'instance_properties': {u'vm_state': u'building', u'availability_zone': None, u'ramdisk_id': u'', u'instance_type_id': 2, u'user_data': None, u'vm_mode': None, u'reservation_id': u'r-q3z7lbct', u'user_id': u'f02218d004cc4f978be0720a55cbb2e7', u'display_description': u'demo', u'key_data': u'ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABgQDfL7KX8Sc3J2qpM4Rqc4vvGxj0bo/eGTtNOKQX4IpPcaJB dvFjy8Zhayr+9wT49ygYelvqFQAdeCwAvsRmmKFffGeXf/BmcfoIiIVjpU4fFgnflenfGPu5seK5 v+SKbHnzURZd8MDie51OjvieAjEwd3KxGKJRdG/rSDd8DvpfZQ== Generated by Nova\n', u'power_state': 0, u'progress': 0, u'project_id':
[Openstack] Allocating dynamic IP to the VMs
Hello, I want to know how I can allocate a dynamic IP to the VM from the same network as the openstack hosts (controller/network-node/compute node) network/management network . For example, in virtual box you can give your VM an IP from the host's network using a Bridge adapter. How can I do this in openstack? From what I understand floating IP's are used when you have a public IP (which is static) to be allocated to VM's. My openstack installation architecture: http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/basic-install/content/basic-install_architecture.html Quantum use case: http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/use_cases_single_router.html ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack] ssh from VM to VM
Hello, I can't ssh from Ubuntu cloud VM to other VM. I get following ubuntu@master:~$ ssh cirros@10.5.5.6 -v OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1, OpenSSL 1.0.1 14 Mar 2012 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 19: Applying options for * debug1: Connecting to 10.5.5.6 [10.5.5.6] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server-client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client-server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY debug1: Server host key: ECDSA 7b:8f:6a:ee:ba:e5:0a:c5:04:01:ca:bd:e5:38:69:55 debug1: Host '10.5.5.6' is known and matches the ECDSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/ubuntu/.ssh/known_hosts:4 debug1: ssh_ecdsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: Roaming not allowed by server debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/ubuntu/.ssh/id_ecdsa debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey). But I can ssh from to my Cirros VMs. Also I can ssh from Ubuntu VM to Cirros VM. Any Idea? Thanks. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack] Testing Grizzly - What repository is the recommended?
On Mar 14, 2013, at 5:35 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: I'm about to test Grizzly but, I'm seeing two alternatives: 1- Install Ubuntu 12.04 and add http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise-updates/grizzly main /etc/apt/sources.list.d/grizzly.list (http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/install/apt/content/osfolubuntu-prerquisite.html) That's the route that I started down, see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23231/. I have yet to get a successful deployment with grizzly using that documentation, but I do have a whole bunch more updates that have yet to be fed back in. I got side-tracked from doing a normal Grizzly install to trying to do one so that we could get the latest vmwareapi stuff, and didn't get to completion in that area, either. I'll see if I can get more of my documentation changes fed back into the project over the next week. -- Brad Knowles bknow...@momentumsi.com Senior Consultant ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10744
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10744/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson4608827232399682076.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10745
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10745/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson1082781972039052860.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10746
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10746/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson4019720240313741875.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10747
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10747/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson6035295873391508515.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10748
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10748/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson7035313701834319433.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10752
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10752/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson5930659491456241156.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10753
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10753/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson3893602428236954354.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10754
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10754/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson1263047260215971610.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10756
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10756/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson3750960399223013421.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: raring_grizzly_swift_trunk #157
Title: raring_grizzly_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/raring_grizzly_swift_trunk/157/Project:raring_grizzly_swift_trunkDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:09:34 -0400Build duration:4 min 35 secBuild cause:Started by user James PageBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 5 builds failed.80ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 4959 lines...]Good signature on /tmp/tmpdtnLiD/swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changes.Checking signature on .dscGood signature on /tmp/tmpdtnLiD/swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1.dsc.Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net): Uploading swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1.dsc: done. Uploading swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring.orig.tar.gz: done. Uploading swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz: done. Uploading swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changes: done.Successfully uploaded packages.INFO:root:Installing build artifacts into /var/lib/jenkins/www/aptDEBUG:root:['reprepro', '--waitforlock', '10', '-Vb', '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt', 'include', 'raring-grizzly', 'swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1_amd64.changes']Exporting indices...Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/raring-grizzly/Release.gpg.new'Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/raring-grizzly/InRelease.new'Deleting files no longer referenced...deleting and forgetting pool/main/s/swift/python-swift_1.7.7+git201303131902~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/s/swift/swift-account_1.7.7+git201303131902~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/s/swift/swift-container_1.7.7+git201303131902~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/s/swift/swift-doc_1.7.7+git201303131902~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/s/swift/swift-object_1.7.7+git201303131902~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/s/swift/swift-proxy_1.7.7+git201303131902~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/s/swift/swift_1.7.7+git201303131902~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debINFO:root:Pushing changes back to bzr testing branchDEBUG:root:['bzr', 'push', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/raring-grizzly']Pushed up to revision 138.INFO:root:Storing current commit for next build: f6e29b81d03508deabd43a48e5e417d8ba9a7f1aINFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/grizzly /tmp/tmpdtnLiD/swiftmk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpdtnLiD/swift/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log 35acd5912ff9478b18c0466fac1184fa3cd6600a..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/raring-grizzly --forcedch -b -D raring --newversion 1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [f6e29b8] Remove check for valid Origin for the "actual request".dch -a [ebcd60f] Add a region tier to Swift's ring.dch -a [b373278] Add missing CONTRIBUTING.md to source tarballdebcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d raring-grizzly -n -A swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1.dscdput ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/grizzly-trunk-testing swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changesreprepro --waitforlock 10 -Vb /var/lib/jenkins/www/apt include raring-grizzly swift_1.7.7+git201303150509~raring-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesbzr push lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/raring-grizzlyEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: raring_grizzly_cinder_trunk #238
Title: raring_grizzly_cinder_trunk General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/raring_grizzly_cinder_trunk/238/Project:raring_grizzly_cinder_trunkDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:11:17 -0400Build duration:4 min 59 secBuild cause:Started by user James PageBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 5 builds failed.80ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 7170 lines...]gpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key)"gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 15 05:14:01 2013 EDT using RSA key ID 9935ACDCgpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key) "Checking signature on .changesGood signature on /tmp/tmptPgh_w/cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changes.Checking signature on .dscGood signature on /tmp/tmptPgh_w/cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1.dsc.Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net): Uploading cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1.dsc: done. Uploading cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring.orig.tar.gz: done. Uploading cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz: done. Uploading cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changes: done.Successfully uploaded packages.INFO:root:Installing build artifacts into /var/lib/jenkins/www/aptDEBUG:root:['reprepro', '--waitforlock', '10', '-Vb', '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt', 'include', 'raring-grizzly', 'cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1_amd64.changes']Exporting indices...Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/raring-grizzly/Release.gpg.new'Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/raring-grizzly/InRelease.new'Deleting files no longer referenced...deleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-api_2013.1+git201303150001~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-backup_2013.1+git201303150001~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-common_2013.1+git201303150001~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-scheduler_2013.1+git201303150001~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-volume_2013.1+git201303150001~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/python-cinder_2013.1+git201303150001~raring-0ubuntu1_all.debINFO:root:Pushing changes back to bzr testing branchDEBUG:root:['bzr', 'push', 'lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/cinder/raring-grizzly']Pushed up to revision 88.INFO:root:Storing current commit for next build: 4b52b1481e3cb6c358252826785228638b0f717dINFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/cinder/grizzly /tmp/tmptPgh_w/cindermk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmptPgh_w/cinder/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/cinder/raring-grizzly --forcedch -b -D raring --newversion 1:2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a No change rebuild.debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d raring-grizzly -n -A cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1.dscdput ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/grizzly-trunk-testing cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1_source.changesreprepro --waitforlock 10 -Vb /var/lib/jenkins/www/apt include raring-grizzly cinder_2013.1+git201303150511~raring-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesbzr push lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/cinder/raring-grizzlyEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build failed in Jenkins: cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10757
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10757/ -- Started by timer Building remotely on pkg-builder in workspace http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/ws/ [cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift] $ /bin/bash -xe /tmp/hudson1508977013671033564.sh + OS_RELEASE=folsom + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/gather-versions.py folsom INFO:root:Querying package list and versions from staging PPA. INFO:root:Initializing connection to LP... INFO:root:Querying Ubuntu versions for all packages. INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: proposed INFO:root:Scraping Packages list for CA pocket: updates + /var/lib/jenkins/tools/ca-versions/ca-versions.py -c -r folsom --- The following Cloud Archive packages for folsom have been superseded newer versions in Ubuntu! glance: Ubuntu: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.2 Cloud Archive staging: 2012.2.1-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 -- Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Jenkins build is back to normal : cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift #10758
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/cloud-archive_folsom_version-drift/10758/ -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_grizzly_glance_trunk #174
Title: precise_grizzly_glance_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_glance_trunk/174/Project:precise_grizzly_glance_trunkDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:37:36 -0400Build duration:57 minBuild cause:Started by user James PageBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 3 out of the last 5 builds failed.40ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 6422 lines...]Searching for duplicated docs in dependency glance-common... symlinking changelog.Debian.gz in glance-api to file in python-glancepkgstripfiles: PNG optimization for package glance-api took 0 sdpkg-deb: building package `glance-api' in `../glance-api_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1_all.deb'.pkgstripfiles: processing control file: debian/glance-registry/DEBIAN/control, package glance-registry, directory debian/glance-registrySearching for duplicated docs in dependency glance-common... symlinking changelog.Debian.gz in glance-registry to file in python-glancepkgstripfiles: PNG optimization for package glance-registry took 0 sdpkg-deb: building package `glance-registry' in `../glance-registry_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1_all.deb'. dpkg-genchanges -b >../glance_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesdpkg-genchanges: binary-only upload - not including any source code dpkg-source --after-build glance-2013.1+git201303150737~precisedpkg-buildpackage: binary only upload (no source included)ERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'glance_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status -9ERROR:root:Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'glance_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status -9INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/glance/grizzly /tmp/tmp8UbGJM/glancemk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmp8UbGJM/glance/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log e75764eee34915f8bc5b664ac18e47a556c9d3dd..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/glance/precise-grizzly --forcedch -b -D precise --newversion 1:2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [157cce7] Segmented images not deleted cleanly from swift.debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC glance_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-grizzly -n -A glance_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1.dscTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'glance_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status -9Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'glance_2013.1+git201303150737~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status -9Process leaked file descriptors. See http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Spawning+processes+from+build for more informationBuild step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_essex_quantum_stable #12
Title: precise_essex_quantum_stable General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_essex_quantum_stable/12/Project:precise_essex_quantum_stableDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:01:30 -0400Build duration:24 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole OutputStarted by an SCM changeBuilding remotely on pkg-builder in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_essex_quantum_stableCheckout:precise_essex_quantum_stable / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_essex_quantum_stable - hudson.remoting.Channel@2c824005:pkg-builderUsing strategy: DefaultCheckout:quantum / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_essex_quantum_stable/quantum - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@18da3e94Wiping out workspace first.Cloning the remote Git repositoryCloning repository originFetching upstream changes from https://github.com/openstack/quantum.gitCommencing build of Revision 753730aaf12585d81038ad3e3988c1294d9ad25b (remotes/origin/stable/essex)Checking out Revision 753730aaf12585d81038ad3e3988c1294d9ad25b (remotes/origin/stable/essex)No change to record in branch remotes/origin/stable/essexNo emails were triggered.[precise_essex_quantum_stable] $ /bin/sh -xe /tmp/hudson6372285767159873474.sh+ /var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package -jINFO:root:Creating tarball using sdistERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: argument of type 'float' is not iterableERROR:root:argument of type 'float' is not iterableINFO:root:Complete command log:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise eTypeError: argument of type 'float' is not iterableError in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise eTypeError: argument of type 'float' is not iterableBuild step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_essex_swift_stable #11
Title: precise_essex_swift_stable General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_essex_swift_stable/11/Project:precise_essex_swift_stableDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:01:30 -0400Build duration:2 min 28 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 1211 lines...]patching file test/probe/test_object_failures.pypatching file test/probe/test_object_handoff.pypatching file test/probe/test_running_with_each_type_down.pypatching file test/unit/account/test_server.pypatching file test/unit/common/middleware/test_swift3.pypatching file test/unit/common/test_daemon.pypatching file test/unit/container/test_server.pypatching file test/unit/obj/test_auditor.pypatching file test/unit/obj/test_server.pypatching file test/unit/proxy/test_server.pyPatch fix-ubuntu-unittests.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)ERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-9d990ea7-1780-4a53-8531-dec9d0856827', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3ERROR:root:Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-9d990ea7-1780-4a53-8531-dec9d0856827', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/precise-essex-proposed /tmp/tmpLb6W2r/swiftmk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpLb6W2r/swift/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log -n5 --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/swift/precise-essex-stable --forcedch -b -D precise --newversion 1.4.8+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [4a6fead] Final 1.4.8 versioningdch -a [d41ad0a] changelog for 1.4.8dch -a [1ecf5eb] updated copyright date for all filesdch -a [8945423] updated authors file and added .mailmapdch -a [cb84214] Add sphinx to test-requires.debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-9d990ea7-1780-4a53-8531-dec9d0856827', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-9d990ea7-1780-4a53-8531-dec9d0856827', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_essex_horizon_stable #36
Title: precise_essex_horizon_stable General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_essex_horizon_stable/36/Project:precise_essex_horizon_stableDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:02:35 -0400Build duration:5 min 22 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 2 builds failed.50ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 5271 lines...]Finished at 20130315-0907Build needed 00:02:07, 21328k disc spaceINFO:root:Uploading package to ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/essex-stable-testinggpg: Signature made Fri Mar 15 09:05:40 2013 EDT using RSA key ID 9935ACDCgpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key) <ja...@shingle-house.org.uk>"gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 15 09:05:40 2013 EDT using RSA key ID 9935ACDCgpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key) <ja...@shingle-house.org.uk>"Checking signature on .changesGood signature on /tmp/tmpTUpZTe/horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changes.Checking signature on .dscGood signature on /tmp/tmpTUpZTe/horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc.Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net): Uploading horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc: done. Uploading horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise.orig.tar.gz: done. Uploading horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz: done. Uploading horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changes: done.Successfully uploaded packages.INFO:root:Installing build artifacts into /var/lib/jenkins/www/aptExporting indices...Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-essex/Release.gpg.new'Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-essex/InRelease.new'Deleting files no longer referenced...deleting and forgetting pool/main/h/horizon/openstack-dashboard-ubuntu-theme_2012.1.4+git201303110401~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/h/horizon/openstack-dashboard_2012.1.4+git201303110401~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/h/horizon/python-django-horizon_2012.1.4+git201303110401~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/h/horizon/python-django-openstack_2012.1.4+git201303110401~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debINFO:root:Pushing changes back to bzr testing branchPushed up to revision 108.INFO:root:Storing current commit for next build: 5ce394226a5333285d89cc8163bb4039a0c0e773INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/horizon/precise-essex-proposed /tmp/tmpTUpZTe/horizonmk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpTUpZTe/horizon/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/horizon/precise-essex-stable --forcedch -b -D precise --newversion 2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a No change rebuild.debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-essex -n -A horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1.dscdput ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/essex-stable-testing horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changesreprepro --waitforlock 10 -Vb /var/lib/jenkins/www/apt include precise-essex horizon_2012.1.4+git201303150902~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesbzr push lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/horizon/precise-essex-stableEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_folsom_cinder_stable #150
Title: precise_folsom_cinder_stable General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_cinder_stable/150/Project:precise_folsom_cinder_stableDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:03:58 -0400Build duration:5 min 9 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 2 builds failed.50ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 5385 lines...]Build needed 00:02:41, 35592k disc spaceINFO:root:Uploading package to ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/folsom-stable-testinggpg: Signature made Fri Mar 15 09:06:14 2013 EDT using RSA key ID 9935ACDCgpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key)"gpg: Signature made Fri Mar 15 09:06:13 2013 EDT using RSA key ID 9935ACDCgpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key) "Checking signature on .changesGood signature on /tmp/tmpFczalt/cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changes.Checking signature on .dscGood signature on /tmp/tmpFczalt/cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc.Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net): Uploading cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc: done. Uploading cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise.orig.tar.gz: done. Uploading cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz: done. Uploading cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changes: done.Successfully uploaded packages.INFO:root:Installing build artifacts into /var/lib/jenkins/www/aptExporting indices...Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-folsom/Release.gpg.new'Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-folsom/InRelease.new'Deleting files no longer referenced...deleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-api_2012.2.4+git201303112301~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-common_2012.2.4+git201303112301~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-scheduler_2012.2.4+git201303112301~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/cinder-volume_2012.2.4+git201303112301~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/c/cinder/python-cinder_2012.2.4+git201303112301~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debINFO:root:Pushing changes back to bzr testing branchPushed up to revision 67.INFO:root:Storing current commit for next build: cbad3e33b5a76e2ae427b943bb4453934d11ed30INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/cinder/folsom /tmp/tmpFczalt/cindermk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpFczalt/cinder/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/cinder/precise-folsom --forcedch -b -D precise --newversion 2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a No change rebuild.debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-folsom -n -A cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1.dscdput ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/folsom-stable-testing cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changesreprepro --waitforlock 10 -Vb /var/lib/jenkins/www/apt include precise-folsom cinder_2012.2.4+git201303150904~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesbzr push lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/cinder/precise-folsomEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_glance_stable #209
Title: precise_folsom_glance_stable General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_glance_stable/209/Project:precise_folsom_glance_stableDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:07:42 -0400Build duration:2 min 37 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 3 out of the last 5 builds failed.40ChangesDo not return location in headersby stuart.mclareneditglance/api/middleware/cache.pyConsole Output[...truncated 2286 lines...]patching file glance/tests/functional/test_bin_glance.pyHunk #2 FAILED at 309.Hunk #3 succeeded at 327 (offset 8 lines).1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file glance/tests/functional/test_bin_glance.pypatching file glance/tests/functional/v1/test_multiprocessing.pypatching file glance/tests/functional/v2/test_images.pypatching file glance/tests/unit/test_clients.pypatching file glance/tests/unit/test_swift_store.pypatching file glance/tests/unit/v2/test_image_data_resource.pyPatch disable-swift-tests.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)ERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-2d822b13-982e-4ee0-bca5-61fdd4a67a49', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3ERROR:root:Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-2d822b13-982e-4ee0-bca5-61fdd4a67a49', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/glance/folsom /tmp/tmp4jSsjX/glancemk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmp4jSsjX/glance/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log afe61664ac5f933622e349da1c0a92d134a81230..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sbzr merge lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/glance/precise-folsom --forcedch -b -D precise --newversion 2012.2.4+git201303150907~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [dd849a9] Do not return location in headersdch -a [04f88c8] Fixes deletion of invalid image memberdch -a [5597697] Wait in TestBinGlance.test_update_copying_from until image is activedch -a [12d28c3] Swallow UserWarning from glance-cache-managedch -a [5183360] Clean dangling image fragments in filesystem storedch -a [03dc862] Avoid dangling partial image on size/checksum mismatchdebcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucTraceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-2d822b13-982e-4ee0-bca5-61fdd4a67a49', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last): File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 141, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-2d822b13-982e-4ee0-bca5-61fdd4a67a49', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_deploy #404
Title: precise_folsom_deploy General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_deploy/404/Project:precise_folsom_deployDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:23:16 -0400Build duration:1 min 41 secBuild cause:Started by command line by jenkinsBuilt on:masterHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesBuild Artifactslogs/syslog.tar.gzlogs/test-02.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-03.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-04.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-05.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-06.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-07.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-08.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-09.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-10.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-11.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzlogs/test-12.os.magners.qa.lexington-log.tar.gzConsole Output[...truncated 63 lines...]DEBUG: Loading config.yaml from /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/nova-compute/config.yamlDEBUG: Charm 'nova-cloud-controller' - using charm path '/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/nova-cloud-controller'DEBUG: Branch: lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/charms/precise/nova-cloud-controller/trunk, revision: DEBUG: Charm path exists @ /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/nova-cloud-controller.DEBUG: Updating charm branch 'nova-cloud-controller'No revisions or tags to pull.DEBUG: Loading metadata from /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/nova-cloud-controller/metadata.yamlDEBUG: Loading config.yaml from /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/nova-cloud-controller/config.yamlDEBUG: Charm 'ceph' - using charm path '/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/ceph'DEBUG: Branch: lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/charms/precise/ceph/trunk, revision: DEBUG: Charm path exists @ /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/ceph.DEBUG: Updating charm branch 'ceph'No revisions or tags to pull.DEBUG: Loading metadata from /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/ceph/metadata.yamlDEBUG: Loading config.yaml from /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/ceph/config.yamlDEBUG: Charm 'keystone' - using charm path '/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/keystone'DEBUG: Branch: lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/charms/precise/keystone/trunk, revision: DEBUG: Charm path exists @ /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/keystone.DEBUG: Updating charm branch 'keystone'Unable to obtain lock file:///var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/keystone/ held by ja...@shingle-house.org.uk on test-01 (process #26450), acquired 1381 hours, 36 minutes ago.Will continue to try until 09:24:49, unless you press Ctrl-C.See "bzr help break-lock" for more.bzr: ERROR: Could not acquire lock "(local)": file:///var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/keystone/ERROR: Could not update branch at /var/lib/jenkins/jobs/precise_folsom_deploy/workspace/precise/keystone from lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/charms/precise/keystone/trunk+ rc=3+ echo 'Deployer returned: 3'Deployer returned: 3+ [[ 3 != 0 ]]+ echo 'Collating logs...'Collating logs...+ /var/lib/jenkins/tools/jenkins-scripts/collate-test-logs.py -o logs2013-03-15 09:24:49,515 INFO Connecting to environment...2013-03-15 09:24:50,933 INFO Connected to environment.2013-03-15 09:24:51,402 INFO 'status' command finished successfullyINFO:root:Setting up connection to test-12.os.magners.qa.lexingtonINFO:paramiko.transport:Connected (version 2.0, client OpenSSH_5.9p1)INFO:paramiko.transport:Authentication (publickey) failed.INFO:paramiko.transport:Authentication (publickey) successful!INFO:paramiko.transport:Secsh channel 1 opened.INFO:paramiko.transport.sftp:[chan 1] Opened sftp connection (server version 3)INFO:root:Archiving logs on test-12.os.magners.qa.lexingtonINFO:paramiko.transport:Secsh channel 2 opened.INFO:root:Grabbing information from test-12.os.magners.qa.lexingtonINFO:paramiko.transport.sftp:[chan 1] sftp session closed.+ exit 1Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureArchiving artifactsEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: test_tempest_smoke #2
Title: test_tempest_smoke General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/test_tempest_smoke/2/Project:test_tempest_smokeDate of build:Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:00:29 -0400Build duration:48 secBuild cause:Started by command line by jenkinsBuilt on:masterHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 491 lines...]Setting up python-nose (1.1.2-3ubuntu4) ...Setting up python-iso8601 (0.1.4-2) ...Setting up python-prettytable (0.6.1-1ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-simplejson (2.6.2-1) ...Setting up python-six (1.2.0-1) ...Setting up python-urllib3 (1.5-0ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-requests (1.1.0-1) ...Setting up python-novaclient (1:2.11.1-0ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-openssl (0.13-2ubuntu3) ...Setting up python-oslo.config (1:1.1.0-0ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-paramiko (1.7.7.1-3.1) ...Setting up python-sqlalchemy (0.7.9-1) ...Setting up python-sqlalchemy-ext (0.7.9-1) ...Setting up python-subunit (0.0.8+bzr176-1ubuntu4) ...Setting up python-testrepository (0.0.13-0ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-testresources (0.2.4-1ubuntu1) ...Setting up python-unittest2 (0.5.1-1ubuntu1) ...Setting up testrepository (0.0.13-0ubuntu1) ...Setting up xml-core (0.13+nmu2) ...Setting up python-keystoneclient (1:0.2.2-0ubuntu2) ...Setting up python-glanceclient (1:0.8.0-0ubuntu1) ...Processing triggers for libc-bin ...ldconfig deferred processing now taking placeProcessing triggers for ca-certificates ...Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs... 158 added, 0 removed; done.Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.ddone.Processing triggers for sgml-base ...[run_tempest.sh] Running setup scripts in tests/tempest.**Configuring Tempest users and tenants in Keystone.**[tests/tempest/setup/01-setup_users] Deleting user tempest-1 with id 4498684642cc447eb5848f36a3f8d4e4.WARNING: Bypassing authentication using a token & endpoint (authentication credentials are being ignored).[tests/tempest/setup/01-setup_users] Deleting user tempest-2 with id 0a6cf3f6cf9d49d5b82f0dfc09736179.WARNING: Bypassing authentication using a token & endpoint (authentication credentials are being ignored).[tests/tempest/setup/01-setup_users] Deleting tenant tempest-tenant-1 with id 4c754548390c4ac999190c26e4b3ec85WARNING: Bypassing authentication using a token & endpoint (authentication credentials are being ignored).[tests/tempest/setup/01-setup_users] Deleting tenant tempest-tenant-2 with id 042905f8504541f6856a90428be968e9WARNING: Bypassing authentication using a token & endpoint (authentication credentials are being ignored).[tests/tempest/setup/01-setup_users] Creating two users in Keystone for Tempst run...[tests/tempest/setup/01-setup_users] Created tenant #1 tempest-tenant-1 with id 9a3beb0ed55a4f02bdf94a2fd1430621.[tests/tempest/setup/01-setup_users] Created tenant #2 tempest-tenant-2 with id 765690775b9749c98dd67a4b6c7f30b1.fatal: repository '%TEMPEST_REPO%' does not existERROR:root:Test run failed.Recording test resultsNo test report files were found. Configuration error?Build step 'Publish JUnit test result report' changed build result to FAILUREEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp